Title: Gifted and Talented Academy
1Gifted and Talented Academy
http//aea11gt.pbworks.com
2Agenda
- Welcome
- Written Plan Questions
- Handshake Activity
- Collaboration in Gifted Programming
- PEPs and Student Goals/Outcomes
- Managing Change
3- I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I
set him free. - --Michelangelo
4Welcome Back!
- Form mixed-district triads
- Introduce yourselves
- Share your teams work on documenting a
differentiated program - Discuss what youve learned
- Identify one idea to share with the large group
5Objectives
- To deepen understanding of the components of
comprehensive gifted and talented programming - To examine system-level factors affecting
comprehensive programming - Collaboration
- To create an intentional match between identified
student need and programming and services - PEPs
- Student-level Outcomes
6Comprehensive Programming
Program Effectiveness Program Evaluation/Audit PE
P Goal Attainment Measuring/Reporting Student
Growth
Program Management K-12 Written G/T
Plan Parent/Community Support Use of
Time/Calendars/Scheduling Staffing Patterns
Programming Services Responsive
Services Individual Planning/PEPs Curriculum Progr
amming Options System Support
Foundation Mission/Philosophy/Beliefs Conceptions
/Definitions of Giftedness Iowa Code Gifted
Program Standards and Goals Domains of Giftedness
7Collaboration What is it? Why would/should we
do it? What role(s) does it play in comprehensive
programming?
8SUCCESSES BARRIERS
- Identify actual/perceived successes and/or
barriers to effective collaboration - What practices lead to success?
- How might you overcome barriers?
9Collaboration between General Gifted Education
- District
- Classroom
- Rationale
- Help one another reach common or shared goals
- Learn from each other and improve effectiveness
of the school - Gain strength through unity
- --Purcell Eckert, p. 225-7
10Jigsaw
- Form mixed-district triads
- Determine number
- 1 most experience in gifted ed.
- 2 next most experience in gifted ed.
- 3 least experience in gifted ed.
- Read assigned section
- Share information
- Discuss insights relevant to your context
- Return to original team grouping and share
11Guiding Assumptions
- General GT educators share common goals.
- General GT educators can learn from each other.
- General GT education programs gain strength
through collaboration. - General GT educators should work as a team to
meet diverse student needs. - GT educators should act as leaders in the
evaluation of services. - --Purcell Eckert, p. 228
12Key Components
Component 1 2 3 4 5
Mission Planning
Collaboration
Professional Development
Curricular Instructional Integration
13Team Activity
- Download Self-Assessment from Wiki
- http//aea11gt.pbworks.com/GT-Academy-Year-1
- Log in to Google Docs
- http//docs.google.com
- Upload to Google Docs
- Rename (include district name)
- Share with team and me
- Complete
14Gifted Programming A System View(ala Borland)
- Instituted for a reason
- Required by law in Iowa
- Perceived deficiency in the way the system serves
the gifted - Program for gifted (subsystem) is planned as an
integrated system which serves greater
educational purposes of the larger system (school
or district) - Addresses educational needs the larger system is
not meeting
15- The program for the gifted is, in a sense,
remedial for the system, since it addresses needs
within the system. - --Borland, p. 48
16- the program for the gifted can enhance the
effectiveness of the larger system only if it
articulates well with the larger system and fills
a recognized gap in it. - --Borland, p. 49
17Talk at Your Table
- What implications does this system approach have
for your gifted and talented programming?
18(No Transcript)
19Remediating the System
- In what ways does your gifted and talented
programming fill a void in the larger system? - What could be improved in your programming to
better accomplish this goal of filling a gap the
system itself cant fill? - Where does collaboration fit?
20Five As Text Protocol
- Form groups of four
- Silently read p. 195-98 of Lessons from Another
Field (stop at Coteaching Models) - Highlight and write notes in the margins in
answer to the following four questions - What Assumptions do the authors hold?
- What do you Agree with in the text?
- What do you want to Argue with?
- What parts of the text do you Aspire to?
- What would you Ask?
21Speaking the Same Language
- Collaboration
- A style for interaction between co-equal parties
voluntarily engaged in shared decision making as
they work toward a common goal.
- Marilyn Friend
22Ways To Collaborate Using Familiar Language
- Collaboration through Consultation
- Collaboration through Co-Teaching
- Collaboration through Reverse Consultation
23Possible Teaming Options
- General Education Teacher - General Education
Teacher (like grade levels, cross grade levels,
content specialists) - General Education Teacher - TAG Teacher
- TAG Teacher - Fine Arts Teacher
- TAG Teacher - ESL Teacher
- TAG Teacher - Special Education Teacher
- TAG Teacher - TAG Teacher
- TAG Teacher - Counselor
- TAG Teacher - Community Members
24TAG
ESL
TAG
SpEd
GenEd
GenEd
Fine Arts
25Look Familiar?
Gifted Student
ESL Teacher
Counselor
Classroom Teacher
Specials Teacher
Community Member
Special Ed. Teacher
Teacher of Gifted
26Collaboration Expectations
- What do you expect of classroom teachers as
collaborative partners? - What do you think classroom teachers expect of
you as a collaborative partner?
27Building Bridges A Study of Collaboration
- Compare classroom teachers expectations of
enrichment specialists with enrichment
specialists expectations of classroom teachers. - Discuss
- What you notice about the two sets of
expectations - What are the similarities and differences between
these lists and yours - What you can do to better meet classroom
teachers expectations (or change those that are
unrealistic)
28- Opportunities multiply as they are seized.
- --Sun Tzu, Chinese general, author of The Art of
War
29What do you need to receive/give
- from/to administrators
- from/to classroom teachers
- from/to g/t colleagues
- in the infrastructure
- in the way of professional learning
to make collaboration (district/building/classroom
) more effective in your setting?
30Personalized Education Plans
- Not required by Iowa Code
- Considered best practice
- Chapter 59
- Suggested components
31PEP Purpose
- The PEP is intended to empower the student to
excel academically. - --Institute for Educational Advancement
- http//www.educationaladvancement.org/programspage
s/pipeline.html
32Personalized Education Plans
- What is a PEP?
- What should it do?
- What does it actually do?
- Who gets a PEP?
- What information does an effective PEP include?
- How individualized should it be?
- Can a PEP be reasonable (in terms of time it
takes to create and monitor) and effective? - How does/can a PEP fold into documentation for
other initiatives (IDM, four year plans, ICC,
etc.)
33Sharing PEP Format and Thinking
- Linda Telleen-Martens
- ELP Coordinator HS ELP Teacher, Ames
- Tara Hofer
- Elementary ELP Teacher, Ames
- Sharing your examples and thinking
- Samples
- http//www.aea11.k12.ia.us/gifted/PEP
- http//www.dpi.state.nc.us/promotionstandards/pep/
02samplepep
34Systemic Change How will you and others need to
change thinking? Who is and isnt comfortable
with the change? What support do you need to
manage the transition? How will others be
supported?
35First or second order?
Do stakeholders perceive the change as
an extension of the past?
a break with the past?
consistent with prevailing organizational norms?
inconsistent with prevailing organizational norms?
congruent with personal values?
incongruent with personal values?
easily learned using existing knowledge skills?
requiring new knowledge skills?
First-order Implications
Second-order Implications
36Work Time
- For next time
- Complete Inservice Design and Staff
Qualifications sections of Self Audit. - Complete or refine/review Identification,
Differentiated Program, and Program Goals
sections of written plan. - Make decisions about PEP use and present to
advisory - Read Chapter 14 in text
37Next Session
- June 16-17, 2011
- Room 18, Heartland AEA