Title: What we have learned from the Francis Report
1What we have learned from the Francis Report
- Claire Barkley
- Medical Director SSSFT
2Overview
- Background- Francis I and II
- Comments on the report
- What does it mean for us?
- Focus on culture and leadership
3Sir Robert Francis QC
4Francis I
- The First Inquiry published February 2010
- Lack of basic care across a number of wards and
departments - Culture neither conducive to good care nor to
staff support - Low morale, lack of openness and acceptance of
poor standards - Management thinking dominated by financial
pressures (and achieving FT status)
5Francis I (continued)
- Absence of clinical governance and lack of
urgency in boards approach to problems - Focus on systems rather than outcomes statistics
and reports rather than patient experience data - Lack of internal and external transparency
regarding existing problems
6Francis II
- The second Inquiry published 6th February 2013
- Signals a need for significant culture change in
NHS - Examines roles of agencies involved with events
at Mid Staffs during 2005-2009 - Conclusions are drawn from 300 witness statements
and further consideration of first report - 290 recommendations
7Recommended
- New statutory duties (candour)
- New criminal offences (deliberately misleading
regulators) - Every single person and organisation within the
NHSneeds to reflect from today what needs to be
done differently in the future
8- Responsibility to consider what is exposed by my
two inquiries and to consider how to apply the
lessons themselves, individually and collectively - Organisations to report publically on regular
basis on whether have accepted my recommendations
and what they are doing to implement them - House of commons select committee to review
(progress) regularly
9Hospitals need more compassion, not cash
-
- Horror stories -1,200 deaths
- Inhumanity on a horrifying scale
- Devastating report
- Managers obsessed with Labours targets
- Patients ruthlessly neglected left lying for
days in their own excrement or driven by
desperate thirst to drink rank water from flower
vases - Many were sent home with life-threatening
illnesses - Culture of bullying and neglect spread from top
to bottom - Anguished complaints of relatives were simply
ignored - Daily Mail Comment 7 February
105 main recommendations
- Clearly understood fundamental standards and
measures of compliance - Openness, transparency and candour throughout the
system - Improved support for compassionate and committed
nursing - Strong and patient centred healthcare leadership
- Accurate, useful and relevant information
11(No Transcript)
12Commentators
- What was said in
- Health Service Journal (HSJ)?
13Those in favour..
- Genie out of bottle in terms of principles and
values being more important in how we manage NHS - You could summarise the whole document in one
sentence-we have lost the focus on caring - It is a reference point for what is going wrong
and should not happen again - Taps into what people are thinking
- Has identified a problem which must be addressed
14Criticisms
- Good stuff tends to be very woolly and motherhood
and apple pie - If you are trying to change the culture, putting
the fear of God into everyone is not necessarily
the way - It is like seeing the right label on the door and
when you open the door there is nothing there - He relies too much on the NHS Constitution. The
vast majority dont know it exists - I dont see Francis as an inflection point
15Government response
- 5 (different) themes
- Prevention of problems
- Detection of problems at early stage
- Taking action promptly to remedy problems
- Robust accountability
- Staff training
16What have commentators said?
- Endorses main message that listening to and
understanding patients must come first - Focus on 5 areas
- Vulnerable elderly care standards
- Development by CQC with patients, staff and other
stakeholders - NHS Constitution
- Clarification of regulatory arrangements
- Enhance use of real time data on quality
- Nuffield trust (19th March)
17HSJ Expert Panel
- HSJ gathered panel of 15 experts 13 March 2013
- Half said poor care likely to remain at same
level and half said likely to get worse - Pointed to role of organisational changes and
tensions in causing worsening of situation - Impact of removal of 4 of tariff year on year
- Nursing burnout second only to recession-hit
Greece
18HSJ (cont.)
- Incentivised the wrong things- nurses encouraged
to move away from bedside - Political reform, reluctant workforce, top-down
fixing, enforcement, perfect storm for more
disasters in health care system - What happens to staff in health care system?
- Start out motivated and optimistic
- Something our system does to staff
- Raising concerns, challenging poor practice
19- Eyes and ears of the service
- More people working on financial probity that
clinical quality? - Different culture in US-senior staff looking at
quality data weekly - Costs to individual of whistle-blowing
- Tradition in NHS of saying what people want to
hear
20- Glitterisation of NHS-celebrating brilliant stuff
and in denial about bad stuff - Suggestion of HSJ whistleblower of the year
award- Golden Whistle - (Phil Hammond)
21- Reasons we do not address poor care
- Never a secret
- Worry about reputational damage prevents us
responding to concerns in open manner
22Nuffield Trust
- Focus on development of standards of care for
vulnerable elderly - Lead role to CQC
- Promotion of NHS Constitution in staff
recruitment, induction and appraisal - Clarification of regulatory arrangements
- Enhanced real time data collection to measure
quality of care
23 24Francis Frenzy
- Risk of fragmenting the report and designing
action plans without seeing the whole context - Hitting targets and missing the point
- We feel uncomfortableeasier to act than reflect
on what happened - Were those people different from us?
- How could they have overseen patient care which
so obviously fell short and amounted in some
cases to cruelty and neglect?
25Why did they do it?
- Were staff conforming to an unspoken code of
conduct or rule? - Had process taken over?
- Not seeing the impact of their actions?
- Or ignoring it?
- Depersonalising care
- Dehumanising patients
26Perhaps
- We do what is expected and if others appear
comfortable it is hard to resist - If we do not see the direct impact we can be less
sensitive (managers?) - Good people do bad things..
- Surely there are other places where this occurs
27(No Transcript)
28- Given the right setting conditions, people behave
in ways they would otherwise consider harmful - Social pressure and conformity
- We know morale is low (doctors worldwide
according to Edwards and Kornacki 2002) - Need for a new compact?
29Isabel Menzies Lyth
30Menzies Lyth, Isabel (1959)
- 'The Functions of Social Systems as a Defence
Against Anxiety A Report on a Study of the
Nursing Service of a General Hospital', Human
Relations 13 95-121 reprinted in Containing
Anxiety in Institutions Selected Essays, vol. 1.
Free Association Books, 1988, pp. 43-88
31Isabel Menzies Lyth
- Need to take a wide view of an institution in
assessing its effectiveness in carrying out its
primary task. - Would include
- the whole way the institution functions
- its management structure, including its division
into sub-systems and how these relate to each
other - the nature of authority and how it operates,
- how it manages anxiety
- social defence systems built into the institution
- its culture and traditions
32What is meant by Culture?
- A pattern of shared basic assumptions- invented,
discovered or developed by a given group as it
learns to cope with its problems of external
adaptation and internal integration-that has
worked well enough to be considered valid and
therefore to be taught to new members as the
correct way to perceive, think and feel in
relation to those problems - (Schein, 1985)
33Emphasis on Culture
- A fundamental culture change is needed
- Francis approach to culture criticised as being
aspirational and too broad brush - However research into culture, its nature and how
it is changed shows it can be shaped and this can
produce benefits, but this is a nuanced area and
more complex than portrayed by Francis
34- Davies and Mannion argue that a common culture as
recommended by Francis may be neither possible
nor even desirable - (BMJ 23/03/13)
- Organisational culture
- Values
- Beliefs
- Assumptions
- Ways of thinking that are translated into common
and repeated patterns of behaviour
35- Maintained and reinforced by the rituals,
ceremonies and rewards of everyday organisational
life - The way we do things round here
- Plus the shared ways of thinking which underpin
these norms - Culture in large organisations rarely uniform
36The cultural paradigm
- Stories
- Symbols
- Routines and rituals
- Controls
- Organisational structures
- Power
- Johnson and Scholes
37NHS Staff
- United only by 2 main issues
- The need for care to be based on individual need
rather than funding - Dislike of constant interference into healthcare
provision by successive UK Governments - Morgan and Ogbonna
38Culture
- Simply urging people to think differently is
unlikely to over-ride the complex personal and
social forces that shape organisational behaviour
39Culture eats strategy for breakfast
40Health care cultures
- Multiple, competing subcultures, some focussed on
professional groups - Linked to teams, wards, services, hospitals
- Differences in power
- Struggles for legitimacy
- Striving for cultural uniformity may be over
optimistic
41- Ambulance crews, support structures, emotional
burden of caring - Prof John Glasby
- Attempts at cultural manipulation and performance
management might have unintended dysfunctional
consequences - Perhaps better to concentrate on the individuals
responsibility to make appropriate choices and
act professionally - There is not a single set of prescriptions to
apply to each group as different pressures apply
42Culture formation
- Group
- History of shared experience
- Shared learning
- Stability of membership
- Human need for stability, consistency and meaning
- Culture
- The Kings Fund
433 problems relating to culture
- Socialisation- teaching newcomers
- Behaviour- cultural predispositions and
situational contingencies - Subculture
- Normal- relate to different experiences and
assumptions - Often in conflict e.g. managerial and
professional - Common assumptions in a crisis
44Culture follows the leader
- Cannot consider culture apart from leadership -
need to look at both - Leaders need to be conscious of culture
- New groups and organisations create new cultures
- Once cultures exist the leaders influence the
leadership criteria- who will and will not lead - To influence culture you need to be a learning
leader
45Trusts most capable of buffering shocks had
- Stable leadership
- Participative cultures with strong engagement
- Emphasis on organisational learning
- McKee, West et al 2010
46Research shows leaders actions speak louder than
formal communication
- The argument for changing my behaviour-
- Leadership 65
- Communications 10
- Systems and processes 25
- Grapevine ?
- Schein
47Solutions?
- Assess national initiatives before implementation
- Support whistleblowers and enable support for
those who raise concerns - Qualitative and quantitative data
- Advocates, leaders
- Openness
- Develop our own leadership skills
48RCPsych
- Passing on concerns
- Medical leadership
- Independent regulator
49Leadership is key
50Francis Report Leadership
- 214 Shared training
- A leadership staff college or training system,
whether centralised or regional, should be
created to provide common professional training
in management and leadership to potential senior
staff promote healthcare leadership and
management as a profession administer an
accreditation scheme to enhance eligibility for
consideration for such roles promote and
research best leadership practice in healthcare
51- 215 Shared code of ethics
- A common code of ethics, standards and conduct
for senior board-level healthcare leaders and
managers should be produced and steps taken to
oblige all such staff to comply with the code and
their employers to enforce it. - 216 Leadership framework
- The leadership framework should be improved by
increasing the emphasis given to patient safety
in the thinking of all in the health service.
This could be done by, for example, creating a
separate domain for managing safety, or by
defining the service to be delivered as a safe
and effective service.
52- 217 Common selection criteria
- A list should be drawn up of all the qualities
generally considered necessary for a good and
effective leader. This in turn could inform a
list of competences a leader would be expected to
have. - 218 Enforcement of standards and accountability
- Serious non-compliance with the code, and in
particular, non-compliance leading to actual or
potential harm to patients, should render
board-level leaders and managers liable to be
found not to be fit and proper persons to hold
such positions by a fair and proportionate
procedure, with the effect of disqualifying them
from holding such positions in future.
53- 219 A regulator as an alternative
- An alternative option to enforcing compliance
with a management code of conduct, with the risk
of disqualification, would be to set up an
independent professional regulator. The need for
this would be greater if it were thought
appropriate to extend a regulatory requirement to
a wider range of managers and leaders. The
proportionality of such a step could be better
assessed after reviewing the experience of a
licensing provision for directors.
54- 220 Accreditation
- A training facility could provide the route
through which an accreditation scheme could be
organised. Although this might be a voluntary
scheme, at least initially, the objective should
be to require all leadership posts to be filled
by persons who experience some shared training
and obtain the relevant accreditation, enhancing
the spread of the common culture and providing
the basis for a regulatory regime.
55- 221 Ensuring common standards of competence and
compliance - Consideration should be given to ensuring that
there is regulatory oversight of the competence
and compliance with appropriate standards by the
boards of health service bodies which are not
foundation trusts, of equivalent rigour to that
applied to foundation trusts.
56Francis report what went wrong with NHS
leadership?
- Why were the leaders apparently unable to see or
hear feedback from the frontline? - Culture of fear
- Compare with other safety cultures e.g. aviation
- Lack of focus on psychological safety
- Dympna Cunnane and Robert Warwick
- Guardian Professional 14/02/13
57- Impact of Griffiths 1980s
- Managerial mindsets
- Danger of centralised processes in service
related industries (Cassoni from JLPartnership) - Tension between giving excellent service and
standardisation of processes
58- The hollow centre
- Meaning and purpose has given way to process
- Need to design organisations with core purpose in
mind - Mindful leaders required who can bridge the gap
59Towards a culture of safety
- Tension exists between
- Creation of an efficient reliable organisation
and - Fostering adaptable, appropriate and
compassionate care - Not either/or but BOTH required
- If this breaks down the result is harm
- 21st century leadership task is to get the best
out of all concerned, to enable them to be
greater together
60- New models of leadership required
- Distributed leadership
- Interdisciplinary working
- Patient centred
- Managers and clinicians together
- All voices heard
61- Staff and service user views important but not
sufficient - Ethical considerations where a tension exists
- Balancing with pressures, anxieties, emotion and
challenge of caring for people with many needs - Reflective practice and peer review
- Holding ourselves and others to account
- Respectful challenge
62Summary of the task ahead
- Creation of a consistent, caring culture
- Vignettes at interviews?
- Being effective, reflective and subject to peer
review - Rewarding the behaviours we wish to encourage
- Role modelling
- A learning culture
63Our teams
- Ask if any of these conditions (active failures)
exist in our teams (mosquito) - Latent conditions (swamps) which lie dormant
until active failure triggers them - Emotional support for staff
- Glasby
64Staff support
- Don't nurture people,nurture their primary task
- then you nurture people.E Menzies Lyth
65Thanks for your attention
- Claire.barkley_at_nhs.net