Title: IRB Minutes
1IRB Minutes RecordsVA Requirements
- Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.)
- Program Analyst
- Program for Research Integrity Development and
Education (PRIDE)
2VHA Handbook 1200.05Sets the Floor, not the
Ceiling
- Follow state and local laws when more stringent
- Follow any additional accreditation requirements
- Local VA policies may be more robust
3Draft Minutes
- Must be written and available for review within 3
weeks of the meeting date - Approval of minor conditions by the Chair or
designated IRB voting member must be documented
in the minutes of the first IRB meeting that
takes place after the date of the approval of the
minor conditions
4Draft Minutes
- Approval by voting members at subsequent IRB
meeting - Must be signed by the IRB Chair, or a qualified
voting member of the IRB designated by the Chair - Final minutes cannot be altered
- May document training members received
- May include adjournment time
5Document Attendance
- Members (voting and non-voting)
- Alternate members
- Document who attended through videoconferencing
or teleconferencing - Clearly indicate they received all relevant
material prior to the meeting and were able to
actively participate in all discussions
6Document Attendance
- IRB minutes should demonstrate that IRB meetings
were convened with members who represent
regulatory/legal requirements and general
perspective of participants (AAHRPP Accreditation
Element II.1.A.) - NOTE IRB members cannot participate in the
meeting discussions or voting by email
7IRB Member With a Conflict of Interest
- Conflict of interest relative to the proposal can
be potential, actual, or perceived - Conflicted members recuse themselves and leave
room (terminate call/videoconference) - Not counted towards quorum
- Document member is not present during the
deliberations or voting on the proposal, and that
the quorum was maintained
8IRB Member With a Conflict of Interest
- Conflicted IRB members are documented in the
minutes as absent with an indication that a
conflict of interest was the reason for the
absence (AAHRPP Accreditation Element II.1.D.)
9Document Quorum
- Quorum majority of IRB members present
38.107(b) - Quorum must be present for each vote
- Non-Scientist must be present
- NOTE Quorum could be indicated in the minutes by
tracking attendance. It does not have to be
indicated with each vote. - No IRB regulatory actions can take place if
quorum is lost
10Document IRB Actions
- Approval of minutes of prior meeting
- Approval of research
- Requiring modifications in research (e.g.,
approve study contingent on specific minor
conditions) - Deferring approval of study contingent on
substantive modifications - Disapproval of research
11Document IRB Actions (continued)
- Suspension or termination of previously approved
research - Details requiring observation of consent process
- Administrative actions (e.g., voting on
non-regulatory actions, etc) - Other actions based on local policy
12Document Vote Properly
- Document the vote on actions including the number
of voting members voting - For
- Against
- Abstaining
- In order for the research to be approved, it
shall receive the approval of a majority of those
members present at the meeting 38.108(b)
13Format to Consider for Documenting IRB Vote When
Alternate Votes
- Total Voting 15
- Vote For-9, Against-3, Abstain-3
- Smith serving as alternate for Jones
- Approved
14Format to Consider for Documenting IRB Vote with
Conflict of Interest
- Total Voting 14 (1 recused)
- Vote For-7, Against-4, Abstain-3
- Note Smith not present due to COI terminated
videoconference connection - Not approved
- NOTE A recusal means they are not voting
15IRB Determinations and Justifications
- Document determinations required by VA and other
Federal requirements - Waiver or alteration of informed consent
- Waiver of documentation of informed consent
- Research involving vulnerable populations
- Waiver of HIPAA authorization
- Document protocol-specific findings justifying
those IRB determinations
16Research Involving Pregnant Women
- Document review of additional safeguards in IRB
minutes - Should document in IRB minutes or protocol file
- Criteria of 45 CFR 46.204 are met
- Adequate provision made to monitor the risks of
subject and fetus - Status of waiver from CRADO, if applicable
17Research Involving Prisoners
- Document review of additional safeguards in IRB
minutes - May wish to document status of waiver from Chief
Research and Development Officer (CRADO) - Should document that each the conditions of 45
CFR 46.301 46.306 are met in IRB minutes or
protocol file
18Research Involving Children
- Document review of additional safeguards
- Should inform investigator of requirement to
obtain CRADO waiver - Reflect discussions regarding
- Level of risk
- Informed consent and assent forms
- Investigators qualifications to conduct research
involving children
19Research Involving Individuals Who Lack
Decision-Making Capacity
- Document review of additional safeguards
- Document IRB deliberations and the criteria used
to approve inclusion of individuals who lack
decision-making capacity in the IRB minutes or
IRB protocol file - Document findings related to the use of surrogate
consent in IRB minutes
20Subjects Susceptible to Coercion or Undue
Influence
- Document that safeguards are adequate to protect
the rights and welfare of subjects who are likely
to be susceptible to coercion or undue influences
21Risk and Rationale
- Document the IRBs determination of the level of
risk (e.g., whether or not the research
constitutes minimal risk) - Document the rationale for the IRBs
determination of the level of risk
22Informed Consent Requirements
- Document the IRBs determination that all
appropriate elements were included in the
informed consent form, and are included in the
informed consent process - Document findings when IRB does not include or
alters some or all of the elements of informed
consent
23Frequency of Continuing Review
- IRB must document which protocols require
continuing review more often than annually, as
appropriate to the degree of risk
38.103(b)(4)38.109(e) - Document the IRBs determination of the frequency
of continuing review of each study
24Document Basis for Requiring Changes or
Disapproval
- Examples
- PI must broaden recruitment pool geographically
to maintain diversity of subjects - IRB disapproves research because of investigators
misconduct inquiry however, he may resubmit,
once inquiry is resolved
25Provide Summary of Controverted Issues and
Resolution
- Example
- IRB debates over whether an Opt-in recruitment
methodology should be required as opposed to the
Opt-out methodology proposed by the investigator - IRB requires the investigator to submit
additional justification as to why an Opt-in
methodology should be approved for this
particular study
26Provide Statements of Significant New Findings
- Example This study demonstrated that anti-HIV
drugs inhibit emerging virus linked to prostate
cancer and chronic fatigue syndrome in Veterans.
The study indicates that four drugs used to treat
HIV infection can inhibit a retrovirus recently
linked to prostate cancer and chronic fatigue
syndrome
27Non-Veteran Subjects
- Provide a summary of the justification for
including non-Veterans as subjects in the IRB
minutes - IRB must appropriately document in the IRB
minutes or IRB protocol file its determinations
regarding participation of non-Veterans in the
study
28Real Social Security Numbers
- Summarize discussion when real Social Security
Numbers (SSNs), scrambled SSNs, or the last four
digits of SSNs will be used in the study - Include discussion of security measures
- NOTE Does not apply if the only use of SSNs is
on the informed consent form or the HIPAA
authorization
29Waiver of HIPAA Authorization
- Documentation of the IRBs findings for waiver of
HIPAA authorization may be in the IRB minutes or
the IRB protocol file - If IRB does not document the waiver of
authorization as required, the waiver is not valid
30FDA-Regulated Studies
- May document that a physician is present
- May document that an IND/IDE has been validated
or one is not required - IRB must categorize a device study as either
significant risk (SR) or non-significant risk
(NSR) and document its determination in the IRB
minutes
31Expedited Review Procedures
- IRB must notify IRB members of research studies
approved - IRB approval must be documented in the IRB
minutes or IRB protocol files
32Other Items for Consideration for IRB Minutes
- May document discussion regarding flagging of
medical records - Provide summary of Protocol Deviations, Adverse
Events, Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to
Subjects or Others, Audits, Reports to ORO, OHRP,
FDA - Document discussion of IRB business
33IRB Records Include
- IRB SOPs as described in 38 CFR 16.103(b)(4) and
(5) - IRB Roster and Member Resumes
- Minutes of IRB meetings
- Federal Wide Assurance (FWA)
- Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
34IRB Study File Includes
- All research proposals and amendments reviewed
- Scientific evaluations, if any, that accompany
the proposals - Approved informed consent documents
- Progress reports submitted by investigators
- Reports of injuries to subjects
35IRB Study File Includes
- Records of continuing review activities
- Copies of all correspondence between the IRB and
the investigators
36IRB Records
- Must be readily available
- Space needs to be sufficient to provide secure
storage of records - Investigator must maintain research records that
the protocol is being implemented as approved - Store according to VA and Federal records
retention requirements
37Key Points
- Accurately reflect activities, discussions, and
determinations in IRB minutes - Record deliberations, actions, and votes for each
protocol in IRB minutes - Maintain IRB minutes and Records in compliance
with VHA Handbook 1200.05, Common Rule, state
requirements, and local VA policy
38QUESTIONS