Mental Health Emergency Care - Rural Access Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Mental Health Emergency Care - Rural Access Program

Description:

The Mental Health Emergency Care (MHEC) provides thorough assessment by video-link by 24/7 mental health nursing staff who have been specifically trained and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:137
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: GreaterWe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mental Health Emergency Care - Rural Access Program


1
Improving Access to Acute Mental Health Care
despite great distance and limited resources
Prepared by Dr Martyn Patfield Mental Health
Emergency Care Rural Access Programme Greater
Western Area Health Service
2
Aim
  • To provide readily accessible, reliable and
    useful Mental Health assessment and management
    input to health staff in rural hospitals dealing
    with mental health emergencies, where
    conventional resources are not availablevia
    video technology
  • And therefore
  • Safer and better quality care
  • Less inappropriate transportation to inpatient
    units
  • Improved mental health skills in general ED
    staff

3
Nature and extent of the problem
  • Since 1990, the rate of inpatient psychiatric
    admission has more than tripled.
  • Most of the population of GWAHS lives in
    communities not serviced by an inpatient
    psychiatric facility.
  • The resulting increase in demand for
    transportation, especially with police and
    ambulance escort, has tested resources (and
    tempers). Towns are left without emergency
    services.
  • Limited MH staffing means that expertise often
    cannot be available where and when it is needed.

4
Admissions to Orange Psychiatry

inpatient unit, 1990 - 2006
5
Strategic importance
  • National Mental Health Policy 2008
  • 2.5 Access to the right care at the right
    time
  • People with mental health problems and
    mental illness will have timely access to high
    quality, coordinated care appropriate to their
    condition and circumstances, provided by the most
    appropriate services.
  • So something had to be done.

6
Planning implementing solutions
  • 2005 NSW Health charges rural MH services with
    development of models to deal with acute MH
    presentations
  • 2006 widespread consultation (inc ED staff,
    GPs, Police, Ambulance, Aboriginal health,
    Hospital transport, etc) throughout GWAHS about
    an early iteration of MHEC-RAP
  • 2007 Planning and recruitment of staff (from
    within Bloomfield Hospital) and redevelopment of
    an old ward in Bloomfield. Training and placement
    of equipment
  • 2008 Clinical operations begin in February 2008

7
The GWAHS solution MHEC-RAP, a virtual
consultation-liaison team
  • Central team 24/7 nurses (2 per shift)
  • psychiatrist in
    office hours (and on-call A/H)
  • Free call 1800 number for mental health
    information and support. (Already in
    place)
  • Structured Triage
  • Video assessment Nurse and/or Psychiatrist
  • Management advice till problem resolved
  • Liaison Police, Ambos, EDs (peripheral and
    central), MHIPUs, on-call psychiatrists,
    families, GPs, Community MH, etc
  • Training for local general hospital staff.

8
Important Elements - why it works.
  • Active engagement of local general nursing staff.
  • Trust and relationship between the central team
    and local staff............. Thus, reduced sense
    of isolation and greater confidence to deal with
    Mental Health presentations.
  • Strong psychiatrist presence to support nurses in
    central team.
  • Accessible equipment which is easy to use.
  • A goal is to increase the psychiatric skills of
    the local general hospital staff.

9
Outcomes evaluation
  • Formal evaluation through 2008 by the Centre for
    Remote Health Research, University of Sydney.
  • Steady increase in utilisation.
  • Rising levels of confidence in EDs.
  • Reduced inappropriate transportation (but also we
    recommend admission for those who might otherwise
    have been missed). Less admissions. Admissions
    more often locally rather than to distant
    psychiatry units.

10
(No Transcript)
11
Transport to Inpatient Unit vs Tendency to use
MHEC RAP
12
Sustaining change
  • Regular training visits to feeder towns (which
    includes delivery of mandatory training to
    nursing staff)
  • MHEC RAP involvement in all MOU Meetings between
    Health, Police and Ambulance. (External pressures
    to encourage use of MHEC involvement with
    emergencies)
  • Clinical governance processes, especially daily
    review of triages and video assessments

13
GWAHS Map MHEC-RAP Training Sites
  • 08-09 Sites where training was conducted
  • Future sites

Coonabarabran
Wilcannia
Warren
Balranald
14
Lessons learned
  • Technology simple is better. (Beware the geeks)
  • Accept evolution (Many changes to our original
    model including safe assessment rooms and
    1800 number as a separate entity)
  • Measurement is useful (e.g. Aggression is not
    as frequent a problem as is usually thought)
  • Measurement has limited use (Trust and
    professionalism are keybut can they be
    measured?)
  • People Its the staff that makes it work, not
    the machines

15
Photo of team
16
Future scope
  • Community Mental Health Services are stretched
    MHEC may provide a basis for support and
    development.
  • GPs have limited access to psychiatry support
    MHEC may extend into less acute MH problems.
  • MHEC-RAP role in support of potential declared
    mental health facilities under the 2007 MHA.

17
Presentations at AE Behavioural Types
First 18 months. Triages
Aggression 231
7 Threats Suicide/ DSH 1373
42 Confused/Psychotic 672
20 Anxiety/depression 689
21 Intoxication/ DA 48
1.5 Other 206
6 TOTAL
3219
16
18
Patient Interview Numerical Responses(First
year evaluation report, University of Sydney)

Was the service prompt and timely to your needs? Not timely 1 Somewhat timely 2 Timely 3 Better than timely 4 Very timely 5 4.08
What do you think of the video system, was it easy to use and helpful? Not helpful 1 Somewhat helpful 2 Helpful 3 Better than helpful 4 Very helpful 5 4.18
Was the care well organised between your location and the other? Not organised 1 Somewhat organised 2 Organised 3 Better than organised 4 Very organised 5 4.39
Number of respondents that would use the service again or recommend it to someone for use 25/31
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com