Title: A tale of two bazaar economies:
1 A tale of two bazaar economies An
Input-Output analysis for Germany and Italy by
Emanuele Breda and Rita Cappariello (Banca
dItalia Economic and financial statistics
Department)
2International relocation of production
ACQUISITION OF INTERMEDIATES FROM FOREIGN
SUPPLIERS (OUTSOURCING)
FDI (OFF-SHORING)
- both phenomena have similar macroeconomic
implications - a change in import composition
- a rising share of imports in the value of
domestic production.
3Main references (Europe and rest of the world)
Feenstra and Hanson (1996) in US the share of
imported inputs on the total purchase of
intermediate products grew from 5.5 per cent in
1972 to 11.6 in 1990. Egger and Egger (2003)
increase, on average, of the imported inputs as a
share of gross output for 11 European counties
between 1990 and 1997. Hummels et al. (1998,
2001) increasing share of imported goods and
services content in exports for some OECD
countries during the 1980s. ECB (2005) increase
of the import content of exports from 1995 to
2000 for an aggregate of economies of the euro
area.
4Main references (input-output)
The indicators for international outsourcing are
usually obtained by using trade data and/or
information from the INPUT-OUTPUT TABLES
- The definition of international outsourcing
underlying all these measures is the one in
Feenstra and Hanson (1996) - By outsourcing we mean the import of
intermediate inputs by domestic firms. - This definition is much broader than the one
considering just trade resulting from specific
relationships between a domestic firm and a
supplier abroad (Grossman and Helpman, 2005).
5Main references (input-output) (2)
- The advantages of this methodology
- to provide an exhaustive measure of the
phenomenon, regardless of relationships between
domestic producers and foreign suppliers. - to avoid an arbitrary dichotomy between
intermediate inputs and other categories of goods
which is very common in trade statistics.
6Main references (input-output) (3)
- However, these indicators
- if constructed on technical coefficients of
production drawn from annual I-O tables and the
trade data, are based on the strong assumption
that the share of imported inputs is the same in
all the industries (Feenstra and Hanson, 1996
Amiti and Wei, 2005). - if based upon direct data on imported inputs
drawn from the symmetric I-O tables, use
information having a significant delay since
these tables are compiled only every 5 years
(ECB, 2005).
7References for Germany and Italy
- Germany Sinn (2003, 2006), after having observed
a strong increase in industrial production and
exports but a much slower growth in domestic
value-added between 1995 and 2003, used the
expression bazaar effect for German economy - Belke et al. (2007) and Danninger and Joutz
(2007) interpreted in a more optimistic fashion
these same facts, concluding that Germany gained
from internationalisation and intensified its
trade links with fast-growing markets. - Italy (manufacturing firms) Bugamelli et al.
(2008) found a positive correlation between
value-added growth and (lato sensu)
internationalisation - Barba Navaretti and Castellani (2004) and
Federico and Minerva (2007) found no evidence of
negative effects of internationalisation on the
domestic employment level.
8Motivations of the paper
- Answer to the questions
- Was the strong increase in outsourcing from 1995
to 2000 biased by the cyclical peak of
international trade in 2000? - Is the Italian economy a bazaar economy too?
Measuring international outsourcing by a set of
different indicators for more recent years for
Italy and Germany
9Motivations of the paper (continued)
- To reach our objectives
- We use instead the annual use I-O tables of
imported inputs updated up to 2006 and available
only for a limited groups of countries. - This data have been used recently to evaluate the
development of outsourcing in Italy (Falzoni and
Tajoli, 2007 Daveri and Jona-Lasinio, 2007) but
without any consideration on methodological
issues regarding neither the measurement of the
phenomenon nor any cross-country comparison.
10International outsourcing concepts and measures
Four different groups of indicators for
outsourcing
Share of Imported Inputs on Total Inputs (IITI
broad and narrow)
Share of Value-Added on Production (VAP)
Import Content of Exports (ICE and DIICE)
Import Content of Production (ICP and DIICP)
11International outsourcing concepts and measures
(2)
- Share of Imported Inputs on Total Inputs (broad
version Feenstra and Hanson, 1996)
where mji and dji correspond respectively
to the imported and the domestically produced
inputs from industry j1,.., J used to produce
output in industry i1,..,n, and M and D are the
corresponding totals.
12International outsourcing concepts and measures
(2)
- Share of Imported intra-industry Inputs on Total
intra-industry Inputs (narrow version Bracci,
2006, Falzoni and Tajoli 2007),
with mii and dii corresponding respectively
to imported and domestically-produced
intra-industry inputs (i.e. the diagonal elements
of matrices) miidii to total intra-industry
inputs of industry i M and D to total
intra-industry inputs of the whole economy.
13International outsourcing concepts and measures
(3)
- Import Content of Domestic Production (Egger and
Egger, 2003)
- Direct and Indirect Import Content of Domestic
Production
with yi representing the gross output of
industry i 1,.., n, 0 makj 1 representing a
multiplicative coefficient of the imported input
from sector k that is embodied in the domestic
production of sector j, and subsequently utilised
as an input in industry i (dji), and Y being the
total output.
14International outsourcing concepts and measures
(4)
- Import Content of Exports (Hummels and al., 2001
Chen and al., 2005)
- Direct and Indirect Import Content of Exports
(BCE, 2005)
with xi representing the exports of industry
i 1,.., n and X the total exports of the
economy.
15International outsourcing concepts and measures
(5)
- Share of Domestic Value-Added on Production
where vi is the value-added of industry i1,.., n.
16International outsourcing concepts and measures
(6)
- IITI (broad and narrow) indices focus on the
firms choice between domestic and external input
markets. - ICP and DIICP intend to capture the firms
substitution of domestic production with
production phases relocated abroad. Since they do
not measure IO (international outsourcing)
regardless of the degree of vertical integration,
they can be useful to evaluate the effects of IO
on macroeconomic variables, but less reliable for
comparing indices across industries. - ICE and DIICE are measures of vertical
specialisation (or proxies for measuring
globalisation), that is the production chain
that link different countries, acting either as
producers in intermediate stages or as exporters. - VAP index is decreasing in IO, and its ability
to capture industries IO is less
straightforward.
17Data
- Two sets of annual input-output tables (Destatis
and Istat) including the use matrices with a
distinction between domestically produced inputs
and imported inputs. - Indices calculated including total purchases of
non-energy products and market services (46
NACE-sectors).
18The extent of internationalisation
19The extent of internationalisation (2)
- In 2006 the overall level of international
outsourcing appears to be comparable between the
two countries. - The level of international outsourcing in market
services in Germany is higher than in Italy
because of a more intensive use of imported
inputs in the financial and banking sector. - Manufacturing sector seems to be more
internationalised in Italy than in Germany.
20The extent of internationalisation in
manufacturing
- For every 100 euros of goods produced in
high-tech sectors, the direct ICP was 26 and 22
euros respectively for Italy and Germany, whereas
the DIICP was 33 and 29 euros. - The low-tech sectors are the least
internationalised ones in both countries. - In 2006 the highest values of international
outsourcing indicators are found in high and
medium-tech industries.
21The extent and development of international
outsourcing Total economy
22The extent and development of international
outsourcing Manufacturing
23The development of international outsourcing
24The dynamics of internationalisation
- In the 1995-2000 period very intense growth in
both countries, especially in Germany (and, for
Germany in services, which, however, started from
extremely low levels of internationalisation and
have a limited weight on the whole economy). - Between 2000 and 2004 weaker increase in Germany.
- During the same period we can observe a reduction
for the whole Italian economy, which reflects the
increasing relative importance of market services
industries. - In the last years under analysis (2005-06),
growth resumed at a fast pace, especially in
Italy.
25A shift and share analysis
- The absolute variation of the indices have
been broken down in two parts - the change of intensity in industries
international outsourcing (the within component).
- the change relative to the economy structure (the
between component). - The shift and share analysis is based on 46
sectors (NACE codes) for the all period
(1995-2006).
26International outsourcing and sectoral change
between 1995 and 2006
27International outsourcing and sectoral change
between 1995 and 2006 (2)
- For Italy the ss analysis confirms an increase
in the international fragmentation for both the
whole economy and the manufacturing sector. This
rise is at least partially counterbalanced by a
production shift towards less internationally
integrated industries. - For Germany, both component move in the same
direction, showing a clear increase in the level
of outsourcing. - The firms propensity to use imported inputs grew
within each sector at a similar pace in both
countries, but the shift of the economic
structure towards more internationalised sectors
was stronger in Germany than in Italy. This holds
for the all economy and for manufacturing.
28Conclusions
- In 2006 Germany and Italy show a similar level of
international outsourcing. Considering the
manufacturing only, Italian firms seems to be
ever more internationalised than the German ones.
Therefore, we could consider, by a static point
of view, the Italian economy as a bazaar
economy too. - Also the dynamic evolution was broadly similar in
the two countries stronger in the years
1995-2000, weaker (if not negative) during
2001-04 - in the last years under study (2005-06) the
growth of indicators resumed at a fast pace,
especially in Italy. This seems to suggest a
change in strategies and a reorganisation of
production in Italian firms. - However, German firms started from a lower level
and experienced a stronger growth in the 1st
sub-period and in the whole period. - For both countries, the highest levels of
international outsourcing are found in high and
medium-tech sectors.
29Conclusions (2)
- Italian lira crises in the first half of the 90s
temporarily boosted price competitiveness of
Italian goods, whereas corresponding Deutsche
mark appreciation triggered German firms effort
to compensate for the loss of competitiveness. - In the beginning of the last decade, the decline
of IO indicators for Italian economy was caused
by a structural shift in the production towards
services, while in manufacturing sectors IO
continued to grow (albeit slowly). - The growth of indicators in the last years
analysed suggests that, before the international
crisis of 2008-09, at least a significant part of
Italian firms was trying to cope with the new
challenges posed by globalisation, by the
diffusion of ICT, and by the adoption of the euro.