Title: The Hungarian minority media in Romania
1The Hungarian minority media in Romania
2Overview
- Hungarian minority in Romania integral society,
encompassing all social strata. Not significantly
assimilated ? do not use majority language in
everyday communication and in mass media
consumption. (Magyari, 2003a) - too wide-ranged to be considered a typical
minority media, but too minoritarian to qualify
as a fully-fledged media system (Magyari, 2003b) - too dispersed, displaying considerable regional
differences not a segment for media marketing,
unfavorable for advertising (Magyari, 2003b)
3Incomplete media system
- TV
- No public TV station (a station which could be
received on the whole territory of Transylvania)
only plans for one one visible consequence
the lack of Hungarian media stars - Romanian public TV allocates insufficient
broadcasting time in Hungarian language
nationwide networks total of 6.5 hours of
Hungarian program per week 0.97 of total
broadcasting time - Regional studios Cluj/Kolozsvár twice a week, a
total of 2.5 hours a week Timisoara/Temesvár
half an hour once a week. - private stations in cities where Hungarians form
a majoritary, where minoritarian, private
stations usually feature a few hours of program
in Hungarian - most popular Hungarian commercial channels
(where available), Duna TV, Romanian commercial
channels - Radio
- No Hungarian program on any of the 4 central
public radio stations - But cosiderable broadcasting time for regional
studios Cluj/Kolozsvár, Târgu Mures/Marosvásárhel
y 4-6 hours daily, Timisoara/Temesvár 1 hour
daily other regional studios insignificant
(max. 1 hour/week) - private stations the same situation as with
private TV stations - Web 3 more important news portals
regional/local portals
4Incomplete media system the written press
- 2 national dailies, 3 national weeklies
- the most characteristic media consumption
behavior is the reading of local/regional
dailies/weeklies (around 15 regional
newspapers) about 67 of the audience read these
(too) (Magyari, 2003b) - relative lack of tabloid press and magazines
- reasons
- lack of tradition Hungarians in Transylvania
torn off the Hungarian press system before the
dawn of tabloid press - lack of resources tabloid press more expensive
than simple dailies - accommercial attitude of the operators between
the two world wars not the economic but the
literaray elite ran most publications - elitism of Hungarian journalists tabloid low
culture, Balkanic character (Magyari, 2003b) - consequences
- gap on the market filled partly by the dailies
but their content doesnt match the needs of the
tabloid readers, so they dont buy regularly
e.g. only once a week, for the TV schedule or
for sports news etc. situational nonhabitual
readers (Magyari 2003b) - publications from Hungary very popular and also
publications in Romanian for those who speak the
language well (and consequenlty would be serious
competitors hard to decide whether reason or
consequence)
5Features of Hungarian journalism in Romania
(Papp, 2006 Magyari, 2003a)
- intellectualization of the field reluctant to
write about the experiences of other social
strata - literaturization emphasis on the philological
quality of the articles, less on content and
appropiate sources. Most of them are primarily
interested in culture, second option domestic
politics. Sports, entertainment, foreign policy
relatively neglected. - elitism tendency to think about the audience as
an elite community - the press is rarely entertaining, consequently
its audience is limited - lack of business orientation works more like
nonprofit NGOs than like economic enterprises.
Yet, most regional publicatons still profitable - mission of the minority journalist the idea of
serving the community - media consumption of journalists similar to the
habits of the audience barely read Romanian
newspapers, journalists from regional papers are
even reluctant to read the national
publications
6Politicization of the press
- most of the regional newspapers are the
successors of the former communist party papers. - affirmative or approving discourse of the
Hungarian press uncritical towards the leaders
of the Democratic Alliance of Hungarians in
Romania (DAHR) (Magyari, 2003a) - especially after 1999-2000 the cleavages from
Hungary appear in Transylvania too supporters of
DAHR, Béla Markó and closer to the left-liberal
parties in Hungary vs. supporters of László Tokés
and the (inner) opposition of the DAHR, closer to
FIDESZ dualistic character of the press - Yet the relatively low number of publications
critical of the DAHR reinforces the one-party
system
7Politicization of the press (contd.)
- extramedial attachments 55 of journalists
member of DAHR, 62 member of some NGO. Age is
positively related to both kinds of membership.
Usually those in a leading position at the
newspaper tend to be in leading positions in NGOs
too aggregation of functions is characteristic
of Hungarian intellectuals belief that
journalism is a mission rather than a job. (Papp,
2006) - Taboos 1. the DAHR 2. the churches.
- Some journalists deny the existence of taboos
especially the older generation, those involved
in politics. (Papp, 2006) - relative lack of left-wing values (Papp, 2006)
- funds financial sources from both Romania and
Hungary are in fact distributed by the DAHR - politicians often also serve as sources (Magyari,
2003a)
8Minority neurosis
- journalist or media neither chauvinistic nor
xenophobic - However on average, journalists would exclude
members of the majority group from their private
sphere
The values of the table represent averages of 6
point Bogardus scales 1 accept as spouse 2
accept as guest in own apartment 3 accept as
neighbor 4 accept to live in the locality 5
accept to visit the locality 6 would not accept
at all (Papp, 2006)
Roma 3.57
Bantu 2.81
Romanians 2.14
Jews 2.06
Germans 1.93
Hungarians 1.08
9Minority neurosis (contd)
- especially in the early 90s, strongly defensive
tone as a reaction to the nationalism of the
majority - minority effect also influences content
Hungarian minority media deals primarily with
ethnic Hungarians and their affairs. Natural
thing, as this group is similar to the
journalists. But sometimes it may also result in
neglecting certain issues and overweighing
others. (Papp, 2005) - occasional articles hint at Hungarian superiority
(Magyari, 2003a) - use of ethnic stereotypes us and them
- mobilizing, propagating, partisan tone our
leaders, our party etc. - The issue on which the minority press occupies a
really genuine position Hungarian-Hungarian
relations (right-wing press in Hungary resembles
most. Mainstream of minority publications more
moderate) - some people find the Hungarian press to be
complaining, lamenting, sometimes excessively
emphasizing its Hungarian nature (nationalistic)
and think that they survive only because of lack
of competition - symbols sometimes more important than social
facts (Papp, 2005) - the charge of high treason (esp. on the more
radical side, after the 2004 referendum on dual
citizenship, but also for DAHR politicians for
abandoning the idea of autonomy)
10Case study Medgyessy-Nastase summit on 1st of
December 2002
- 1st of December national holiday in Romania in
1918 National Assembly at Alba Iulia proclaimed
the union of Transylvania and Romania - For Hungarians not a joyful day (Béla Markó,
12th of December, 2002)
Poitical context Romania (and Slovakia) strongly
oppose the application of the Hungarian status
law and demand amendment
Adrian Nastase and Péter Medgyessy meet at a
reception at Hotel Kempinski in Budapest and
clink glasses
Protests on Erzsébet square Right-wing
organizations demand the resignation of the
government because the PM has bertrayed the
nation, shouting Down with Trianon!
11Case study 1 the reaction of the press - Hungary
- Magyar Nemzet (conservative, right-wing)
- Mediaseanu celebrates the Hungarian PM whose
code-name is Péter Medgyessy - Romanian feast in Budapest
- The PM caused scandal a shame and the
humiliation of the Hungarian nation - perhaps Romanian ministry of foreign affairs
bought the hotel in the meanwhile without our
knowledge commenting the fact that the
reception had been announced to take place at
Romanian embassy in Bp. - even geographically beyond the idea of from the
Dniester to the Tisza - Népszabadság (left-liberal)
- Hungarian government can feel eased, because
Romania will not reject the status law
unconditionally - Medgyessy crossed the Rubicon of doing such a
gesture - It would have been rude to reject the invitation.
However, the same article aknowledges that no one
can expect that sound of mind Hungarians could
rejoice over the 1st of December 1918.
12Case study 1 The reaction of the press - Romania
- Adevarul
- before the event suggesting that the Romanian PM
should celebrate in Romania imagine what would
happen if G.W.Bush wouldnt spend the 4th of July
in the U.S. - Highway of Friendship Unprecedented event
yet, the Earth didnt crack under our feet
although seemed political suicide, the gesture is
a first signal towards the future, which
catches the wind out of the sails of the
extremists on both sides. - It is interesting to note that both Magyar Nemzet
and Népszabadság cite a sentence from this
article, but totally out of context Nastase
commited treason, that even the darkest
nationalist scripts wouldnt have imagined. The
original article sarcastically starts with this
sentence - Adevarul de Cluj
- Romania and Hungary should forget the injuries
from the past - Evenimentul Zilei
- less emphasis on the content of the summit, more
attention on the protests againts it. Objective,
one article even makes the claim that the public
opinion in Hungary doesnt agree with the
attitude of the protestors, rather it condemns
it. - A couple of weeks later Hungarian extremist
protested once again. This time the paper warns
that such demonstrations are detrimental to the
international image of Hungary and can threaten
the stability of Central Europe. - Ziua
- Hungarian officials think that Romania annexed
Transylvania. Otherwise the paper devoted
relatively little space to the journey of Nastase
to Bp., they rather cover celebrations in Romania
13Case study 1 Reaction of Hungarian press in
Romania
- Both national dailies rather focus on the
content of the meeting and report about the
protests without commenting - Column in Krónika contrasts the Budapest events
with an incident in Sfântu Gheorghe/Sepsiszentgyör
gy, where the Hungarian mayor was reluctant to
display sufficient Romanian flags on the
national holiday. The columnist writes that
something happened in Budapest. The two PMs took
the risks, and the event is a sign that one need
not necessarily approach the national holiday of
the other group with passionate anger. The
conclusion is that the mentioned mayor is still
far from understanding this. - The event was relatively neglected in the
regional press mostly only news-agency material
featured, without commentary. - Some newspapers (but most importantly the
Internet portals) take over articles from Hungary - Radical press (Erdélyi napló) similar rethoric
to Magyar Nemzet - obsequious Hungarian foreign policy
- what would happen to a Romanain PM if he would
celebrate with his Russian collegue the
Molotov-Ribbentrop pact (by which Russia gained
Bessarabia) - The next step would be for the Hungarian
government to celebrate the anniversary of the
Mohács battle with some Suleyman - Romanian feast in Budapest - emphasis on
police violence against protestors
14Case study 1 Conclusion
- The press in Hungary displayed the strongest
differences - The most radical positions came from Hungary too,
but Transylvanian publications borrow these
articles and some publications also match the
style in their own articles - Romanian press generally moderate
- Generally speaking, the Hungarian media in
Romania treats the events soberly, without
playing the nationalist card - Nevertheless the polarization from Hungary is
also displayed in Transylvanian publications
15Case study 2 draft report on accession of
Romania to the EU
- The foreign affairs committee of the EP discusses
the draft report on accession of Romania by
Pierre Moscovici. The document is important
because it is the last report before the
accession. - The report notes that substantial progress has
been made in the reform of the justice system,
the fight against corruption etc., but further
progress is needed in the fields of child
protection, integration of minorities, in
particular the Roma and Hungarian minorities, and
the treatment of the mentally handicapped - 3 areas still unsatisfactory reform of the
justice system and the fight against organised
crime and corruption absorption of Union aid in
the agricultural sector application of the
acquis communautaire in certain areas of food
safety. The first should be the focus of special
attention from the Romanian authorities. - It is obvious, that Romania still has a lot of
work to do. - Yet, the minority press focuses almost
exclusively on the issue of the Hungarian
minority
16Case study 2 draft report on accession of
Romania to the EU
- Krónika, Szabadság briefly review the report,
then deal in more detail with the amendments
handed in by Hungarian MEPs - ÚMSZ reports on the 14th of November that the
Hungarian Human Rights Foundation urges the MEPs
to take into consideration the rights of the
Hungarian Minority and draws attention to the
amendments. The document is reviewed more
thoroughly only on the next day. (15th of
November), and is the only to mention other
amendments (esp. reagrding the access of Romanian
citizens on the labor merket) - Bihari Napló (regional daily) two interviews 1.
with Kinga Gál, member of FIDESZ and MEP, 2. with
DAHR observer in EP. Both exclusively about the
issue of minorities - Adevarul the Foreign Affairs Committee has
harshly amended the Moscovici report which was
favorable to Romania. The paper stresses that
most of the amendments have been formulated by
Kinga Gál, a constant critique of Romania. Two
more amendments are referred to, but in much less
detail one by the Greens about Rosia Montana and
one about lustration of future Romanian MEPs. - Gândul only this last amendment is mentioned
- România Libera short news most of the
amendments were favorable, those whch formulated
criticism came from the Hungarian MEPs.
17Bibliography
- Magyari Tivadar. 2003a. Hungarian Minority Media
in Romania Toward a Policy of Professional
Improvement. In Sükösd Miklós Bajomi-Lázár
Péter (szerk.) 2003 Media Policy Reform in
East-Central Europe. Budapest, CEU Press.
185-202. - Magyari Tivadar. 2003b. Elemzések a romániai
magyarok sajtóolvasási szokásairól Analyses
about the Press Reading Habits of Hungarians in
Romania. In Erdélyi Társadalom. Vol. I., No. 1.
113-131. - Papp Z. Attila. 2005. The Hungarian Press System
in Romania During the Nineties The World of the
Operators. Regio, Volume 8. pp. 141-153. - Papp Z. Attila. 2006. Keretizmus. A romániai
magyar sajtó és muködtetoi 1989 után Framism.
The Hungarian Press System in Romania and its
Operators after 1989. Csíkszereda, Soros
Oktatási Központ. - HTMH Observer 2002/46 2002/47 (www.htmh.hu)
- www.nol.hu
- www.mno.hu
- www.adevarulonline.ro
- www.evenimentulzilei.ro
- www.ziua.ro
- www.hhrf.org/erdelyinaplo