Analysis of HIV Evolution - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Analysis of HIV Evolution

Description:

Virus can have either the lytic or lysogenic life cycle Markham Study of HIV ... progressors My partner and I ... Selection of Subjects, ClustalW ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:73
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: LMU89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Analysis of HIV Evolution


1
Analysis of HIV Evolution
  • Bobak Seddighzadeh
  • and
  • Kristoffer Chin
  • Department of Biology
  • Loyola Marymount University
  • Bio 398-01
  • February 23, 2010

2
Outline
  • Background
  • Question
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • References

3
Function of the HIV Virus
  •  HIV is a retrovirus that affects immune cells,
    specifically T cells.
  • Retroviruses contain reverse transcriptase also
    known as RNA-dependent DNA polymerase.
  • Reverse transcriptase synthesizes single stranded
    RNA into a c-DNA molecule.
  • Since viruses cannot synthesize their own
    proteins, they require a host cell to carry out
    its replication process.
  • HIV infects the host cell. It then injects its
    genome from its capsid and uses reverse
    transcriptase to create a c-DNA template that it
    then incorperates into the host cells DNA. The
    host cell transcribes and translates proteins
    that assemble into more copies of the virus.
  • Virus can have either the lytic or lysogenic life
    cycle

4
Markham Study of HIV Virus
  • Evolution is the change in the allele frequency
    in a population over a period of time
  • More specific to HIV, the population refers to
    all the HIV viruses in an affected individual,
    and the allele refers to each variant of the HIV
    env gene.
  • Different individuals in the population vary in
    heritable traits that can be passed onto
    offspring that may or may not give them a
    selective advantage.
  • Markham et al. (1998) Study
  • Nucleotide sequences of the env region were used
    to study evolution
  • The viruses were classified into groups according
    to rate of CD4 T cell decline progressors and
    non-progressors
  • Progressors had increased rates of diversity and
    divergence in comparison to non-progressors and
    ultimately higher rates of CD4 T cell decline.
  • We wanted to know why a disparity exists in the
    rate of evolution amongst variants

5
Differences in Nucletide Sequences?
  • More specifically our question was what is or
    are the nucleotide sequences in the env region of
    the V3 domain that are responsible for the
    increased genetic diversity, divergence, and rate
    of CD4 T cell decline amongst rapid progressors
    and non-progressors
  • My partner and I predict that the increased rate
    of CD4 decline, genetic divergence and diversity
    are directly related to two possible mechanism
    A) HIV-1 variants termed rapid progressors
    selected for a structural mechanism that does not
    protect the genetic material against mutations as
    effectively B) or HIV-1 variants termed rapid
    progressors selected for a mechanism that induces
    mutations on its own DNA. We also predict that
    both these mechanism are related to nucleotide
    differences found in the env region of the V3
    domain.

6
Methods Selection of Subjects, ClustalW,
ClustDist, Counting Nucleotide Differences
  • Selection
  • Subjects and visits highest rate of CD4 T Cell
    decline
  • Clones Largest Max distance, for more variation
  • ClustalW
  • Analysis and comparison of S
  • Analysis and comparison of Unrooted trees of
    subjects
  • ClustDist
  • Analysis of Max Distance of Nucleotide sequence
    differences
  • Counting nucleotide differences
  • Analysis of specific nucleotide differences from
    Non and Rapid Progressors using Excel

7
ResultsNon and Rapid Progressors Subjects,
Visits, and Clone Selection
Non Progressors Subject Visit Clones Max Distance
2 1, 3, 4 (1,5) (4,5) (3,8) (3) (11) (14)
12 3, 4, 5 (1,3) (1,2) (5,6) (3) (6) (9)
13 2, 3, 5 (1,2) (3,6) (3,6) (1) (3) (4)
Rapid Progressors Subject Visit Clones Max Distance
4 2, 3, 4 (5, 13) (2,16) (1,4) (16) (14) (15)
10 4, 5, 6 (5,8) (3,10) (4,7) (13) (12) (20)
11 2, 3, 4 (1,6) (2,5) (6,8) (3) (7) (7)
8
Results Unrooted tree of selected Rapid
Progressors
of Clones S Theta Min Distance Max Distance
18 100 29 4 51
9
Results Unrooted tree of selected Non Progressors
of Clones S Theta Min Distance Max Distance
18 71 20 1 47
10
Results Unrooted tree of selected Rapid and Non
Progressors
of Clones S Theta Min Distance Max Distance
36 142 34 1 52
11
Results Samples of differences of Nucleotide
Sequence in Non and Rapid Progressors
S4V4-4 GAGGTAGTAATTAGATCTGAAAATTTCACGAACAATGCTAAAATTATAATAGTACAGCTG S4V4-4 AATAAATCTGTAGAAATTAATTGTACAAGACCCAACAACAATACAATAAGAAGGATA--- S4V4-4 CCTATAGGACCCGGCAGAGCATTTTATACAACAGG--------CAGAATAGGCAATATAAGGCAA S4V4-4 GCTCATTGTAACATTATTGAAACAAAATGGAATAACACTTTAAAACTGATAGTTGACAAA S4V4-4 TTAAGAGAACAGTTTGG-----GAATAAAACAATAATCTTTAATCAATCCTCA
S10V4-5 GAGGTAGTAATTAGATCTGAAAATTTCACGGACAATGCTAAAACCATAATAGTACAGCTG S10V4-5 AATGAATCTGTAGAAATTAATTGCACAAGACCCAACAACAATACAAGAAGAAGGATA--- S10V4-5 CATATGGGACCAGGCAGAGCATTTTATGCAACAGGAGAAATAATAGGAGATATAAGGCAA S10V4-5 GCACATTGTAACCTTAGTAGAACAAAATGGAATGACACTTTAAAACAGGTAGTTGACAAA S10V4-5 TTAAGAGAACAATTTAG-----GAATAAAACAATAATCTTTAAGCAATCCTCA
S2V1-1 GAGGTAGTAATTAGATCCGAAAATTTCACGAACAATGCTAAAATCATAATAGTACAGCTG S2V1-1 AATGAATCTGTAGAAATTAATTGTACAAGACCCAACAACAATACAAGAAAAAGTATA--- S2V1-1 CATATAGGACCAGGTAGAGCATTTTATACAACAGGAGACATAATAGGAGATATAAGACAA S2V1-1 GCATATTGTAACATTAGTAGAGCAGAATGGAATAACACTTTAAAACAGATAGTTATAAAA S2V1-1 TTGAGAGAACACTTTGG-----GAATAAAACAATAGTCTTTAATCACTCCTCA
S13V3-3 GAGATAGTAATTAGATCCGAAAATTTCACAAACAATGCTAAAATCATAATAGTACAGCTG S13V3-3 AAGGAATCTGTAGAAATTAATTGTACAAGACCTGGCAACAATACAAGAAGAAGTATA--- S13V3-3 AATATAGGACCAGGTAGAGCATTTTATGCATCAAGAGGAATAATAGGAGATATAAGACAA S13V3-3 GCATATTGTAACATCAGTAAAGCAAAATGGGATAACACTTTAGGACAGGTAGCTACAAAA S13V3-3 TTAAGAGAACAATTTAG----------GAATGCTACAATAGTCTTTAATCACTCATCA
12
Past Studies in the Nucleotide Sequences in HIV
  • Hill and Hernandez found a certain loop in the
    gene sequence in Rapid progressors that in the
    beginning of infection and showed up again in the
    end.
  • They also found that lack of immunity shows
    diverse forms, but there is a significant
    domination once there is a fit form of the
    disease
  • Found significant diversification in the
    beginning of the infection and slowly lowered.
  • Specific Changes in the V3 region alter phenotype
    that correlated to disease progression

13
Past Studies in the Nucleotide Sequences in HIV
  • Usage of CCR4 is related to high sequence
    conservation in contrast theCXCR4 tropic viruses
    that spread sequence space over larger regions.
  • The location of the sequences in the space can be
    used toimprove the accuracy of the prediciton of
    the coreceptror usage.
  • Bozek found that patients with high CD4 T cell
    counts  had highly conservessequences in
    comparison to patients that had low CD4 T cell
    counts.

14
Interpretation of Differences found in Nucleotide
Sequences
  • 10 nucleotide sequence difference were found in
    the comparison of the non and rapid progressor
    subjects that were chosen
  • These 10 differences shows that there were some
    common sequences that may be necessary to the
    rapid decline of T Cells that is caused by the
    HIV virus
  • The 10 differences may not seem a lot, but the
    unrooted tree of both Non and Rpaid progressors
    shows a strong diversity in visits 13 and 11, 12
    and 11.
  • The other branches of the trees shows close
    relation among the other visitors which can be
    interpreted that there is no significant changes
    in the nucelotide sequences in non and rapid
    progressors
  • Markham found a lot more diversity in the rapid
    progressors, it is possible that the clones that
    we chose was not as effective
  • We were more concerned with nucleotide
    differences, and we did not evenconsider the
    sequence space. This may provide insight as to
    why thereare not significant nucleotide
    differences amongst progressors
    andnon-progressors yet they functionalally
    different.

15
Translation of Sequences and Nucleotide Spaces
  • In future studies, we believe that a translation
    of the nucleotide sequences will show light to
    the results we found
  • There may be no specific change that is found in
    the nucleotide sequence, but it is quite possible
    with the amino acids
  • Hill an Hernandez found differences in the amino
    acids as finding more Basic than acidic
  • Analyzing the Nucleotide spacing found in the V3
    region as analyzed by Bozek

16
References
  • Borrego P, Marcelino JM, Rocha C, Doroana M,
    Antunes F, Maltez F, Gomes P, Novo C, Barroso H,
    and Taveira N. The role of the humoral immune
    response in the molecular evolution of the
    envelope C2, V3 and C3 regions in chronically
    HIV-2 infected patients. Retrovirology 2008 Sep
    8 5 78.
  • Hill MD and Hernandez W. Nucleotide and amino
    acid mutations in human immunodeficiency virus
    corresponding to CD4 decline. Arch Virol 2006
    Jun 151(6) 1149-58.
  • Templeton AR, Reichert RA, Weisstein AE, Yu XF,
    and Markham RB. Selection in context patterns of
    natural selection in the glycoprotein 120 region
    of human immunodeficiency virus 1 within infected
    individuals. Genetics 2004 Aug 167(4) 1547-61.
  • Bozek K, Thielen A, Sierra S, Kaiser R, and
    Lengauer T. V3 loop sequence space analysis
    suggests different evolutionary patterns of CCR5-
    and CXCR4-tropic HIV. PLoS One 2009 Oct 9 4(10)
    e7387.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com