Title: Case reports of BRONJ
1Case reports of BRONJ
- ???? ???????????????
- ??E? Intern ???
- ???
- ???
- ???
- ???
2General data
Case 1
- Name ?x?
- Gender Female
- Age 76 y/o
- Native ???
- Marriage status Married
- Occupation ?
3Chief Complaints
- Rt submandibular swelling for 2 months
4Present Illness
- 97.12.11
- This 74 y/o female was suffered from the above
episode, at first she went to LDC , the dentist
suggest ed her to come to our OPD for further
examination. She took Fosamax. - 2 polyps at right edentulous ridge, local pus
() - Right submandibular swelling about 57cm
5Past History
- Past Medical History
- Hypertension() DM(-) denied other systemic
illness - Hospitalized???????
- osteoporosis
- drug or food allergy penicillin
- Medication
- drug for hypertension control
- ?????
- Forsamax (alendronate(??) ?/? for 45 yrs )
6- Past Dental History
- Extraction ,CB,OD,RCT
- Attitude to Dental TxFair
- Oral Habits
- Alcohol (-)
- Betel quid (-)
- Cigarette (-)
7- 3x3 cm
- Mixed RL with RO, irregular shape bony
- destruction
8(No Transcript)
9Differential Diagnosis
?Infection Osteomylities
- ?Tumor
- Benign (X)
- Malignancy
- osteosacoma
- odontogenic malignancy tumor
-
10Clinical impression
- Bisphosphonate- related osteonecrosis of jaw
(BRONJ)
11Treatment course
- 97.12.11 (first visit) refer from LDC
- ID
- anaerobic culture, aerobic culture
- Rx amoxicillin/ panadol / suwell
- 97.12.18
- pus culture report
- Clostridium bifermentans
- ?metronidazole() Ampicillin ()
- Clindamycin ()
12- 97.12.1297.12.31
- N/S irrigation
- Antibiotic
- 98.1.7
- arrange OP
- 98.1.15
- OP sequestrectomy saucerization
-
13 14- 98.5.6
- Remove sequestrum (in OPD)
15 16General data
Case 2
- Name ????
- Gender Female
- Age 51 y/o
- Native Kaohsiung
- Marriage status Married
- First Visit 97/12/18
17Chief Complaints
- Ask for oral examination for dental care after ??
application - Bad smell from wound of extraction for more
than 1 year.
18Present Illness
- 97/12/18
- This 49 y/o female has received Zometa IV
monthly for bone metastasis for about 3 years.
And the nurse of cancer center suggested her to
visit our OPD for oral examination. - She stated she had extraction experience
of teeth 15 and 16 more than 1 year ago in LDC.
19Past History
- Past Medical History
- Breast carcinoma with bone metastasis (T1N2M1)s/p
operation , systemical chemotherapy and
radiotherapy. - Serous microcystic adenoma over pancreatic tail
s/p partial pancreatectomy - Otitis media s/p eardrum reconstraction
- Tonsil excision
20- Past Dental History
- Extraction, CB fabrication, OD, scaling
- Attitude to Dental TxFair
- Oral Habits Related to Malignancy
- Alcohol (-)
- Betel quid (-)
- Cigarette (-)
21Oral Examination
- A fistula was found on edentulous ridge of teeth
15 16, tracing with GP to take a periapical
film. - Missing
- 15,16,17,18,27,28,37,38,45,46,48
- Caries 13(D),14(M),34(B)
- Metal crown 22,23,24,25,26,35,36,44xx47
- PFM crown 42
22Panorex findings
There is an ill-defined bony destruction area
about 2x2cm in diameter over edentulous ridge of
teeth 15 and 16 .
23Differential diagnosis
- Bisphosphonate related osteomyelitis over Rt
post. Maxilla - Breast carcinoma with bone metastasis of jaw
- Osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORN)
Clinical Impression Bisphosphonate-Related
Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (BRONJ)
24Treatment Plan
- Antibiotic therapy
- Local debridement
- Advanced surgical management
2598.8.13
26- Cases review of BRONJ (KMUH)
27Cases review
- Patient source
- 14 BRONJ patients in KMUH dental dept.
- Methods chart review
- 1.bisphosponate(BP) usage
- 2.radiographic evaluation
- 3.systemic condition
- 4.oral hygiene and dental
- condition
28General data
- Sex
- Male Female 014 (female 100)
- Age
- 21-50 y/o 1 (7.1)
- 51-60 y/o 2 (14.2)
- 61-70 y/o 3 (21.3)
- 71-80 y/o 6 (42.6)
- 81-90 y/o 2 (14.2)
- Range 42-82, average 69 y/o
- Reason for BP usage
- Breast ca (BC) with bone meta or prevention
6(42.8), - Osteoporosis 8(57.2)
- DM 5 (35.5 )
29Used form of BP
Z PZ BZ
Oral
IV 3 2
OralIV 1
- O
- A 8 (oral)
- P pamidronate
30Using time of BP(months)
- 11-30m 3
- 31-50m 6
- 51-70m 1
- 71-90m 2
- 101-110m 1
- Minimum 13m (A/oral)
- Maximum103m (A/oral)
- Average 47m
31Lesion characteristics
- Bony exposure12/14(85.7)
- Lesion Numbers
0 1 2 3
1(7.1) 8(57.1) 4(28.6) 1(7.1)
Location Upper Ant. Upper premolar Upper molar Lower anterior Lower premolar Lower molar
No.() 1 (5.6) 2 (11.1) 2(11.1) 2(11.1) 4(22.2) 7(38.9)
32Symptoms and signs
Clinical characteristics
Pain 14/14 100 1
Swelling 9/14 64.3
Delayed healing wound (sockets) 11/14 78.6 3
neurosensory changes 3/14 21.4
Pus 13/14 92.9 2
Intraoral sinus tract extraoral fistula 8/14 57.1
Tooth mobility 5/14 35.7
X ray finding 14/14 100 1
33Clinical characteristics
Radiolucency RO mixed
10 (71.4) 0 4 (28.6 )
- Lesion size
- Maxium 53 cm
- Minimum 11 cm
34ONJ staging
0 1 2 3
0 1/14 (7.1) 12/14 (85.7) 2/14 (14.3)
none extraction Other
2/14 (14.3) 11/14 (78.6) 1/14 (tooth Fx) (7.1)
35lt 1m 1m 23m 12m
2 4 1 1
1130m 3150m 5170m 7190m 91110m
4 4 2 1 1
Minima 12 Maxima 94 Average 44.8
36Clincal procedures treatments
- Biopsy 7/14 (50)
- Bacterial culture 6/14 (42.9)
- Clostridium bifermentans
- staphylococus epidermidis
- propionibacterium species
- Antibiotic 14/14 (100)
- amoxicillin, clindamycin, metronidazole,
clindamycin, - Local irrigation and debridement 12/14 (85.7)
- Operation (in OR) 6/14 (42.9)
- HBO 4/14 (28.6)
37- Periodontitis 12/14 (85.7)
- ??????
Upper anterior Upper premolar Upper molar Lower anterior Lower premolar Lower molar
3 site 0 site 0 site 3 site 7 site 8 site
38conclusion
- ?????????????????????????,??????,???????
- ??????????,??????
- 11/14 (78.6)?????????????,???????????????
- ????????15????,??44.8m
- ???????????(100)???,?????(92.9)
,???????????????,????????????
39Discussion
40INDICATIONS AND BENEFITS OF BISPHOSPHONATE
- Bps. have high affinity for hydroxyapatite ,
remaining unmetabolized for long periods of time.
- During bone remodeling, the drug is taken up by
osteoblast and internalized in the cell
cytoplasm. - Reducing recruitment and proliferation of
osteoclast precursors and inducing osteoclast
apoptosis. - Bps. also have antiangiogenic properties and may
be directly tumoricidal.
As a result, bone turnover becomes profoundly
suppressed, and over time the bone shows little
physiologic remodeling.
41INDICATIONS AND BENEFITS OF BISPHOSPHONATE
THERAPY
- IV Bisphosphonates
- ?cancer-related conditions
- 1.hypercalcemia of malignancy
- 2.bone metastases (breast cancer, prostate
cancer , lung cancer) - 3.lytic lesions of multiple myeloma
- Pamidronate(Aredia), Zoledronic acid(Zometa),
Zoledronate(Reclast), Ibandronate(Boniva)
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 672-12, 2009, Suppl
42- Oral Bisphosphonates
- most prevalent and common indication ?
osteoporosis - Pagets disease of bone and osteogenesis
imperfecta of childhood. - Off-label uses
- ? Numerous other conditions where a decrease
in bone remodeling by bisphosphonates might aid
in disease management - giant cell lesions of the jaw
- pediatric osteogenesis imperfecta
- fibrous dysplasia
- Gauchers disease
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 672-12, 2009, Suppl
43Common bisphosphonates
44Relative Potency
- Etidronate (Didronel) 1
- Tiludronate (Skelide) 10
- Pamidronate (Aredia) 100
- Alendronate (Fosamax) 1,000
- Risedronate (Actonel) 10,000
- Ibandronate (Boniva) 10,000
- Zolendronic acid (Zometa) gt100,000
Relative to etidronate (a non-nitrogen-containing
bisphosphonate with relative potency of 1).
45BRONJ Case Definition
- Patients may be considered to have BRONJ
- 1. Current or previous treatment with a
bisphosphonate. - 2. Exposed bone in the maxillofacial region that
has persisted for more than 8 weeks. - 3. No history of radiation therapy to the jaws
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 672-12, 2009, Suppl
46Incidence of BRONJ
Independent epidemiological efforts from
clinicians and the International Myeloma
Foundation reported incidence estimates between
5 10.
- IV BISPHOSPHONATES
- ?0.8 to 12
- ORAL BISPHOSPHONATES
- 0.7/100,000 person-years of exposure(Merck)?underr
eporting. - Surveillance data from Australia (patients
treated weekly with alendronate ) ? 0.01 to
0.04 - 13,000 Kaiser-Permanente members( long-term oral
bps)? 0.06 - IVgtgtoral.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 672-12, 2009, Suppl
47RISK FACTORS
- 1. Drug-related risk factors
- A. Bisphosphonate potency
- zoledronate (Zometa)gt
pamidronate(Aredia)gt oral bps. - B. Duration of therapy
- 2. Local risk factors
- A. Dentoalveolar surgery 5-21-fold
increased risk in IV Bps. treated cancer
patients. - B. Local anatomy Mandible Maxilla21
- (Thin mucosa overlying bony prominences such
as tori , bony exostoses, and the mylohyoid
ridge) - C. Concomitant oral disease history of
inflammatory dental disease are at a 7-fold
increased risk.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 672-12, 2009, Suppl
48- 3. Demographic and systemic factors
- A. increasing age whites.
- B. systemic factor (renal dialysis, low
hemoglobin, obesity, and diabetes) - C. chemotherapeutic agents
(cyclophosphamide, erythropoietin, and steroids) - D. tobacco users, alcohol exposure(X)
Wessel et al - 4. Genetic factors
- ?single nucleotide polymorphisms, in the
cytochrome P450-2C gene CYP2C8
Sarasquete et al
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 672-12, 2009, Suppl
49Staging of BRONJ
- Patient at risk
- no apparent necrotic bone in asymptomatic
patients who have been treated with IV or oral
Bps. - Stage 0 no clinical evidence of necrotic bone,
present with nonspecific symptoms or findings,
include - Symptoms
- 1. Odontalgia not by an odontogenic cause
- 2. Dull, aching bone pain in the body of
the mandible - 3. Sinus pain
- 4. Altered neurosensory function
Clinical findings 1. Loosening
of teeth not explained 2. Fistula
not associated with pulpal necrosis Radiographic
findings 1. Persistence of
unremodeled bone in sockets
2. Thickening/obscuring of periodontal
ligament 3. Inferior alveolar
canal narrowing
50- Stage1 exposed and necrotic bone in patients
who are asymptomatic and have no evidence of
infection.
51- Stage2 exposed and necrotic bone in patients
with pain and clinical evidence of
infection(pain, erythema , purulent drainage.)
52- Stage3 exposed and necrotic bone in patients
with pain, infection, and one or more of the
following - Exposed necrotic bone extending beyond the region
of alveolar bone - 2. Pathologic fracture
- 3. Extraoral fistula
- 4. Oral antral/oral nasal communication
- 5. Osteolysis extending to the inferior border
of the mandible or sinus floor
53Treatment stretagy
- At risk Not require any treatment.
- Patient education.
- Stage 0
- Systemic management, including
- use of pain medication and
antibiotics - Stage 1
- Antibacterial mouth rinse(0.12
CHX) - Clinical follow-up
- No surgical treatment is
indicated.
54- Stage2
- Symptomatic treatment with oral antibiotics
- (adjusted according to culture )
- Oral antibacterial mouth rinse
- Pain control
- Superficial debridement to relieve soft tissue
irritation. - Stage3
- Antibacterial mouth rinse
- Antibiotic therapy and pain control
- Surgical debridement / resection for longer term
palliation of infection and pain. -
55Treatment strategy and advisements
- Patients About to Initiate IV
- If systemic conditions permit, initiation of Bps.
therapy should be delayed until the dental health
has been optimized. - if systemic conditions permit, until the
extraction site has mucosalized (14 to 21days) or
until adequate osseous healing has occurred. - Patients be educated as to the importance of
dental hygiene and regular dental evaluations and
specifically instructed to report any pain,
swelling , or exposed.
56- Asymptomatic Patients Receiving IV
Bisphosphonates - Avoid direct osseous injury .
- The efficacy of a drug holiday for patients
receiving yearly zoledronic acid therapy and the
appropriate timing of dentoalveolar surgery is
unknown. - Asymptomatic Patients Receiving Oral
Bisphosphonate - A. Patients are adequately informed of the small
risk of compromised bone healing. - B. The use of bone turnover marker levels, in
conjunction with a drug holiday, has been
reported as an additional tool to guide treatment
decision.
57- C. For individuals taken an oral bps. for fewer
than 3 years and have no clinical risk factors. - ?no alteration or delay in the planned surgery
is necessary. - D. For fewer than 3 years and have also taken
corticosteroids concomitantly - ? consider discontinuation of the oral bps.
for at least 3 months before after oral
surgery.
58- Patients with BRONJ
- Treatment objectives ?eliminate pain, control
infection of the soft and hard tissue, and
minimize the progression or occurrence of bone
necrosis. - Surgical debridement is variably effective
- ?Difficult to obtain a surgical margin in
early stage. - ? Surgical treatment should be delayed if
possible. - Stage 3 disease might require resection and
immediate reconstruction with a reconstruction
plate or an obturator .
59- Hyperbaric oxygen therapy has some improvement in
wound healing and long-term pain scores, but its
use as the sole treatment modality for BRONJ
cannot be supported at this time. - Other non-invasive treatment
- platelet-rich plasma, parathyroid hormone,
and bone morphogenic protein..--gtneed more study.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 6796-106, 2009, Suppl 1
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007 65 573- 80.
60- Mobile segments of bony sequestrum should be
removed . - Extraction of symptomatic teeth within exposed,
necrotic bone should be considered because it is
unlikely that extraction will exacerbate
established necrotic process. - Long-term discontinuation of IV Bps might be
beneficial. - (12 years)
- Discontinuation of oral Bps for 6-12 months may
result in either spontaneous sequestration or
resolution after debridement surgery.
61Thank you for your attention!!