Finite Difference Analysis of a flat plate - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Finite Difference Analysis of a flat plate

Description:

Evan Selin & Terrance Hess Find temperature at points throughout a square plate subject to several types of boundary conditions Boundary Conditions: 4 Constant ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: EvanS82
Learn more at: http://www.et.byu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Finite Difference Analysis of a flat plate


1
Finite Difference Analysis of a flat plate
  • Evan Selin Terrance Hess

2
Goals
  • Find temperature at points throughout a square
    plate subject to several types of boundary
    conditions
  • Boundary Conditions
  • 4 Constant Temperature surfaces
  • 3 Constant Temperatures and 1 heat flux surface
  • 2 Constant Temperatures and 2 heat flux surfaces
  • Automate the construction of solver matrices

3
Problem Set Up
  • Required Properties
  • Temperatures at each boundary
  • Conductivity, k
  • Heat flux, q (W/m2)
  • Positive flux entering plate

4
Problem Set Up
  • Equations used

5
Process
12
-4 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 -4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 -4 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 -4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 -4 2 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 1 -4 1 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 1 -4 1 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 1 0 0 1 -4 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -4 2 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 -4 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 -4 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 -4
  • Determine (x,y) position of each node
  • Create finite difference equations for desired
    set of boundary conditions
  • Build augmented matrix for solution
  • Solve matrices for temperatures at each node
    (matrix inversion)
  • Build algorithm to automatically generate
    solution matrix

Coefficient Matrix for 1 heat flux
6
Solution 1st boundary condition
  • T1 35 ?, T2 50 ?, T3 100 ?, T4 50 ?

7
Solution 2nd boundary condition
  • T1 0 ?, T2 50 ?, T3 100 ?, q4 50 W/m2,
    k 15.1 W/mK

8
Solution 3rd boundary condition
  • T1 100 ?, q2 75 W/m2, T3 50 ?, q4 -25
    W/m2, k 15.1 W/mK

9
Conclusions
  • Numerical Solution Software is very complex
  • Setting up equations is the hard part
  • Matrix increases size on order of divisions
    squared
  • Calculations take a long time for large very fine
    mesh

10
Appendix Hand Work
11
Appendix Hand Work
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com