Mixed models - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Mixed models

Description:

Mixed models Concepts We are often interested in attributing the variability that is evident in data to the various categories, or classifications, of the data. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Ying57
Category:
Tags: funny | mixed | models | office

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mixed models


1
Mixed models
2
Concepts
  • We are often interested in attributing the
    variability that is evident in data to the
    various categories, or classifications, of the
    data.
  • For example, in a study of basal cell epithelioma
    sites, patients might be classified by gender,
    age-group, and extent of exposure to sunshine.
  • Table
  • Another example

3
Fixed and random effects
  • First is the case of parameters being considered
    as fixed constants, or we call them, fixed
    effects. These are the effects attributable to a
    finite set of levels of a factor that occur in
    the data and which are there because we are
    interested in them.
  • The second case corresponds to parameters being
    considered random, we call them random effects.
    These are attributable to a usually finite set of
    levels of a factor, of which only a random sample
    are deemed to occur in the data.
  • For example, four loaves of bread are taken from
    each of six batches of bread baked at three
    different temperatures.

4
Fixed effect model
  • Example 1 Placebo and a drug
  • Diggle et al. (1994) describe a clinical
    trial to treat epileptics with the drug
    Progabide. We consider a response which is the
    number of seizures after patients were randomly
    allocated to either the placebo or the drug.
  • Model
  • There are the only two treatment being used, and
    in using them there is no thought for any other
    treatments. This is the concept of fixed effects.

5
  • Example 2 Comprehension of humor
  • A recent study of the comprehension of humor
    involved showing three types of cartoons (visual
    only, linguistic only, and visual-linguistic
    combined) to two groups of adolescent (normal and
    learning disabled).
  • Suppose the adolescents record scores of 1
    through 9, with 9 representing extremely funny
    and 1 representing not funny at all.
  • Model
  • Because each of the same three cartoon types is
    shown to each of the two adolescent groups, this
    is an example of two crossed factors, cartoon
    type and adolescent group.

6
  • Example 3 Four dose levels of a drug
  • Suppose we have a clinical trial in which a drug
    is administered at four different dose levels.
  • Model
  • The four dose levels are fixed effects because
    they are used in the clinical trial and are the
    only dose levels being studied.
  • They are the doses on which our attention is
    fixed.

7
Random effect models
  • Example 4 Clinics
  • Suppose that the clinical trial of example 3 was
    conducted at 20 different clinics in New York
    City. Consider just the patients receiving the
    dose level numbered 1.
  • Model
  • It is not unreasonable to think of those clinics
    as a random sample of clinics from some
    distribution of clinics, perhaps all the clinics
    in New York City.
  • Note model here is essentially the same
    algebraically as in example 3. However, the
    underlying assumptions are different.
  • Characteristic of random effects they can be
    used as the basis for making inferences about
    populations from which they have come.
  • The random effect is a random variable and the
    data will be useful for making inference about
    the variation among clinics and for predicting
    which clinic is likely to have the best reduction
    of seizures.

8
Properties of random effects in linear mixed
models
  • Notation

9
Example 5 Ball bearings and calipers
  • Consider the problem of manufacturing ball
    bearings to a specified diameter that must be
    achieved with a high degree of accuracy.
  • Suppose that each of 100 bal bearings is measured
    with each of 20 micrometer calipers, all of the
    same brand.
  • Model
  • Two random effects 100 ball bearings being
    considered as a random sample from the production
    line and 20 calipers considered as a random
    sample from some population of available
    calipers.
  • An additional property

10
Example 6 Medications and clinics
  • Considering four dose levels of example 3 were
    used in all 20 clinics of example 4, such that in
    each clinic each patient was randomly assigned to
    one of the dose levels.
  • Model
  • Since the doses are the only doses considered, it
    is a fixed effect.
  • But the clinics that have been used were chosen
    randomly, so it is a random effect.
  • The interaction between a fixed effect and random
    effect is still a random effect.
  • So this is a mixed model.

11
Example 7 Drying methods and fabrics
  • Devore and Peck (1993) report on a study for
    assessing the smoothness of washed fabric after
    drying.
  • Each of nine different fabrics were subjected to
    five methods of drying (line drying, line drying
    after brief machine tumbling, line drying after
    tumbling with softener, line drying with air
    movement, and machine drying)
  • Method of drying is a (fixed or random) effect?
  • Fabric is a fixed or random effect?

12
Longitudinal data
  • A common use of mixed models is in the analysis
    of longitudinal data which are defined as data
    collected on each subject on two or more
    occasions.
  • Methods of analysis have typically been developed
    for the situation where the number of occasions
    is small compared to the number of subjects.
  • Reasons for using longitudinal analysis
  • To increase sensitivity by making within-subject
    comparisons
  • To study changes through time
  • To use subject efficiently once they are enrolled
    in the study.

13
  • The decision as to whether a factor should be
    fixed or random in a longitudinal study is often
    made on the basis of which effects vary with
    subjects.
  • That is, subjects are regarded as a random sample
    of a larger population of subjects and hence any
    effects that are not constant for all subjects
    are regarded as random.
  • For example suppose we are testing a blood
    pressure drug at each of two doses and a control
    dose (dose0) for each subject.
  • Individuals clearly have different average blood
    pressures, so our model should have a separate
    intercept for each subject.
  • Similarly, the response of each subject to
    increasing dosage of the drug might vary from
    subject to subject, so we model the slope for
    dose separately for each subject.
  • Also assume that blood pressure changes gradually
    with age.
  • Model

14
Fixed or random?
  • A multicenter clinical trial is designed to judge
    the effectiveness of a new surgical procedure.
  • If the procedure will eventually become a
    widespread procedure practiced at a number of
    clinics, the we would like to select a
    representative collection clinics in which to
    test the procedure and we would then regard the
    clinics are a random effect.
  • However, suppose we change the situation
    slightly. Now assume that the surgical procedure
    is highly specialized and will be performed
    mainly at a very few referral hospitals (Assume
    that all of those referral hospitals are enrolled
    in the trial). In such case

15
Making a decision
  • The decision as to whether certain effects are
    fixed or random is not immediately obvious.
  • An important question is are the levels of the
    factor going to be considered a random sample
    from a population of values which have a
    distribution?
  • If yes, then the effects are to be
    considered as random effects if no, then
    fixed.
  • When inferences will be made about a distribution
    of effects from which those in the data are
    considered to be a random sample, the effects are
    considered as random when inferences are going
    to be confined to the effects in the model, the
    effects are considered fixed.
  • Another way is to ask the questions Do the
    levels of a factor come from a probability
    distribution? and Is there enough information
    about a factor to decide that the levels of it in
    the data are like a random sample?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com