Who would you choose? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Who would you choose?

Description:

Who would you choose? You re representing a doctor, charged with murder under a similar statute,because she, at the request of her patient, suffering from early ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: JanetR87
Learn more at: http://www.umass.edu
Category:
Tags: choose | reasoning

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Who would you choose?


1
Who would you choose?
  • Youre representing a doctor, charged with murder
    under a similar statute,because she, at the
    request of her patient, suffering from early
    stages of alzeimers, helped him commit suicide by
    injecting him with cyanide
  • Would it be different if the doctor prosecuted
    for performing abortion -16 weeks?

2
LEGAL REASONING
  • How judges (and lawyers) argue from past cases
    and deal with the doctrine of stare
    decisis-precedent
  • How judges interpret statutes
  • How judges (and other legal actors) exercise
    discretion
  • All of these offer insights into how the
    day-to-day outcomes in law emerge

3
Law and Official Discretion
  • The judging process and the judges
    personality-Jerome Frank
  • The process of judging is psychologically
    driven-contrary to prevailing notions that it is
    an objective process
  • Starts with an intuitive hunch and then finds
    evidence to support it.
  • Hunch arises from unconscious and conscious
    sources

4
Is legal reasoning objective?
  • Llewellyn argues that legal reasoning is more
    stable and predictable-I.e. analysis of precedent
  • Factors beyond the psychological affect legal
    reasoning and outcomes, I.e. environmental
    factors -moral, political, economic-Scottsboro
    Boys
  • Does the notion of intuition undercut the notion
    of professionalism-the basis of the legal
    profession?

5
Law and Official Discretion
  • The judging process and the judges
    personality-Jerome Frank
  • The process of judging is psychologically
    driven-contrary to prevailing notions that it is
    an objective process
  • Starts with an intuitive hunch and then finds
    evidence to support it.
  • Hunch arises from unconscious and conscious
    sources

6
Examples-applying discretion
  • Forgery case
  • Attempted murder
  • Rape

7
Exam Review
  • Review session tonight
  • Bring 2 pencil to class
  • Know the names of cases and the names of authors
    of the readings
  • Know facts, issues, rulings, reasoning and how
    precedent was operating
  • Know, stare decisis, coverture, statutory
    constriction (strict and loose), names of judges
    in Speluncean Explorers and their philosophy
  • Lawyer/client relationship
  • Theories of adversary process
  • lecture and readings
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com