Title: BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO
1BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO CLOSED CAPTURE-RECAPTURE
METHODS
2Workshop objectives
- Basic understanding of capture-recapture
- Estimators
- Sample designs
- Uses and assumptions
3Detectabilityand abundance estimation
N true abundance C catch p probability of
capture E(C) pN
4Incomplete capture Inference
Inferences about N require inferences about p
5Estimating abundance with capture probability
known 0.5 (or 50)
- If you ignore p then C 2 is biased
- Usually we have to collect other data to estimate
p!
6Closed Population Estimation
- Parameters
- Abundance
- Capture probability
- Population closed
- No gains or losses in the study area
- Replicate samples used to estimate N, p
7Commonly Used EstimatorsLincoln-Petersen/Schnabe
l/etc.
- Design
- Animals caught
- Unmarked animals in sample given (or have)
unique marks - Marks on any marked animals recorded
- Release marked animals into population
- Resample at subsequent occasions
- Minimum two sampling periods (capture and
recapture) - (Ideally) a relatively short interval between
periods - Not during migration, harvest period, other
period with - significant gains, losses, movement
- Must be long enough to generate recaptures
8Closed Population Estimators
- Key Assumptions
- Population is closed
- (no birth/death/immigration/emigration)
- Animal captures are independent
- All animals are available for capture
- Marks are not lost or overlooked
- L-P and Schnabel
- assume equal p (never ever possible)
- Probability of recapture not affected by previous
capture
9Violations of Assumptions
- Closure violation
- Mortality or emigration during sampling
- Unbiased estimate of N at first sample time
- Immigration or birth
- Unbiased estimate of N at last sample
time - Both
- Valid inferences not possible
10Violations of Assumptions
All animals are not available for capture -
underestimate N - overestimate p
11Violations of Assumptions
- Equal capture probability (when assumed)
- Differences (heterogeneity) among individuals
- Underestimate abundance
- Trap response trap-shy
- Overestimate N
- Underestimate p
- Trap happy
- Underestimate N
- Overestimate p
12Potential Violations of Assumptions
- Tag loss
- Lost between sampling periods
- Underestimate p
- Overestimate N
- Overlooked or incorrectly recorded
- Underestimate p
- Overestimate N
- Effect can be eliminated or minimized by
double-tagging
13Variance of abundance estimate
Depends on Variance in true N Capture
probability Variance in estimated p Affected by
sample size Sample size Number of marked
animals Number of capture occasions
14Rule of thumb
- Number of animals captured each occasion (C)
determines precision of estimates of N - If capture probabilities low or true abundance
low - More effort in fewer occasions
- Increases occasion specific p
- Increases C
15Closed population estimators
- Definitions
- pt probability of first capture sampling
occasion t - ct probability of recapture sampling occasion
t1 (dont confuse with big C) - N population size
- Note there are t-1 estimates possible for c
16Closed population estimators
- Definitions
- If there is no effect of first capture on
recapture probability - - no trap happy
- - no trap shy, etc.
- pt1 ct
17Capture (encounter) histories
- H1 101
- Verbal description individual was captured on
first and third sample occasion, not captured on
second occasion - Mathematical depiction
- P(H1 101) p1(1-c1)c2
18Capture (encounter) histories
- H1 111
- Verbal description individual was captured on
all three occasions - Mathematical depiction
- P(H1 111) p1c1c2
19Capture (encounter) histories
- H1 001
- Verbal description individual was captured on
first and third sample occasion, not captured on
second occasion - Mathematical depiction
- P(H1 001) (1-p1)(1-p2)p3
20Capture (encounter) histories
100 p1(1-c1)(1-c2)
010 (1-p1)p2(1-c2)
001 (1-p1)(1-p2)p3
110 p1c1(1-c2)
101 p1(1-c1)c2
011 (1-p1)p2c2
111 p1c1c2
21Capture (encounter) histories
H Capture and recapture equal differ in time Capture and recapture equal across time
100 p1(1-c1)(1-c2) p1(1-p2)(1-p3) p(1-p)2
010 (1-p1)p2(1-c2) (1-p1)p2(1-p3) (1-p)p(1-p) or p(1-p)2
001 (1-p1)(1-p2)p3 (1-p1)(1-p2)p3 (1-p)2 p
110 p1c1(1-c2) p1p2(1-p3) p2(1-p)
101 p1(1-c1)c2 p1(1-p2)p3 p(1-p)p or p2(1-p)
011 (1-p1)p2c2 (1-p1)p2p3 (1-p)p2
111 p1c1c2 p1p2p3 p3
22Huggins version of CR estimator
23Why Covariates?
Capture probability known to be related
to species, body size, habitat
characteristics More efficient means of
accounting for heterogeneity e.g., assume p
varies through time (5 time periods) due to
differences in stream discharge Number of
parameters time varying model 5 Number
parameters p in f(discharge) 2 Effects model
selection AIC -2LogL 2K Danger of over
parameterization (more parameters than data)
24Frequently encountered problem
- I dont have enough marked and/or recaptured
individuals - Make sure closure assumption not violated
- Include data from other years/locations to
- estimate p for poor recapture year (Huggins)
- Bayesian hierarchical approaches
-
p?
p1
p2
25Frequently encountered problem
Lake Sturgeon in Muskegon River, MI
Year Year
Catch Statistic 1 2 3 4
Total Gill Net Hours 3030 2250 1247 1852
Total marked adults 13 10 8 15
Recaptured adults 8 5 1 2
Schnabel Estimate (95 CL) each year seperate 24 (12-74) 15 (9-45) --- ---
Estimate (95 CL) modeled together f(soak time, size) 22 (16-45) 16 (12-37) 45 (14-247) 18 (16-39)
26Double Sampling
Disadvantages of capture recapture approaches
Can be labor/time intensive!!
But.double sampling can reduce effort
Capture recapture
Normal sampling
Estimate p and adjust data
27Mark-resight(will not cover in this course)
- Estimate population size
- Resighting marked and unmarked individuals
- Requires known number of marks
- But version available if marks unknown (not
recommended) - Used terrestrial applications but potential fish
uses - snorkeling if marks detectable
- weir or trap where unmarked fish returned
unmarked - Marks
- Batch marked
- Individually identifiable
- Open and closed versions
28BREAK! then ON TO MARK