Methods - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Methods

Description:

Comparison of %SOM and pH Baseline Measurements at the AJLC Annex Soil analysis of an urban landscape to evaluate its potential in supporting an educational low-input ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: Forres3
Category:
Tags: biology | methods | soil

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Methods


1
Soil analysis of an urban landscape to evaluate
its potential in supporting an educational
low-input, high-yield biofuel garden. Elsa D.
Hoffman, Georgia W. Skoirchet, and Laila S.
Williams Systems Ecology (ENVS316) Fall 2008
Methods We sampled various points on the Annex
landscape to determine baseline levels of pH,
soil organic matter (SOM), and soil texture. The
north turf was partitioned into 5 x 5.5 meter
plots (sites A through L) and the south turf into
sites M and N, where we sampled for pH and SOM
as indicated in the figure below. We sampled for
soil texture at a lower resolution at sites
marked by stars and numbered 1-6. Standard
methods were used for soil analyses (Klute,
1986). Findings
  • Introduction
  • In light of the non-renewable and environmentally
    degrading nature of
  • fossil fuels, biofuels are becoming an
    increasingly worthwhile alternative
  • fuel source (Giampietro et al., 1997). Biofuel
    results from the conversion of
  • plant biomass to energy, a process that has a net
    CO2 emission of zero
  • (Kamm, 2004). A biofuel is considered any type of
    fuel that can be
  • produced from a biomass substrate and that can be
    either mixed with or
  • replace fossil fuels (Giampietro et al, 1997).
    Perennial grasses such as
  • Panicum virgatum (switchgrass) and Miscanthus
    giganteus and hardwood
  • trees such as Salix spp. (willow) and Populus
    spp. (poplar), are considered
  • energy crops (Kamm, 2004). These plants can grow
    in temperate to warm
  • climates, yield high amounts of biomass relative
    to corn and soybean and
  • promote soil fertility through carbon
    sequestration (Yates, 2008).
  • The largest pool for terrestrial carbon is found
    in soil (Sciencedaily, 2008).
  • Therefore, when selecting biofuel species it is
    important to consider the
  • plants' interactions with the soil in which they
    grow, including their ability
  • to sequester carbon. Soil organic matter (SOM) in
    particular is an
  • pH ranged from 6 to 7.8 within sample sites A-N,
    with an overall average of 7.35, which is
    slightly basic. Miscanthus and switchgrass have
    been shown to grow well in this pH range (DEFRA,
    2007). SOM ranged from 4.6 to 11.4 with an
    average of 6.5 over the entire landscape.
    Samples J, M and N are considerably higher values
    which could be due to sampling mishaps.
  • Recommendations
  • Miscanthus Because Miscanthus grows taller than
    switchgrass, we recommend planting it to the
    north of the switchgrass plots.
  • Panicum virgatum (switchgrass) We recommend
    planting monocrops and polycrops of various
    switchgrass species, including some Ohio natives.
  • Salix spp. (willow) Willows, at maturity, are
    tall and can shade out shorter plants we suggest
    planting them on the perimeter to define the
    gardens boundaries and to be an example of a
    woody biofuel crop.
  • Populus spp. (poplar) Due to the same size
    issues as the willows, we suggest planting poplar
    trees only on the perimeter of the garden.

(DEFRA, 2007 Parish, 2005 OSU Abrahamson,
1998 Mercker).
Soil texture is an important determinant of both
drainage and nutrient conditions. Using the soil
texture data (percentages of clay, silt, and
sand) and a soil class triangle, we found that
the samples 1-6 were clay, clay loam, clay loam,
clay, clay loam and silty clay loam respectively.
The average soil texture for the entire
landscape was 39 clay, 31 silt and 30 sand.
Miscanthus, several species of switchgrass,
poplar, and willow can tolerate growing in all
these soils (DEFRA, 2007 Parish, 2005 OSU
Abrahamson, 1998).
  • Literature Cited (continued)
  • Mercker, D. Biofuels Initiative Short Rotation
    Woody Crops for Biofuel. The University of
    Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station (US)
    cited 2008 Dec 7 Available from
    www.utextension.utk.edu/publications/spfiles/SP702
    -C.pdf
  • Mixed Prairie Grasses Better Source of Biofuel
    Than Corn Ethanol and Soybean Biodiesel. National
    Science Foundation Press Release Internet 2006
    Dec 7. cited 2008 Dec 7. Available from
    http//www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id1082
    06.
  • Ohio Trees Populus (Poplar). Ohio State
    University Extention Service (US) cited 2008
    Dec 7
  • Available from http//ohioline.osu.edu/b700/b700_
    20.html
  • Parish, D., and Fike, J. 2005. The Biology and
    Agronomy of Switchgrass for Biofuels. Critical
    Reviews in Plant Sciences. 24423-459.
  • Planting and Growing Miscanthus Best Practice
    Guidelines. Department for Environment and Rural
    Affairs (UK) updated 2007 Jul cited 2008 Dec
    7 Available from www.defra.gov.uk/erdp/pdfs/ecs
    /miscanthus-guide.pdf.
  • Replacing Corn With Perennial Grasses Improves
    Carbon Footprint of Biofuels. ScienceDaily
    Internet. 2008 Dec 5 cited 2008 Dec 7.
    Available from http//www.sciencedaily.com/releas
    es/2008/12/081202133228.htm.
  • Yates, D. Miscanthus can meet U.S. biofuels goal
    using less land than corn or switchgrass. News
    Bureau University of Illinois At
    Urbana-Champaign Internet. 2008 Jul 30. cited
    2008 Dec 7 Available from http//news.illinois.
    edu/NEWS/08/0730miscanthus.html.
  • Literature Cited
  • Abrahamson, L., Robison, D., Volk, T., et al.
    1998. Sustainability and environmental issues
    associated with willow bioenergy development in
    New York (USA). Biomass Bioenergy. 1517-22.
  • Giampietro, M., Ulgiati, S., and Pimentel, D.
    1997. Feasibility of Large-Scale Biofuel
    Production Does an enlargement of scale change
    the picture?. Bioscience. 47587-600.
  • Kamm, J. 2004. A New Class of Plants for a
    Biofuel Feedstock Energy Crop. Applied
    Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 11355-70.
  • Kintisch, E. 2008. Sowing the Seeds for High
    Energy Plants. Science 25478.
  • Klute A. 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis Part I.
    American Society of Agronomy. Madison, Wisconsin.
    404-411.
  • Klute A. 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis Part
    III. American Society of Agronomy. Madison,
    Wisconsin. 485-487, 1004-1006.
  • Lewandowski, I., Clifton-Brown, J., Scurlock,
    J., et. al. 2000. Miscanthus European Experience
    With a Novel Energy Crop. Biomass and Bioenergy.
    19209-227.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com