Active surveillance and decolonization of MRSA carriers as a tool for MRSA bacteremia reduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Active surveillance and decolonization of MRSA carriers as a tool for MRSA bacteremia reduction

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Last modified by: EMEK Created Date: 1/1/1601 12:00:00 AM Document presentation format: Other titles – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:215
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: mednetCo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Active surveillance and decolonization of MRSA carriers as a tool for MRSA bacteremia reduction


1
Active surveillance and decolonization of MRSA
carriers as a tool for MRSA bacteremia reduction
  • B. CHAZAN, N. TEITLER, R. COLODNER, O. NITZAN, H.
    EDELSTEIN, R. RAZ

Ha Emek Medical Center Afula Israel
2
Abstract
  • Background
  • Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus
    aureus (MRSA) is endemic in Israel's hospitals.
    Patients (pts) colonized with MRSA are a
    reservoir for spreading the bacteria and self
    infection. Active surveillance (AS) is an
    infection control measure used in order to reduce
    MRSA invasive infection.
  • Since 2001 we conducted an-ongoing bacteremia (B)
    surveillance in our hospital, and noticed a
    continuous rise in MRSA B rates 22.9, 16.7,
    30.8, 32.7, 36.8 (2001 to 2005).
  • Material and methods
  • The study was conducted at the HaEmek Medical
    Center, a community teaching hospital in northern
    Israel serving a population of 500,000
    inhabitants.
  • An AS of MRSA carriers was implemented since
    2004. Risk groups for MRSA colonization at
    admission were defined long term care facility
    residents (LTCFR) and pts. hospitalized in the
    prior 3 months.
  • Nostrils, peri-anal and armpit cultures were
    obtained, and contact isolation was implemented
    pending results. Decolonization (DC) protocol was
    applied to MRSA carriers.
  • Results
  • MRSA carriers were found in 25 of LTCFR, 20 and
    33 of readmission pts. (from our other
    hospitals respectively). gt90 of the carriers
    were identified by nose and peri-anal cultures
    without additional benefit of armpits cultures,
    thus policy was changed to nose and peri-anal
    swabs alone. DC procedures were carried out in
    pts during hospitalization.
  • Following the intervention the rate of MRSA B
    decline from 32.7 (2004) to 10.3 (2007)
    (plt0.01).
  • Conclusions
  • Ongoing B surveillance is an excellent tool to
    identify changes in antimicrobial
    susceptibilities
  • Nasal and peri-anal swab cultures identified most
    MRSA carriers
  • Contact isolation and DC of MRSA carriers
    contributed to the decrease of MRSA B rates
  • Infection control measures are mandatory in order
    to keep lower levels of MRSA B

3
Background
  • Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    (MRSA) is endemic in Israel's hospitals. Patients
    colonized with MRSA are a reservoir for spreading
    the bacteria and become infected themselves.
  • Active surveillance is one of the infection
    control measures that aim to reduce the level of
    MRSA distribution and invasive infection.
  • Since 2001 we conducted an-ongoing bacteremia
    surveillance in our hospital, and noticed a
    continuous rise in MRSA B rates 22.9, 16.7,
    30.8, 32.7, 36.8 (2001 to 2005).

4
Objectives
  • Active surveillance to identify patients
    colonized with Methicillin resistant
    Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at admission.
  • To implement a policy of
  • Contact isolation of high risk patients for MRSA
    colonization (until culture results were
    obtained)
  • Decolonization of patients with MRSA positive
    cultures .
  • To evaluate if a search and destroy policy is
    an effective tool to stop the increase in MRSA
    bacteremia rates.

5
Methods
  • The study was conducted at the HaEmek Medical
    Center, a community teaching hospital in northern
    Israel serving a population of 500,000
    inhabitants.
  • An active surveillance of MRSA carriers was
    implemented since 2004.
  • Risk groups for MRSA colonization at admission
    were defined
  • Long term care facility residents.
  • Prior hospitalized in in another hospital (3
    months).
  • Readmission from our hospital ( 3 months).
  • Nostrils, peri-anal and armpit cultures were
    obtained.
  • Contact isolation in the patientws room was
    implemented pending results.
  • Decolonization protocol was applied to MRSA
    carriers
  • Nasal Mupirocin twice daily for 5 days in each
    nostril
  • Daily shower with chlorhexidine gluconate 4
  • All consecutives episodes of Staphylococcus
    aureus bacteremia (MSSA and MRSA) since 1.1.2001
    until 31.12.2007 were registered.

6
Results
  • The rate of MRSA colonization was
  • 25 in long term care facility residents.
  • 20 in readmitted patients.
  • 33 in patients hospitalized previously in
    another hospital.
  • Nose and perianal cultures identified more than
    90 of MRSA carriers, while armpits did not
    improve the sensitivity of the surveillance.
  • No significant changes were observed in the rate
    of S. aureus bacteremia (11.2 in 2001, 9.2 in
    2007).
  • Decontamination procedures were carried out in
    all hospitalized patients identified as MRSA
    carriers.
  • Following the intervention the rate of MRSA
    bacteremia decline from 32.7 (2004) to 10.3
    (2007) (plt0.01).

7
Frequency of bacteremia by year 2001-2007 all
isolates Vs. S. aureus (MSSA and MRSA) (N.S. for
all)
8
Frequency of S. aureus bacteremia by year
2001-2007 of MSSA Vs MRSA isolates
p 0.01 between 2004 and 2007
9
Conclusions
  • Ongoing bacteremia surveillance is an excellent
    tool to identify changes in antimicrobial
    susceptibilities
  • No significant changes were found in the
    frequency of bacteremic isolates as in the rate
    of S. aureus bacteremia through seven years
    surveillance.
  • The rate of MRSA colonization was lower in
    readmitted patients, higher in long term care
    facility residents and highest in patients coming
    from another hospital.
  • Nasal and peri-anal swab cultures identified most
    MRSA carriers.
  • A policy of search and destroy (contact
    isolation and decontamination of MRSA carriers)
    contributed not only to halt the increasing rate
    in MRSA bacteremic isolates but to decrease this
    worrisome trend.
  • Infection control measures are mandatory in order
    to keep these lower levels of MRSA bacteremia.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com