Life is all about choices - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Life is all about choices

Description:

Title: The Belmont Report Author: jmwinste Last modified by: Jeanne Winstead Created Date: 10/9/2002 10:02:54 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:197
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 56
Provided by: jmwi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Life is all about choices


1
Life is all about choices
Human Subjects Research Ethics
2
Welcome to the Ethical Time Machine
  • Join me as we journey back to an age where
  • The field of Medicine comes into its own, and
  • Optimism, Progress, and Science sit on the Throne
    of GOD

All Aboard!
3
First Human Heart Transplant Year - 1967
Penicillin - 1940
First Test Tube Baby Born 1978
sulfa drugs - 1932
First successful Open Heart Surgery - 1952 
First Electrocardiogram 1903
4
20th Century Research Ethics Milestones
Back to the Future
1991
Common Rule
Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations
1981
1979
Belmont Report
1972 Syphilis Study Exposed
1966 The Beecher Article (NEJM)
1964
Declaration of Helsinki
Milgram Study
Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act
1962
The Thalomide Tragedy
1947
Nuremberg Code
US Human Radiation Experiments
The Nazi Experiments
1932 The Syphilis Study Begins
Trigger Events
5
Nazi Germany at beginning of World War II
  • Was the most scientifically and technologically
    advanced country in the world,
  • Had a proposed code of research ethics,
  • Supported midwifery, nutrition programs,
  • ecology, public health, human genetics, cancer,
    radiation, and asbestos research

6
However
  • The Nazis also
  • exploited peoples trust in the medical community
  • by performing unethical experiments
  • on populations they discriminated against.

7
Nazi Battlefield Medicine Experiments
  • 1942 High altitude or low pressure experiments
    at Dachau
  • 1942-1943 Freezing experiments at Dachau
  • 1942-1945 Malaria experiments at Dachau
  • 1943-1944 Phosphorus burn experiments at
    Buchenwald
  • 1944 Seawater experiment at Dachau

8
At Ravensbruck
  • women were shot or slashed on the legs.
  • The wounds stuffed with glass, dirt, and bacteria
    cultures and sewn shut
  • then treated with experimental anti-infective
    agents.

9
20th Century Research Ethics Milestones
Back to the Future
1991
Common Rule
Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations
1981
1979
Belmont Report
1972 Syphilis Study Exposed
1966 The Beecher Article (NEJM)
1964
Declaration of Helsinki
Milgram Study
Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act
1962
The Thalomide Tragedy
1947
Nuremberg Code
US Human Radiation Experiments
The Nazi Experiments
1932 The Syphilis Study Begins
Trigger Events
10
The Nuremberg Code
  • Key Ideas
  • Voluntary Informed Consent
  • Right of the Subject to Withdraw from the
    Experiment at any Time
  • A Human Subject Cannot be Sacrificed for the
    Greater Good of Science
  • Investigator must terminate the experiment at any
    time the well-being of his/her subjects is
    threatened.

11
20th Century Research Ethics Milestones
Back to the Future
1991
Common Rule
Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations
1981
1979
Belmont Report
1972 Syphilis Study Exposed
1966 The Beecher Article (NEJM)
1964
Declaration of Helsinki
Milgram Study
Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act
1962
The Thalomide Tragedy
1947
Nuremberg Code
US Human Radiation Experiments
The Nazi Experiments
1932 The Syphilis Study Begins
Trigger Events
12
Human Radiation Experiments
  • In 1994, President Clinton appointed the Advisory
    Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE)
  • To investigate unethical experiments conducted by
    our government during WWII and the Cold War Era

http//tis.eh.doe.gov/ohre/roadmap/achre/
13
ACHRES Investigation Revealed
  • testing on soldiers
  • feeding radioactive cereal to teenagers at a
    school for the mentally retarded,
  • irradiating the testicles of prison inmates,
  • injecting plutonium into hospital patients,
  • intentional releases of radiation into the
    environment

14
4000 human radiation experiments conducted
  • In a two prong effort by the US to
  • Provide for National Security
  • Provide medical studies to improve human health
  • Too often deceptively, secretly, and/or without
    informed consent

15
Testimony before ACHRE, 1995
  • My mother, Jan Stadt, had a number, HP-8. She
    was injected with plutonium March 9, 1946. She
    was 41 years old, and I was 11 years old at the
    time. My mother and father were never told or
    asked for any kind of consent to have this done
    to them.
  • My mother went in (to the hospital) for
    scleroderma...and a duodenal ulcer, and somehow
    she got pushed over into this lab where these
    monsters were.
  • Milton Stadt
  • Son of subject in the Rochester University
    experiments

16
20th Century Research Ethics Milestones
Back to the Future
1991
Common Rule
Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations
1981
1979
Belmont Report
1972 Syphilis Study Exposed
1966 The Beecher Article (NEJM)
1964
Declaration of Helsinki
Milgram Study
Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act
1962
The Thalomide Tragedy
1947
Nuremberg Code
US Human Radiation Experiments
The Nazi Experiments
1932 The Syphilis Study Begins
Trigger Events
17
The Thalidomide Tragedy
18
Thalidomide was prescribed for morning sickness
  • Approved in Europe in late 1950s but not in US
    due to diligent efforts by one USDA doctor.
  • However as was common practice among
    pharmaceutical companies
  • some U.S. doctors were supplied samples
  • and paid to study its safety and efficacy.

19
It was subsequently discovered that
  • Thalidomide causes severe deformities in babies
  • and its effects are even passed on to later
    generations.

20
20th Century Research Ethics Milestones
Back to the Future
1991
Common Rule
Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations
1981
1979
Belmont Report
1972 Syphilis Study Exposed
1966 The Beecher Article (NEJM)
1964
Declaration of Helsinki
Milgram Study
Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act
1962
The Thalomide Tragedy
1947
Nuremberg Code
US Human Radiation Experiments
The Nazi Experiments
1932 The Syphilis Study Begins
Trigger Events
21
1962 Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act
  • Looked at practices of pharmaceutical companies
  • Required more testing before widespread use
  • Informed consent from patients receiving
    experimental drugs

22
20th Century Research Ethics Milestones
Back to the Future
1991
Common Rule
Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations
1981
1979
Belmont Report
1972 Syphilis Study Exposed
1966 The Beecher Article (NEJM)
1964
Declaration of Helsinki
Milgram Study
Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act
1962
The Thalomide Tragedy
1947
Nuremberg Code
US Human Radiation Experiments
The Nazi Experiments
1932 The Syphilis Study Begins
Trigger Events
23
Socio-Behavioral Studies
  • Milgrams Study of Obedience to Authority
  • Subjects coerced into feeling they had seriously
    injured somebody
  • The Stanford Prison Experiment
  • What happens when you put good people in an evil
    place?
  • http//www.prisonexp.org/
  • Radiation experiments on soldiers
  • Fear

24
20th Century Research Ethics Milestones
Back to the Future
1991
Common Rule
Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations
1981
1979
Belmont Report
1972 Syphilis Study Exposed
1966 The Beecher Article (NEJM)
1964
Declaration of Helsinki
Milgram Study
Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act
1962
The Thalomide Tragedy
1947
Nuremberg Code
US Human Radiation Experiments
The Nazi Experiments
1932 The Syphilis Study Begins
Trigger Events
25
Declaration of Helsinki 1964
  • Research with humans should be based on the
    results from laboratory and animal
    experimentation
  • Research protocols should be reviewed by an
    independent committee prior to initiation
  • Informed consent from research participants is
    necessary
  • Research should be conducted by
    medically/scientifically qualified individuals
  • Risks should not exceed benefits

26
20th Century Research Ethics Milestones
Back to the Future
1991
Common Rule
Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations
1981
1979
Belmont Report
1972 Syphilis Study Exposed
1966 The Beecher Article (NEJM)
1964
Declaration of Helsinki
Milgram Study
Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act
1962
The Thalomide Tragedy
1947
Nuremberg Code
US Human Radiation Experiments
The Nazi Experiments
1932 The Syphilis Study Begins
Trigger Events
27
Dr. Beecher began his famous article in the NEJM
by stating
  • medicine is sound, and most progress is
    soundly attained

28
He then went on to describe
  • 22 examples of research studies
  • with controversial ethics
  • conducted by reputable researchers and
  • published in major journals.
  • "Until this article we assumed that unethical
    research could only occur in a depraved regime
    like the Nazis.
  • Robert J. Levine, MD

29
20th Century Research Ethics Milestones
Back to the Future
1991
Common Rule
Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations
1981
1979
Belmont Report
1972 Syphilis Study Exposed
1966 The Beecher Article (NEJM)
1964
Declaration of Helsinki
Milgram Study
Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act
1962
The Thalomide Tragedy
1947
Nuremberg Code
US Human Radiation Experiments
The Nazi Experiments
1932 The Syphilis Study Begins
Trigger Events
30
Syphilis the AIDS of an earlier time
  • Untreated, it can lead to
  • severe heart disease,
  • brain damage,
  • paralysis, and
  • death.
  • The problem was, until 1907, no one could treat
    it.

31
Then Nobel Prize-winning microbiologist Paul
Ehrlich discovered Salvarsan
  • an arsenic-based compound.
  • It was the first chemotherapy.

32
The 1920s was a progressive era in medicine
  • Armed with confidence and the Scientific Method,
  • Public Health Service officials were determined
  • to control syphilis in their time.
  • They set up free treatment clinics throughout the
    south,
  • including Macon county, Alabama,
  • home to the Tuskegee Institute.

33
But in 1932, the funding for treatment ran out.
  • While writing the final report,
  • Dr. Taliaferro Clark, head of the PHS Venereal
    Disease Division
  • conceived an idea to salvage the study
  • Macon county offered an unparalleled opportunity
  • for the study of the effect of untreated
    syphilis
  • in the Negro male.

34
The Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro male
(1932 1972)
  • was only supposed to last a year
  • but then Dr. Raymond Vondelehr
  • advocated continuing the study
  • to get autopsies.
  • Autopsies would confirm clinical observation
  • and therefore greatly contribute
  • to the scientific reliability
  • of the studys findings.

35
Bringing them to Autopsy
  • By the time Jean Heller broke the story
  • in the Washington Star in 1972
  • The experiment had gone on for 40 years.
  • During all this time, it was no secret
  • to the wider medical community.
  • Results of the study had been published
  • in well known medical journals.
  • Yet no one ever questioned the study.

36
399 Participants
  • None were ever told they had syphilis.
  • None were ever offered a cure
  • even when penicillin became available in 1943.
  • Researchers had even interfered
  • to keep subjects from getting penicillin
  • so the study could continue.

37
Nothing Learned will Prevent, Find, or Cure a
Single Case
  • 28 men died of syphilis
  • 100 men died from related complications
  • at least 40 wives were infected
  • 19 children had contracted the disease at birth
  • a whole peoples trust was shattered

38
Bad Blood
  • Macon county residents were very poor.
  • They lived and died without medical care
  • because they could not afford it.
  • They didnt distinguish between syphilis
  • and a host of other maladies
  • which they called bad blood.
  • They trusted the government doctors and
  • they traveled great lengths
  • to get a little free medical care.
  • They were told they were being treated for bad
    blood.

39
I, like most everybody else,
  • was horrified at the things that were practiced
    upon these Jewish people, such as doing
    experiments while the patients were not only
    alive but doing such things as would cause their
    deaths.
  • All these sorts of things were horrendous to me
    and I, like most everyone else, deplored them.
  • Dr. John R. Heller, Researcher, Tuskegee Syphilis
    Study

40
Final Report of Tuskegee Syphillis Study
  • "Society can no longer afford
  • to leave the balancing of individual rights
  • against scientific progress
  • to the scientific community."

41
20th Century Research Ethics Milestones
Back to the Future
1991
Common Rule
Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations
1981
1979
Belmont Report
1972 Syphilis Study Exposed
1966 The Beecher Article (NEJM)
1964
Declaration of Helsinki
Milgram Study
Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act
1962
The Thalomide Tragedy
1947
Nuremberg Code
US Human Radiation Experiments
The Nazi Experiments
1932 The Syphilis Study Begins
Trigger Events
42
In 1974 at Belmont, the National Commission for
the Protection of Human Subjects began
deliberations
  • Kenneth John Ryan, M.D.,
  • Joseph V. Brady, Ph.D.,
  • Robert E. Cooke, M.D.,
  • Dorothy I. Height, President, NCNW,
  • Albert R. Jonsen, Ph.D.,
  • Patricia King, J.D.,
  • Karen Lebacqz, Ph.D.,
  • David W. Louisell, J.D.,
  • Donald W. Seldin, M.D.,
  • Eliot Stellar, Ph.D.,
  • Robert H. Turtle, LL.B., Attorney.

43
Which led in 1978 to the opening words of the
Belmont Report
  • Scientific Research has produced substantial
    social benefits.
  • It has also posed some troubling ethical
    questions.

44
The 3 Basic Ethical Principlesof the Belmont
Report
Respect for Persons
Benefice
Justice
45
Respect for Persons
  • Definition
  • Individuals should be treated as autonomous
    agents
  • Persons with diminished autonomy are entitled to
    protection
  • Application
  • Voluntary Informed Consent

Belmont Report
46
Benefice
  • Definition
  • Do not harm
  • Maximize possible benefits
  • Minimize possible harms
  • Application
  • Assessment of risks and benefits

Belmont Report
47
Justice
  • Definition
  • Who ought to receive the benefits of research?
  • Who ought to bear its burdens?
  • Application
  • Equitable Selection of Subjects

Belmont Report
48
20th Century Research Ethics Milestones
Back to the Future
1991
Common Rule
Consolidated HHS/FDA Regulations
1981
1979
Belmont Report
1972 Syphilis Study Exposed
1966 The Beecher Article (NEJM)
1964
Declaration of Helsinki
Milgram Study
Kefauver-Harris Amendments Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act
1962
The Thalomide Tragedy
1947
Nuremberg Code
US Human Radiation Experiments
The Nazi Experiments
1932 The Syphilis Study Begins
Trigger Events
49
First Human Heart Transplant Year - 1967
Penicillin - 1940
First Test Tube Baby Born 1978
sulfa drugs - 1932
First successful Open Heart Surgery - 1952 
First Electrocardiogram 1903
50
Home free in the 21st Century?
  • Research is still Risky
  • Gene Therapy Trials
  • Death of 18 year old Jesse Gelsinger in 1999
  • Conflict of interest
  • Cloning
  • Nanotechnology
  • Internet Research
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Chemical and Biological terrorism
  • Space travel

51
Institutions where Studies have been temporarily
suspended July 1998 July 2001
  • Rush Presbyterian St. Lukes Medical Center
  • Friends Research Institute
  • Veteran Affairs Greater LA
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • John Hopkins

52
Questions to Consider
  • Why should we be concerned about Human Subject
    Research?
  •  
  • Do you think another Tuskegee could happen in the
    future?
  •  
  • Do you think a Tuskegee could ever happen to you?
  •  
  • Can you envision yourself ever being faced with
    an ethical dilemma in Human Subjects research?
    What are some guidelines or resources you could
    turn to?
  •  
  • And finally,
  •  
  • The Tuskegee Study started in the United States
    in 1932 and continued for 40 years, well past the
    Nuremberg trials. It was also no well kept
    secret. Research articles were published in major
    medical journals during this time. Why do you
    think nobody saw a connection between Nuremberg
    and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study?

53
The 1997 Presidential Apology to Tuskegee
Participants
54
Life is all about choices
choices have consequences
Now its your turn - how will YOU choose?
55
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com