Music: The Beatles: Magical Mystery Tour (1967) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Music: The Beatles: Magical Mystery Tour (1967)

Description:

Title: STATEMENT OF THE CASE Author: Marc Fajer Last modified by: Marc A. Fajer Created Date: 8/22/2001 9:05:30 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:120
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: MarcF85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Music: The Beatles: Magical Mystery Tour (1967)


1
Music The Beatles Magical Mystery Tour (1967)
  • Lunch Office Hours Today Cancelled Ill e-mail
    lunchers about rescheduling
  • Lunch Tomorrow (Meet _at_ 1225 on Bricks Barker,
    Desai, Koslow Parkins Uhlman Wales Wytrykusz

2
Friday New Issue in Mullett Escape
  • Generally When Does Owner of Escaped Animal Lose
    Property Rights?
  • Why Different from Watch or Ring?
  • What Facts are Relevant?

3
Friday New Issue in Mullett Escape
  • Different from First Possession (Where All 3
    Cases Ask Similar Qs)
  • Escape Cases Focus on Different Concerns
  • Mullett Applies English Common Law Rule
  • Manning Fact-Specific Result Not Using English
    Common Law Test

4
LAST TIME Phosphorus DQ28
  • Assume that we are in a world where the
    net-owners have no enforceable rights in fish
    caught in their nets until they physically remove
    the fish from the nets. Thomas chooses to take
    fish from the owners nets. Who is affected by
    this decision?

5
EXTERNALITIES
  • Cost or benefit external to a decision-making
    process
  • Must be w reference to particular decision
  • helpful to start by identifying decision maker

6
EXTERNALITIES
  • Cost or benefit external to a decision-making
    process
  • Must be w reference to particular decision
  • helpful to start by identifying decision maker
  • If decision-maker considers a cost, but chooses
    to absorb it, not an externality
  • E.g., Thomas considers own exertion necessary to
    take from nets, may decide to take anyway

7
EXTERNALITIES
  • Likely Externalities in DQ28 Shaw hypo? Whose
    interests can Thomas ignore?
  • PHOSPHORI?

8
EXTERNALITIES
  • Likely Externalities in DQ28 Shaw hypo
  • Costs to net-owners their families
  • Loss of availability to purchasers from
    net-owners
  • Effects on net manufacturers
  • Effects on fish food chain (might be benefits
    if net-fishing discouraged)

9
EXTERNALITIES
  • Internalizing Externalities Forcing
    Decision-Maker to Consider

10
EXTERNALITIES
  • Internalizing Externalities Forcing
    Decision-Maker to Consider
  • DQ30 (Zinc) Examples of Internalizing from
    Outside Reading?

11
EXTERNALITIES
  • Internalizing Externalities Forcing
    Decision-Maker to Consider
  • Beneficial Because Means Price of Activities Will
    Reflect Real Cost (e.g., pollution costs)

12
EXTERNALITIES
  • Internalizing Externalities Forcing
    Decision-Maker to Consider
  • Beneficial Because Means Price of Activities Will
    Reflect Real Cost
  • Can Internalize Several Ways
  • Require Payment of Damages
  • Criminalize Activity
  • Private Negotiation (Bribes)

13
Phosphorus DQ28
  • If the fish are worth more to the net-owners than
    to Thomas, presumably there is some amount of
    money they could contract to pay him to leave the
    fish alone that would leave all parties better
    off than before the contract. What obstacles
    stand in the way of the parties entering this
    contract?

14
Phosphorus DQ28
  • What obstacles stand in the way of the parties
    entering this contract?
  • Assume cost to net-owner is 500/wk benefit to
    Thomas is 300/wk.
  • Assume One-on-One Negotiation.

15
Costs of One-on-One Negotiation
  • Investigation Costs
  • Bargaining Costs
  • Strategic Behavior
  • Enforcement Costs

16
Phosphorus DQ28
  • What obstacles stand in the way of the parties
    entering this contract?
  • Assume cost to net-owner is 500/wk benefit to
    Thomas is 300/wk.
  • Assume Multi-Party Negotiation.

17
Additional Costs of Multi-Party Negotiation
  • Free-Riding
  • Holdouts
  • Organization/Management Costs

18
Collectively Transaction Costs
  • Investigation Costs
  • Bargaining Costs
  • Strategic Behavior
  • Enforcement Costs
  • Free-Riding
  • Holdouts
  • Organization/Management Costs

19
Transaction Costs Can Prevent Parties from
Reaching Bargains that are Efficient ( Would
Make Everyone Better Off)
20
DQ32 Costs of Internalization?
  • costs of bargaining privately
  • costs of collectively creating new rules (can be
    very expensive)
  • multi-party negotiation
  • legislation

21
Basic Demsetz Analysis 1st Thesis
  • Identify decision at issue

22
Basic Demsetz Analysis 1st Thesis
  • Identify decision at issue
  • Identify old rule

23
Basic Demsetz Analysis 1st Thesis
  • Identify decision at issue
  • Identify old rule
  • Identify neg. externalities under old rule

24
Basic Demsetz Analysis 1st Thesis
  • If cost of externalities gt
  • cost of change ?
  • change in rule

25
Basic Demsetz Analysis 1st Thesis
  • If cost of externalities gt cost of change ?
    change in rule
  • Rough Approximation (Not Precise Math)

26
Basic Demsetz Analysis 1st Thesis
  • If cost of externalities gt cost of change ?
    change in rule
  • Rough Approximation (Not Precise Math)
  • Resulting Change in Rule Unpredictable

27
ZINC DQ31
  • Why does the author believe that new property
    rights tend to arise from the emergence of new
    or different beneficial and harmful effects?
    (p.26)

28
Basic Demsetz Analysis 1st Thesis
  • If cost of externalities gt cost of change ?
    change in rule
  • Rough Approximation (Not Precise Math)
  • Resulting Change in Rule Unpredictable
  • Often Results from Social/Cultural Change
  • New Social Habits ? Scarcity
  • New Science/Technology ?
  • Scarcity or Better Monitoring

29
Basic Demsetz Analysis 1st Thesis
  • Identify decision at issue
  • Identify old rule
  • Identify neg. externalities under old rule
  • Identify change in circumstances

30
Basic Demsetz Analysis 1st Thesis
  • Identify decision at issue
  • Identify old rule
  • Identify neg. externalities under old rule
  • Identify change in circumstances
  • Does change increase neg. externalities?

31
Basic Demsetz Analysis 1st Thesis
  • Identify decision at issue
  • Identify old rule
  • Identify neg. externalities under old rule
  • Identify change in circumstances
  • Does change increase neg. externalities?
  • If cost of externalities gt cost of change ?
    change in rule

32
Demsetz 1st Thesis Shaw
  • Identify decision at issue
  • Identify old rule
  • Identify neg. externalities under old rule
  • Identify change in circumstances
  • Does change increase neg. externalities?
  • If cost of externalities gt cost of change ?
    change in rule

33
DQ33 Calcium Apply to Montagne
  • Identify decision at issue
  • Identify old rule
  • Identify neg. externalities under old rule
  • Identify change in circumstances
  • Does change increase neg. externalities?
  • If cost of externalities gt cost of change ?
    change in rule
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com