Country Overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Country Overview

Description:

MeTA Ghana Country Overview Public Sector Private Sector Civil Society * * Medicines Transparency Alliance Title of presentation * MeTA * Title of presentation * MeTA ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:109
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: Inventiv
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Country Overview


1
MeTA Ghana
  • Country Overview
  • Public Sector
  • Private Sector
  • Civil Society

2
Country Overview
  • Augustina Koduah (Mrs)
  • Country Coordinator

3
Multi-stakeholder process
  • What were the major milestone in the
    multi-stakeholder process?
  • Inaugural Meeting of Governing Council by Deputy
    Minister in September 2008
  • Official Launch in November 2008
  • First National forum in December 2009
  • CSO Media Orientation in April 2009
  • Quarterly Governing Council Meetings to date
  • Independent monitoring of medicines quality
    through routine testing with FDB monitoring
    access to medicines using NHIS data based on
    agreed indicators with NHIA established
  • Participated in major MeTA led International
    activities MIAG Jordan Training
  • Launch and Sensitization of Ghana MeTA CSO Group
    community targeted communication activities in
    April 2010

4
Examples
  • Multi-stakeholder analysis workshop carried out
    in June 2010
  • National Multi-stakeholder Technical discussion
    forum on data disclosure in June 2010

5
Major achievements and successes
  • What where the main achievements and successes of
    MeTA in your country?
  • Active Multi-stakeholder Council made up of
    excellent spread of relevant stakeholders with
    sub committees (Administration, Advocacy
    Technical) a strong interest to move forward
    towards regular dialogue on medicines issues
  • Independent Secretariat Functional Website
    www.metaghana.org
  • Facilitated an active independent civil society
    capacity to lead consumer advocacy campaign to
    support disclosure and accountability on access
    to medicines
  • Baseline Pharmaceutical disclosure survey
    sector scan studies completed
  • Good collaboration established with NHIA to use
    data to monitor access to medicines based on
    agreed indicators with promising public health
    benefits
  • Case studies shared with other MeTA countries
    through international meetings and country
    exchange visits

6
Major Achievement
  • Results of Routine Minilab Quality Assurance Test
    led to necessary regulatory interventions

7
Overall challenges
  • What have been the main challenges during the
    MeTA pilot phase?
  • Initial unclear Standard Operating Procedures
  • Latent mutual suspicion between the state and
    private sector
  • Nervousness of some stakeholders about change
  • MeTA assumes that enforcement mechanisms exist
    across the medicines manufacture, import,
    procurement and distribution systems, but
    historically enforcement of regulations is weak
  • Slow and Bureaucratic Decision Making process
  • Maintaining momentum of stakeholders over time.
    (Diminishing returns)
  • Working together to build trust understanding
    between different stakeholders is difficult
  • Timeliness and sustainability of financing beyond
    the pilot phase.

8
Lessons Learned
  • What are the main lessons from MeTA in your
    country?
  • Players in the pharmaceutical sector have varying
    interest and power
  • Multi-stakeholder groups in the pharmaceutical
    sector have a better understanding of each other
    through transparent and systematic engagement
  • Potential to make a positive impact in medicines
    access through transparent multi-stakeholder and
    systematic data sharing and disclosure works.
  • Providing Ghanaian leadership on medicines
    transparency disclosure and dissemination of
    information to eliminate the risk of counterfeit
    and substandard medication as well as pricing in
    the supply chain

9
Thank you
  • Name of presenter Augustina Koduah (Mrs)
  • Email appidanq_at_yahoo.com
  • Mobile number 233 20 8769228

10
Public Sector
  • Mr. Samuel Boateng
  • Office of Chief Director
  • Ministry of Health (MoH)

11
Summary Analysis at start of MeTA
  • What were the needs and issues in your specific
    sector at the start of MeTA?
  • Strong existing enabling and legislative
    environment BUT
  • Benefits of improved procurement not translating
    into affordability and availability for patients
    (e.g. 2004 WHO/HAI Medicines Survey)
  • Inconsistency with other sectors (private and
    mission) in terms of how standards (i.e. quality,
    availability and pricing) are developed and
    applied
  • Low consumer awareness due to very little
    information on quality, availability and prices
    of medicines in the public domain,
  • Non-adherence to treatment guidelines by
    prescribers and irrational use of medicines by
    providers persists despite improved guidance and
    education
  • Supply chain performance problems from CMS
    downstream leading to high stock-out rate
  • Vulnerability of NHIS to fraud due to inefficient
    data analysis and dissemination
  • Public health safety concerns arising from
    counterfeit and/or substandard products

12
Major milestones
  • What milestones have been achieved during the
    MeTA pilot phase?
  • Proactive engagement with private sector,
    development partners civil society through
    multi-stakeholder collaboration in information
    sharing to build consensus around availability,
    quality, pricing and rational use to increase
    access to essential medicines for the poor
  • Periodic monitoring of medicine prices and
    availability as well as their rational use using
    WHO standard indicators-2008
  • Key Data on medicines from the NHIA made
    available for systematic analysis and
    dissemination to improve transparency,
    accountability, pricing and quality.
  • Independent monitoring of medicines quality
    through sentinel testing using GPHF minilabs
    2009.
  • Partnership with CSOs to provide more information
    to consumers, around quality rational use in
    medicines advocacy
  • Data validation of NHIA data carried out
    awaiting dissemination

13
Successes
  • What were the successes for your sector during
    the MeTA pilot phase?
  • Provided Ghanaian leadership on medicines
    transparency and accountability through
    multi-stakeholder engagement as model in West
    Africa for both effective governance and market
    efficiency.
  • Initiated opportunity for pricing and rational
    use of medicines monitoring mechanism to inform
    the NHIS
  • Reduced and/or eliminating the risk of
    counterfeit and substandard medication in the
    supply chain.
  • Provided mechanism for public sector commitment
    to fight inefficiency and corruption in the drug
    supply landscape.

14
Challenges
  • What challenges has your sector endured during
    the MeTA pilot phase?
  • Mutual suspicions and mistrust between sectors
  • Nervousness of all stakeholders about change
  • Need to assume a degree of commitment to
    transparency by all stakeholders and willingness
    to be mutually accountable.
  • Sustaining regular open stakeholder dialogue and
    commitment of all parties in all sectors.
  • Right to Information Bill yet to be passed into
    legislation
  • Dealing with sensitivities of various interest
    groups in the sector

15
Lessons Learned
  • What are the lessons that your sector has learned
    from MeTA?
  • Multi-stakeholder involvement helping to break
    barriers
  • Transparency Accountability in the engagement
    process is vital for success of MeTA
  • The need to accommodate the interests and
    perceptions of all local stakeholders to reflect
    the character of the multi-stakeholder is a key
    ingredient for its efficiency
  • The essential elements of a strong, vibrant and
    sustainable MeTA in Ghana are
  • Having the right people connected and committed
  • Willingness of stakeholders to be mutually
    accountable
  • Ghanaian ownership driven
  • Sustainable political commitment

16
Thank you
  • Name of presenter Mr. Sam Boateng
  • Job Title Office of Chief Director, MoH Member,
    Ghana GC
  • Email samuel.boateng_at_moh.gov.gh
  • Mobile number 233 244 269336
  • Website www.moh.gov.gh

17
Private Sector
  • John Allotey
  • Manager, Business Development
  • LaGray Chemical Company, Nsawam, Ghana

18
Summary Analysis at start of MeTA
  • Lack of market data
  • Medicines available in therapeutic areas
  • Sources of medicines
  • Pricing both open market and retail
  • Uncertainties around regulatory issues
  • Steps in the approval process
  • Time taken for approval of application
  • Poor knowledge of government procurement system
  • Competitive advantage of local manufacturers
  • Personalities and approachability of government
    personnel
  • Limited engagement with National Health Insurance
    Authority
  • Medicines list
  • Pricing

19
Major milestones
  • Active participation of private sector in MeTA
  • Participation in planning and launching the pilot
  • Launch of MeTA as multi-stakeholder process
  • Participation in Level Playing Field with other
    sectors eg. Govt., CSO, etc
  • Movement towards regular, open stakeholder
    dialogue
  • Ghana forum
  • London Forum
  • Opportunity to present case of local manufacturing

20
Successes
  • Recognition of potentially rich sources of
    information for MeTA to harness and make an
    impact
  • Food and Drugs Board registry of medicines
  • Procurement information from Ministry of Health
  • National Health Insurance data on prescriptions
  • Value of political will
  • MOH support making MeTA Ghana possible
  • Meeting other stakeholders
  • Appreciation of problems of other stakeholders
  • Willingness to work as a team to improve access
  • The beginning of trust building

21
Challenges
  • Some lack of interest in work and activities of
    MeTA
  • Competing issues and challenges within the sector
  • Threats from cheap competition
  • Threats (perhaps unintended) from foreign
    largesse (e.g. Affordable Medicines- Malaria)
  • Need of government support to build industry
  • Some suspicions around motives of MeTA
  • Status as independent entity questioned
  • Potential for manipulation of objectives
  • May be used by both local as well as
    multinational pharmaceutical companies to
    discredit each other

22
Lessons Learned
  • Transparency around medicine quality,availability
    and pricing is possible
  • Potential for data sharing or disclosure exists
  • MeTa can be honest broker because of
    multi-stakeholder status
  • Persistence required in sustaining interest of
    all
  • Commitment of stakeholders
  • Work required in allaying suspicion and obtaining
    consistent cooperation

23
Acknowledgements
  • Dr. Paul A. Lartey PMAG
  • Dr. Isaac Morrison - SPMDP
  • Pharmaceutical Society of Ghana
  • Association of Licensed Chemical Sellers
  • Ghana Medical Association
  • Ghana Registered Midwives Association

24
Thank you
  • John Allotey
  • Manager, Business Development, LaGray Chemical
    Company, Nsawam, Ghana
  • Email john.allotey_at_lagraychem.com
  • Mobile number 233-20-831-7767
  • Website www.lagraychem.com

25
Civil Society
  • Presenter Charles Allotey
  • Executive Director-Health
    Access Network
  • Ralph Ahiabu
  • Director of Programs - DeSMAS

26
Summary Analysis at start of MeTA
  • What were the needs and issues in your specific
    sector at the start of MeTA?
  • Lack of organized civil society coalition
    directly involved in issues related to access to
    medicines.
  • Lack of capacity among civil society
    organizations to deal with medicines issues,
    especially where technical in nature.
  • Ignorance among community members on issues
    surrounding medicine prices, quality,
    availability and access in general.
  • Patients and consumers lacked information and
    power to realize their rights to healthcare and
    medicines - e.g. rights in Patients Charter,
    benefits and quality of care under National
    Health Insurance Scheme.
  • Inadequate linkages and collaboration between the
    public, private and civil society sectors.

27
Major milestones
  • What milestones have been achieved during the
    MeTA pilot phase?
  • Built network and made linkages amongst civil
    society organizations across all 10 regions of
    Ghana.
  • Enhanced capacity of network members on access to
    medicines and transparency issues - e.g.
    workshops at various levels.
  • Established online social network (NING Group) to
    facilitate communication and mutual visibility of
    network members.
  • Launch of Ghana MeTA Civil Society Group by the
    Deputy Minister of Health.
  • Developed 4 educational posters targeted at
    consumers on relevant medicines issues in Ghana
    translated into 7 major local dialects.
  • Undertook community awareness-raising activities,
    including public fora and radio programs.
  • Held a detailed mid-term review developed
    forward plans for 2010-11.
  • In sum We have achieved a lot, with limited
    resources. And more is planned!

28
Successes
  • What were the successes for your sector during
    the MeTA pilot phase?
  • Enthusiasm has been created among community
    groups who are now able to engage in discussions
    on medicines issues.
  • Trust and collaboration are emerging between CSOs
    and public sector agencies on transparency and
    access to medicine issues.
  • We have enhanced awareness among consumers on
    patients responsibilities, counterfeit and
    substandard medicines, and the rational use of
    medicines.
  • We have a database and linkages at national,
    regional, district and community levels that will
    facilitate information sharing and joint
    advocacy, right across the country.

29
Challenges
  • What challenges has your sector endured during
    the MeTA pilot phase?
  • Sustaining interest of network members to engage
    actively in the MeTA process following the
    establishment of the network.
  • Aligning individual and organizational interests
    of network members to the core objectives of
    MeTA.
  • Demands made on members engaged in the
    organizational process were very high due to the
    sacrificial nature of the work.
  • Limited resources constrained the creative and
    innovative ideas that would have enriched the
    overall outcome. For example, we had hoped to
    engage in some operational research on medicine
    related issues in communities nationwide. This
    would have engaged network members proactively,
    resulting in (bottom up) data to complement that
    at policy level (top down).

30
Lessons Learned
  • What are the lessons that your sector has learned
    from MeTA?
  • Non-health professionals within the CSO network
    are able to engage with a wide range of
    stakeholders and the media on issues relating to
    transparency and access to medicines The CSO
    network includes those working on governance,
    corruption, womens rights, childrens rights,
    community health, etc.
  • The CSO sector is gaining valuable knowledge and
    experience through participation in the MeTA
    multi-stakeholder process.
  • Working with different stakeholders is possible
    and offers a better opportunity to address
    challenges than one stakeholder group acting
    alone. For example, on issue x
  • Opportunity created through the MeTA process to
    work with people with diverse professional
    backgrounds, skills and expertise resulted in
    achieving better outcomes. For examplewe
    achieved

31
Thank you
  • Name of presenter Charles Allotey
  • Job Title Ghana MeTA
    CSO Group Coordinator
  • Email
    kallotey_at_gmail.com, han.ghana_at_gmail.com
  • Mobile number 233
    (0)244280284
  • Skype
    kallotey
  • Website
    www.hanghana.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com