Conceptual Puzzles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Conceptual Puzzles

Description:

Conceptual Puzzles & Theoretical Elegance (principledness? naturalness?) Need to add cognition not just numbers, experiments, and algorithms Multiple ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 6
Provided by: PaulSmo1
Learn more at: https://web.stanford.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Conceptual Puzzles


1
Conceptual Puzzles Theoretical Elegance
(principledness? naturalness?)
2
  • Need to add cognition not just numbers,
    experiments, and algorithms
  • Multiple representations are tapped
    differentially by different tasks/conditions
    (Boersma, 319 pm)
  • Especially important in study of gradience
  • Probability distribution family
  • but see distribution-free methods (PAC learning)
  • Rankings Natural for (partial) orders? (MaxEnt
    1)
  • Outputs Natural for induction/generalization?
    (MaxEnt maximizes entropy)
  • Bias Bayesian inference

3
  • Constraint interaction through numbers
  • The Counting Catastrophe
  • WSP sH ?main stress M-PARSE
  • Numerical/HG typology sH sH ? sH iff sHs gt n
    ?n,
  • OT typology sH sH ? sH iff sHs gt n for n ?
    1, ?
  • Variation through Losers
  • Relative Harmony predicts relative frequency
  • Harmony Theory/MaxEnt and HG also Paters
    relativized H in HG (yesterday)
  • The Epenthesis Catastrophe
  • MAX DEP ? ?/batak/ ? bataka ? but
    /batak/ ? batakatatata ? /batak/? bata ?
  • Fate of harmonically bounded forms?

 
 
4
  • Variation through winners of multiple rankings
  • Number of rankings producing an output predicts
    relative frequency
  • All other approaches (?)
  • Bogus Rankings Catastrophe
  • A, B conflict Proportion of A-obeying output (A
    B)
  • A B 1/2
  • X bogus no (relevant) violations
  • X A B 1/3 A X B 2/3 A X, X
    B 1
  • Ordinal, not just quantitative, effects

5
  • Analogical Combinatorial Catastrophe
  • Theorem. Lexical Similarity Theory cannot explain
    Basic Combinatorial Generalization.
  • Lex ta, ki ? ti/ka ? pa/tu
  • Smolensky, P. 2006. On theoretical facts and
    empirical abstractions. In Wondering at the
    natural fecundity of things Essays in honor of
    Alan Prince, eds. E. Bakovic, J. Ito, and J.
    McCarthy. Linguistics Research Center
    http//repositories.cdlib.org/lrc/prince/13
    ROA.
  • Role of puzzles, thought experiments generality
    of proposed solutions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com