William H. Graff, American TCB - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

William H. Graff, American TCB

Description:

Title: OVERVIEW Last modified by: William Graff Created Date: 2/10/1998 9:47:26 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Other titles: Times New Roman Arial ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:176
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: acbcertCo
Category:
Tags: tcb | american | graff | wifi | william

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: William H. Graff, American TCB


1
William H. Graff, American TCB
Updates for Test Reporting
2
GSM Duty Factor
Test Report and supporting documentation should
clearly support GPRS capabilities of the device.
Please include information regarding both the
GPRS classes (e.g. class 10 and class A). Test
with maximum power for both body-worn and head
positions as applicable. Currently the FCC has
been asking on most GSM applications to verify if
the GPRS capability will work while the device is
transmitting in voice mode.

3
CDMA 2000 / W-CDMA
  • The FCC has requested all TCBs to consult with
    them before any attempt to approve CDMA 2000 is
    attempted.
  • FCC is considering whether or not to consider
    CDMA 2000 a new technology and therefore
    subject to approval exclusively by the Commission

4
Layards
Devices with Neck worn lanyards or that are
intended to be next to the body should be tested
with 0 gap and body tissue liquid. Both Front
and Back should be tested. An eyelet on the
device does not necessitate use of neck lanyards.
Instructions to the user should clearly
support the correct uses.

5
Layards
An eyelet on the device does not necessitate use
of neck lanyards. Instructions to the user should
clearly support the correct uses and accessories
provided. If the manufacturer provides a neck
lanyard with the device (in the box), or suggests
to the user that this device is intended for
lanyards, then it should be tested with 0cm gap.

6
Tablet Devices

Tablet device screen sizes range 8-14 and
weights range 2-8 lbs.
7
Tablet Type Devices

Smaller devices may qualify for handheld-only
operations, but filing must include strong
justification for such contact TCB or FCC for
guidance if needed. Generally unless a strong
justification can be made, portable may be
assumed.
8
Tablet Type Devices
Consumer tablet PCs are expected to have
lap-held use positions per IDB RFx 7) d)
ii). - Excert from Mobile and Portable
Device RF Exposure Equipment Authorization
Procedures Released March 18, 2004 which
states For undefined or unclear device usage
positions, where existing or standardized test
procedures are not applicable, SAR should be
evaluated according to the normal operating
configurations which are intended for the device.

9
SAR Test Documentation
  • Important test setup details affecting SAR
    should be provided in SAR Test Documentation
  • Belt clip and air gap thickness.

10
SAR Test Documentation
  • PCMCIA card distance to phantom for laptop and
    PDA testing.
  • P1528 device reference lines


    for held to ear
    testing.

11
USB Style Dongles
  • Direct-connected USB (without integral cable)
    differs from most PCMCIA in that port alignment
    may be horizontal (H), vertical (V), and 180
    degrees H or V, with respect to a notebook
    computer host

12
USB Style Dongles
  • Grantee is responsible for SAR compliance in all
    such intended use positions.
  • 1-host SAR testing is accepted for many Part 15
    and some licensed-service USB-dongle
    transmitters.
  • 3-host SAR test results have been filed for some
    licensed-service devices
  • IDB/KDB Mar04 webpost RFx Procedures 7)b), 7)c)
    are applicable

13
802.11 WLAN Devices

The FCC has spent considerable amount of time
reviewing these devices and experimenting with
many aspects of the SAR testing. The FCC has
been seriously thinking about proposing many
changes to the SAR procedures used for testing
for these types of devices. Remember that
these are proposals, are subject to change, and
may or may not be implemented.
14
802.11 WLAN Devices
Proposed Future Guidelines Only
  • Proposed Changes Include the following. Note
    that these are proposed changes and should not be
    considered final until formally released by the
    FCC
  • Default channels use for test may be different
    than simply Low, Mid and High and will depend on
    power measurements of channels near the Low and
    High channels. This is due to the variance of
    bandedge channels seed in some devices where the
    bandedge channels have reduced power.

15
802.11 WLAN Devices
Proposed Future Guidelines Only
  • 2.) Certain modulations may be considered
    required for default testing, but others may
    still need to be required depending on certain
    set power levels.
  • For example, 802.11g is only required to be
    tested if the average power is 0.25 dB gt than the
    802.11b power for the same channel

16
802.11 WLAN Devices
Proposed Future Guidelines Only
3.) Higher data rates usually have lower average
output. Higher data rates should be tested only
when the average output is 0.25 dB gt that at the
lowest data rate for the default a-b/g mode
test channels

17
802.11 WLAN Devices
Proposed Future Guidelines Only
4.) Turbo modes (proprietary modes) typically
operate at higher data rates requiring higher
order modulations lower average power. Turbo,
half quarter rate channels should be tested at
the lowest data rate used in each proprietary
mode when the average output is greater than that
on the closest default a-b/g mode channels.

18
802.11 WLAN Devices
Proposed Future Guidelines Only
5.) Switched Diversity Issue. The SAR of each
antenna should be measured independently on the
highest output channel in each a-b/g
mode. Other channels should be tested only
when the SAR vary by gt 25 for the two antennas
on highest output channel or gt 1.2 W/kg.

19
802.11 WLAN Devices
Proposed Future Guidelines Only
6.) MIMO Type Devices. FCC is developing
Procedures. These are likely to involve
simultaneous TX conditions and

20
5 GHz SAR

The FCC has expressed that review of SAR for
devices in the 3 6 GHz range will hopefully be
released to TCBs soon. However exact dates have
not been released.
21
PCMCIA Cards
For PCMCIA Cards with antennas external to
the host device, the FCC is considering possible
changes to their current testing requirements.
1) The 3 host policy that is typically
required in certain situations may change for
depending on certain acceptable margins to
ensure compliance for variations among typical
laptops.
Proposed Future Guidelines Only

22
PCMCIA Cards
  • 2) The FCC is also considering test methods
    with use an extender card instead of a typical
    laptop computers and compare these measurements
    to those made in a typical host.

Proposed Future Guidelines Only

23
Proposed Changes
The FCC also expects that any new procedures
required for SAR measurements will likely also
have a transition period associated with them.
This is subject to be determined depending on the
future release of information from the FCC.

24
FCC/TCB Training Bulletins
  • HAC for cellphones is mandatory on for 25 of a
    carriers product line
  • HAC test procedure already exists.
  • TCBs are able to review HAC soon.

25
FCC/TCB Training Bulletins
  • 5GHz SAR not yet released to TCBs.
  • Notice will come in the form of a RO
  • Training material is in preperation

26
FCC/TCB Training bulletins
  • SAR testing for WiFi products is being further
    refined.
  • More emphasis on test software used inside WiFi
    transmitter and defining its characteristics.
  • FCC will require more documentation of software,
    especially on/off transmitter timing
    characteristics.

27
FCC/TCB Training Bulletins
  • No agreement yet on DFS testing for 802.11a.
    Testing with NTIA / FCC on proposed new procedure
    has been scheduled for November.
  • FCC hopes to get revised DFS Test Procedure to
    TCBs before end of year.

28
FCC/TCB Training Bulletins
  • Field Programmability to add DFS to existing
    802.11a radios prohibited unless radio is
    Certified as a SDR.
  • Factory programmability allowed using the Class
    II change procedure.

29
FCC/TCB Training Bulletins
  • DFS products must go to FCC
  • SDR products must go to FCC
  • A DFS testing exclusion exists for client
    equipment which is under the control of a
    Certified access point.
  • Ad-Hoc mode for clients prohibited

30
FCC/TCB Training Bulletins
  • FCC has provided further guidance on MIMO and
    steered array antennas.
  • Specific guidance is offered from FCC on Pout
    measurements, RF Exposure calculations, radiated
    Restricted Band measurements.

31
FCC/TCB Training Bulletins
  • FCC will now allow Class II changes for RF
    category Portable to Mobile to be handled by
    TCBs.

32
FCC/TCB Training Bulletins
  • GPS repeaters are not permitted in USA. GPS
    spectrum is carefully protected. No Part 15
    Intentional Radiators are permitted.
  • Reference See 15.205

33
Questions?
  • whgraff_at_atcb.com
  • major_at_atcb.com
  • jerry_at_atcb.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com