Title: A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ON HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
1A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ON HEALTH TECHNOLOGY
ASSESSMENT
2Some problems with health technology
- Efficacy (benefits)
- Safety
- Financial costs (and cost-effectiveness)
- Social
- Ethical
- Institutional
3The case of the computed tomography (CT) scanner
- Rapid diffusion beginning in 1972
- No well-designed studies of efficacy until later
- Excellent and exciting pictures of the inside of
the human body - High profits to be made (USA)
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) had a similar
pattern 15 years later - Positron emission tomography (PET) repeating the
story now
4The case of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM)
- Rapid diffusion into health care during 1970s
- Claims of substantial benefits in terms of fetal
deaths and injuries not backed by studies - Synthetic studies (systematic reviews) in 1970s
and 1980s showing no benefits - Use has continued without much change
5The case of diethylstilbesterol (DES)
- Synthetic estrogen introduced in late 1930s
- Claims of substantial benefits to mother and
child, especially in terms of averted
miscarriages - Claims not supported by studies
- From 1973, cases of clear-cell adenocarcinoma of
the vagina in DES daughters - Other complications gradually emerged (sons,
mothers) - Use continues in many parts of the world,
although not North American or Europe
6Changes since the time of these cases
- Greatly expanded number of randomized clinical
trials (RCTs) - Frequent systematic reviews of the literature,
following established standards - Data bases making studies more available
(Cochrane, HTA database, many others) - Evidence-based medicine seems to be the norm (in
terms of lip-service?)
7Problems with health technology continue
- Health systems filled with unproven, dangerous
and costly technology - Some examples
- Machines for physiotherapy
- Occupational therapy
- Many drugs with marginal or few benefits
Alzheimer drugs a current example - Overuse of traditional surgical procedures
tonsillectomy, hysterectomy
8Health technology assessment is not only for the
purpose of keeping technology out of the system
also should facilitate entry when this is
justified
- Prevention is an undervalued and underused set of
technologies - Therapies also not always used properly -
thrombolysis
9Health technology assessment is a structured
analysis of a health technology, a set of related
technologies or a technology-related issue that
is performed for the purpose of providing input
to a policy decision. It encompasses safety,
efficacy (benefits), costs and cost-effectiveness,
organizational implications, and social and
ethical issues.
10Health Technology
- Drugs
- Devices
- Medical and surgical procedures
- And the organizational and support systems within
which health care is delivered
11Purposes of health technology
- Prevention
- Diagnosis
- Treatment
- Rehabilitation.
12Health policies that may be related to HTA
- General public health policies
- Research and development
- Regulation of pharmaceuticals and equipment
- Payment for services
- Quality assurance
- Education and training of providers
- Consumer education
13Establishment of public programs for HTA
- 1970s the USA was the leader later, changes
in health care emphasis - 1987 Swedish Council for HTA (SBU)
- 1990 Canada, Australia and Western Europe
- Gradual spread throughout the world All of the
European Union, Latin America, Asia, Israel - Africa only continent where HTA almost does not
exist
14Important international supporters for HTA
- World Bank China, Malaysia, Poland and other
Eastern European countries - World Health Organization many useful
conferences and consultations - PAHO (WHO for Americas) - promoted HTA in
individual member states since mid-1980s
15The Present
- HTA is institutionalized at the national policy
level in about 50 countries, plus some regional
and provincial programs - HTA an important force in (perhaps) 10 countries
- HTA is growing in importance in all of these
areas, and spreading into middle-income countries - BUT poorer countries essentially left out
16Concerns for the future
- Apparent lack of will of governments to intervene
in health care to improve the health of their
populations - National focus on costs of care (and not quality)
although costs is a legitimate concern - Role of industry a pervasive force in health
care. Partnerships? With firms whose primary
motivation is profits?
17Trends in the future
- New and continued efforts to assure
implementation of HTA results example of UK,
also point to Sweden, the Netherlands, France,
Malaysia - More emphasis on financial mechanisms, especially
payment for services to assure appropriateness
and high quality
18Closing points
- Development of HTA is becoming an important force
in the world today - movement toward HTA and
evidence-based medicine has been called the
third revolution in health care - Slow but steady rate of change
- Aggressive policies toward health technology
using HTA results are the path to more effective
health care - All countries need such policies