The CANS and Evidence Based Practice Implementation: Hanging Together or Just Left Hanging? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

The CANS and Evidence Based Practice Implementation: Hanging Together or Just Left Hanging?

Description:

Title: Enhancing the Quality of Clinical Practice at EMQ FF: Assessment EBP Strategy and and Core Clinical Skills Author: Abram Rosenblatt Last modified by – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:161
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Abra57
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The CANS and Evidence Based Practice Implementation: Hanging Together or Just Left Hanging?


1
The CANS and Evidence Based Practice
Implementation Hanging Together or Just Left
Hanging?
  • Abram Rosenblatt, Ph.D.
  • EMQ FamiliesFirst

2
Presentation Overview
  • Context
  • EBPs
  • Measurement
  • Gaps
  • Example
  • Conclusions

3
Service Systems Are Complex
  • Practice
  • Program
  • System

4
Impact is Complex
  • Effectiveness
  • Efficiency
  • Equity

5
Setting the Stage A Framework
6
Purposes of Collecting Data and Perceived Value
7
Setting the Stage Trends
  • Systems of Care
  • System Focus?
  • Efficiency and Equity Impacts
  • Effectiveness unclear
  • Wraparound
  • Mostly Program, also practice and system
  • Fidelity
  • Effectivenessmaybe
  • Evidence Based Practice
  • Practice, also program
  • Effectiveness

8
The Current Star EBPs
  • More Effective than Usual Care
  • Dont know a lot about usual care
  • Arbitrary Metrics Problem
  • Replication Concerns
  • Transportability and Drift
  • Equity?
  • Iatrogenic potential at system level
  • Efficiency?
  • Cost Effectiveness usually unknown

9
EBP Alphabet Soup
  • Mandate for EBPs and Motivation to select most
    effective services creates challenges
  • EMQ FF EBP Implementation (Partial List)
  • PCIT
  • Incredible Years
  • Triple P
  • TF-CBT
  • ACRA
  • BSFT
  • ACT
  • FFT

10
Where to Go?
  • Outcomes Management
  • TCOM
  • Measurement Feedback Systems
  • Results Based Accountability
  • Clinical Dashboards
  • Common Elements Approaches
  • MAP/Child STEPS
  • Quality of Care

11
Turbulence Ahead
  • County or project specific Outcome Requirements
  • EBP Measurement Requirements
  • Over 30 Different Measures used at EMQ FF, most
    of which can not be changed or consolidated
  • Multiple Measures and Perspectives
  • The Importance of Values
  • Rapidly changing economic and funding landscape
  • Health Care Reform

12
What to do? An Example from One Agency
  • Strong History of Wraparound
  • Intensive EBP implementation
  • Strong Commitment to Outcomes and Evaluation
  • Multiple Counties and Regions
  • Strong Values
  • Foster Care and Mental Health

13
Addressing Gaps
  • Assessment
  • Outcomes Management/Measurement Feedback
  • Strategic Use of Evidence Based Practice
  • Overall Clinical Competencies and Skills
  • Outcome data collection across all programs
  • Evolution
  • Values

14
Assessment and Outcomes Child and Adolescent
Needs and Strengths (CANS)
  • Clinician Based Rating Scale
  • Parent and Child Perspectives?
  • Mental Health Assessment
  • Symptoms
  • Diagnosis
  • Real World Referents
  • In Home
  • In School
  • Out of Trouble

15
Clinical Skills Development Needs
  • Usual Care not as effective and beneficial as
    Evidence Based Practices
  • Many EBPs already in place at EMQ FF and no
    strategic plan for EBP implementation
  • EBPs do not exist for all clinical situations
  • EMQ FF serves youth who do not match existing
    EBPs
  • EBPs costly and labor intensive
  • Some clinical staff at EMQ FF are not qualified
    for some EBP trainings

16
Use EBPs Efficiently and Effectively Relevance
Mapping
  • Can create a guideline for EBP implementation at
    EMQ FF based on existing data
  • Includes
  • Presenting problem or diagnosis
  • Age
  • Gender
  • Ethnicity
  • Setting
  • Allow for a more rational approach to determining
    EBP implementation at EMQ FF and more efficient
    resource allocation given high cost of most EBPs.

17
Examples from Relevance Mapping
  • Seventy-six percent (71) of youth are covered by
    at least one evidence-based treatment that
    applies to their primary problem, age group, and
    gender.
  • About half of youth with attention/hyperactivity
    problems are above the tested age range for
    evidence-based treatments.
  • Aside from treatments developed for disruptive
    behavior, many evidence-based treatments are less
    often tested in settings typical of the service
    model.
  • Cognitive Behavior Therapy alone applies to 61
    of all youthalmost all of the youth coverable by
    any evidence-based practice.

18
Core Clinical Skills Managing and Adapting
Practice (MAP)
  • Common Elements Approach Effective services from
    high quality parts
  • Match practice elements to specific clinical
    scenarios
  • Practice elements based on extensive review of
    existing literature (Evidence Based practice
    elements)
  • Practice Wise Data Base
  • Helps select practice elements
  • Helps select EBPs if appropriate
  • Clinical Dashboard
  • Feedback on selected outcomes

19
Creating an Integrated Clinical Model
  • Standard Assessment with the CANS
  • Efficient and Effective planning for EBP
    implementation with relevance mapping
  • Core clinical skill development with the Common
    Elements Approach
  • Use of the CANS to enhance selection of
    appropriate common elements or EBPs at the
    clinical level
  • Clinical Quality Improvement with the Clinical
    Dashboard using the CANS as core measure
  • Development and refinement of current practices
    at EMQ FF

20
Integrated Model CANS and Relevance Mapping
  • CANS for Assessment and Outcomes Tracking
  • Assists in EBP implementation
  • Assists in common elements selection
  • Core component of Clinical Dashboard tracking
  • Assists in level of care determinations
  • EBP Relevance mapping
  • Empirically map potential EBPs to young people
    served
  • Appropriate use of EBPs
  • Shows where common elements approach is most
    needed
  • Demonstrates where novel program development is
    most needed

21
Integrated Model Baseline Clinical Skills and
Clinical CQI
  • MAP model
  • Assures baseline clinical competencies
  • Applies to young people and families for whom
    EBPs are not relevant
  • Applies to young people and families for whom
    EBPs can not be provided
  • Helps guide EBP selection by clinical staff
  • Helps provide continuous quality improvement at
    the clinical level
  • Integrate with CANS

22
Advantages
  • Standardization of assessment
  • Standardization of core clinical competencies
  • Applicable to most or all young people and
    families served at EMQ FF
  • Compatible with existing services
  • Does NOT replace existing clinical skill sets and
    judgment
  • Efficient and effective use of costly service
    options
  • Enhances clinical workforce development
  • Empirically based and state of the art

23
Conclusion Moving the CANS to Center Stage
  • Assessment
  • Replace EBP measures?
  • Outcomes
  • Usual Care?
  • EBP Relative Effectiveness
  • Measurement Feedback
  • EBP planning
  • Common Elements Selection
  • Quality of Care
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com