Woody Biomass Background - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Woody Biomass Background

Description:

Title: Woody Biomass Background Author: mdemchik Last modified by: dzamora Created Date: 8/3/2006 5:34:37 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: mdem3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Woody Biomass Background


1
Woody Biomass Background
2
Some History
  • 1970s energy crisis results in government
    subsidies and research
  • 1978 Public Utilities Regulatory Policy Act
    (utilities must buy energy from other producers)
  • During 1980s, 6,300 megawatts of new wood fired
    capacity added (from 200 megawatts in late
    1970s)

3
And then
  • 15 plants in CA alone are bought out and closed
    by utilities (to reduce costs associated with
    buying their power Bergman and Zerbe 2005)
  • During the 1990s not many new plants are built
  • It is believed that this is due to limited tax
    credits, increased conventional power capacity
    and overall low fuel costs

4
Now
  • Resurge in interest in biomass
  • Costs of energy is increasing
  • At the same time forest fires are increasing and
    forest fuels reduction needs have reached
    epidemic levels in some parts of the country
  • Great public interest in renewable energy
  • Public concern about CO2 etc.

5
US energy use
6
US Energy Use (Scary Numbers)
  • About 100 Quads per year (DOE 2000)
  • A quad is a quadrillion BTUs
  • 100,000,000,000,000,000 BTUs is US use
  • 100,000,000,000 MMBTUs

7
US Energy Use (Scary Numbers)
  • About 100 Quads per year (DOE 2000)
  • A quad is a quadrillion BTUs
  • 100,000,000,000,000,000 BTUs is US use
  • 100,000,000,000 MMBTUs
  • Roughly the energy in 5,882,352,941 cords of
    aspen (just for comparison)
  • MN cut less than 3,000,000 cords of pulpwood in
    2001

8
We will not be replacing all energy consumption
with biomass, but it can be part of the picture
9
What is Feasible
  • About a 30 replacement of energy needs using ag
    residue/products and forest residue (Perlack et
    al. 2005)
  • Total forestland unutilized residue at this point
    (368 million dry tons)
  • Ag land (998 million dry tons) this is based on
    several changes that we will not discuss

10
Mike Math (obviously sort of gross measurements)
  • 13.8 mmbtu per oven dry ton
  • 368 million dry tons in US of wood residue
  • 5,078,400,000,000,000 btu
  • About 5 quads in all wood residue in US (about 5
    of current use)

11
Outline
  1. Benefits of wood
  2. Problems
  3. Potential users

12
1. Benefits of Wood
  • Domestic and LOCAL source
  • Renewable and carbon neutral (?)
  • Low heavy metal emissions
  • Extremely low sulfur dioxide emissions
  • Low ash with good reuse potential

13
Benefits of Wood
  • Domestic and LOCAL source
  • MN imports most of its energy (no coal, oil or
    gas deposits) resulting in large amounts of money
    leaving the state
  • The US has a low level of self-sufficiency in
    energy production
  • Renewable and carbon neutral (?)
  • Low heavy metal emissions
  • Extremely low sulfur dioxide emissions
  • Low ash with good reuse potential

14
Benefits of Wood
  • Domestic and LOCAL source
  • Renewable and carbon neutral (?)
  • Generally, wood is a renewable resource if the
    site is not degraded by the harvest
  • Wood uses CO2 to grow and harvest removes less
    CO2 than is stored on the site, generally carbon
    used equals or exceeds carbon harvested
  • Low heavy metal emissions
  • Extremely low sulfur dioxide emissions
  • Low ash with good reuse potential

15
Benefits of Wood
  • Domestic and LOCAL source
  • Renewable and carbon neutral (?)
  • Low heavy metal emissions
  • Mercury levels are very low in wood
  • Other heavy metals are low
  • Land application of ash is possible and common
  • Extremely low sulfur dioxide emissions
  • Low ash with good reuse potential

16
Benefits of Wood
  • Domestic and LOCAL source
  • Renewable and carbon neutral (?)
  • Low heavy metal emissions
  • Extremely low sulfur dioxide emissions
  • Generally there are very low levels of sulfur in
    wood
  • Low sulfur coal is generally more expensive than
    high sulfur coal
  • Scrubbing to reduce sulfur emissions is expensive
  • Low ash with good reuse potential

17
Benefits of Wood
  • Domestic and LOCAL source
  • Renewable and carbon neutral (?)
  • Low heavy metal emissions
  • Extremely low sulfur dioxide emissions
  • Low ash with good reuse potential
  • Wood with bark is usually less than 2 ash and
    wood itself is less than 1
  • Wyoming coal from Powder River Basin (an example)
    is 5
  • This results is 2-5 times as much ash
  • While both fly ash (free-40 per ton) and bottom
    ash (free to 6 per ton) have markets, their
    disposal (particularly bottom ash) is usually not
    a cashflow, it is usually a cost

18
Problems
  • Collection
  • Freight
  • Storage
  • Burning

19
Problems
  • Collection
  • Existing concentrated sources already used
  • Dispersed sources require new technology or
    different operation of equipment while harvesting
  • Freight
  • Storage
  • Burning

20
Problems
  • Collection
  • Freight
  • Shipping is one of the highest costs, often 50
    miles is quoted as the maximum freight (this is
    subject to a lot of debate however)
  • Storage
  • Burning

21
Problems
  • Collection
  • Freight
  • Storage
  • Chips have limited storage life
  • Bundles have much longer storage but require an
    additional step in the processing
  • Other methods?
  • Burning

22
Problems
  • Collection
  • Freight
  • Storage
  • Burning
  • Wood as a chunk is as strange fuel (part is
    cooking, part is having volatiles produced and
    part is charcoal all at the same time, therefore
    it is hard to control)
  • In most large plants it has to be pulverized
  • In nearly all cases, moisture of the material
    reduces harvestable heat. Wood is generally to
    high moisture without some natural or artificial
    drying.

23
Potential Users
  • Heat
  • Electric
  • Co-gen

24
Conclusions
  • Biomass for energy is a very viable energy source
    for the US
  • There is a large resource out there
  • As energy prices increase, the economic viability
    of these fuels is also increasing
  • However, care needs to be taken not to repeat
    errors from the 1980s

25
  • 1 KWh 3413 BTU1 therm 100,000 BTU
  • 1 kilowatt hour of electricity 3,413 Btu1 cu.
    ft. natural gas 1,008 - 1,034 Btu1 therm gas
    100,000 Btu1 gallon crude oil 138,095 Btu1
    barrel crude oil 5,800,000 Btu1 gallon
    gasoline 125,000 BtuFrom CO Biomass
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com