Applikasi teori kepemimpinan dalam pendidikan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Applikasi teori kepemimpinan dalam pendidikan

Description:

Applikasi teori kepemimpinan dalam pendidikan Anda perlu membincangkan aplikasi setiap teori ini dalam institusi tempat anda bekerja Leadership Foundations Managers ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:630
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: 5686908
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Applikasi teori kepemimpinan dalam pendidikan


1
Applikasi teori kepemimpinan dalam pendidikan
  • Anda perlu membincangkan aplikasi setiap teori
    ini dalam institusi tempat anda bekerja

2
  • Leadership Foundations
  • Managers versus Leaders
  • Trait Theories
  • Behavioral Theories
  • Cross Cultural Implications
  • Situational Contingency Leadership
  • Fiedlers Leadership Contingency Theory
  • Houses path-Goal Theory of Leadership
  • Hersey and Blanchards Situational Leadership
    Theory
  • Graens Leader-member exchange Theory
  • Substitutes for Leadership Theory
  • Implicit Leadership
  • Leadership as Attribution
  • Leadership Prototypes
  • Inspirational Leadership Perspectives
  • Charismatic Leadership
  • Transformational and Transactional Leadership
  • Charismatic and Transformational Leadership
    Issues.

3
Leadership Foundation A Summary
  • Managers versus Leaders
  • Leadership is the process of influencing others
    to understand and agree about what needs to be
    done and how to do it, and the process of
    facilitating individual and collective efforts to
    accomplish shared objectives.
  • The role of management is to promote stability or
    to enable the organization to run smoothly,
    whereas the role of leadership is to promote
    adaptive or useful changes.

4
  • Persons in managerial positions could be involved
    with both management and leadership activities,
    or they could emphasize one activity at the
    expense of the others. Both management and
    leadership are needed.
  • Leadership appears in two form
  • Formal leadership which is exerted by persons
    appointed to or elected to positions of formal
    authority in organizational.
  • Informal leadership which is exerted by persons
    who become influential because they have special
    skills that meet the resource needs of others.

5
  • Trait Theories
  • Trait perspective assume that traits play a
    central role in differentiating between leaders
    and non-leaders or in predicting leader or
    organizational outcomes.
  • Traits with positive implications for successful
    leadership are as follow-

Energy and adjustment or stress tolerance Prosocial power motivation Achievement orientation Emotional maturity Physical vitality and emotional resilience A high need for power exercised primarily for the benefit of others Need for achievement, desire to excel, drive to success, willingness to assume responsibility, concern for task objectives Well-adjusted, does not suffer from severe psychological disorders
6
Self-confidence Integrity Perseverance or tenacity Cognitive ability, intelligence, social intelligence Task-relevant knowledge Flexibility General confidence in self and in the ability to perform the job of a leader Behavior consistent with espoused values honest, ethical, trustworthy Ability to overcome obstacles strength of will Ability to gather, ingrate, and interpret information intelligence, understanding of social setting Knowledge about the company, industry, and technical aspects Ability to respond appropriately to change in the setting
7
  • Behavioral Theories
  • The behavioral perspective assumes that
    leadership is central to performance and other
    outcomes.
  • Two classic research programs-at the University
    of Michigan and the Ohio State University-
    provide useful insights into leadership
    behaviors.

8
  • Michigan Studies
  • In the late 1940s, researchers at the University
    of Michigan introduced a research program on
    leadership behavior.
  • The researchers derived two basic forms of leader
    behavior employee centered and production
    centered. Employee-centered supervisors are those
    who place strong emphasis on their subordinates
    welfare.
  • In contrast, production-centered supervisors are
    more concerned with getting the work done.
  • In general, employee-centered supervisors were
    found to have more productive workgroups than did
    the production-centered supervisors.
  • Sometimes, the more general term human-relation
    oriented and oriented are used to describe these
    alternative leader behavior.

9
  • Ohio State Studies
  • A leader high in consideration is sensitive to
    peoples feelings and tries to make things
    pleasant for the followers.
  • A leader high in initiating structure is
    concerned with spelling out the task requirements
    and clarifying other aspects of the work agenda.
  • The Leadership Grid
  • Robert Blake and Jane Mouton have develop the
    leadership grid approach based on extensions of
    the Ohio State dimensions.
  • Leadership grid results are plotted on a
    nine-position grid that places concern for
    production on the horizontal axis and concern for
    people on the vertical axis.

10
  • Cross-Cultural Implications
  • It is important to consider how well the kinds of
    behavioral dimensions discussed earlier transfer
    internationally. Some work in the United Stated,
    Britain, Hong Kong, and Japan shows that the
    behavior must be carried out in different ways in
    alternative cultures.
  • British leaders are seen as considerate if they
    show subordinates how to use equipment, whereas
    in Japan the highly considerate leader helps
    subordinates with personal problems.

11
Situational Contingency Leadership
  • Another development in leadership thinking has
    recognized, however, that leader traits and
    behaviors can act in conjunction with situational
    contingencies.

12
  • Fiedlers Leadership Contingency Theory
  • Situational control is the extent to which
    leaders can determine what their groups are going
    to do and what the outcomes of their actions and
    decision are going to be.
  • The least preferred co-worker (LPC) scale is a
    measure of a persons leadership style based on a
    description of the person with whom respondents
    have been able to work least well.
  • Fred Fiedlers work began the situational
    contingency era in t emid-1960s. His theory holds
    that group effectiveness on an appropriate match
    between a leaders style (essentially a trait
    measure) and the demands of the situation.

13
  • Fiedler uses an instrument called the least
    preferred co-worker (LPC) scale to measure a
    persons leadership style.
  • Leader-member relations (good/poor) membership
    support for the leader.
  • Task structure (high/low) spelling out the
    leaders task goals, procedures, and guidelines
    in the group.
  • Position power (strong/weak) the leaders task
    expertise and reward or punishment authority.
  • Fiedlers three situati0nal control variables.
  • 2. House path goal theory (as discussed before)

14
  • Hersey and Blanchards Situational leadership
    Theory
  • Situational leadership model focuses on the
    situational contingency of maturity or
    readiness of followers.
  • Situational contingency approaches, the
    situational leadership model developed by Paul
    Hersey and Kenneth Blanchard posits that there is
    no single best way to lead.

15
  • Hersey and Blanchard focus on the situational
    contingency of maturity, or readiness, of
    followers, in particular.
  • Readiness is the extent to which people have the
    ability and willingness to accomplish a specific
    task.
  • A telling style (S1) is best for low follower
    readiness (R1)
  • A selling style (S2) is best for
    low-to-moderate follower readiness (R2)
  • A participating style (S3) is best for
    moderate-to-high follower readiness (R3)
  • A delegating style (S4) is best for high
    readiness (R4)

16
  • Graens Leader-Member Exchange Theory
  • Leader-member exchange (LMX) theory emphasize the
    quality of the working relationship between
    leaders and followers.
  • An LMX scale assesses the degree to which leaders
    and followers have mutual respect for one
    anothers capabilities, feel a deepening sense of
    mutual trust, and have a strong sense of
    obligation to one another, which followers will
    be a part of the leaders in-group or
    out-group.

17
  • In-group followers tend to function as
    assistants, lieutenants, or advisers and to have
    higher-quality personalized exchanged with the
    leader than do out-group followers.
  • The out-group followers tend to emphasize more
    formalized job requirements, and relative low
    level of mutual influence exist between leaders
    and out-group followers.
  • LMX is associated with increased follower
    satisfaction and productivity, decrease turnover,
    increased salaries, and faster promotion rates.

18
  • Substitutes for Leadership Theory
  • Substitutes for leadership make a leaders
    influence either unnecessary or redundant in that
    they replace a leaders influence.
  • It will be unnecessary and perhaps not even
    possible for a leader to provide the kind of
    task-oriented directed already available from an
    experienced, talented, and well-trained
    subordinate.
  • In contrast, neutralizers prevent a leader from
    behaving in a certain way or nullify the effects
    of a leader's action.
  • Little formal authority or is physically
    separated, for example, his or her leadership may
    be nullified even tough task supportiveness may
    still be needed.

19
CHARACTERISTICS OF INDIVIDUALS
IMPACT ON LEADERSHIP
Experience, ability, training
Professional orientation
Indifference towards organizational rewards
Substitutes for task-oriented leadership
Substitutes for task-oriented and supportive leadership
Neutralizes task-oriented and supportive leadership
CHARACTERISTICS OF JOB
Highly structured/routine
Intrinsically satisfying
Substitutes for task-oriented leadership
Substitutes for supportive leadership
CHARACTERISTICS OF ORGANIZATION
Cohesive
Low leader position power
Leader physically separated
Substitutes for task-oriented and supportive leadership
Neutralizes task-oriented and supportive leadership
Neutralizes task-oriented and supportive leadership
20
Implicit Leadership
  • To move from the symbolic leadership extension of
    leadership substitutes to implicit leadership.
  • In the mid 1970s a couple of researchers argued
    that leadership factors are in the mind of the
    respondent. It remains to be established whether
    or not they are more than that. this general
    notion is described here in two forms.
  • The first one is labeled leadership as
    attribution and the second is termed leadership
    prototypes.

21
  • Leadership as Attribution
  • If leader attribute an employees poor
    performance to lack of effort, they may issue a
    reprimand, whereas if they attributes the poor
    performance to an external factor, such as work
    overload, they will probably try to fix the
    problem.
  • Inference-based emphasizes leadership
    effectiveness as inferred by followers based on
    perceived group or organization performance
    outcomes.

22
  • Leadership Prototypes
  • Leadership prototypes are the second form of
    leadership considered to be in the mind of the
    beholder. Here, research argues that people have
    a mental image of the characteristics that make a
    good leader or that a real leader would
    possess to be considered effective in a given
    situation.
  • Leadership prototypes are an alternatives way to
    the inference-based approach to assess leadership
    and are termed recognition based (you know one
    when you see his or her characteristics profile).

23
  • Recognition-based is leadership effectiveness
    based on how well a person fits characteristics
    of a good or effective leader
  • Small-scale study contrasted typical business
    leader prototypes between Japan an the United
    States.
  • Japan responsible, educated, trustworthy,
    intelligent, disciplined
  • United States determined, goal oriented,
    verbally skilled, industrious, persistent.

24
Inspirational Leadership Perspective
  • Charismatic Leadership.
  • Are those leaders who, by force of their personal
    abilities, are capable of having a profound and
    extraordinary effect on followers.
  • Transformational and Transactional Leadership.
  • Transactional leadership involves
    leader-followers exchanges necessary for
    achieving routine performance agreed upon between
    leaders and followers.
  • Transformational leadership occurs when leaders
    broaden and elevate followers interest and stir
    followers to look beyond their own interest to
    the good of others.

25
  • Charismatic and Transformational Leadership
    issues.
  • Issues 1 can people be trained in
    charismatic/transformational leadership?
  • Issues 2 is charismatic/transformational
    leadership always good?
  • Sila bincangkan dalam kumpulan.

26
Study Guide
  • What are leadership foundations?
  • Leadership is the process of influencing others
    to understand and agree about what needs to be
    done and how to do it, and the process of
    facilitating individual and collective efforts to
    accomplish shared objectives
  • Leadership and management differ in that
    management is designed to promote stability or to
    make the organization run smoothly, whereas the
    role of leadership is to promote adaptive change.
  • Traits or great-person approaches argue that
    leader traits have a major impact on
    differentiating between leaders and nonreaders or
    predicting leadership outcomes.
  • Traits are considered relatively innate and hard
    to change.
  • Similar to trait approaches, behavioral theories
    argue that leader behavior have a major impact on
    outcomes.
  • Leader behavior theories are especially suitable
    for leadership training.

27
  • What are situational contingency approaches to
    leadership?
  • Leader situational contingency approaches argue
    that leadership, in combination with various
    situational contingency variables, can have a
    major impact on outcomes.
  • The effect of traits are enhanced to the extent
    of their relevance to the situational contingency
    faced by the leader.
  • Strong or weak situational contingencies
    influence the impact of leadership traits.
  • Fiedlers contingencies theory, Houses path-goal
    theory, Hersey and Blanchards situational
    leadership theory, Graens leader-member exchange
    theory, and Kerr and Jermiers substitutes for
    leadership theory are particularly important
    specific situational contingency approaches.
  • Sometimes, as in the case of the substitutes for
    leadership approach, the role of situational
    contingencies replaces that of leadership, so
    that leadership has little or no impact in itself.

28
  • What are implicit leadership approaches to
    leadership?
  • Attribution theory extends traditional leadership
    approaches by recognizing that substantive
    effects cannot always be objectively identified
    and measured
  • Leaders form attribution about why their
    employees perform well or poorly and respond
    accordingly as do employees concerning leaders.
  • Leaders and followers often infer that there is
    good leadership when their group performs well.
    This is an inferential perspective.
  • Leaders and followers often have in mind a good
    leader prototype compare the leader against such
    a prototype an conclude that the closer the fit,
    the better the leadership. This is a
    representational perspective.
  • Some contend that leadership makes no real
    difference and is largely symbolic others,
    following the romance of leadership notion,
    embrace this symbolic emphasis and attribute
    almost magical qualities to leadership.

29
  • What are inspirational perspective to leadership?
  • Charismatic and transformational leadership helps
    move followers to achieve goals that transcend
    their own self-interests and help transform the
    organization.
  • Particularly important among such approaches are
    Basss transformational theory and Houses and
    Conger and Kanungos charismatic perspectives.
  • Transformational approaches are broader than
    charismatic ones and sometimes include charisma
    as one of their dimensions.
  • Transformational/charismatic leadership, in
    general, are important because they go beyond
    traditional leadership in facilitating change in
    the increasingly fast-moving workplace.
  • In terms of charismatic/transformational
    leadership training, Bass and his colleagues,
    Conger and Kanungo, and Kaouzos and Posner, among
    others, have developed such training programs.
  • Charismatic/transformational leadership are not
    always good, as shown by the example of Adolf
    Hitler.
  • Charismatic/transformational leadership are not
    always helpful since even if good, they may
    divert energy away from other kinds of
    leadership.
  • Charismatic/transformational leadership are
    important throughout the organization, as well as
    the top.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com