Lecture 11 Economic Theory of the Firm - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Lecture 11 Economic Theory of the Firm

Description:

Lecture 11 Economic Theory of the Firm There are two views of the firm: 1. Neoclassical (traditional) theory: Firm is a calculating entity, that makes decisions, buys ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:277
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: Ra144
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lecture 11 Economic Theory of the Firm


1
Lecture 11Economic Theory of the Firm
  • There are two views of the firm
  • 1. Neoclassical (traditional) theory
  • Firm is a calculating entity, that makes
    decisions, buys inputs, making output, and
    selling for profit for loss
  • 2. Property rights theory
  • Firm is a collection of contracts between owners
    of resources, who wish to combine some portion of
    their resources, for some period, for some purpose

2
Traditional Theory of the Firm
  • Traditionally, the firm headed by the
    entrepreneur or manager makes decisions
  • What to produce?
  • When and how to produce it?
  • How much to produce?
  • What is its price?
  • The firm is seen as having a production function
  • Relates inputs and outputs like a recipe
  • q q (x,y,z)
  • q is output
  • x, y, z are inputs
  • The exact form depends on technology, state of
    knowledge, etc.

3
A production function
  • A production function is often a mechanical or
    engineering view of productionlabor, supplies
    and capital
  • 1 shovel of cement
  • 3 shovels of sand
  • 5 shovels of stone
  • 4 liters of water
  • Use labor to mix cement, sand, and stone for 1
    minute
  • Add more water to get right texture
  • Use labor and hoe to mix for 2 minutes
  • Output 12 liters of wet concrete
  • Most of this is engineering. The role of
    economics is limited to the importance of price,
    substitutes, etc. Important concepts, but not
    difficult to grasp.

4
Property Rights Theory Firms and Markets
  • Where is the line between the market vs. command
    and control (within the firm)?
  • The market relies on spot prices to provide
    information and induce decisions
  • The firm relies on command and control within the
    context of long term contracts to inform and
    induce
  • The tradeoff
  • Market is informationally efficient
  • The firm is contractually efficient
  • The balance between these two determines the
    margin of choice between the firm and the market

5
What Kind of Organizational Form to Choose?
  • A key role of managers is to procure inputs in
    the least cost mannerincluding providing
    incentives for workers to be productive.
  • If this is not accomplished, costs will be higher
    than needed and the firm will lose profits and
    perhaps go out of business in a competitive
    market.
  • Does a manager procure inputs from the market or
    procure inputs within the firm?

6
How to obtain needed inputs?
  • Consider possible stages of production
  • Obtaining raw materials
  • Obtaining finished parts
  • Assembly
  • Transportation services
  • Storage
  • Wholesaling
  • Retailing

7
How to obtain needed inputs?
  • Consider general services needed by an
    organization
  • Accounting
  • Finance (including credit service)
  • Human Resources
  • Legal Services
  • Marketing (advertising, etc.)
  • Janitorial Service
  • Who is to provide such services?

8
Who provides such needed services and functions?
  • Should the firm produce within the organization
    or outsource?
  • There is no one answermany conditions will
    determine outcome.
  • Think of the great range of options
  • Spot markets ? Long Term Contracts ?
  • Vertical Integration (produce in house)

9
Methods of Obtaining Inputs
  • 1. Spot market or spot exchange
  • Buyers and sellers of inputs exchange, but might
    not deal again. Benefit deal with specialized
    sellers, usually with low transaction costs. It
    means we do not have to integrate the seller into
    the firm or deal with over time. Possible
    problem exploitation by seller who knows we are
    ignorant or need supply badly.

10
Methods of Obtaining Inputs
  • 2. Contracts
  • Legally based extended relationship between
    buyer and seller.
  • Benefits specialization, ability to terminate
    sellers who do not perform, reduction in
    opportunistic behavior compared to spot markets.
    Problems costly in complex environments
    incentives to cheat act badly.

11
Many Forms of Contracts
  • Services (Deere and Ryder Trucks UPS and
    Toshiba warranty laptop repairs UPS and Jockey
    Japanese call centers in Dalien)
  • Joint Ventures (foreign firms in China)
  • Leases (office buildings)
  • Franchises (McDonalds, car dealers)
  • Strategic Alliances (Merck Astra)

12
Methods of Obtaining Inputs
  • 3. Vertical Integration
  • (Non-market exchange)
  • When a firm chooses to produce an input
    internally rather than contract with outsiders.
    Benefits reduced opportunistic behavior by
    outsiders and fewer contracting costs. Problems
    lost specialization and increased organizational
    costs.

13
When Is Vertical Integration Most Likely to Be
Necessary?
  • Brand name (goodwill) protection
  • When there are specific assets
  • When there are high sunk costs
  • When contracts especially difficult to enforce

14
Methods of Obtaining Inputs
  • Summary
  • Is there substantial specialized investments
    relative to contracting costs? If nolikely to
    use spot market.
  • If yesis the cost of contracting high relative
    to the cost of integration? If yesvertical
    integration if nocontracts with outside
    suppliers.

15
Recent Example Ford
  • Ford had used annual bidding competition to
    achieve low cost suppliers for auto parts (70
    billion a year).
  • Problems high administrative cost, bankruptcy by
    suppliers, quality control uneven
  • Solution longer term contracts with fewer
    suppliers (down from 2,500 to 1,000) closer
    working relationship estimated savings of 10
    per year.

16
Agency Costs
  • Who gets what or thinks they deserve something
    is a part of what we call Agency Costs or
    Agency Problems.
  • Agency costs exist as a problem whenever a
    principal hires an agent to act on his behalf.
  • Solving this universal problems is a key
    managerial problem in managing personnel and in
    controlling costs.

17
A Major Drawback of Firms Agency Costs
  • The agency problem arises from the separation of
    ownership and control.
  • Owners of firms are interested in profit
    maximization.
  • Managers and other employees are interested in
    maximizing own self-interests.
  • How do we give managers an incentive to act as if
    they were owners of the firm? How do we get
    employees to not shirkthat is, work as hard as
    they can in the manner the owners would want?
    Telling people to work hard does not help muchit
    is a matter of incentives.

18
Agency Costs . . .
  • These are a problem because we are human. If we
    cheat ourselves, then no one else bears the
    cost. So we never cheat ourselves. So the
    one-person firm is efficient and does not suffer
    agency costs.
  • It is natural for us to want to exploit others
    get others to pay more than they agreed to pay or
    we produce less than we agreed to produce. That
    is, a divergence in interest between principal
    and agent in a multi-person organization and in
    contracts.

19
Monitoring, Signals and Contracts
  • Assume a company will need an average of 50 hours
    of legal work a year at 100/hour.
  • The law firm has an incentive to inflate the
    number of hours to maybe 70 hours.
  • Company knows that, so pays an expert to monitor
    the law firm
  • Law firm knows it is being monitored so has
    incentive to monitor itself.
  • How to avoid this problem both parties recognize?
  • Parties may reach fixed price contract to avoid
    monitoring costs send right signal.

20
Monitoring
  • We have incentives to shirk take more than we
    should or work less than we should. Monitoring is
    costly, so sensible to accept some losses. Many
    forms of monitoring (spot checks, etc.).
  • Usually there is unequal (asymmetric) information
    between parties. One knows more than the other
    and can exploit that.
  • Examples. Person selling used car.
  • Buy insurance (buyer exploits seller)

21
Monitoring Bonding
  • How do we assure customers that we will not
    exploit them unfairlythat they will pay a
    reasonable, market price?
  • Various devices
  • Fixed price contracts Bonds Warranties
  • Future price guarantees.
  • Less formal Reputation. The evidence is strong
    this matters greatly in the market. We pay
    premiums to deal with firms with good reputations.

22
Entrepreneurs and their Firms
  • Key Managerial Problem
  • Giving employees incentives to act as if they are
    owners.
  • In general The entrepreneur or top manager must
    cede authority to others. The movement has been
    in this direction especially in knowledge-based
    production.

23
Decentralization Pros Cons
  • Empowering workers and managers is a good
    concept--
  • BENEFITS
  • 1. More effective use of local knowledge
  • those closest know the most
  • 2. Conservation of senior management top
    people cannot know or do everything
  • 3. Training motivation for local managers
    helps attract and keep good managers and train
    future top managers

24
Decentralization . . .
  • A good idea but obviously not perfect--
  • There Are Costs
  • 1. Agency costs
  • shirking self-dealing so control and
    monitoring measures needed
  • 2. Coordination costs and failures
  • duplication pricing errors
  • 3. Less effective use of central information
  • local managers cannot know all information the
    central managers, so have inferior knowledge

25
Decentralizing Team Decisions
  • Create teams composed of people with different
    expertise to make decisions
  • Ex.Hallmark Cards has teams of art, design,
    production and marketing assigned by holiday with
    decision rights rather than move produce from
    functional area to areacut time in half.
  • BenefitsImproved use of specific knowledge and
    employee buy in due to better information, more
    cooperation less blame.
  • CostsCollective-action and free-rider problems.
  • Same thing in car productionteam development
    tried at Chrysler separate functional areas at
    GM. Tradeoffs.

26
Decision Management Control
  • 1. Initiationproposals to use firm resources and
    the structuring of contracts
  • 2. Ratificationchoice of initiatives to be
    implemented
  • 3. Implementationexecution of ratified decisions
  • 4. Monitoringmeasurement of performance of
    decision agents and implementing rewards
  • Remember agents (managers within a firm) do not
    bear the full cost of their actions, so cannot be
    delegated both decision management and control
    hierarchy still necessary. Make authority and
    lines of control clear to avoid confusion.

27
Questions How Do We Overcome Agency Costs?
  • The larger the organization, or the greater the
    distance from the owners to the workers, the more
    likely that agency costs will become significant
    large corporation look more like an inefficient
    government agency. What economic incentives do
    firms take to try to give workers proper
    incentives?

28
Question Large Organization with Simple
Monitoring
  • Mary Kay Cosmetics grew from sale of 200,000 in
    1963 to over 600 million in 1993, 30 years
    later. The product is common and very
    competitive. The key to growth was measurement of
    employee effort and rewards. What was it?

29
Question on Team Incentives
  • Suppose different numbers of people are assigned
    to pull a rope as hard as you can.
  • One person pulls the rope.
  • Three people pull the rope together.
  • Eight people pull the rope together.
  • How does the pulling force (work effort) per
    person change across these three cases?

30
Incentives of Managers
  • In the fast-food industry, about 30 of stores
    are company owned and run by a salaried manager.
    About 70 of the stores are run as franchises by
    owner-operators who split profits with the parent
    company. 1) Which kind of store would you think
    would tend to be more profitable?
  • 2) Why then does the parent choose to own some?
    Where would they be located?
  • 3) Would you expect employees to see a
    difference in the managers?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com