Title: WINDS OF DEATH
1CHAPTER 5
2- - A chapter about the production and release of
toxic compounds - Looks at the evolution of chemical hazard
- --- a production of the interaction of the
development of the industry and how society
utilizes chemical products
3I cant think of a better example of the chemical
specialization than the pesticide industry
- Insecticide Herbicide
- Fungicide Nematicide
- Rodenticide Bactericide
- Acaricide Algicide
- Miticide Molluscicide
- Avicide Slimicide
- Piscicide Ovicide
4Pesticide-class chemicals not carrying a
-icide suffix
- Disinfectants
- Growth regulators
- Defoliants
- Desiccants
- Repellents
- Attractants
- Chemosterilants
5- Combining industrial, economic, political, and
social contexts, gives a better understanding of
where and why chemical hazards occur - and why some people and places are more
susceptible to this risk - Bhopal, India (1984)
- Guadalajara, Mexico (1992)
- Seveso, Italy (1997)
6- - Accidental releases occur daily, some small and
unnoticed. Others resulting in significant damage
to both people and property
7Forms of Impacts
- (1) disruption of organic life- support
systems - (2) damage to wildlife
- (3) damage to human health
- (4) damage to property
- (5) nuisance effects
- (smell tastesight)
8Types of Chemical Hazards
- Toxic chemicals substances that are fatal to
over 50 of test animals at a given concentration - Hazardous chemicals harmful to humans for a
number of reasons - Carcinogen chemicals, radiation, or viruses
that cause/promote growth of malignancy
especially resulting in metastasis
9Types of Chemical Hazards, cont
- Mutagens agents like radiation or chemicals
that cause mutations - change in the DNA of a living organism
especially in germ cells - Teratogens chemicals, radiation, viruses, etc,
that cause birth defects in human embryos
10Chemical Hazards and Terrorism
- There are many chemical agents available to
terrorists - Some of the most widely known and feared and
would cause the greatest number of injuries
11Chemical Hazards and Terrorism, cont
- (1) Blister Agents (mustard gas) a few drops
can cause severe injury(attacks eyes, skin,
respiratory and digestive systems)
flammable - In pure state, colorless and odorless
manufacturers add color (amber, green) and odor
(mustard, garlic)
12Chemical Hazards and Terrorism, cont
- (2) Blood Agents (hydrogen cyanide) under
pressure a liquid, in use a gas flammable - Low concentrations-little effect
- High concentration toxic and rapid death
(attacks eyes nervous, respiratory digestive
systems) - In pure state odor of almonds or peach blooms
- (/-) volatile, dissipates quickly
- () Toxic effects may be delayed
13Chemical Hazards and Terrorism, cont
- (3) Choking Agents (chlorine) many are
industrial compounds, are readily available
- React with H2O to form hypochlorous acid (HClO)
and hydrochloric acid (HCl ) attacks
respiratory system (coughing, choking, fluid
build-up) - Pungent, bleach-like smell, greenish- yellow gas
14Chemical Hazards and Terrorism, cont
- (4) Nerve agents (Sarin) all are toxic in
small concentrations - Odorless, resembles water or a light vegetable
oil aerosol dispersion best - Attacks eyes, skin, muscles, respiratory
system, nervous system, digestive system - Many dead animals, birds, insects may indicate
an incident
15The Production of Chemical Hazards
- Many types of hazard are associated with the
chemical industry. They can generally be classed
into two categories - (a) incidents / accidents
- (b) waste products
16The Production of Chemical Hazards, cont
- - Severity and magnitude of the hazard is a
function of - (1) type of technological failure
- (2) location of the incident
- Both will affect the spatial area impacted,
including as it relates to product life cycles
17The Production of Chemical Hazards, cont
- (3) property(ies) of the chemical hazard
- --- persistence resistance to degradation
- hydrolysis (water)
- photolysis (sunlight)
- oxidation (O2 bacteria)
- --- solubility ability to dissolve in water
- --- volatility measure of the tendency of a
compound to become a gas - --- absorption tendency to bond with
organic and inorganic matter
18The Production of Chemical Hazards, cont
- - Because chemical hazard incidents can occur at
any point in the lifetime of the chemical
manufacture-to-disposal chemical hazards are
difficult to manage
19Cutter
- More than any other technological hazards,
chemical hazards require a thorough understanding
of the scale and context (social, historical,
political, economic, environmental) of chemical
use because of the source of the hazard is so
randomly distributed (p. 87)
20- Technological change and innovation is the
driving force in the evolution of world societies
from rural agrarian to urban industrial - --- since the Industrial Revolution, the pace
of innovation has accelerated with marked
societal results
21Better living through chemistry?
- - Rapidness of this technological change and its
complexity has led to a correlated increase in
unintended and unanticipated consequences - - Until very recently, societies have taken the
position that benefits have outweighed
risks/costs esp chemical industry - somewhat blindly, I think
22Chemical Industry Temporal Patterns
- Viewed most broadly, two spatial patterns emerge
- (1) Prior to 1900 concentration in
Britain (soda) and Germany (Dyeing) - (2) After 1900 diversified and rapidly
growing -
23- Why pattern after 1900?
- --- technological advances / innovations in
science - --- internationalization of industry /
multi-nationals - --- mechanization increased efficiency
- --- abandonment of batch operations for
continuous-flow operations
24Product Life Cycles
- Text says that these also played an important
role in industry transformation / spatial
organization - Can be viewed as birth-to-death of of a product
line or an innovation (p. 89)
25Product Life Cycles, cont
- Four stages
- (1) research and development
conception, testing, patenting,
commercialization of a product or innovation - --- industry concentrated in a few
locations reflecting factor(s) of
production
26Product Life Cycles, cont
- Four stages, cont
- (2) new product stage introduction of new
product / innovation - --- rapid market growth
- --- market monopolization
- --- core area is reinforced and enhanced as
skilled labor emigrates - may become nodal and foster
- business serving employment
27Product Life Cycles, cont
- Four Stages, cont
- (3) maturity competitors enter the product /
innovation field - --- innovator firms advantage disappears
- --- need to reduce cost and product is mass
produced - --- industry seeks dispersion of facilities
to control cost and off-set decreased market
share
28Product Life Cycles, cont
- Four stages, cont
- (4) decline and termination
- --- product or innovation declines and
eventually disappears - --- new product of innovation opportunity
- --- often associated with antiquated
facilities / methods - --- firm may continue reduced marketing of
product/innovation
29Historical and Spatial Evolution of the Chemical
Industry
- International Developments pre-1900
- - Text sulphuric acid was the first commercially
produced chemical (Arabs 8th C) - - Not until the Industrial Revolution that the
chemical industry go its start - --- early 18th C industry production dominated
by heavy organics, particularly alkali and soda
ash both in demand for hard soap and glass
production -
30- International Developments pre-1900, cont
- - Initially demand far exceeded supply (vegetable
sources) - as a consequence, the impetus existed for
innovation and the search for alternative
sources - (1) Cutter cites the LeBlanc Method
- sulphuric acid and salt to synthesize alkali
31- International Developments pre-1900
- - LeBlanc Method inherently dangerous
- Interesting for every ton of synthetic alkali
produced by LeBlanc, 1.4 tons of tank waste
resulted - - By 1863, concern about the effects of
hydrochloric venting that the British government
enacted the UK AlKali Act
32- International Developments pre-1900
- (2) Solvay Method for alkali synthesis
- less tank waste cheaper in raw materials
needed less labor - became preferred method of
- production
- more capital intensive not accepted in
Britain factor in the demise of British soda
industry
33- Other sectors of the chemical industry in Europe
were equally important - (1) synthetic dyes from coal tar
- (Switzerland and Germany)
- (2) coal tar gas
- (3) explosives industry
34- Explosives industry developed somewhat
differently - --- early industry (esp. if Chinese are
included) - --- not dominated by a single country or
concern - national defense?
- national pride?
- --- initially greater competition
35- --- eventually saw the evolution of the
Gunpowder Trust , an oligopoly which
cooperated in carving out market areas and
market shares for its members - --- Factors consolidated producers into two
giants - du Pont (U.S.)
- Noble Industries (Scotland)
36- - Additionally, during the period
- (a) growth of pharmaceutical sector---
Bayer (1898) - (b) birth of petro-chemical industry---
fertilizers and pesticides
37The 20th Century and the American Chemical
Industry
- Pre-World War I Rapid Innovations
- U.S. chemical industry in its infancy and largely
dominated by foreign technology and foreign
investment - --- despite 100 years of independence we were
still a cog in European mercantile colonialism
38The 20th Century and the American Chemical
Industry, cont
- By 1900 U.S. had distinct chemical production
concentrations - (1) close to market areas
- (Philadelphia/northern New Jersey)
- (2) close to raw materials
- (West Virginia/Detroit/Pittsburgh, etc)
- (3) close to power sources
- (Niagara Falls)
39- - Interesting few chemical producers in
Mid-west or in Gulf Coast States - - Pre-war years were characterized by rapid
innovation in the industry - Dow bromides from brine
- Monstanto artificial sweetener
- chemical advancements in plastic and acrylics
- Kodak emulsions and film-making
40The 20th Century and the American Chemical
Industry, cont
- War and Inventiveness
- Armed conflict spark invention and innovation
esp. for the chemical industry - (1) war-time embargo brought German
shortage in nitrogen - (2) development of caustic chlorine gas,
mustard gas and chloropicrin - (3) synthesis of isopropyl alcohol
41The 20th Century and the American Chemical
Industry, cont
- By the end of WWI, the U.S. chemical industry had
grown significantly while retaining decentralized
spatial organization - - The fertilizer industry was the largest single
sector, followed by explosives
42The 20th Century and the American Chemical
Industry, cont
- The Interwar Years Merger Mania and
Diversification - 1920s and 30s were decades of merger and
acquisition the chemical industry grew and
expanded operations into new products and markets - Research takes precedent over manufacturing
43The 20th Century and the American Chemical
Industry, cont
- The Interwar Years Merger Mania and
Diversification cont, - Two important discoveries occurred in the
inner-war period that permanently altered
American chemical industry - (1) development of polymerization
- (2) ability to crack molecules
44The 20th Century and the American Chemical
Industry, cont
- The Interwar Years Merger Mania and
Diversification , cont - - polymerization allowed customization of
molecule chains - - cracking molecules results in more
feedstock for processing / later new products - - whole synthetics industry ultimately
increased need for resources and raw material
45Interesting
- Changing World Technologies, a factory in
Carthage, MI, utilizing a process called thermal
depolymerization has developed a way to speed up
Mother Nature by combining heat and pressure to
convert turkey by-products (beaks, feathers,
bones, etc,) into oil
46Interesting, cont
- Claim process will work on anything containing
carbon - The only by-products are oil, natural gas, carbon
materials and water - Plant produces 3,000 barrels of biofuel weekly
from 1200 tons of turkey parts (ConAgra
slaughterhouse supplied) - Cost 80/barrel smell of burning turkey parts
threat of increased cost of turkey guts (E
Magazine, Vol XVI, No. 6)
47The 20th Century and the American Chemical
Industry, cont
- Shortages and Substitutions
- Once again, war spawned shortages and need for
substitutions sparked technological development - - Much of this expansion was Federally funded as
military or patriotic need
48The 20th Century and the American Chemical
Industry, cont
- Shortages and Substitutions, cont
- (1) war time expansion
- (2) affluent American chemical market
- (3) destruction of the German
- petro-chemical industry during and after the
war made the U.S. industry world leaders after
the war
49Unheralded Growth and Transition
- 1950-60s brought little technological change
- easier to think of this time as period of
reorganization / restructuring - Movement from small operations supplying
domestic-market need to publicly trades
corporations of international branch operations
and product diversification - demanded larger / more capital intensive
operations
50 Unheralded Growth and Transition, cont
- ? How much of this overseas restructuring was the
result of birth of U.S. environmental movement
(NEPA, EPA, etc) and subsequent moratorium on
production of select chemical production in the
U.S. - --- it is clear that increased government
regulation of pharmaceutical industry did occur
51 Unheralded Growth and Transition, cont
- Example clioquinol thalidomide (Cantergan)
and phocomelia deformity - I would add that this regulation was complicated
by indirect biological response example
exposure to - --- formaldehyde and sickhouse syndrome
- --- sodium fluoroacetate
52 Unheralded Growth and Transition, cont
- There are also immune system depressants that
turn off body natural defenses - Widespread access to TV makes media become a
leading mass marketing tool - chemical sales becomes big business
- Economies of scale drove chemical industry
thinking - (drive for efficiency and market share)
53 Unheralded Growth and Transition, cont
- Also, during this period chemicals as weapons of
war again make appearance - now directed against their operating
environment not them - ex napalm, dev. In WWII by Dupont and
Standard Oil CO. reappears - Also a growing backlash against the chemical
industry - Rachel Carson, Silent Spring
- common ground movement of anti-war, consumer
protection and environmental, groups
54Safety and Environmental Awakening
- With what we developed and what we knew at the
time, is the U.S. chemical industry good or
bad? - Mowrey and Redmond vs Ames
- - After 1970 the chemical industry for first time
comes under concerted, organized and unified
regulatory effort
55Safety and Environmental Awakening, cont
- (1) Legislative - Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) - --- legislative act unifying worker protection
across the U.S. - --- set health and safety standards for
workplaces of 10 or more workers - --- Standards set for noise, chemical agents,
temperature, workplace - safety, worker training and exposure
56Safety and Environmental Awakening, cont
- (2) Accidents brought occupational and
environmental exposure - Firemaster (1974) fire retardant of
polybrominated biphenyls was mistakenly delivered
to a agricultural feed plant instead of - Nutrimaster , a dairy additive thousands of
farm animals died, animal deformities -
57- A Michigan feed worker accidentally mixed a bag
of Firemaster into feed. Before discovered,
thousands of cows (as well as pigs chickens
sheep) in southwestern Michigan were affected.
As were humans who ate the meat and eggs, drank
the milk, etc - 23,000 cattle 1.5 million chickens thousands
of pigs and sheep were slaughtered - why? simple mistake - same company, similar
names, similar packaging
58Safety and Environmental Awakening, cont
- (2) Cont
- kepone (early 1970s) a pesticide poisons the
James River and chemical workers - Lathrop, CA (1978) EPA closed a
dibromochloropropane where chemical workers
became sterile and pesticide residue contaminated
soil and groundwater
59Safety and Environmental Awakening, cont
- These episodes and others fueled chemophobia
and brought renewed calls for tighter legislation - The chemical industry continued growth and
expansion, esp. in petro-chemicals - helped Texas, Louisiana, New York, New
Jersey, California become leading chemical
states and older industrial concentrations
dispersed
60Risk and Hazards Assessment
- Accidents have always been part of the chemical
industry - both in reality and perceptually
- history has repeated itself with multiple
accidents in the same location - reliable data on accidents is complicated by
a lack of dependable data on type and
circumstance - further, big accidents get the press
61Risk and Hazards Assessment, cont
- It is easy to conclude that worldwide there is a
general underestimation of accident hazard - Globally there is no comprehensive data base,
though attempts are in place - SARA Title III (U.S.)
- EU Seveso Directive
- Control of Industrial Major Accident Hazard
(U.K.) - UN International Programme on Chemical Safety
- UN International Register of Potentially Toxic
Chemicals
62Airborne Toxic Releases
- International Patterns
- As would be expected, there are conflicting
reports on the trend in chemical accidents
(Cutter) - General consensus that greatest frequency of
these accidents are LDCs - lack industrial infrastructure development /
safety and response infrastructures - --- this is somewhat balanced more reported
accidents lesser severity
63Airborne Toxic Releases, cont
- The U.S. Hazardscape
- Cutter opens section with a statement that
examination of the global patterns of
accidents reveal little about the contextual
nature of the hazard - How should we be trained to react to releases?
- Time limit time of exposure
- Distance distance yourself from the threat
uphill and upwind - Shielding learn common substance that form a
barrier / protect (Schellhorn)
64Airborne Toxic Releases, cont
- For example
- (1) A doctor in Richland, WA, you see an
inordinate number of cancer patients. A check
shows no reported chemical or radioactive
accidents in your area. Random occurrence?
Probably not. - You are downwind of Hanford Nuclear Reservation.
For 28 yrs (circa 1970) Hanford had routinely
released radioactive metals and chemicals into
the atmosphere. Because it was SOP, it is not
classed as an accident
65Airborne Toxic Releases, cont
- Or
- (2) Tired of problems at Richland, you move east
to Long Island, where you encounter much the same
scenario of cancer clustering. Coincidence?
Probably not. - Long Island is home to Brookhaven National
Laboratory, a center for pure scientific study.
One of their experiments was the Gamma Forest.
Here for 15 yrs (to 1980), 20 hrs a day, high
concentrations of radioactive cobalt was pumped
through 100 acres of forest to examine that the
impact might be. Again, SOP, not reported, not
an accident.
66Airborne Toxic Releases, cont
- - Cutters figures and studies have become
somewhat dated - - Cutter provides us a literature view of
chemical incidents (p. 103), but concludes that
even the cited studies do not give an
understanding of the increasing hazards of
chemical use. - For the limited analysis Cutter does here, she
confines herself to airborne chemical releases.
published accounts
67Airborne Toxic Releases, cont
- Frequency and Distribution
- - A total of 339 incidents occurred 1900-1990,
compared to 333 worldwide - --- majority 1970s and 80s
- --- Cutter notes that beginning 1950 there is
almost a doubling each succeeding decade - --- point sources dominated the numbers /
transport sources (shipping and pipelines)
showed fewer numbers - --- by state TX CA NJ LA NY PA IL
-
68Airborne Toxic Releases, cont
- Chemical Accidents
- Year Total Acute Releases
- U.S. Inter U.S. Inter
- 00-09 4 2
0 0 - 10-19 14 19 1
0 - 20-29 12 18 5
3 - 30-39 6 20 3
2 - 40-49 15 25 6
4 - 50-59 18 27 5
8 - 60-69 53 36 29
14 - 70-79 118 89 50
41 - 80-89 99 97 66
38
69Airborne Toxic Releases, cont
- Chemical Accident Sources and Totals
- Year Total Stationary Transport Pipelines
Unknown - 00-09 4 4 0
0 0 - 10-19 14 12 0
0 0 - 20-29 12 11 1
0 0 - 30-39 6 3 3
0 0 - 40-49 15 8 5
1 1 - 50-59 18 12 4
1 1 - 60-69 53 35 10
3 5 - 70-79 118 55 43
8 12 - 80-89 99 53 38
2 6
70Airborne Toxic Releases, cont
- Chemical Type
- Cutter summarizes with six categories of accident
by chemical type - (1) Acute SARA provided
- --- majority of accidents (1970-1990) were
from stationary sources from this class - (2) Radiation
- (3) Ammunition and Explosives
- (4) Oil and Natural Gas
- (5) Known chemicals not covered previously
- (6) Unknown chemical agents
71Airborne Toxic Releases, cont
- Severity
- - Frequently hard to judge because the most
visible indictors are also the most obvious - - Author observations on fatalities by chemical
type - Munitions explosions resulted in greatest
fatalities - Acute releases resulted in less deaths, but more
injuries than other classes - Radiation class was relative injury-free
- but long-term effects are down played
72Context of Risk
- According to Cutter
- (1) incidents are increasing nationally and
internationally - (2) toxicity of materials involved is
increasing - It is noteworthy the chemical industry as a whole
(by SIC codes) has one of the best safety records
among manufacturers but this is little comfort
if you are one of the 50,000 persons evacuated
from more than 100 accidents in Cutters study
period
73Context of Risk, cont
- Historically, risk has shifted
- From early dependence on heavy inorganics and
small operations where exposure was occupational - to
- Large specialized and diversified operations,
heavily capital dependent and operating on the
basis of economies of scale - Hazard increased with growth and
diversification
74Context of Risk, cont
- Some locations have been left more vulnerable to
chemical hazards than others - vulnerability The likelihood that an
individual or group will be exposed to and
adversely affected by a hazard. - --- By our social geography, the South has been
particularly vulnerable to this threat
75(No Transcript)
76(No Transcript)
77(No Transcript)