Title: TAX ADMINISTRATION CAPACITY AND CAPABILITY TAX BAR ASSOCIATION KARACHI KHAWAJA TANVEER AHMED Member (Tax Policy
1TAX ADMINISTRATIONCAPACITY AND CAPABILITY TAX
BAR ASSOCIATION KARACHIKHAWAJA TANVEER
AHMEDMember (Tax Policy Reforms)March 18,
2006
2NEED FOR REFORMS
- Overall Fiscal Effort low stagnant Tax / GDP
Ratio (Details to be followed) - Heavy Reliance on Indirect Taxes leading to
Regressive Taxation System - Protectionism through high tariffs leading to
inefficiencies and anti-export bias - Taxation on Production and Trade Activities
rather than consumption and income - Wide-ranging exemptions and concessions
3NEED FOR REFORMS Contd
- Primitive and antiquated tax administration
(Cylindrical instead of Functional) - Complexity of tax laws and arbitrariness in their
application - Persistence within manual record keeping and
limited IT support - Lack of transparency and inadequate HR Skills
and / Capabilities
4NEED FOR REFORMS Extract from Report of the
Task Force on Reform of Tax Administration,
April 2001
- Legal and administrative changes are frequent and
adhoc. - Major tax policy changes are not accompanied by
adequate changes in administrative framework. - Relationship between the taxpayer and tax
collector is largely adversial. - Organization, business processes, systems,
facilities and budget have not kept pace with the
growing demands on tax administration. - Management of human resources is severely
deficient. - Thus there was a Need for major changes in the
taxation system through tax policy and
administrative reforms -
5LOW TAX EFFORT TAX POLICY ISSUES
- Revenue adequacy Tax / GDP ratio - By
international comparisons the ratio is low - More relevant According to Pakistans spending
levels and the ongoing federal deficit, the ratio
is too low
6Tax GDP RatiosOverall Federal Provincial
Comparison
FY Total Rev. Tax Rev. Federal Taxes CBR Rev. Sur-charges Prov. Taxes
1999-00 13.5 10.7 10.2 9.2 1.0 0.5
2000-01 13.4 10.7 10.2 9.4 0.7 0.5
2001-02 14.2 10.9 10.5 9.2 1.2 0.4
2002-03 14.9 11.5 11.0 9.6 1.4 0.5
2003-04 14.8 11.5 10.5 9.4 1.1 0.5
2004-05 13.5 10.6 9.6 9.0 0.5 0.5
7Tax GDP RatiosCBR Revenue
FY CBR Revenue Direct Taxes Sales Tax Customs Excise
1999-00 9.2 3.0 3.1 1.6 1.5
2000-01 9.4 3.0 3.7 1.6 1.2
2001-02 9.2 3.2 3.8 1.1 1.1
2002-03 9.6 3.1 4.1 1.4 0.9
2003-04 9.4 3.0 4.0 1.6 0.8
2004-05 9.0 2.8 3.6 1.8 0.8
8REASONS FOR LOW TAX GDP RATIO
- The causes are multiple and often interconnected
- Low buoyancy of some particular taxes (e.g.
excises plus effects of tariff / trade reform) - Sizable underground economy (it has been
estimated at 35-40 of GDP) - Considerable tax evasion (it has been estimated
at 7 of GDP) - Narrow tax bases of major taxes (income and GST)
- Low tax effort of sub-national governments, soft
budget constraint / convenient dependency on
transfers / revenue sharing arrangements - Over the long run, tax revenue buoyancy has been
low (at 0.93 for tax revenues at 0.47 for total
revenues) hence a declining Tax /GDP ratio.
9REASONS FOR LOW TAX-GDP RATIO
- Mismatch Between Sectoral Shares in Tax and GDP
Composition - Share of Agriculture in GDP-MP 22 and in Taxes
1.2 - Share of Manufacturing in GDP-MP 17.1 and in
Taxes 62.2 - Share of Services Sector in GDP-MP over 50 and
its share in Taxes is 27.3 - (continued)
10REASONS FOR LOW TAX-GDP RATIO
- Within services sector
- Share of Transport, Storage Communication in
GDP 13.8 and in Taxes 4.5 - Share of Finance and insurance in GDP 3.2 and in
Taxes 3.9 - Share of Construction in GDP 2.2 and in Taxes
2.9 - Share of Wholesale Retail Trade in GDP 16.9
and in Taxes 2.8 - Thus, Low contribution of agriculture and leading
service sectors highlights the need to diversify
to the un-tapped areas/ sectors
11OBJECTIVES OF TAX REFORMS
- To increase revenue
- To widen taxpayers base
- To simplify tax laws and evolve effective dispute
resolution mechanism - To provide end to end automation of work
processes - Taxpayer friendly environment
- To develop an honest and efficient tax
administration
12STRATEGY FOR REFORM
- New Organizational Structure
- Combating Corruption
- Financial Administrative Issues
- Universal Self Assessment
- IT Management Function
- HRM - Evaluation of strengths weaknesses
13NEW ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
- Re-organization of CBR on functional lines
- Five new Members from Private Sector
- Complete overhaul of Income Tax operations
- Strengthening of GST, Excise and Customs
- Re-engineering of all Business Processes
14COMBATING CORRUPTION
- Re-Design of Jobs to Minimize Possibilities of
Corruption - Extensive Use of Technology to Reduce Corruption
- Public Commitment for Striking Against Corruption
- Special Code of Conduct for Employees
- Training to Emphasize Integrity Issues
- Severe Timely Penalties
- Clear Guidelines Regarding Handling of Complaints
of Corruption
15FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES
- CBR to remain a Division of the Government
- Enhanced Autonomy to formulate expenditure and
resource Budget - Formulate own recruitment and staffing structure
- Protect itself against external intrusion
- Committee of the Cabinet to approve Budget and
Policies
16UNIVERSAL SELF ASSESSMENT
- Introduction of Universal Self Assessment System
- Selectivity and Risk Assessment for Audit and
Taxpayers to be provided reasons - Contact between officials and Taxpayers to be
minimized. - Large scale taxpayers education
17INFORMATION MANAGEMENT FUNCTION
- Achieve developed countries level of taxpayer
convenience and voluntary compliance by - Making significant investment in IT
- Establishing Information System Plan (ISP)
- CBRs nationwide IT structure
18HRM - EVALUATION OF STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
- Human Resource Audit
- Decision processes review
- Future competencies training needs
- Compensation package
- Workforce Planning and sequencing
19SPECIFIC TAX POLICY MEASURES IN THE DIRECT TAX
REGIME
- Revision in Individual and Company Rates in
Budget 2002-03 - Introduction of Self Assessment
- Streamlining the WHT Structure, less dependence
on presumptive tax regime - Withdrawal of Exemptions
20SPECIFIC TAX POLICY MEASURES IN SALES TAX
- 4 rates of 15, 18, 20 and 23 substituted with
single uniform rate of 15 - Threshold of turnover raised from Rs.0.5 million
to Rs.5.0 million - Aberrations like turnover scheme and Enlisting
Scheme abolished - Refund regime automated and five major sectors
zero rated
21SPECIFIC TAX POLICY MEASURES IN CUSTOMS
- Highest tariff brought down from 80 in 1993-94
to 25 in 2002-03 - Multiple slabs reduced to 4, i.e. 5, 10, 20
and 25 - Tariff protection to locally produced goods
- Automated business process legally covered
through changes in customs laws and procedures
22TAX ADMINISTRATION REFORMSFollowing Table shows
that the number of applications for the ADRC are
growing 15.1.2006
Category Customs Sales Tax Income Tax Total
Application received 155 490 161 806
Rejected for the ADRC 14 31 42 87
Cases decided 47 141 47 235
Under process 22 46 21 89
Pending with Committee 72 288 51 411
In over 100 appeals, taxpayers preferred the ADRC and requested stay of appeals proceedings. In over 100 appeals, taxpayers preferred the ADRC and requested stay of appeals proceedings. In over 100 appeals, taxpayers preferred the ADRC and requested stay of appeals proceedings. In over 100 appeals, taxpayers preferred the ADRC and requested stay of appeals proceedings. In over 100 appeals, taxpayers preferred the ADRC and requested stay of appeals proceedings.
23OUTCOME OF REFORM MEASURESIN TERMS OF CHANGE IN
TAX MIX
Direct Taxes (Percent) Sales Tax Customs Excise Indirect Taxes (Percent)
1990-91 18.0 15.4 45.7 20.9 82.0
1995-96 29.2 18.6 33.2 19.1 70.8
1997-98 35.1 18.4 25.4 21.1 64.9
99-2000 2.5 33.6 27.8 16.1 67.5
2000-01 31.8 39.1 16.6 12.5 68.2
2001-02 35.3 41.2 11.8 11.7 64.7
2002-03 32.9 42.3 15.0 9.8 67.1
2003-04 31.7 42.1 17.5 8.7 68.3
2004-05 30.9 40.6 19.5 8.9 69.0
24OUTCOMEOF REFORMS IN REVENUE COLLECTION
25PROJECTS IN 2006-2007
- 12 RTOs to start functioning in 2006
- LTU at Islamabad
- Roll out of CARE Plan to other Customs stations
by December 2006 - Taxpayers Facilitation Centres
- Business Process Re-engineering of Sales Tax and
Income Tax Operations - End to end automation
26FUTURE STRATEGY
- Continue to create enabling environment for
various stakeholders. The idea is to - Promote Economic Activity
- Encourage Investment
- Spread out commercial activities
- Expand exports
- Create incentive driven taxation structure with
adequate safe-guards to deal with delinquent
taxpayers - Promote efficiency, equity and transparency
27FUTURE STRATEGY Contd
- Further simplification of Rules and Procedures
- Continuous Reduction and Rationalization of Tax
and Tariff Structure - Strengthening the HRM and Audit functions
- Co-location and Integration of Taxes
- End-to-end Automation of work processes to
minimize taxpayer tax collector interface and - Emphasis on taxpayers education and facilitation
and wider dissemination of CBR efforts - THANK YOU