Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations

Description:

Changes to the NMP that constitute a substantial change that would trigger permit modification include: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:166
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Melissa384
Learn more at: https://www.mnbar.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations


1
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations
  • Wayne Anderson, MPCA
  • MSBA CLE
  • March, 5, 2009

2
Clean Water Act context
  • A discharge of a pollutant from a point
    source to waters of the United States is
    prohibited unless the discharge is in compliance
    with a permit.
  • A person who discharges or proposes to discharge
    must apply for a permit.
  • Permits authorize discharge in certain
    circumstances. They can provide liability
    protection when natural disasters cause a
    discharge.

3
Clean Water Act and Agriculture
  • Point Sources
  • Concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs)
  • Nonpoint Sources
  • Animal feeding operations (AFOs)
  • Agricultural storm water

4
CAFO Rule History
EPA revises rule
EPA proposes revisions to the rule
EPA issues CAFO rule
2006 2009
2005
2003
2003/4
1999
1972 1974/76
Waterkeeper court decision
EPA/USDA Unified National Strategy for AFOs
Lawsuits on 2003 rule
NMP deadline
Clean Water Act
5
2003 Rule(68 Fed. Reg. 7176, February 12,
2003)- 40 CFR 122,123 412
  • What is a CAFO?
  • Which CAFOs must apply for permits?
  • What are permit conditions for CAFOs?
  • Production area
  • Land application area
  • Large vs. Medium or Small CAFO

6
Definitions
  • What is an AFO?
  • Animals confined for 45 days in 12 months
  • No vegetation in confinement area
  • What is a CAFO?
  • Large number of animals
  • Medium number of animals plus discharge
  • to stream running through production area or
  • via man-made device
  • Small case-by-case

7
Large CAFOs

Animal Type Threshold
Mature Dairy Cows 700
Veal Calves 1,000
Beef Cattle or Heifers 1,000
Swine 2,500 (55 lbs or more) 10,000 (under 55 lbs)
Horses 500
Sheep or Lambs 10,000
Turkeys 55,000
Chickens, liquid manure 30,000
Chickens, other than liquid manure 125,000 (not laying hens) 82,000 (laying hens)
Ducks 5,000 (liquid manure) 30,000 (other than liquid manure)
8
Medium CAFOs

Animal Type Range
Mature Dairy Cows 200 - 699
Veal Calves 300 - 999
Beef Cattle or Heifers 300 - 999
Swine 750 - 2,499 (55 lbs or more) 3,000 - 9,999 (under 55 lbs)
Horses 150 - 499
Sheep or Lambs 3,000 - 9,999
Turkeys 16,500 - 54,999
Chickens, liquid manure 9,000 - 29,999
Chickens, other than liquid manure 37,500 -124,999 (not laying hens) 25,000 - 81,999 (laying hens)
Ducks 1,500 4,999 (liquid manure) 10,000 29,999 (other than liquid manure)
9
Definitions- What is the production area?
  • Animal confinement area
  • Manure, litter and process wastewater containment
    and storage area
  • Raw material storage area
  • Egg washing and mortality management areas

10
What is manure, litter, and process wastewater?
  • Urine and manure
  • Bedding and litter (used)
  • Compost
  • Leachate
  • Water used at the AFO
  • Watering
  • Washing
  • Flushing
  • Animal cooling
  • Swimming
  • Dust control

11
  • What is manure, litter, and process wastewater?
  • Precipitation that comes into contact with
  • Animals,
  • Urine or manure,
  • Litter,
  • Compost,
  • Bedding,
  • Feed, or
  • Mortalities

12
Highlights of Final Rule
  • Revises Duty to Apply
  • Replaces 2003 requirement for all CAFOs to apply
    for NPDES permits instead requires only those
    CAFOs that discharge or propose to discharge to
    apply for permits.
  • New certification option
  • Adds voluntary no discharge certification
    option for CAFOs that do not discharge or propose
    to discharge.

13
Duty to Apply
  • Some conditions that may result in a discharge
  • Production area not designed or operated to
    achieve zero discharge
  • Precipitation exceeding the operating capacity of
    the storage structure
  • Inundation of production area due to Flooding
  • Runoff from open feed bunkers, stockpiles exposed
    to precipitation

14
Highlights of Final Rule
  • Additional nutrient management plan (NMP)-related
    requirements
  • Operators to submit NMPs w/permit application
  • Review of NMP by permit authorities and public
  • Includes terms of NMP into permit
  • Allows 2 approaches for developing terms of NMP-
    linear and narrative

15
Additional Details Nutrient Management Plans
  • Is the entire NMP required to be publicly
    noticed?
  • Yes, the permitting authority is required to make
    the entire NMP and the draft terms of the NMP
    available to public.
  • Is the entire NMP incorporated into the permit?
  • The permitting authority must incorporate the
    terms of the NMP into the permit.

16
Additional Details Rates of Application
  • What are substantial changes to the NMP and that
    require a permit modification?
  • Changes to the NMP that constitute a substantial
    change that would trigger permit modification
    include
  • Addition of new land application areas not
    previously included in the NMP
  • Addition of any crop not included in the NMP and
    corresponding field-specific rates of
    application.
  • Any increase of risk of nutrient transport

17
Additional Details Technology-based Eff.
Limitations
  • What are the best conventional pollutant control
    technology (BCT) effluent limitations for fecal
    coliform?
  • EPA did not identify any economically achievable,
    technologically available, and cost reasonable
    technologies on which to establish national
    effluent limitations for fecal coliform.
  • EPA affirmed the BCT limitations are the same as
    the 2003 rule BPT and BAT limitations
  • No discharge from production area.
  • Limited exemption for precipitation-based
    overflows under specified conditions.
  • Land application rates that minimize transport of
    nutrients required setback or vegetated buffer.

18
Additional Details Water Quality-based Eff.
Limitations
  • EPA clarifies that permit writers may require
    water quality-based effluent limitations (WQBELs)
    in CAFO permits if necessary to meet applicable
    water quality standards
  • To further limit discharges from the production
    area and/or
  • With respect to any non-agricultural stormwater
    discharges from the land application areas.

19
Additional Details Duty to Apply
  • Which CAFOs Must Seek Permit Coverage
  • How does a CAFO know if it needs to apply for
    permit coverage?
  • The Final Rule calls for a case-by-case
    determination of whether the CAFO does or will
    discharge from its production or land application
    area based on an objective assessment of the
    CAFOs design, construction, operation, and
    maintenance.
  • If an unpermitted CAFO previously discharged and
    has permanently fixed the cause of the discharge,
    does it need to apply for a permit?
  • A CAFO that has had a discharge in the past and
    has taken the steps necessary to permanently fix
    the cause of the discharge is not required to
    apply for a permit if it is designed,
    constructed, operated, and maintained for no
    discharge.
  • Does a CAFO need to obtain permit coverage to
    claim the agricultural stormwater exemption for
    precipitation-related discharges from land
    application?
  • A CAFO that does not have any discharge other
    than agricultural stormwater and that does not
    propose to discharge is not required to seek
    permit coverage. In the Final Rule EPA clarifies
    the applicability of the agricultural stormwater
    exemption to unpermitted CAFOs.

20
Additional Details Voluntary Certification
Option
  • Voluntary No Discharge Certification Option
  • What is the incentive for an unpermitted CAFO to
    certify?
  • A properly certified CAFO makes an up-front
    demonstration to the Director that it does not
    have to get a permit. In the event of a discharge
    from a CAFO with a valid certification, the CAFO
    would only be subject to liability for the
    unpermitted discharge, not for failure to seek
    permit coverage prior to the discharge.
  • What are the qualifications for the voluntary
    certification option?
  • In order to properly certify under the voluntary
    option, a CAFO must be designed, constructed,
    operated and maintained for no discharge in
    accordance with rigorous eligibility criteria,
    including a technical evaluation of open manure
    storage structures and development and
    implementation of an NMP that ensures no
    discharge.
  • The CAFO also must submit a signed statement,
    general information about the facility, and
    description of eligibility. If a CAFO meets all
    of the eligibility and submission requirements
    its certification will become effective upon
    submission without required review by the
    permitting authority.
  • If a properly certified CAFO discharges, can it
    recertify?
  • After a discharge from a properly certified CAFO,
    the CAFO can recertify if it permanently fixes
    the cause of the discharge and it has not
    previously recertified after a discharge from the
    same cause. The CAFOs recertification is
    submitted for a 30-day review.

21
Implementation Status
  • About 23 States, including IN, MI, OH, and WI,
    have revised their programs to align with the
    2003 regulation (MN decided we did not need to
    revise our program).
  • About 44 percent of the 19,000 CAFOs are
    currently permitted. In Region 5, 63 percent of
    Large CAFOs are permitted.

22
Comparison of the MPCA NPDES Permit Activities to
Other Region V States
State Total CAFOs CAFO w/NPDES Permits CAFOs w/o NPDES Permits NPDES Coverage to Date ()
Illinois 500 8 492 2
Indiana 655 507 148 77
Michigan 202 181 21 90
Minnesota 1,116 1,110 6 99
Ohio 175 44 131 25
Wisconsin 176 176 0 100
TOTAL 2,760 1,975 785 72
Note This information is from September,
2008 state reports to EPA Region V.
23
Minnesota Authorities
  • Mn Stat. 116.07 subd 7c
  • (a)MPCA must issue NPDES permits for feedlots
    with 1000 animal units or more and that meet the
    definition of CAFO in CFR 40, Sec 122.23
  • (h)MPCA commissioner must develop criteria for
    determining which feedlots are required to apply
    for and obtain NPDES permits and which must
    obtain State Disposal system (SDS) permits based
    on actual or potential to discharge

24
Attorney General Review
  • MPCA has authority to administer the NPDES
    program for all CAFOs
  • authority to require NPDES permits for CAFOs
  • Authority to require CAFOs to meet federal
    discharge limits
  • MPCA has adequate time to make permit decisions
    in light of MN Stat. 15.99
  • MPCA has adequate authority to condition permits
    and to take enforcement action

25
Wayne AndersonMPCA
  • Wayne.p.anderson_at_state.mn.us
  • 651-757-2195
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com