Title: The Capital Structure Decision
1The Capital Structure Decision
2Todays plan
- Review what we have learned about market
efficiency - Why is it important?
- What are the three-forms of market efficiency?
- Can you give me an example for each form of
market efficiency? - The capital structure decision
- The capital structure without taxes
- MMs proposition 1
- MMs proposition 2
- The capital structure with taxes
- MMs proposition 1
- MMs proposition 2
3What have we learned in the last lecture?
- What do we mean by market efficiency?
- Why is market efficiency important in corporate
finance? - What are the three-forms of market efficiency?
- Can you give me an example for each form of
market efficiency?
4Some true or false questions about market
efficiency
- 1 When securities are priced fairly, then
financing at current market rates is a positive
NPV transaction. - 2 Firms should avoid financing through stock
issues, since stock financing is a zero-NPV
transaction. - 3 If the market is efficient, stock prices
should only be expected to react to new
information that is released. - 4 The intent of technical analysis is to discover
patterns in past stock prices. - 5 Technical analysts have no effect upon the
efficiency of the stock market. - 6 Market efficiency implies that security prices
impound new information quickly.
5Some true or false questions about market
efficiency
- 7. Financing decisions are easier to reverse than
investment decisions. - 8. In efficient capital markets, all securities
are fairly priced. - 9. If security prices follow a random walk, then
on any particular day, the odds are that an
increase or decrease in price is equally likely. - 10. Fundamental analysts attempt to get rich by
identifying patterns in stock prices. - 11.Strong-form market efficiency implies that one
could earn above average returns by examining
the history of a firm's stock price. - 12. Insider information has nothing to do with
historical stock prices
6Capital structure
- Does the size of a pizza have nothing to do with
how it is sliced? - Is the value of a firm also independent of how
the firm mixes debt and equity?
7Look at the both sides of a balance sheet
Asset
Liabilities and equity
Market value of equity
Market value of the asset
E
V
Market value of debt
D
VED
8Does capital structure affect the firm value?
Equity
Debt
Debt
Equity
Debt
Equity
Govt.
wasted
Govt.
Slicing the pie doesnt affect the total
amount available to debt holders and equity
holders
Slicing the pie can affect the size of the
wasted slice
Slicing the pie can affect the size of the
slice going to government
9MMs proposition 1
- Modigliani Miller
- If the investment opportunity is fixed, there
are no taxes, and capital markets function well,
the market value of a company does not depend on
its capital structure. - How can we understand this?
- The size of a pizza has nothing to do with how
you slice it.
10MM (Debt Policy Doesnt Matter)
Example - River Cruises - All Equity Financed
11MM (Debt Policy Doesnt Matter)
Example cont. 50 debt
12MM (Debt Policy Doesnt Matter)
Example - River Cruises - All Equity
Financed - Debt replicated by investors
13MMs proposition 2
- Modigliani Miller
- If the investment opportunity is fixed, there
are no taxes, and capital markets function well,
the expected rate of return on the common stock
of a levered firm increases in proportion to the
debt-equity ratio (D/E), expressed in market
values. - The WACC is independent of how the firm is
financed
14WACC without taxes in MMs view
r
rE
WACC
rD
D V
15Capital structure and Corporate Taxes
- The use of debt has a lot of implications
- Financial risk- The use of debt will increase the
risk to share holders and thus Increase the
variability of shareholder returns. - Interest tax shield- The savings resulting from
deductibility of interest payments.
16An example on Tax shield
- You own all the equity of Space Babies Diaper
Co.. The company has no debt. The companys
annual cash flow is 1,000, before interest and
taxes. The corporate tax rate is 40. You have
the option to exchange 1/2 of your equity
position for 10 bonds with a face value of
1,000. - Should you do this and why?
17C.S. Corporate Taxes
All Equity 1/2 Debt EBIT 1,000 Inte
rest Pmt 0 Pretax Income 1,000 Taxe
s _at_ 40 400 Net Cash Flow 600
18C.S. Corporate Taxes
All Equity 1/2 Debt EBIT 1,000 1,000
Interest Pmt 0 100 Pretax
Income 1,000 900 Taxes _at_ 40 400 360 Net
Cash Flow 600 540
19Capital Structure and Corporate Taxes
All Equity 1/2 Debt EBIT 1,000 1,000
Interest Pmt 0 100 Pretax
Income 1,000 900 Taxes _at_ 40 400 360 Net
Cash Flow 600 540
Total Cash Flow All Equity 600 1/2 Debt
640 (540 100)
20Capital Structure and tax shield
D x rD x Tc rD
D x Tc
Example Tax benefit 1000 x (.10) x (.40)
40 PV of 40 perpetuity 40 / .10
400 PV Tax Shield D x Tc 1000 x .4 400
21MMs proposition 1 with tax
- firm value value of all equity firm PV(tax
shield) - Example,
- all equality firm value 600/0.16,000
- PV( tax shield)400
- firm value6,400
22MMs proposition 2
- The weighted average cost of capital is
decreasing with the ratio of D/E, that is - Can you understand this intuitively?
23WACC Graph
24Financial Distress
- Costs of Financial Distress - Costs arising from
bankruptcy or distorted business decisions before
bankruptcy. - Market Value Value if all Equity Financed
- PV Tax Shield
- - PV Costs of Financial Distress
25Financial distress
- Costs of Financial Distress - Costs arising from
bankruptcy or distorted business decisions before
bankruptcy. - Market Value Value if all Equity Financed
- PV Tax Shield
- - PV Costs of Financial Distress
26Optimal Capital structure
- Trade-off Theory - Theory that capital structure
is based on a trade-off between tax savings and
distress costs of debt. - Pecking Order Theory - Theory stating that firms
prefer to issue debt rather than equity if
internal finance is insufficient.
27Financial Distress
Maximum value of firm
Costs of financial distress
PV of interest tax shields
Market Value of The Firm
Value of levered firm
Value of unlevered firm
Optimal amount of debt
Debt