Status, Trends, and Future of the South - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Status, Trends, and Future of the South

Description:

Title: Global Entrpreneurship Conference Author: Laurence W. Stewart Last modified by: Laurence W. Stewart Created Date: 8/8/2004 3:12:25 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:167
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: Laure114
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Status, Trends, and Future of the South


1
Status, Trends, and Future of the Souths
Forest and Agricultural BiomassAugust 29-31,
2005University of Georgia Center for Continuing
EducationBiomass and Carbonaceous Materials to
Clean Energy Fuels
  • Laurence W. Stewart, Principal
  • William Eng, Principal
  • 6185 NW 107th Terrace, Parkland, FL 33076
  • Tel (954) 340-1388 Fax (954) 340-1387
  • Email info_at_phoenixcgi.com
  • www.phoenixcgi.com

2
Biomass Evangelists Creed
  • Perhaps the most significant non-technical
    barrier to using biomass...for energy is the lack
    of creativity and negativity in attitudes. Too
    many people know what cant be done.
  • Lynn L. Wright, Demonstration and Commercial
    Production of Biomass for Energy, 1995, National
    Renewable Energy Labs, Golden, Colorado

3
The Future
  • Thirty years from now there will be a huge
    amount of oil and no buyers. Oil will be left
    in the ground. The Stone Age came to an end, not
    because of a lack of stones, and the Oil Age will
    come to an end not because of a lack of oilOn
    the supply side it is easy to find oil and
    produce it, and on the demand side there are so
    many new technologies (emphasis added)
  • Sheikh Zaki Yamani
  • Oil Minister of Saudi Arabia (1962 1986), June
    2000

4
.. Is Here Today Highlights
  • BCT solves problems through a family of
    technologies that convert any kind of carbon
    containing waste to clean energy
  • Family of Proprietary Technologies
  • Proven, flexible and scalable plants can use a
    variety of biomass and agricultural feedstocks as
    well as any kind of carbonaceous material from
    biosolids, to MSW, and fossil fuels
  • Energy output can be in the form of
  • liquid fuels (ethanol, methanol),
  • electricity,
  • hydrogen, and
  • Syngas, natural gas or LNG
  • Compelling Economics with IRRs of 30 to 100

5
Technology Family
  • Patented Pyrolytic Steam Reforming Gasifier
    (PSRG) featuring a Staged Temperature Reaction
    Process (STRP)
  • Produces Medium to High BTU, Clean Syngas
  • Minimizes Tar in Produced Syngas
  • Handles a variety of materials singly or in
    combination
  • Catalytic Alcohol Reactor featuring a Trade
    Secret High Throughput Catalyst
  • Converts Syngas to Ethanol and higher alcohols
    Catalytically
  • Produces approximately 70 Ethanol and 30
    Methanol
  • Proprietary Methanation Reactor
  • Flexibly and Economically Enhances BTU of syngas
    to pipeline quality for use as NG replacement
  • Or enhance other characteristics of syngas, e.g.,
    increase production of hydrogen

6
Gasifier Technology (contd)
  • Pyrolytic Steam Reforming Gasifier (PSRG) with
    Staged Temperature Reaction Process
  • The BCT system typically generates syngas from
    biomass, coal, coal slurry, coal fines and other
    carbonaceous feedstocks with energy content in
    the range of 400-600 BTU/ft3 at an average
    thermal energy conversion efficiency of 75.
  • The BCT system has the highest energy
    efficiency of any system under consideration
    and the highest syngas energy content of any
    thermochemical biomass conversion system that has
    been developed for biomass inputs of less than
    1,000 tons/day.
  • As yet unpublished study evaluating the BCT
    system and others for a large west coast waste
    water treatment utility district.

7
BCT PSRG / STRP Gasifier
8
Gasifier Technology (contd)
  • First Stage Devolitization Reactor
  • Forces out the oxygen entrained with feedstock
  • In a reducing environment, raises the temperature
    of the feedstock in three or four distinct stages
    to just below combustion temperature, which
  • Releases the volatiles (VOCs) which
  • makes their energy available for subsequent
    reforming or energy production, and
  • Avoids the production of excess heat, CO2 and
    other combustion products
  • Eliminates flash pyrolysis and run away
    combustion
  • Eliminates slag
  • Greatly reduces ash production
  • Greatly reduces production of CO2

9
Gasifier Technology (contd)
  • Second Stage Reforming Reactor
  • Entrained Flow Design
  • Combines feedstock (char) with superheated steam
    at 1500º F which results in
  • Lower operating temperatures Reforming
    temperatures are lower within a controlled
    environment.
  • Lower soot production This is partly due to
    lower maximum temperatures and partly due to
    higher steam carbon ratio which reduces soot
    production.
  • Lower emissions The gas composition is different
    when steam is added as a gasification agent. The
    H2 content is increased and the CO2 content is
    lowered. The results in a faster combustion and
    lower emissions of CO and NOx.

10
Gasifier Technology (contd)
  • Benefits of BCT Two Stage Reactor Approach
    include
  • Very high conversion efficiency,
  • Tar content in produced gas is extremely low.
  • A unique feature specific to the Klepper/BCT
    system is that the cyclones and water condenser
    are integrated and contained within the biomass
    gasification chamber. This design conserves
    space and reduces the loss of heat energy
  • Integrated Gas Cleanup and Conditioning produces
  • Ultra Clean Syngas with
  • No particulates
  • No tar
  • No alkali metals
  • Low NOx, SOx, and CO2

11
Typical Syngas Composition
  • Analysis of Syngas from Gasification of Wood
    Waste (sawdust)
  • About 525 (/-) BTU

12
Custom Syngas Properties
13
Very Low Emissions
  • Test Results Show Very Low Emissions 8hr test
    of Wood Waste at rate of 7.5 tons/day
  • NOx 0.22 tons per year
  • SO2 0.001 tons per year
  • CO 0.42 tons per year

14
Catalytic Ethanol Reactor(Optional)
  • Breakthrough Catalytic Process
  • Standard refining technology proprietary
    catalyst
  • Produces 70 Ethanol and 30 Methanol
  • Why Ethanol?
  • Ethanol offers highest value end-product
  • Large and growing market (additive to gasoline)
  • Can produce at much lower cost than competitive
    processes, e.g., fermentation

Commercial Scale Testing Ethanol Reactor
15
Ethanol Price Forecast
  • Prepared by California Energy Commission

16
Options other than Ethanol
  • Syn-Gas can be custom designed to power an
    Internal Combustion Engine Generator gas Turbine
  • The Syn-Gas can also be enhanced to pipeline
    quality with our proprietary Methanation reactor
  • The Syn-Gas can be compressed and sold as CNG /
    LNG
  • The Syn-Gas can be sold for use in a biorefinery
    or other chemical processes

17
No Derate Required
  • Can be used to power an IC or Turbine Genset with
    no derate.

18
Materials Testing Facility(Small Gasifier)
Controls
Instrumented testing facility allows small-scale
test of any potential feedstock to determine
empirical ethanol production results
Small Ethanol Reactor
Small Gasifier
19
Materials Testing Facility(Big Gasifier)
20
Pilot Demonstration Facility
Pilot testing facility allows short-term design
testing of feedstock to optimize process design
21
Production Units
15 to 250 ton/day Custom-built Systems
15 ton/day wood waste to electricity system built
for Government of Saskatchewan
22
Rice Straw Demonstration
  • Rice Straw to Ethanol Demonstration October 8,
    2004, for the city of Gridley, California
    arranged by their consultant, TSS Consultants.
    (www.tssconsultants.com)

23
Gridley Team Objectives
  • Gridley retained TSS Consultants to
  • Identify the most viable emerging waste biomass
    to energy and fuel conversion technologies for
    the recovery of value from rice straw and other
    biomass resources in terms of
  • Economic (E1) Viability
  • High Energy (E2) Efficiency
  • Least Impact on the Environment (E3)
  • Most Effective (E4) Solution

24
TSS Technology Assessment Approach
  • Gridley Chose TSS because
  • In the past several years TSS had critically
    assessed approximately 350 biomass conversion
    systems from suppliers/developers worldwide over
    the past several years
  • Five candidate systems were chosen by TSS for an
    in-depth comprehensive technical and business
    analysis using the 4E assessment models for
    quantifying their potential economic viability
  • (E1) Economic Efficiency
  • (E2) Energy Efficiency
  • (E3) Environmental Friendliness
  • (E4) Effective in the conversion of waste biomass
    to energy and fuels.

25
MethodologyTechnology Assessment Approach
  • TSS mandate from the City of Gridley was to
  • Consider all relevant technologies currently
    available for the conversion of fossil and
    renewable carbonaceous biomass materials to
    energy and fuels developed by
  • Private organizations
  • Government agencies, commissions and
    departments
  • Academic institutions
  • Non-government organizations
  • Research institutes and non-profit
    organizations
  • Select candidate conversion technologies for 4E
    assessment studies, testing, further development
    and validation

26
Key Processes Under Evaluation and Development
for Biomass Conversion Technologies to Energy
and Fuels
  • TSS Evaluated the Suitability of the Technologies
    for the Following Processes
  • Biomass Conversion Processes (Combustion)
  • Syngas and Natural Gas for Heating, ProcessSteam
    and Cooling
  • Conversion of Syngas and Natural Gas to
    Electricity
  • Conversion of Syngas and Natural Gas to Fuels
  • Conversion of Syngas and Natural Gas for Heating,
    Process Steam and Cooling

27
Candidate Biomass Conversion Technologies Under
Consideration
  • TSS Examined the Following Technologies
  • Thermal Gasification (Syngas Production)
  • PSRG / STRP Gasification (Syngas Production)
  • Thermal Oxidation (Energy Production by
    Incineration)
  • Integrated Thermal Gasification and Oxidation
    (Energy Production)
  • Thermogenic Anaerobic Digestion (Methane
    Production)
  • Hydro-Gasification (Syngas Production)

28
And the Winner is..
TSS Selected the PSRG / STRP Waste to Energy
System as Best of Breed and the Recommended
System
29
Evaluation ConclusionsConversion of Waste
Biomass to Energy and Fuels
  • TSS Concluded
  • PSRG/STRP Gasification has been found to be the
    most promising technology to date. This process
    can produce synthetic natural gas (syngas) that
    is
  • Economically competitive with natural gas (E1)
    (5.00/MM BTU)
  • Energy efficient (E2) for Syngas Production
    (71-75)
  • Environmentally friendly minimal gas-phase or
    particulate-phase pollutants are emitted (E3)
  • Effective in terms of its future high potential
    for the conversion of waste and fossil biomass to
    energy and fuel (E4)

30
BCT in the News
  • The BCT Gasifier has been chosen as the key core
    component in a mobile version of BCTs gasifier
    (Min. 22 units) by the Department of Defense to
    convert waste generated by our troops in
    Afghanistan and Iraq to electrical power.
  • BCT Mobile Technology has been identified as the
    preferred method for disposing of forest slash
    generated in the effort to thin western forests
    and prevent forest fires and is the centerpiece
    of a demonstration project in Jefferson County,
    CO.
  • BCT technology has been identified as the
    preferred technology to convert agricultural
    waste (rice straw) to higher value liquid fuels
    (ethanol) by a California agricultural
    cooperative.
  • RDIUP or Remotely Deployable Integrated
    Utilities Package

31
The Future..
  • Weve embarked on the beginning of the Last Days
    of the Age of Oil. Nations of the world that are
    striving to modernize will make choices different
    from the ones we have made. They will have to.
    And even todays industrial powers will shift
    energy use patternsThe market share for
    carbon-rich fuels will diminish, as the demand
    for other forms of energy grows. And energy
    companies have a choice to embrace the future
    and recognize the growing demand for a wide array
    of fuels or ignore reality, and slowly but
    surely be left behind.
  • Mike Bowlin, Chairman and CEO, ARCO, and
  • Chairman, American Petroleum Institute February
    9, 1999

32
For More Information
  • Laurence W. Stewart, Principal Cell (954)
    304-0113
  • William Eng, Principal Cell (954) 647-0287
  • 6185 NW 107th Terrace, Parkland, FL 33076
  • Tel (954) 340-1388 Fax (954) 340-1387
  • Email info_at_phoenixcgi.com
  • www.phoenixcgi.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com