Title: Standard Setting Political Issues
1Standard Setting Political Issues
2Class Announcements
- Assignment 10 due March 31st available on-line
- Research Paper Part 4 and bonus due April 3rd
- Business Banquet - April 2nd 545-8pm, Catering
- Gabrieau's Bistro Keynote Speaker - Annette
Verschuren, Past President of Home Depot for
Canada and Asia - Final Exam 700pm April 19th, Main Gym, Oland
Centre
3Class Objectives
- Incentives for Production of Information
- Regulation (e.g. setting standards) as a
political process - Standard setting process in Canada
- Theories of standard setting
4Standard Setting Regulation
- Standard setting is the regulation of firms
external information production decisions by some
central authority - Information asymmetry used to justify regulation
- Accounting is a highly regulated area of economic
activity - Regulation includes minimum disclosure, GAAP,
GAAS, audits
5Standard Setting Incentives for Information
Production
- Contractual
- Compensation contracts
- IPO
- Market-Based (non-contractual)
- Securities markets (firm value)
- Managerial labour markets (Reputation)
- Takeover market (corporate control)
- Other
- Disclosure Principle
- Signaling
- Private information Search
6Standard Setting Political
- A demand for information production as a result
of information symmetry creates the demand for
regulation. - Because of the problem of unanimity, investors
push for regulation causes standard setting to be
a political process - Natural to expect that the various constituencies
would appeal to the political process when
conflicting views can not be resolved by
contractual or market forces. - In standard setting, the interests of managers,
small investors, large investors and other must
be traded-off
7Standard Setting
- What is the standard setting process?
- In Canada http//www.frascanada.ca/accounting-stan
dards-board/what-we-do/about-the-acsb/index.aspx - Internationally http//www.ifrs.org/How-we-develop
-standards/Pages/How-we-develop-standards.aspx
8Standard Setting in Canada
- CICA Handbook is the major source of accounting
and auditing standards in Canada - Accounting Standards Boards (AcSB) establishes
standards for Handbook - ASB Structure
- Voluntary board members administrative staff and
full time chair - Publishes standards on its own authority
- Advised Private Enterprise Advisory Committee,
its members and staff - 2/3rds of Board must be CICA members (broaden
representation)
9Standard Setting in Canada (contd)
- ASB New standards
- Requires 2/3rd approval of Board members
(supermajority voting) - Exposure drafts enable reaction to standards by
all interested parties - ASB Timeliness
- Due process requires time
- Guidelines are interpretations of standards
- See www.cica.ca
10Standard Setting in the US
- FASBs purpose is to establish and improve
standards - Part of a three part organization
- Independent of AICPA
- Consists of 7 full time Board members
- 5/7ths majority to pass a standard
- Heavy emphasis on due process
11International Standard Setting
- In 2001 IASB adopted a structure similar to FASB
- Board of 14 members (12 full time)
- Established to harmonize global economy
- Compliance is not mandatory
- Process
- Agenda is set by staff, Board, constituents
- Solicits comment from constituent based on a
decision paper both in writing and in public
sessions - Publication of an exposure draft is a mandatory
step in due process - After due process is completed, all outstanding
issues are resolved and the IASB members have
balloted in favor of publication, the IFRS is
issued.
12International Standard Setting
- Benefits
- Cost reduction
- International comparability and consistency
- Increase market efficiency
- Delay
- IASC still in infancy and standards being
developed - Strength and stringency issues
- Getting US on board
- No enforcing mechanism
- Perspectives on role of standards
- Language translations
13Standard Setting Process Inclusions
- 1) Conceptual Framework
- 2) Sufficient independence and authority
- 3) Accountability to public interest
- 4) Thorough and published results
- 5) Due process
- 6) Decision rationale communicated
- 7) Broad vs detailed standards
- 8) Small vs. large companies
14Two Theories of Standard Setting
- 1) Public Interest Theory
- Public demand for correction of market failures
- Best interest of society
- Maximize social welfare
- First best approach to standard setting
- 2) Interest Group Theory
- Presence of a number of interest groups
- Various groups lobby to convince regulation
- Regulatory maximizes its own welfare
- Regulation viewed as a commodity
15Standard Setting and Theory
- We do not know how to calculate the best tradeoff
between conflicting uses of information by
investors and managers - Current Standard Setting process is most
consistent with Interest Group Theory - Existence of conflicting constituencies
- Broad representation
- Exposure drafts
- Super-majority voting
- Due process
- Public hearings
16Criteria for Standard Setting
- 1. Decision usefulness investor reaction
- 2. Costs
- Standard setting process
- Managements adherence to standard
- Contract rigidities
- Proprietary information
- 3. Reduction of asymmetry improves operation of
markets - 4. Consensus encouraged and necessary for
adoption
17Standard Setting Problems
- 1) Questions concerning independence
- 2) Need better opportunity for interested parties
to be heard - 3) Inadequate research, monitoring, enforcement,
and education - 4) Internationalization of standards
- 5) Cost of process
18Class Objectives - Revisited
- Incentives for Production of Information
- Regulation (e.g. setting standards) as a
political process - Standard setting process in Canada
- Theories of standard setting