Formation and Evolution of Supermassive binary black holes in AGNs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 54
About This Presentation
Title:

Formation and Evolution of Supermassive binary black holes in AGNs

Description:

Title: Formation and Evolution of Supermassive binary black holes in AGNs Author: Fukun Liu Last modified by: liu Created Date: 12/23/2003 1:03:12 PM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:176
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: Fuku4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Formation and Evolution of Supermassive binary black holes in AGNs


1
??????????????
  • ???
  • ???????

2
??
  • ????????????????
  • ?????????
  • ???????????????
  • ???????????????
  • ??

3
1??????????????
1.1?????CDM????????????
4
Mice ????????
5
1.2????????????????????????????????????????,?????
????????????????
Galaxy galaxy
Normal galaxy
merging
evolution
?????????????(?)
gas starbursts galaxy
Evolution
Short-lived AGNs
Martini 2004
6
1.3?Gravitational Wave Astrophysics
LISA?????????
?????????????, ?????????????????
NS NS NS BH WD NS
Gravitational radiation
LIGRO, etc
Big bang
Gravitational radiation
LISA
SMBH SMBH
Gravitational radiation
LISA
7
1.4???????????????
???VLBI????????????? (Begelman et al , 1980,
Nature)
4C12.50
  • ???????????????
  • BL Lac

8
????????????????
BL Lac object OJ287 p11.86 yr (Sillapaa et al.
1988, ApJ, Liu Wu 200, AA)
9
2? ???????????????pc????
10
?????????????
Galaxy interaction
Dynamic friction
Bound SMBBHs
11
?????????????,?????,???????????
12
  • ???,??????????????????????,?????????
  • ????????????,????????

13
Pre-merger candidates 3C75A,B of double-pairs of
radio jets
14
Two active nuclei in one galaxy
NGC6240 a1.4 kpc (Komossa, et al., 2003,
ApJL)
15
?????
  • ????????????????,?????
  • ??????????????????????????,???????????,???????????
    ?????????????????

??,???????????,???????
16
??????????,??????????,???????
  • The gravitational wave radiation becomes
    important only when Liu, Wu, Cao 03

The binary may stall at 100rg lt a lt 10,000rg
for a time-scale longer than the Hubble time-scale
17
  • Numerical computations dynamic friction (e.g. Yu
    2002, MNRAS)

18
Hierarchical galaxy formation model is wrong or
binary can lose its angular momentum due to other
mechanism(s)
Possible
19
3? ????????????????
20
  • ????????????

????????????????????
???????????????,?????????????????????
(Ivanov et al., 99, Liu, et al., 03, Liu 04)
21
???????????????????????
22
?????????????Mdgtm? ???????????,?????????????????
??????(Ivanov et al. 1998, ApJ)
????????
????????
????????
????????
23
  • ?????????????????,???????????????
  • ???gtH/r,?????????????????
  • ????????????????(Ivanov et al. 99, Liu 04)

24
????????????????????(Papaloizou Pringle 1983,
MNRAS)
25
  • ???Kerr??????????????
  • Lens-Thirring frame-dragging
  • ?Kerr??????????,????Lens-Thirring?????????????,???
    ?????????????????
  • Bardeen-Peterson ??(Bardeen Peterson 75)
  • ?????????Bardeen-Peterson??

26
  • ???????????Bardeen-Peterson??
  • ?BP???,?????????????
  • ????????????,BP???

27
  • ????????,?Kerr????????????,???????????????????????
    ??????????????????
  • ??,???????????????????????????????????????????????
    ???
  • ???????????????????,???????????????????

28
Observational evidence for the disk-binary
interaction
X-shaped radio sources(Liu 2004, MNRAS)
3C403
3C326
29
????????
  • ??X-???????????FRII???????(Dennett-Thorpe et al
    02)
  • ??????????????????????,???????????????????????,FR
    II??????????????FRI??????????????????
  • ???? 7??????X-??? Leahy Parma 92
  • ?????????????????????,7????????????FRII?????????
    ????????AGN????
  • ??????????????
  • ?????????????????????,????????????????,??????????
    ???????
  • ???????????
  • ????????????????,?????????????????????????

30
Random distribution of jet orientations(Liu,
Zhang, Wu, 2005, in preparation)
HST 0.05
VLA 0.05
31
With respect to major axis of host galaxy
Random (KS---0.124)
32
With respect to dust lane in host galaxy
Unrelaxed system
Relaxed system
F angle between dust lane and major axis of host
galaxy
33
3.2 Coplanar binary-disk system resonant
interaction
  • The potential due to the secondary

Fourier expension
?epicyclic frequency
rs
r
34
  • Secondary perturbation initiates density waves
    at Lindlad resonance radius

m
35
The whole inner region is destroyed by waves
36
  • Opens a gap in the accretion disk
  • The outer boundary of the gap
  • The inner boundary

rR/R0 rs0.8
Lin Papaloizou, 1986, ApJ
37
3.3?Removal of matter in the inner accretion disk
(Liu, Wu, Cao, 2003, MNRAS)
38
When the SMBBHs merge, the inner diskdisappears
and leaves a big hole with a truncation radius
(Liu, Wu, Cao, 2002, MNRAS)
Refilling time-scale
39
Interruption of jet formation in Double-double
radio galaxies (DDRGs) (Liu, Wu, Cao, 2003,
MNRAS)
DDRG 3C219 with hot spots in the outer lobes
40
1-10 FRIIs
41
???????(Liu et al 03)
  • ??Interruption of jet formation in DDRGs
  • ????????????????????????
  • ??Two pairs of well-aligned radio lobes
  • ??????????????????,???????????????????,??????????
    ??
  • ????????FRII???????
  • ??????????????????????????????????????????,??????
    ????,??????
  • ??Interruption time scale Myr
  • ??????????????????????????500rG??????????????????
    ?tr/vr1Myr

42
3.4?Periodic outbursts in AGNs (Liu Wu, 2002,
AA Zhao, Liu, Wu, 2005, AA, in preparation)
  • Hydrodynamics
  • Periodic outbursts due to (1) binary-disk
    interaction, (2) precession of jet orientation
    and (3) motion of plasma in helical jets in AGNs
  • double-peaked outbursts if accretion is
    advection dominated (ADAF)
  • Low-luminosity AGNs (e.g. BL Lac objects)
  • One is thermal and the other is synchrotron
    emission from jets
  • single-peaked outbursts if accretion disk is a
    standard thin disk (e.g. Blazars except BL Lacs)

43
  • Data combination of two databases (USA)
  • University of Michigan Radio Astronomy
    Observatory (UMRAO)
  • 35 years 8.0GHz
  • National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO)
  • 21 years 8.2GHz
  • 45 BL Lac objects 91 Quasars
  • Data analysis
  • Fourier spectrum analysis, etc

44
Fundamental frequency
?
(3/2)?
?/2
2?
3?
45
Four types
In 29/45 BL Lac objects and 49/91 quasars
P1-10 yr
46
4??????????4.1?????
47
(No Transcript)
48
Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA)
49
  • Gravitational wave astrophysics LISA
  • Merger rates expectation 1 event/year
  • Merger history hierarchical galaxy formation
    model
  • Constraints on formation scenarios of high-z,
  • low-mass galaxies
  • BH mass measurements
  • GW standard candles??????

50
LISA???????
51
4.2???
  • ???????????,??X-????afterglow
  • ??X-?????LISA??????????????

52
4.3??????????
  • Largest possible recoil velocity (Favata et al.,
    2004, ApJ )

53
??
  • Post-merged SMBHs is expected to
  • Escape in disk galaxy (Merritt et al 04, ApJ)
  • ??????????
  • off-center active nuclei (Madau et al 04, ApJ)

54
??
  • ??????????????????,?????????
  • ???????????????????????????????????
  • ??????????,???????????????????????????????????????
    ???
  • ????????????????????????LISA????LISA??
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com