Conceptualizing and Measuring War - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Conceptualizing and Measuring War

Description:

Title: A Kantian System? Democracy and Third Party Conflict Resolution Author: Sara Mitchell Last modified by: sbmitche Created Date: 11/11/2001 3:49:45 PM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: SaraMi5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Conceptualizing and Measuring War


1
Conceptualizing and Measuring War

2
Some Issues Along the Way
  • Are there multiple causal paths to war (e.g. more
    than one cause)?
  • Example Bremer (1993)
  • Are there domain specific laws, or no universal
    explanations of warfare?

3
Example of domain specific law
  • Case Domain IV DV
  • 1 A X war
  • 2 A X war
  • 3 A X war
  • 4 A not X not war
  • 5 B X not war
  • 6 B X not war
  • 7 B X not war
  • 8 B not X war

4
Example of domain specific law
  • In domain A, X is a necessary and sufficient
    condition for war.
  • In domain B, X is neither necessary nor
    sufficient for war.
  • If we analyzed cases 1-8, we would conclude that
    X is unrelated to war, even though it is strongly
    related to war in a particularly domain.

5
Some Issues Along the Way
  • Because wars are so rare, the number of plausible
    explanatory factors far exceeds the number of
    wars, and if it is not true that only a very few
    of these factors play a significant role in war,
    then the task of sorting out the causes of war
    will be very difficult.

6
Major War Data Collection Efforts
  • Quincy Wright, A Study of War (1942, 1965)
  • Lewis Fry Richardson, Statistics of Deadly
    Quarrels (1960)
  • Melvin Small and J. David Singer, Resort to Arms
    (1982) Correlates of War (COW) Project

7
COW project
  • Data collected from 1816-2001
  • The purpose of the COW project is to identify
    the variables that are most frequently associated
    with the onset of war..to discover the trends
    and fluctuations in the frequency, magnitude,
    severity, and intensity of war. (Singer and
    Small, 19724)

8
COW Criteria for Interstate War
  • 1) Fatalities minimum 1000 military personnel
    casualties among all participating system members
  • 2) On each side, there must be at least one
    participant that is a member of the international
    system
  • -Minimum 500,000 population
  • -Diplomatic recognition by France and UK
    through WWI
  • -After 1920, UN or League of Nations member or
    received diplomats from any two major powers

9
COW Criteria for Interstate War
  • 3) To be a war participant, a state must suffer
    100 fatalities or have a minimum of 1000 armed
    personnel engaged in active combat

10
MID Data Set
  • The COW Project also developed the Militarized
    Interstate Dispute (MID) data set.
  • This data codes over 2,300 threats, displays, and
    uses of military force from 1816-2001.
  • This data is often employed in dyadic form, where
    each case records a MID between two states in a
    given year.
  • We can study escalation from dispute to war with
    the MID data.

11
Major Powers
  • Austria-Hungary (1816-1918)
  • Prussia/Germany (1816-1918, 1925-1945,
    1991-present)
  • Russia/USSR (1816-1917, 1922-present)
  • Italy (1860-1943)
  • Japan (1895-1945, 1991-present)

12
Major Powers
  • France (1816-1940, 1945-present)
  • Great Britain (1816-present)
  • United States (1898-present)
  • China (1949-present)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com