Mergers and Acquisitions (background) Prof Scott Moeller - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Mergers and Acquisitions (background) Prof Scott Moeller

Description:

Title: No Slide Title Author: AAnderson Last modified by: pearsc Created Date: 4/5/2000 9:20:10 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Company – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:164
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: aan66
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mergers and Acquisitions (background) Prof Scott Moeller


1
Mergers and Acquisitions(background)Prof
Scott Moeller
Tailored learningCass Executive Education
bespoke programmes
2
MA Volumes go in Waves and we're now on the
downward slope
Source Thomson Financial
3
Most acquisitions historically have been
failures
  • 1987 McKinsey 116 acquisitions 61 failed
  • . Porter 56 of all acquisitions get sold off
  • 1996 Mercer/ 150 deals 57 failure rate,
  • Business Week 30 had 'substantial' losses
  • . Economist 150 acquisitions 70 failed to meet
    expectations
  • . McKinsey 160 acquisitions Only 12
    accelerated their growth
  • 1997 Sirower 168 mergers Only 20 return in 4
    years
  • 1998 A. T .Kearney 115 mergers 58 added no
    value
  • 1999 McKinsey 77 fail to yield expected
    synergies
  • 2001 KPMG 118 acquisitions 70 created no value
    / 31 destroyed value

4
Why do MA deals fail?
Blue Non CFO CFO survey
5
MA Paradox
  • Most mergers fail, but few companies succeed
    without acquiring or merging.
  • Can you be a large organisation without having
    made acquisitions?
  • Is organic growth sufficient to become a leading
    player?
  • Is there a 'best time' to make acquisitions?
  • Managements challenge
  • 'How can you reconcile the low odds of deal
    success with the need to incorporate mergers
    into the growth strategy.'
  • Or today
  • 'How to make deals successful NOW when the
    market's going down?'

6
The current merger wave is different
  • 1987 McKinsey 116 acquisitions 61 failed
  • . Porter 56 of all acquisitions get sold off
  • 1996 Mercer/ 150 deals 57 failure rate,
  • Business Week 30 had 'substantial' losses
  • . Economist 150 acquisitions 70 failed to meet
    expectations
  • . McKinsey 160 acquisitions Only 12
    accelerated their growth
  • 1997 Sirower 168 mergers Only 20 return in 4
    years
  • 1998 A. T .Kearney 115 mergers 58 added no
    value
  • 1999 McKinsey 77 fail to yield expected
    synergies
  • 2001 KPMG 118 acquisitions 70 created no value
    / 31 destroyed value

7
And 2008 looks to be even better!
Short term Shareholder Return
8
What has changed in the past several years?
Most organisations are now far more disciplined
and focused in their transactions than ever
before. In particular, we have noted, and
confirmed by live interviews, the following
recurring themes
9
Three essential Components to a Merger Deal
10
MA The Seven Deadly Sins
Source financialworld.co.uk, March 2007
11
Good and bad reasons for doing deals
12
Criteria for Target Assessment
13
Alternatives to MA
14
Total Deal Cost
15
Public Deals 6 Step Process
16
Simplified Deal Process
17
  • Due Diligence

Know thy enemy and know thyself in a hundred
battles you will never be in peril. Sun Tzu
400-320 BC
18
Due Diligence Key success factors
19
  • Post Merger Integration

A wise person once said that a beautiful
marriage is one in which two people become one.
The trouble starts when they try to decide which
one.
20
Change or Preserve?
High
Change in Target
Low
High
Change in Acquirer
21
Focus of Integrations
Source Mergermarket / CMS Cameron McKenna, Feb
2007
22
LEARN CIA principle
23
Poor communication (use of "killer"
phrases)highlights poor underlying strategy
24
Two related "killer" phrases
25
More communication indicators of poor
implementation
26
Summary Key Success Factors in Post-Merger
Integration
27
Mergers and Acquisitions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com