The Twelve Enhanced Accountability Measures and Six Performance Funding Measures presentation

About This Presentation

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Twelve Enhanced Accountability Measures and Six Performance Funding Measures

1
The Twelve Enhanced Accountability Measures and
Six Performance Funding Measures

Annual Report
Academic Year
2005-2006

Department of Planning and Research
2
1. Progress of Basic Skills Students

75 will do the following
progress within the level
complete the level
advance to the next level
enter curriculum or occupational extension courses

3
1. Where we stand

In the 2004-05 year (12,304 students)
10 completed a level or goal
41 progressed at the same level
26 moved to a higher level
77 composite progress percent

4
1. System-wide Results

The College met the benchmark
For the 2004-2005 academic year (reported one
year in arrears) 55 of 58 community colleges met
the required standard and one made significant
improvement.
The average composite measure for the System was
81 percent.
The range in the adjusted composite measure was
from a low of 70 percent to a high of 94 percent.

5
2. Passing Rates for Licensure

An aggregate institutional passing rate of 80
with no one passing rate falling below 70.

6
2. Where we stand

Licensure exams were taken for the first time for
422 students with the following results
Exam Area Taking Passing Percent Exam Ex
am Passing
Basic Law Enforcement 25 25 100
Dental Hygiene 23 23 100
Phys. Therapy Assistant 13 10 77
Emerg. Med. Tech (EMT) 161 155
96
Nursing 33 25 76
Real Estate Sales 167 145 87
Total/Aggregate
Pass Rate 422 383 91

7
2. Where we stand (continued)

Once again, no data were available this year for
Insurance-Life/Health
Insurance-Property/Liability
Insurance-Med. Supplement

8
2. System-wide Results

The College met the benchmark
In the 2004-2005 year, 43 community colleges met
or exceeded the aggregate institutional passing
rate of 80, and 23 colleges met the minimum
accepted performance level of 70 on all reported
licensure examinations.
Twenty-three colleges met both standards.
An additional four colleges showed significant
improvement.

9
3. Goal Completion of Completers

95 of program completers will report goal
completion.
Data were taken from a survey of graduates.

10
3. Where we are

Students were asked Did you accomplish your
goal in attending the College?
The following number percent responded
Yes, completely 378 (82.5)
Yes, partially 73 (16)
No 7 (1.5)
98 of completers met their goal in attending
the College.

11
3. System-wide Results

The College met the benchmark.
System-wide, 99 of completers met their goal in
attending community college
For the 2004-2005 academic year, all 58 community
colleges met the performance standard.

12
4. Employment Status of Graduates

95 of graduates (adjusted for local
unemployment) will report being employed.
Data were be collected by the System Office from
the ESC based on the CRCFAR file (curriculum
registration, completion and financial aid
report) .

13
4. Where we stand

Of the 403 exit completers from the 2003-2004
year (measured one year in arrears), 99.5 were
employed within one year of graduating.
System-wide, data on 17,495 graduates for the
2003-4 academic year were collected.
The system average employment rate was 99.58.
All 58 colleges met the standard.

14
5. Performance of College Transfer Students

Performance of transfer students (carrying
college transfer program code) who enroll in the
UNC System within two years of leaving the
community college will look at two cohorts
Graduates (compared to native-rising juniors)
Students who take a minimum of 24 hours (compared
to native-rising sophomores)
The benchmark was set that the percent
of the combined community college cohort
in good academic standing (GPA of 2.0
or greater) would be equal that of UNC students

15
5. Where we stand
in good academic standing (2.0 gt after two
semesters)

2003-2004 Year
All NCCCS Graduates (n1,508) 89.4
CPCC Graduates (n94) 90.4
All NCCCS students with 24 hours
or more (n2,759) 83.3
CPCC students with 24 hours or
more (n246) 80.9
Combined UNC Total 87.1
Combined NCCCS Total 85.5
Combined Total of CPCC Students 83.5

16
5. System-wide Results

The College made significant improvement on this
benchmark.
Twenty-one community colleges met the 87.1
performance standard and fifteen made significant
improvement over last years performance.
This measure and the licensure pass rates
traditionally have the lowest passing rates
across the system.

17
6. Passing Rates in Developmental Courses

Successful completion is A-C
Students who receive an I or W are removed
70 of those completing the course (A-F grades)
must successfully complete (A-C)

18
6. Where we stand

During 2004-05, of 9,512 seats in remedial
courses
Content Area Total A-C Percent
Completers Completers Completers
English 3,222 2,835 88
Math 4,487 3,114 69
Reading 1,803 1,565 87
Total 9,512 7,505 79

19
6. System-wide Results

The College met the benchmark
Of all 100,551 NCCCS students who completed a
developmental course, 81 had a grade of C or
better.
Fifty-four colleges met the performance standard.
One college made significant improvements.

20
7. Success Rate of Developmental Studies
Students in Subsequent Courses

There will be no significant difference in the
grades received in the subject-specific,
college-level course between those who took a
developmental course and those who did not
Only MAT, ENG and RED will be tracked. The final
course in the sequence of developmental courses
determines when the student enters the cohort

21
Results of Measure 7

CPCC Cohort Number Passed with Cgt
Developmental 2,201 77
Non-developmental 4,943 80
Difference determined to be statistically
significant.

22
Detail by Course Area
Developmental Cohort Developmental Cohort Non-developmental Cohort Non-developmental Cohort
Fall 2003 Pass Fail Pass Fail
English 84.18 15.82 87.29 12.71
Math 71.07 28.93 77.07 22.93
Reading 68.59 31.41 76.20 23.80

Spring 2004 Pass Fail Pass Fail
English 87.20 12.80 86.42 13.58
Math 74.13 25.87 76.54 23.46
Reading 70.81 29.19 77.75 22.25

All Percent 77.33 22.67 80.03 19.97
23
7. System-wide Results

The College did not met the benchmark.
System-wide, 45 colleges met the standard no
significant difference between the developmental
students and non-developmental students in their
performance in subsequent college-level courses.

24
8. Student Satisfaction of Completers and
Non-completers

90 of the combined responses of completers and
non-completers will report being satisfied with
the quality of programs and services at CPCC.
Data taken from a survey of graduates and phone
interview of non-completers.

25
8. Where we stand

On the graduate follow-up survey sent out to all
graduates/completers and a random selection of
non-completers.
Students were asked about their satisfaction
with the overall quality of academic programs
96 of completers were satisfied
97 of non-completers were satisfied

26
8. System-wide Results

The College met the benchmark.
System-wide, 95 of program non-completers
responded that they were satisfied with the
academic programs of community colleges while 98
of completers were satisfied.
57 colleges met the performance standard.

27
9. Curriculum Student Retention and Graduation

60 of the curriculum students (excluding T
codes) from the previous Fall (2004) will do the
following
Graduate with a degree, certificate or diploma
Re-enroll this past fall (2005)
These students are considered persistent.

28
9. Where we stand
Total Number Percent
Total Cohort from Fall 2004 Number who Graduated 10,539 632 100 6

Returning Students in Curriculum in the Fall 2005 5,690 54
Total Persistence 6,322 60
Total Non-returning Students (exit non-completers) 4,217 40
29
9. System-wide Results

The College met the benchmark.
System-wide, all 58 colleges met the benchmark
with an average of 63 of Fall 2004 students
either graduating by or returning in Fall 2005.

30
10. Employer Satisfaction With Graduates

85 of the employers of graduates will report
being satisfied with their preparation.
The system office does this survey
for all 58 schools

31
10. System-wide and Local Results

During the 2004-2005 year, 17,532 employers of
community college
completers were surveyed.
A total of 4,734 surveys were completed and
returned by employers for a 27 return rate.
Overall, 95 of those employers who returned
surveys indicated that they were satisfied with
the job preparation of community college
graduates.
Of those who returned surveys, 155 were employers
of CPCC graduates and of those, 97 were
satisfied.
All 58 colleges met the standard.

32
11. Business/Industry Satisfaction With Services
Provided

90 of businesses surveyed will report being
satisfied with the services they receive from
their local community college.
Survey data were collected by the NCCCS from New
and Expanding Business and Industry Training and
the Small Business Centers .

33
11. System-wide and Local Results

The total number of survey respondents was
33,164. Of those, 100 responded that they were
satisfied with the customized training provided
by community colleges.
All 58 colleges met the benchmark.
Of the 33,164 surveys, 406 were in Central
Piedmonts region.
Of those respondents, 100 were satisfied with
customized training provided by CPCC.

34
12. Program Enrollment

Each college must maintain an enrollment of at
least 10 students per program averaged over three
years.
A program will be defined as the major unit when
it contains A, C, and D programs sharing a common
faculty.
Example Horticulture is a program - A15240,
C15240 and D15240 are the credentials it grants.

35
One Low Enrolled Program
Program Program Code 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 3-year Average
Mechanical Drafting Technology 5034 12 9 6 9
36
12. System-wide Results

The System Office allows the College to remove
planned low-enrollment programs from the list
(e.g. cytotechnology).
The System Office also removed all closed
programs (paper work sent forward).
The College did not meet the benchmark.
In the 2004-2005 academic year, 44 colleges met
the performance standard of a minimum three-year
average annual headcount of 10 students per
program.

37
Two Different Processes

Accountability Measures (the big stick)
All twelve must be reported.
Institutions considered out of compliance will
be reported to the State Legislature.
Results of these must be published in our
catalog.
Those which we do not meet will require an action
report identifying what we intend to do to fix
the problem.

38
Accountability MeasuresHow We Did.

Accountability Measure Performance Status
Progress of Basic Skills Students met
Passing Rate on Licensure Exams met
Goal Completion of Completers met
Employment Rate of Graduates met
Performance of College Transfer Students
sig.improve.
Passing Rate of Developmental Students met
Success rate of Developmental in Subsequent
Courses not met
Student Satisfaction of Completers/Non-completers
met
Curriculum Student Retention and Graduation
met
Employer Satisfaction met
Business and Industry Satisfaction with
Services met
Program Enrollment not met
Total Accountability Measures Met 10 of
12

39
System-wide Progress

In 2004-5, of the 58 community colleges in the
NCCCS, seven (12) met all 12 accountability
measures.
An additional twenty-seven (46.6) met 11 of 12
measures and seventeen (29.3) met 10 of 12
measures.
As for the rest of the colleges, three (5) met
9, and four (7) met 8.

40
Two Different Processes

Performance Funding Measures (the carrot)
We must report on five measures
Progress of Basic Skills students
Performance of college transfers
Passing rates on state licensure exams
Goal completion of completers and non-completers
Employment status of graduates/completers
Business and Industry Satisfaction with Services
(our optional sixth measure)
If we pass, we have the potential to not revert
money (1/3 of 1 for each 2 overall)

41
Performance Funding Second Tier

If we meet 5 of the 6 performance funding
measures, we are considered a superior
performing institution.
Superior funding institutions have the
opportunity to earn up to 1/3 of 1 from the pool
of funds reverted from other colleges at the end
of the year.

42
Performance Funding Six Measures

Performance Funding Measure Performance
Status
Progress of Basic Skills Students met
Passing Rate on Licensure Exams met
Goal Completion of Completers met
Employment Rate of Graduates met
Performance of College Transfer Students
sig.improve.
Business and Industry Satisfaction with
Services met
Total Performance Funding Measures Met 6
of 6

43
System-wide Progress

In 2004-5, of the 58 colleges, thirteen (22.4)
met all 6 performance funding measures and
thirty-four (58.6) met 5 of 6 measures.
The remaining eleven (19) met 4 of 6.

The Twelve Enhanced Accountability Measures and Six Performance Funding Measures PowerPoint PPT Presentation