Merchants of Doubt - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Merchants of Doubt

Description:

... May 1994 Disinformation campaign Concealing the source Attacking regulations from many different sides In 1991 Philip Morris outlined four objectives ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:153
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: obo8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Merchants of Doubt


1
Merchants of Doubt
  • Tobacco industry Public Relations or Propaganda?

2
Public relations (PR)
  • is a field concerned with maintaining public
    image for businesses, non-profit organizations or
    high-profile people, such as celebrities and
    politicians.
  • the practice of managing communication between an
    organization and its publics

3
Propaganda
  • a mode of discourse
  • intended to persuade, to manipulate, and to
    indoctrinate its audience
  • into accepting policies
  • that they might not otherwise support.

4
Propaganda
  • Propaganda is a discourse that legitimates
    certain interests and polices while providing a
    one-sided, simplified, and distorted, but not
    necessarily totally untrue, view of events or
    people.

5
(No Transcript)
6
The Fight over Secondhand Smoke
  • By the mid-1980s, nearly every American knew that
    smoking caused cancer and other illnesses
  • However, the tobacco industry successfully
    promoted and sustained doubt.
  • When the EPA (Environment Protection Agency) took
    steps to limit indoor smoking, the Tobacco
    Institute set out to challenge the EPA.

7
Secondhand smoke
  • The Industry knew of the dangers of secondhand
    smoking by the early 1970s
  • The industry own research had found that
    sidestream smoke contains more toxic chemicals
    than mainstream smoke
  • The states were moving actively against tobacco.
  • By 1979 all states (except Nevada and Kentucky)
    had some antismoking legislation

8
Research
  • A landmark study National Cancer Center
    Research Institute in Tokyo (impact on women
    whose husbands smoke).
  • Also, a study in New England Journal of Medicine
    (impact of smokers on co-workers)
  • Publicly the industry criticized the studies
  • Privately they agreed with the studies

9
The response of the tobacco industry
  • Philip Morris vice-president in 1993
  • All of us whose livelihoods depend upon tobacco
    sales must band together into u unified force
  • The bottom line is if smokers cant smoke at
    work, in stores, restaurants, they are going to
    smoke less

10
The first response increased advertisement
  • Presenting cigarettes as a symbol of strength,
    manhood, courage

11
From L.A. Times, May 1994
  • Brown Williamson Tobacco Corp. spent more than
    950,000 between 1979 to 1983 to feature its
    cigarette brands in more than 20
    movies--including payments of at least 300,000
    to action film star Sylvester Stallone.
  • The payments took the form of checks, cash and
    merchandise--including jewelry and automobiles
    for such stars as Paul Newman, Sean Connery and
    Stallone

12
Disinformation campaign
  • The Center for Tobacco Research set up a special
    projects office to deal with secondhand smoke
  • The development of opposing scientific evidence
  • Expert witnesses
  • Industry sponsored conferences to challenge the
    emerging scientific consensus

13
Concealing the source
  • Several projects were run as law firms
  • to conceal their identity and
  • to shield these efforts from scrutiny using
    attorney-client privilege

14
Attacking regulations from many different sides
  • Restrictions on smoking in the workplace seen as
    employment discrimination
  • Increased taxation of tobacco products seen as
    frivolous taxation in general, tax and spend
    attitude, big government
  • Generally restrictions on smoking seen as Nanny
    government, overprotective.

15
In 1991 Philip Morris outlined four objectives
specifically related to secondhand smoke
  • Fight bans on smoking in workplaces
  • Maintain smoking areas in transportation
    facilities (e.g., airports)
  • Promote the idea of accommodationthat smokers
    had the right to be accommodated
  • Maintain the controversy about tobacco smoke in
    public and scientific forums.

16
The EPA Report in Dec 1992 Respiratory Health
Effects of Passive Smoking
  • The report attributed 3,000 lung cancer deaths
    and 150,000 to 300,000 cases of bronchitis and
    pneumonia in children per year to secondhand
    smoke
  • Thousands of cases of aggravated asthma
  • Tobacco was considered a class A carcinogen
  • But overall the report was cautious many other
    effects of secondhand smoke were left for further
    research

17
The EPA Report the tobacco industry attack
  • Tobacco industry attacked the report and other
    studies by questioning their
  • methodology,
  • consistency
  • evidence, and
  • statistical significance

18
Scientists for Hire
  • The Tobacco Industry hired a number of well know
    scientists willing to fight science
  • One of them, Fred Singer, established Science and
    Environment Policy Project to defend tobacco
    industry

19
The use of Public Relations Firms
  • APCO worldwide
  • In the early 1990s, APCO worked closely with
    tobacco industry to
  • develop scientific articles to defend
    secondhand smoke and
  • promote the idea that the EPA work was junk
    science

20
Bad Science A Resource Book
  • 200-page book published by tobacco industry
  • Pretended to be scientific work fighting bad
    science
  • It propagated the idea that science is
    manipulated by government agencies for political
    purposes

21
Bad Science A Resource Book
  • It claimed that
  • Too often science is manipulated to fulfill a
    political agenda
  • No agency is more guilty of adjusting science to
    support preconceived public policy prescriptions
    than the EPA
  • Like many studies before it, EPAs recent report
    concerning environmental tobacco smoke allows
    political objectives to guide scientific research

22
Overall
  • In pluralistic societies, all social, economic,
    and political forces fight for their rights,
    recognition, and interests
  • Sometimes the fight is honest
  • Sometimes is not
  • Citizens need to be aware of the methods used in
    political propaganda, advertisement, and in
    public relations

23
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com