TRADEMARKS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

TRADEMARKS

Description:

Title: INTELL. PROP. SURVEY: TRADEMARK SECTION Author: PJanicke Last modified by: Paul Janicke Created Date: 7/30/2000 5:29:30 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:197
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 68
Provided by: PJan8
Learn more at: https://www.law.uh.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TRADEMARKS


1
TRADEMARKS
  • PROF. JANICKE
  • JULY 2008

2
TO BE A MARK
  • HAS TO SERVE AS A BRAND
  • MEANING HAS TO DISTINGUISH ONES GOODS OR
    SERVICES FROM THOSE OF OTHERS

3
TO BE A MARK
  • HAS TO BE USED PHYSICALLY
  • ON THE GOODS, or
  • ON GOODS CONTAINERS, or
  • ON POINT-OF-SALE DISPLAYS OF GOODS, or
  • ON INVOICES OR SHIPPING DOCUMENTS, IF THE ABOVE
    METHODS OF USE ARE IMPRACTICAL, or
  • IN CATALOGS OR WEBSITES ADVERTISING THE GOODS

4
  • FOR A SERVICE MARK, USE CAN BE
  • ON SIGNS, ADS, OR PAPERS CONNECTED TO THE
    SERVICE

5
TO BE A MARK
  • THE MARKED GOODS OR SERVICES HAVE TO PASS IN
    COMMERCE
  • LOCAL, FOR STATE RIGHTS
  • INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN, FOR FEDERAL RIGHTS

6
PROTECTION
  • RIGHTS BEGIN UPON FIRST USE
  • REGISTRATION IS UNNECESSARY
  • CAN SUE FOR INFRINGEMENT OF AN UNREGISTERED MARK
  • DONE UNDER UNFAIR COMPETITION LAWS

7
BENEFITS OF REGISTRATION
  • WHILE NOT NEEDED FOR OWNING EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO
    USE A MARK, OR FOR SUING INFRINGERS, THERE ARE
    MANY BENEFITS TO A FEDERAL REGISTRATION
  • CAN RESERVE A MARK PRIOR TO USE
  • EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE THE MARK IS PRESUMED FROM
    REGISTRATION
  • INCONTESTABLE AFTER 5 YEARS

8
(MORE BENEFITS OF FED. REGISTRATION)
  • CAN SUE INFRINGERS IN FEDERAL COURT, REGARDLESS
    OF DIVERSITY
  • VALIDITY OF MARK IS PRESUMED
  • PROTECTION AGAINST INFRINGEMENT IS NATIONWIDE
  • U.S. CUSTOMS SERVICE WILL ASSIST AGAINST
    INFRINGING IMPORTATIONS

9
RESERVING A MARK
  • CAN NOW FILE APPL. TO REGISTER BASED ON INTENT TO
    USE
  • PROVIDES CONSTRUCTIVE USE AS OF FILING DATE
  • MUST ACTUALLY USE IN COMMERCE PRIOR TO
    REGISTRATION

10
MARKS THAT ARE EASY TO PROTECT
  • COINED KODAK PURELL
  • ARBITRARY APPLE SUN
  • SUGGESTIVE MILKY WAY COPPERTONE

11
HARDER TO PROTECT
  • DESCRIPTIVE TASTEE
  • A SURNAME STEINWAY WATERMAN
  • GEOGRAPHIC MID-ATLANTIC SOUTHWEST
  • THESE WERE NOT PROTECTED AT FIRST USE
  • NEED TO DEVELOP ACQUIRED DISTINCTIVENESS OVER
    TIME, SOMETIMES CALLED SECONDARY MEANING

12
WHAT IS NOT A MARK
  • GENERIC NAME OF A THING
  • BREAD FOR BREAD
  • SOME CLOSE ISSUES
  • ASPIRIN
  • SHREDDED WHEAT
  • Cf. KLEENEX PING-PONG XEROX

13
EXAMPLES OF MARKS
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
NATURE OF RIGHTS IN MARKS
  • PREVENT OTHERS FROM USING SIMILAR MARK WHERE
    CONFUSION WOULD BE LIKELY
  • NOT A RIGHT TO PREVENT ALL USES
  • CADILLAC FOR CARS AND DOG FOOD
  • CHAMPION FOR PAPER AND BOXING GLOVES AND SPARK
    PLUGS

25
DURATION OF EXCLUSIVE RIGHT
  • AS LONG AS YOU ARE USING IT IN COMMERCE, PROVIDED
    - -
  • IT DOES NOT BECOME GENERIC
  • IT DOES NOT LOSE ITS CHARACTER AS SINGLE-SOURCE
    INDICATOR

26
REITERATING THE LEGAL BENEFITS OF REGISTRATION
  • PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE
  • CONSTRUCTIVE USE EVERYWHERE, AS OF THE FILING
    DATE
  • STARTS FIVE-YEAR CLOCK TO INCONTESTABILITY

27
PRACTICAL BENEFIT OF REGISTRATION
  • OTHERS WILL FIND OUT ABOUT YOUR RIGHTS, AND WONT
    ADOPT SIMILAR MARK
  • CHEAP POLICING

28
PASSING/FAILING THE FIRST REQUIREMENT OF A MARK
  • NOT A DISTINGUISHING BRAND

29
PASSING/FAILING SECOND REQUIREMENT OF A MARK
  • NON-USE IN ACTUAL COMMERCE
  • 1127

30
PASSING/FAILING THIRD REQUIREMENT OF A MARK
  • NON-USE ON GOODS OR CONNECTED TO SERVICES

31
FALLING INTO THE REGISTERED PIT
  • PROBLEM
  • 1ST USER HAS NO REGISTRATION
  • 2ND USER GOT STATE AND FEDERAL REGISTRATIONS, TWO
    YEARS AGO
  • GOODS/MARKS CONFUSINGLY SIMILAR
  • WHO WINS?

32
THE THORNPERMANENT LOCAL USE RIGHTS
  • THE ONE BIG PROBLEM FOR THE FIRST USER IN
    COMMERCE
  • SECOND USER CAN GET PERMANENT LOCAL RIGHTS TO USE
  • IF CONFUSION, FIRST USER MUST STAY OUT!

33
PERMANENT USE RIGHTS
  • CONDITIONS
  • (1) FIRST TO USE IN A LOCALE (STATE OR LESS)
  • (2) NO KNOWLEDGE OF PRIOR USER ELSEWHERE AT TIME
    OF ADOPTION

34
PERMANENT USE RIGHTS
  • FOR MANY YEARS, THE CUTOFF DATE FOR ESTABLISHING
    LOCAL RIGHTS WAS REGISTRATION DATE
  • REGISTRATION PROVIDED CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE (SEE
    1072), THEREBY BLOCKING CONDITION (2)

35
PERMANENT USE RIGHTS
  • NOW, CONGRESS HAS PROVIDED THAT A FEDERAL
    REGISTRATION CONSTITUTES CONSTRUCTIVE USE
    EVERYWHERE AS OF THE FILING DATE (1057(c)
  • THIS KILLS CONDITION (1) AS OF THE FILING DATE

36
PERMANENT USE RIGHTS
  • ? REGISTRATION AS CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE DOESNT
    MATTER ANY MORE

37
QUASI-MARKS AND NON-MARKS
  • WALK THROUGH 1052
  • THESE CONDITIONS FOR REGISTRATION ARE APPLIED
    BY COURTS IN DECIDING PROTECTION FOR
    UNREGISTERED MARKS

38
QUASI-MARKS AND NON-MARKS
  • START WITH 1052 (a) - (d) TELLS US MANY PROBLEMS
    ARE INCURABLE

39
QUASI-MARKS AND NON-MARKS
  • THE (e) GROUP SOME ARE CURABLE
  • DESCRIPTIVE
  • GEOGRAPHIC
  • SURNAMES
  • SOME NOT CURABLE DECEPTIVELY MISDESCRIPTIVE

40
QUASI-MARKS AND NON-MARKS
  • FUNCTIONAL (WORRY MARK PROTECTION CAN LAST
    FOREVER)
  • EXAMPLE SHAPE OF A DESK LAMP
  • CANNOT BE CURED

41
GETTING FROM QUASI TO FULLSHOWING ACQUIRED
DISTINCTIVENESS
  • OFTEN CALLED SECONDARY MEANING
  • SHOWS THE QUASI-MARK HAS ARRIVED NOW SIGNALS
    SOURCE
  • FIVE YEARS EXCLUSIVE USE MAY DO
  • 15 USC 1052 (f)

42
LESS KNOWN TYPES
  • COLLECTIVE MARKS
  • TRADE / SERVICE MARKS
  • MEMBERSHIP MARKS
  • CERTIFICATION MARKS
  • 1054

43
CONFUSION LIKELIHOOD
  • AS TO SOURCE
  • AS TO SPONSORSHIP
  • AS TO AFFILIATION
  • AS TO APPROVAL

44
CONFUSION LIKELIHOOD
  • SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF PERSONS
  • PROBLEM OF LANGUAGE TRANSLATION
  • DEPENDS HOW MANY SPEAK IT IN U.S.

45
STRONG-WEAK MARKS
  • COINED -- e.g., KODAK STRONGEST OF ALL
  • ENTITLED TO THE WIDEST SCOPE OF PROTECTION
  • MODAK, DODAK, KODAR, FOR FILM WILL BE HELD
    INFRINGING
  • ARBITRARY e.g. APPLE
  • ALSO VERY STRONG

46
  • SUGGESTIVE (e.g. MILKY WAY COPPERTONE) OK, BUT
    WEAKER
  • CREAMY WAY, BRONZETONE MIGHT BE HELD
    NONINFRINGING
  • DESCRIPTIVE (e.g. TASTEE BREAD, SUPERIOR
    WATERBEDS), and SURNAMES (WATERMAN FOR PENS, FORD
    FOR CARS)
  • ARE NOT PROTECTED RIGHT AWAY
  • ARE PROTECTED WHEN THEY HAVE ACQUIRED
    DISTINCTIVENESS

47
  • DESCRIPTIVE INCLUDES GEOG. DESCRIPTIVE (e.g.
    SOUTHWEST FOR AIRLINE SERVICES, HOUSTON CHRONICLE
    FOR NEWSPAPERS)
  • NOT PROTECTED AT FIRST
  • GENERIC NAME OF ARTICLE (e.g. ASPIRIN)
  • CANNOT SERVE AS A MARK
  • CANNOT ACQUIRE DISTINCTIVENESS ITS PART OF THE
    LANGUAGE

48
FACTORS IN JUDGING LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
  • NO SINGLE FACTOR CONTROLS
  • SUNKIST FOR FRESH FRUIT AND FOR DRIED FRUIT
    WERE OWNED BY UNRELATED COMPANIES
  • MARKS LIKE ACME, SUPERIOR, AND NATIONAL HAVE
    MANY OWNERS
  • FAMOUS CASES HAVE CHECKLISTS

49
FACTORS
  • STRENGTH OF PS MARK
  • HOW ARBITRARY?
  • HOW MUCH USE?
  • SIMILARITY OF THE MARKS
  • SIGHT
  • SOUND
  • MEANING
  • SCRIPT OR DESIGN
  • SIMILARITY OF PRODUCTS OF SERVICES

50
FACTORS (CONTD.)
  • SIMILAR CHANNELS OF TRADE
  • SIMILAR ADVERTISING OR PROMOTION MEDIA
  • BAD FAITH ADOPTION
  • SOME COURTS GIVE THIS HEAVY WEIGHT OTHERS DONT
  • SIMILAR TARGET CUSTOMERS
  • SIMILAR PURCHASE CONDITIONS TIME, PRICE, ETC.

51
  • COURTS HAVE TO WEIGH ALL THE FACTORS
  • THEY REACH A DECISION THAT IS TO SOME DEGREE
    SUBJECTIVE

52
WHO HAS THE RIGHT? THE PROBLEM OF GRAY GOODS
  • ARISES FROM CORPORATE SPINOFFS ABOUT AS FREQUENT
    AS MERGERS
  • WHEN FOREIGN MARKET IS SPUN OFF, MARKS USUALLY GO
    WITH
  • ALSO FROM LICENSING IP MAXIMIZATION

53
GRAY GOODS
  • U.S. RULE
  • IF OWNERS ARE SAME OR RELATED, NO RELIEF AGAINST
    IMPORTATION
  • IF OWNERS ARE UNRELATED, RELIEF IF QUALITY IS
    LOWER

54
WHAT IS NOT INFRINGEMENT
  • FAIR USE TO DESCRIBE
  • JANICKES COMPUTER RENTAL
  • WE RENT ALL TYPES, INCLUDING COMPAQ, IBM, AND
    DELL
  • 1115 (4)

JANICKES COMPUTER RENTAL WE RENT ALL
TYPES INCLUDING COMPAQ AND IBM
55
WHAT IS NOT INFRINGEMENT
  • OWN NAME IN BUSINESS OTHER THAN AS A MARK
  • Cf SPERAS RESTAURANT
  • TONY SPERA, PROP.
  • TONYS RESTAURANT
  • TONY SPERA, PROP.

56
N.B.
  • NO GENERAL RIGHT TO USE YOUR OWN NAME IN BUSINESS
  • MOST ATTEMPTS FAIL
  • NO POINT IN CHANGING YOUR NAME TO JOHNNY WALKER
    IF YOU ARE GOING TO SELL WHISKY

57
N.B.
  • STATEMENTS OF DISCONNECTEDNESS USUALLY FAIL

58
A WORD ABOUT DILUTION
  • WHEN THERE IS NO INFRINGEMENT BECAUSE NO
    LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
  • BUT THE ACTS OF D SOMEHOW CHEAPEN OR TARNISH OR
    REDUCE THE VALUE OF PS MARK

59
A WORD ABOUT DILUTION
  • EXAMPLE
  • CADILLAC FOR CARS
  • FOLLOWED MANY YEARS LATER BY CADILLAC FOR DOG
    FOOD

60
A WORD ABOUT DILUTION
  • ONLY AVAILABLE FOR FAMOUS MARKS
  • NO DAMAGES NORMALLY
  • INJUNCTIVE ONLY
  • 1125 (c)

61
REMEDIES
62
INJUNCTIVE
  • NO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WITHOUT EXCLUSION POWER
  • CONSIDER LAND OR CAR ANALOGY IF ONLY DAMAGES,
    YOU ARE MERELY IN THE RENTAL BUSINESS

63
INJUNCTIVE
  • PRELIMINARY
  • PERMANENT
  • 1116 (a)
  • 4,000 TRADEMARK SUITS FILED ANNUALLY
  • ABOUT 45 GO TO TRIAL

64
MONETARY
  • DS PROFITS
  • OR PS DAMAGES DIFFICULT TO SHOW
  • COURT CAN TREBLE PS DAMAGES
  • IF DS PROFITS AS REMEDY IS TOO SMALL/LARGE,
    COURT CAN ENTER A JUST AMOUNT
  • 1117 (a)

65
ATTORNEYS FEES
  • EXCEPTIONAL CASES ONLY
  • USUALLY MEANS WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT
  • 1117 (a)

66
DESTRUCTION
  • A NICE MEDIEVAL REMEDY
  • ALL INFRINGING LABELS, AND THE MEANS OF MAKING
    THEM PRINTING GEAR, INCL. COMPUTERS?
  • 1118

67
DEFENDANTS REMEDIES
  • ATTORNEYS FEES IN EXCEPTIONAL CASES
  • 1117 (a)
  • ORDER TO CANCEL REGISTRATION
  • 1119
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com