Largest Contiguous Sum - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Largest Contiguous Sum

Description:

Title: Largest Contiguous Sum Author: Thaddeus F. Pawlicki Last modified by: Thaddeus F. Pawlicki Created Date: 1/21/2002 7:15:42 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:114
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: Thadd2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Largest Contiguous Sum


1
Largest Contiguous Sum
  • CSC 172
  • SPRING 2002
  • LECTURE 2

2
Todays Agenda
  • Largest Sum Problem Analysis
  • Linked Lists
  • Workshop Sign up

3
LAB ASSINGMENTS
  • Labs are due at the beginning of the first lab of
    the following week
  • Lab hand ins (hardcopy) will be a report
  • Hand in to lab TA
  • Neat, Stapled, Broken into sections
  • Cover page describing the lab
  • Listing of required files, properly modified

4
Example
  • One dimensional pattern recognition
  • Input a vector x of n floating point numbers
  • Output the maximum sum found in any contiguous
    subvector of the input.
  • X2..6 or 187
  • How would you solve this?

31 -41 59 26 -53 58 97 -93 -23 84
5
Obvious solution
  • Check all pairs
  • int sum int maxsofar 0
  • for (int i 0 iltx.lengthi)
  • for (int j i jltx.lengthj)
  • sum 0
  • for (int k ikltjk) sum xk
  • maxsofar max(sum,maxsofar)

6
How long does the obvious solution take?
  • We could measure it benchmarking
  • What is a good size of input to measure?

7
How long does the obvious solution take?
  • We could analyse it
  • Multiply the cost (time required) to do
    something by the number of times you have to do
    it.
  • If n is the length of the array
  • Outer loop runs exactly n times
  • Inner loop runs at most n times
  • Inner most loop runs no more than n times
  • Lets say the and max take unit time

8
How long does the obvious solution take?
  • We call this an n3 solution
  • Can you think of a better (faster) way?
  • Can you do an analysis that will prove it better?
  • That is what we do in CSC 172
  • For some very common tasks

9
A better solution
  • We notice that the sum xi..j is intimately
    related to the sum xi..(j-1)
  • Use this fact to prevent taking redundant sums

10
A better solution
  • Check all pairs
  • int sum int maxsofar 0
  • for (int i 0 iltx.lengthi)
  • sum 0
  • for (int j i jltx.lengthj)
  • sum xk // the sum of xi..j
  • maxsofar max(sum,maxsofar)

11
How long for the better solution?
  • Outer loop runs exactly n times
  • Inner loop runs at most n times
  • Lets say the and max take unit time

12
How long for the better solution?
  • Innerloop cost n 1
  • Outerloop cost n (Innerloop cost)
  • Outerloop cost n ( n 1)
  • Outerloop cost n2 n

13
How much better is the better algorithm than
the obvious?
  • We are comparing an n2 to an n3 algorithm
  • Does efficiency matter?
  • If we wait 18 months, the speed of computers will
    double, right?

14
Time to solve a problem(400MHz Pent II) Bently,
2000
Size Obvious 1.3n3 ns Better 10n2 ns
103 1.3 sec 10 msec
104 22 min 1 sec
105 15 days 1.7 min
106 41 years 2.8 hrs
107 41 millennia 1.7 wks
15
Max size problem solved
Obvious 1.3n3 ns Better 10n2 ns
Sec 920 10,000
Min 3600 77,000
Hr 14,000 6.0105
Day 41,000 2.9106
16
Divide Conquer
  • To solve a problem of size n, recursively solve
    two sub-problems of size of size n/2, and combine
    their solutions to yield a solution to the
    complete problem.

17
DC for LCS
x
a
b
ma
mb
ma , mb or
mc
18
Recursive DD LCS
  • public double LCS(double x)
  • return LCS(x,0,x.length-1)

19
Recursive DC LCS (proto structure)
  • public double LCS(double x, int lower, int
    upper)
  • if (lowergtupper) return 0
  • if (lower upper) return max(0,xlower)
  • middle (upper lower) /2
  • return max(LCS(x,lower,middle),
  • LCS(x,middle1,upper))
  • // still need to do mc

20
How to find mc?
  • Note that mc consists of two parts
  • The part starting at the boundary and reaching up
  • The part ending at the boundary and reaching down
  • The sum of these is mc

mc
mclower
mcup
21
Recursive DD LCS
  • public double LCS(double x, int lower, int
    upper)
  • if (lowergtupper) return 0
  • if (lower upper) return max(0,xlower)
  • middle (upper lower) /2
  • double umax findUmax(x,middle1,upper)
  • double lmax findLmax(x,lower,middle)
  • return max(LCS(x,lower,middle),
  • LCS(middle1,upper),
  • lmax umax)

22
findLmax
  • public double findLmax(double x,
  • int lower,int middle)
  • double lmax 0, sum 0
  • for (int j middlejgtlowerj--)
  • sumxj
  • lmax max(lmax,sum)
  • return lmax
  • // Run Time? In terms of middle-lower?

23
findUmax
  • public double findLmax(double x,
  • int middle1,int upper)
  • double umax 0, sum 0
  • for (int j middlejltupperj)
  • sumxj
  • umax max(lmax,sum)
  • return umax
  • // Run Time? In terms of upper-middle1?

24
Recursive DD LCS
  • public double LCS(double x, int lower, int
    upper)
  • if (lowergtupper) return 0
  • if (lower upper) return max(0,xlower)
  • middle (upper lower) /2
  • double umax findUmax(x,middle1,upper)
  • double lmax findLmax(x,lower,middle)
  • return max(LCS(x,lower,middle),
  • LCS(x,middle1,upper),
  • lmax umax)
  • //Run time of the two calls?

25
Run Time of DC LCS
  • Every call on a range of n takes
  • n to find umax lmax
  • 2 (recursive) calls of size n/2 each
  • Formally
  • TLCS(n) 2TLCS(n/2)n
  • As we will see (later in the course) this solves
    to
  • O(n log n)

26
Time to Solve (Bently)
1.3n3 10n2 47nlog2n
103 1.3 sec 10msec .4msec
104 22 min 1 sec 6 msec
105 15 days 1.7 min 78 msec
106 41 years 2.8 hours .94 sec
107 41 millennia 1.7 weeks 11 sec
27
Max size (Bently)
1.3n3 10n2 47nlog2n
Sec 920 10,000 1.0106
min 3600 77,000 4.9107
hr 14,000 6.0105 2.4109
day 41,000 2.9106 5.01010
28
LCS Scanning
  • A scanning algorithm starts at the left end x0
    and proceedes to theright xn-1 keeping track of
    the current result
  • The key to a scanning algorithm is
  • Given that the problem is solved for the
    x0..j-1 range
  • Do some processing at step j that will extend the
    partial solution to the x0..j range

29
LCS Scanning
  • Keep a record of the best and the current
  • If the current is better than the best then
    replace
  • How do I extend the maxendinghere?

x
maxendinghere
maxsofar
j
0
30
Extending maxendinghere
  • We have up until xj-1
  • Should we include xj?
  • We should if adding xj keeps the sum positive
  • Consider if the max ending at xj is negative
    then the contribution from xj and before cannot
    be of benefit to what comes after
  • Otherwise, we should reset maxendinghere to zero
  • The empty vector

31
LCS Scanning
  • public double LCS(double x)
  • double maxsofar 0, maxendinghere 0
  • for (int j 0jltx.lengthj)
  • maxendinghere
  • max(maxendingherexj,0)
  • maxsofar max(maxsofar,maxendinghere)
  • return maxsofar
  • // Run Time?

32
Time to solve (Bently)
1.3n3 10n2 47nlog2n 48n
103 1.3 sec 10msec .4msec 0.5 msec
104 22 min 1 sec 6 msec .5 msec
105 15 days 1.7 min 78 msec 5 msec
106 41 years 2.8 hours .94 sec 48 msec
107 41 millennia 1.7 weeks 11 sec .48 sec
33
Max Problem (Bently)
1.3n3 10n2 47nlog2n 48n
Sec 920 10,000 1.0106 2.1107
min 3600 77,000 4.9107 1.3109
hr 14,000 6.0105 2.4109 7.61010
day 41,000 2.9106 5.01010 1.81012
34
Machine Power?
n Alpha 21164A, C, obvious ald TRS-80, BASIC, Linear alg
10 0.6 microsec 200 millisecs
100 0.6 millisecs 2.0 sec
1000 0.6 sec 20 sec
10,000 10 min 3.2 min
100,000 7 days 32 min
1,000,000 19 years 5.4 hrs
35
Design Principles
  • Save state to avoid recomputation
  • Preprocess into data structures
  • Divide and conquer
  • Scanning algorithms
  • Cumulatives when dealing with ranges

36
Open problem
  • Extend LCS to 2D
  • Given an nxn array of reals, find the maximum sum
    contained in any rectangular sub-array
  • What is the time complexity?

37
Further reading
  • Programming Pearls by Jon Bently 2nd ed. 2000
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com