Democratizing Elections - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Democratizing Elections

Description:

Title: Public Campaign Financing and Portland s Voter-owned Elections System Author: Virginia Rumfelt Last modified by: Marvin Created Date – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:281
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: Virginia128
Learn more at: https://web.pdx.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Democratizing Elections


1
Democratizing Elections
  • US SOCIETY SPRING 09

2
Outline
  • Voter Disenfranchisement
  • Voter Suppression
  • VoterOwned Elections
  • Instant Runoff Voting

Planting the Standard of Democracy
3
Voter Disenfranchisement
  • Philip Green, KarenRose Anderson, Tom Stephens

4
Outline
  • Voter Fraud Protection
  • Mail In Ballots
  • Felon Disenfranchisement

5
Voter Fraud Protection
  • Required Photo ID
  • Goal prevention of individual cases of fraud
  • Problem Not all citizens or registered voters
    have valid photo ID (largely affects minorities
    and women)

6
Mail In Ballots
  • Not available in many U.S. states
  • Goal Avoids possible voter fraud
  • Problem Many people unable to get to polls due
    to disability, distance, busy schedules etc
    therefore lower voter turn out.

7
Historic significance of voting rights in the U.S.
  • Upon founding, only white land owning men had the
    right to vote
  • 1868 - 14th Amendment grants African Americans
    the legal right to vote
  • 1920 - 16th Amendment grants women the right to
    vote

8
Historic Significance of Voting rights in the U.S.
  • 1964 - Civil Rights Act bans the suppression
    African Americans voters
  • 1971 - Congress lowers voting age to 18
  • Today - Over 5 million people in the US remain
    banned from exercising their right to vote

9
Felon Disenfranchisement
  • Voting restrictions placed on citizens convicted
    of a felony
  • 48 States prohibit inmates from voting while
    incarcerated for a felony
  • 30 States exclude felons on parole/probation from
    voting
  • Kentucky Virginia deny the right to vote to
    ex-felons permanently

10
Who is Affected?
  • 5.3 Million Americans (1 in every 41 adults) have
    currently or permanently lost the right to vote
    as result of felony conviction
  • 2.1 Million are ex-offenders that have completed
    their sentences

11
Election Outcomes
  • Although the outcome of the extraordinarily
    close 2000 presidential election could have been
    altered by a large number of factors, it would
    almost certainly have been reversed had voting
    rights been extended to any category of
    disenfranchised felons
  • Had disenfranchised felons been permitted to
    vote, we estimate that Gores national margin
    of victory in the popular vote would have
    surpassed one million votes Regardless of
    popular vote, however, one state Florida held
    the balance of power. If disenfranchised felons
    in Florida had been permitted to vote, Democrat
    Al Gore would certainly have carried the state
    and the election.

12
Minorities
  • Disproportionate number of minority adults
    disenfranchised due to conviction of a felony
  • African Americans
  • Make up 38 of disenfranchised adults but 13.4
    of U.S. population
  • 13 of African Americans are disenfranchised (7
    times the national average)
  • Latino Americans
  • Make up 16 of disenfranchised adults but 13 of
    U.S. Population

13
Felon Re-Enfranchisement
  • Promotes rehabilitation civic integration for
    those convicted of felonies
  • Gives a voice to those disproportionately
    disadvantaged by felony convictions (namely
    minorities low income communities)

14
Efforts Toward Re-Enfranchisement
  • Educating ex-felons about voting rights process
    for regaining right to vote
  • Grassroots re-enfranchisement projects
  • --www.projectvote.org
  • --www.sentencingproject.org

15
Voter Suppression
  • Katlin Pointer
  • Ronnie Balog-Ressler

16
Outline
  • Distribution of Election Resources
  • Barriers to Third Party Registration
  • Challenging Voters at the Polls
  • Voter Intimidation
  • Purging Voters
  • Election Day Registration

17
Voter Suppression
  • Distribution of Election Resources
  • Problems at voting polls in minority and urban
    precincts
  • Discourages voters due to not enough voting
    machines
  • Poorly Trained and disorganized poll workers

Voter suppression video
18
Voter Suppression
  • Third Party Registration Restrictions
  • Preserving political successes
  • Regulation of third party activities
  • Concerns of voter fraud

19
Voter Suppression
  • Challenging voters at the polls
  • Intimidation
  • Police presence at polling places
  • Voters improperly asked for photo ID and/or proof
    of citizenship
  • Exclusion of 20 million Americans who lack photo
    identification

20
Voter Suppression
  • Voter intimidation
  • Deceptive flyers
  • Misleading and/or harassing phone calls
  • Forced to declare aloud their party affiliation

21
Voter Suppression
  • Voter caging
  • Purging or challenge voters registration
  • Undeliverable mail compiled into "challenge
    lists" of unverifiable addresses and can be used
    to challenge voters' eligibility

22
Voter Suppression
  • State voter challenge laws
  • Challenge the right of other citizens to vote
  • Post-Reconstructive Era
  • Employed restrictive residency requirements,
    periodic registration, poll taxes, and literacy
    or understanding requirements.

23
Voter Suppression
  • Election Day Registration
  • Supporters
  • Increased voter turnout
  • Decreased Voters confusion
  • Human Nature of Procrastination
  • Opponents
  • Time/financial cost
  • Increase in Fraud

24
Public Campaign Financing and PortlandsVoter-ow
ned Elections System

Mary Heil Virginia Rumfelt
25
Outline
  • Old ways of doing things
  • New election system
  • How VOE works
  • Oregon
  • Is it still a broken system?

26
The conundrum
  • http//www.voterownedhawaii.org/roadvideo.php

27
In theory
  • Candidates that demonstrate broad community
    support may choose to receive all the funding
    they will need to finance a campaign.
  • People from increasingly historically
    underrepresented would be able to run and,
    therefore, a more diverse population is
    represented.

28
How does V-OE work?
29
  • Along with a handful of other US States, Portland
    is the first US city to attempt the VOE model
  • Online voting
  • Oregon to join interstate compact to modify the
    Electoral College

30
Success debatable
  • Until now, Money Has Limited Democracy
  • Roughly 90 of elections in PDX had been won by
    the candidate with the most bucks and access to
    the media.
  • A surge of empowerment felt in voters
  • Controversy Obamas refusal of Public Funds
    during the 2008 presidential election
  • Broken System
  • Record breaking internet fundraising

31
Instant Runoff Voting
  • Michael Saxton
  • Cassidy Jorgensen
  • Dennis Dunn

32
What is IRV?
  • Alternative voting process to the electoral
    system
  • Based on a ranking system of preferred candidates
  • Based on winning the majority of votes not
    plurality (more than anyone else)

33
How IRV Works
  • Muppet Slides
  • http//www.instantrunoff.com/how/muppets/

34
IRV Objections
  • Multiple choices mean multiple votes
  • The other votes are only counted if you chose the
    losing candidate
  • Ranking can hurt candidates

35
IRV Objections cont.
  • Creates false majorities if there isnt a clear
    number one choice
  • Costs the taxpayer more money

36
IRV Benefits
  • Elects candidate with a true majority
  • Increases voter turnout

37
IRV Benefits cont.
  • Eliminates primaries and saves money
  • Candidates use a less negative campaign strategy
    to attract voters

38
IRV Benefits cont.
  • Lesser known candidates can attract more votes
  • IRV only counts one vote at a time
  • Minimizes wasted votes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com