In silico ADME/Tox in drug design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 51
About This Presentation
Title:

In silico ADME/Tox in drug design

Description:

Title: In silico methods: ADMET vs receptor affinity Author: Akzo Nobel Last modified by: ridderl Created Date: 1/28/2004 8:42:05 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:303
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: Akz9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: In silico ADME/Tox in drug design


1
In silico ADME/Tox in drug design
  • Bioinformatics IV
  • (Computational Drug Discovery)
  • Wednesday 7 June 2006
  • CMBI, University of Nijmegen
  • Lars Ridder, Organon

2
What makes a good drug ?
  • Good activity/selectivity on the right target
  • BUT ALSO !!!
  • Absorption
  • Distribution
  • Metabolism
  • Excretion
  • Toxicity

ADME/Tox
3
Reasons for drug failure in Clinical Development
(gt80)
4
Role of in silico ADME/Tox
Market
Research
Development
300m 4-5yrs (30)
500m 8-10yrs (70)
Does the compound work in man?
Failure rate over 80-90 (safety, efficacy)
5
In-house design cycle
Guide optimisation based on in silico models
Screening, hit-optimization, lead selection, lead
optimization, SOPP, development
Validate/refine models based on new
pharmacological data
6
Absorption/Distribution/Metabolism
  • Pharmacokinetic parameters
  • Oral bioavailability fraction of dose that
    enters blood circulation (after 1st pass
    metabolism in the liver)
  • Absorption fraction of dose that passes the gut
    wall
  • Clearance (CL) amount of blood cleared per time
    unit
  • Volume of distribution (Vd) (I.V.) Dose /
    Initial plasma concentration

7
Absorption
MW lt 500, non-polar
Most common route of drug absorption
8
Membrane permeation
Water
C1
Membrane
C2
Penetration rate P x A x (C1-C2) P partition
into membrane A effective surface area of
membrane C1-C2 concentration gradient
Depends on physicochemical properties of drug,
e.g. lipophilicity, MW, hydrogen bonding, etc.
9
Hydrogen bond donors and acceptors
Absorption requires desolvation, which becomes
more difficult with an increasing number of
hydrogen bonds
10
The octanol/water model
water
octanol
11
The octanol/water model
water
octanol
12
The octanol/water model
water
octanol
LogD depends on pH !
13
pH-range in GI tract
pH pH (fed) (fasted) 3-7 1.4-2.1 5-6.5 6.5 6.5-
8 6.5-8 5-8
14
ClogP
  • Calculating logP from structure
  • Fragmentation of solute molecule by identifying
    Isolating Carbons (IC not doubly or triply
    bonded to a hetero atom)
  • Remaining fragments are characterized by topology
    and environment (i.e. the type of ICs bound to
    it)
  • ClogP is a sum of (tabulated or estimated)
    contributions of all fragments isolating
    carbons corrections
  • Where corrections are made for intramolecular
    polar, dipolar and hydrogen bond interactions as
    well as electronic (aromatic) interactions
    (modified Hammett approach)

15
ClogP - examples
Fragment Value
6 x IC (arom) 0.78
Carboxy -0.03
Hydroxy -0.44
4 x Hydrogen 0.91
Electronic int. 0.34
ClogP 1.56
Exp. logP 1.58
16
ClogP - examples
Fragment Value
6 x IC (arom) 0.78
Carboxy -0.03
Hydroxy -0.44
4 x Hydrogen 0.91
Electronic int. 0.34
H-bonding 0.63
ClogP 2.19
Exp. logP 2.26
17
ClogP vs. Caco-2
Caco-2 in vitro assay to measure absorption rate
18
Lipinskis Rule-of-5
  • Lipinski (1997) selected 2245 orally active drugs
    from the World Drug Index (WDI)
  • Distribution analysis suggested that poor
    absorption is more likely when
  • Mol. Weight gt 500
  • ClogP gt 5
  • Nr. of H-bond donors gt 5
  • Nr. of H-bond acceptors gt 10

19
Correlation to in vivo (rat) absorption
  • In-house rules
  • based on
  • ClogP
  • MW
  • H-bond donors
  • H-bond acceptors
  • But also
  • Polar surface area
  • Nr. of rotatable bonds

Good no properties out of range Medium 1
property out of range Bad gt 1 property
out of range
These simple physico-chemical properties largely
determine bioavailaility !
20
Pharmacokinetic modeling
  • PK-sim
  • Cloe
  • PKexpress
  • Gastroplus

Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 50 (2001) S41S67
21
Distribution
  • Most important organ
  • The brain
  • Drugs acting on the central nervous system (CNS)
    must cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB)
  • Peripheral drugs may be required not to pass the
    BBB to avoid CNS side effects
  • Physicochemical properties are important (again)
  • Efflux by P-gp mediated active transport

22
Metabolism/Excretion
23
Metabolic enzymes
Lipophylic metabolites
Cytochrome P450 Hydroxylation, dealkylation,
N-oxidation, epoxidation, dehydrogenation, etc.
e.g. Flavin monooxygenases
Dehydrogenases
Phase I (mostly) oxidation
Polar metabolites
glutathione H2O glucuronate
sulphate acetate methyl
Phase II conjugation
Hydrophylic metabolites
24
Contributions of Phase I and Phase II enzymes to
drug metabolism
ADH, alcohol dehydrogenase ALDH, aldehyde
dehydrogenase CYP, cytochrome P450
DPD, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase NQO1,
NADPHquinone oxidoreductase or DT
diaphorase COMT, catechol O-methyltransferase
GST, glutathione S-transferase HMT, histamine
methyltransferase NAT, N-acetyltransferase STs,
sulfotransferases TPMT, thiopurine
methyltransferase UGTs, uridine 59-triphosphate
glucuronosyltransferases. Evans (1999) Science
286 487
25
Cellular localisation of metabolic enzymes
  • Endoplasmitic reticulum (ER) of intestinal- and
    liver cells contain P450
  • Cytosol contains Phase II metabolic enzymes

26
Xray structures of P450
  • CYP 2C5 from rabbit was 1st mammalian P450 to be
    crystallized in 2000
  • the substrate access channel is likely to be
    buried in the membrane
  • Structures of most important human CYPs (2C9, 3A4
    and 2D6)
  • Williams et al. (2000) Mol. Cell 5121

27
Structure of P450
Substrate access
Heme catalytic centre
28
Cytochrome P450 (CYP)
Reactive iron-oxo intermediate Compound 1
29
Phase 1 metabolism vs. lipophilicity
In vitro measurement of metabolic stability in
microsomes ER membrane fraction of liver
cellsIn-house data Compounds tend to be very
stable or very unstable
30
The Cytochrome P450 family
CYP3A4
Family
Subfamily
Individual protein
31
Isoenzyme specificity
  • Various isoenzymes have different but overlapping
    substrate specificities
  • (CR indicates flatness of molecule)
  • Lewis (2002) Drug Disc. Today 7918

32
Individual variation in P450 activity
  • Genetic polymorphism
  • Defective gene poor metabolizer (e.g. CYP
    2C19 gt20 in Asians)
  • Gene multiplication extensive metabolizer
    (e.g. CYP 2D6)
  • Enzyme induction
  • -gt Increased protein synthesis
  • Enzyme inhibition
  • Enzyme activation
  • (CYP 3A4)
  • Avoid drugs being metabolized via a single route
    !

Drug-drug interactions !
33
Occurrence of major polymorphisms
Ingelman-Sundberg et al. (1999) Trends in Pharm.
Sciences20342
34
Impact of P450 polymorphism
Ingelman-Sundberg et al. (1999) Trends in Pharm.
Sciences20342
35
Metabolite identification
  • It is often important to identify the metabolites
    formed by P450s
  • Identification of toxic metabolites
  • Knowledge about the site of metabolism can be
    used to design metabolically more stable
    compounds (e.g. by modifying/blocking the labile
    site in a molecule)

36
P450 metabolism
  • Which metabolites are formed by P450s depends
    on
  • If and how (i.e. in what orientation) a compound
    is bound to the active sites of individual CYPs
  • The chemical reactivity of various sites of a
    molecule towards CYP catalyzed mechanisms

37
In silico methods
  • Binding in CYP active site
  • Docking
  • Pharmacophore
  • Reactivity of ligand sites
  • QM methods
  • Metabolism rules
  • Expert knowledge
  • Empirical scoring

38
Modeling Ligand binding to CYP2C19by homology
modeling and docking
39
Assessing chemical susceptibility towards CYP
metabolism based on QM calculations
Many CYP reactions begin with abstraction of
aliphatic H
Works for small molecules for larger drug
molecules a combination of high level modeling
and QM calculations will ultimately result in
more accurate predictions
40
Derivation of metabolic rules
  • Example rule for N-acetylation
  • NH21 gtgt N1C(O)C
  • Apply on training set of 7307 reactionsmetabolite
    s generated in total 1223metabolites match
    experimental product 122probability 122/1223
    0.10

41
Refined rules for N-acetylation
Three more specific rules for N-acetylation
79 / 357 0.22
33 / 417 0.08
122/1223 0.10
10 / 88 0.11
42
Refined rules for N-demethylation
10/13 0.77
11/200.55
102/266 0.38
109/434 0.25
182/1052 0.17
2/87 0.02
43
Current rule base at Organon
  • 148 rules
  • phase I and phase II metabolism
  • Probabilities range from0.006 (glycination of
    aliphatic carboxyls)to 0.77 (demethylation of
    methyl-anilines)

44
Evaluation Sulfadimidine
1
5
Sulfadimidine
2
3
Prediction(rank)
4
45
Application metabolic stability
Predicted Rank 1
-gt Confirm experimentally by mass spectroscopy
Med Chem optimisation increased metabolic
stability
46
Toxicity
  • Systemic Toxicity
  • Acute Toxicity
  • Subchronic Toxicity
  • Chronic Toxicity
  • Genetic Toxicity
  • Carcinogenicity
  • Developmental Toxicity
  • Photo toxicity
  • Organ Specific Toxicity
  • Blood/Cardiovascular Toxicity
  • Hepatotoxicity
  • Immunotoxicity
  • Reproductive Toxicity
  • Respiratory Toxicity
  • Nephrotoxicity
  • Neurotoxicity
  • Dermal/Ocular Toxicity

Many endpoints Many mechanisms -gt Tough problem
47
Prediction of toxicity
Biology Activity (Toxicity)
Rules/Tox-icophores
Chemistry Structure Reaction mechanisms
  • Expert or rule-based systems
  • QSAR or correlative methods

48
Example expert systemDerek
  • 303 knowledge based alerts or toxicophores
  • 35 tox. endpoints
  • refs to literature included
  • Works well e.g. for mutagenicity

49
Example expert systemDerek output
50
Example QSAR methodAPA Acute toxicity model
  • 37400 IP-mouse LD50 data
  • Classification
  • Knowledge from literature
  • Properties identified form decision trees
  • QSAR based on fragments
  • Overall R0.8 for test-set

51
  • Absorption
  • Distribution
  • Metabolism
  • Excretion
  • Toxicity

Market
Research
Development
Decrease failure rate !
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com