FCoE Overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

FCoE Overview

Description:

Host initiates Port Login with chosen Targets FC Routing Ethernet Routing Dynamic Scheme: ... Against TCP Slow Start impacts I/O latency, throughput ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:191
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: TonyH79
Learn more at: https://ewh.ieee.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FCoE Overview


1
FCoE Overview
  • IEEE CommSoc/SP Chapter
  • Austin, Texas, May 21 2009
  • Tony Hurson
  • tony.hurson_at_ieee.org

2
Networked Storage History
3
SANs Latency, Throughput Requirement
4
SCSI Read, Write over FC
5
FC Fabric Port Terminology
6
FC Initialization Flow
  • Host (Physical Machine) initiates Fabric Login
    with nearest switch FLOGIN receives a VN_Port
    ID in return
  • (Additional entities on same Host e.g. Virtual
    Machines may also log into fabric using NPIV
    FDISC, each getting a unique VN_Port ID).
  • (Host may use well-known FC servers to discover
    the VN_Port IDs of its Targets and their LUNs).
  • Host initiates Port Login with chosen Targets

7
FC Routing
8
Ethernet Routing
  • Dynamic Scheme Source Learning
  • If unicast DstMAC is not in lookup table, flood
    frame to all ports except its source port.
  • Note source port of SrcMAC in lookup table, if
    not already present
  • Age/invalidate lookup entries
  • Similar flooding behavior for multicast
  • Precludes loops in fabric

9
FC Frame Format
10
FC Classes of Service
  • Class 1 dedicated connection obselete
    unsupported in FCoE
  • Class 2 acknowledged, with ACKs from remote
    peer. Supported in FCoE, though some link-layer
    features (F_RJT, F_BSY) irrelevant. Useful for
    large Sequences and sequential devices.
  • Class 3 unacknowledged, FCoE-supported. Most
    prevalent for disk applications. Error recovery
    punted to higher (FCP) levels.
  • Class F inter-switch link only. FCoE-supported

11
Protocol Stack History and Comparison
12
iSCSI SAN Pros and Cons
  • For
  • Runs over existing, ubiquitous Ethernet, TCP/IP
    fabrics.
  • Internetworking built in.
  • Lots of fabric management tools (ready for
    enterprise storage?).
  • Against
  • TCP Slow Start impacts I/O latency, throughput
    (but newer TCPs are tunable)
  • Lossy fabrics impact I/O latency through
    re-transmission and complicate receive endpoint
    data placement.
  • Bridging to legacy FC SANs slow/expensive because
    of TCP termination overhead.

13
Lossless Ethernet via PAUSE
14
FCoE Early Deployment Example
15
FCoE Frame Format
16
FCoE Endpoint Model
17
FCoE Switch Functional Model
18
Converged Ethernet
  • AKA Data Center Bridging (DCB). Run up to four
    major traffic classes on single 10 GbE fabric. In
    order of market prevalence
  • Networking (TCP/IP, lossy).
  • Block Storage (lossless FCoE, or lossless/lossy
    iSCSI).
  • Management (heartbeat traffic, low bandwidth,
    but must get through).
  • Inter-Process Communication (clustered computing
    high bandwidth, low latency, lossless preferred).

19
Groundwork for DCB
  • IEEE 802.1Qaz ETS DCBX bandwidth allocation
    to major traffic classes (Priority Groups) plus
    DCB management protocol.
  • IEEE 802.1Qbb Priority PAUSE. Selectively PAUSE
    traffic on link by Priority Group.
  • IEEE 802.1Qau Dynamic Congestion Notification.

20
IEEE 802.1Qaz Enhanced Transmission Selection
  • Support at least 3 Priority Groups/traffic
    classes
  • PGs identified by Priority field of existing
    802.1Q VLAN Tag
  • Configured Bandwidth per PG has 1 resolution
  • PG15 has limitless bandwidth (use sparingly!, for
    Management)
  • Work Conservation if the wires free, use it.

21
ETS Configuration Example
  • PG0 (Storage) 40 of port b/w
  • PG1 (Networking) 20 of port b/w
  • PG2 (IPC) 40 of port b/w
  • PG15 (mgmt) limitless
  • If a PG underutilizes, others can fill the space.
  • Typical implementation DWRR.

22
IEEE 802.1Qbb Priority PAUSE
23
IEEE 802.1Qau Dynamic Congestion Control
Background
  • Lossless fabrics are prone to congestion
    spreading (congestion trees).
  • Ethernet-FC gateways with their different port
    speeds (10 GbE 8 Gbps) are natural bottlenecks.
  • ETS Work Conservation model adds fuel to fire.
  • Solution switches/endpoints notify traffic
    sources of incipient congestion, via feedback
    messages sources reduce rates accordingly.

24
Congestion Notification in Action
25
Congestion Control at Endpoint Transmit
26
FCoE Summary
  • Presents new, but very familiar, PHY and Link
    Layers for FC.
  • Core switching discipline remains FC-SW-5.
  • Higher FC layers almost completely unchanged
    (thats the legacy value!)
  • Biggest Ethernet-level requirement lossless
    fabric.
  • Part of Converged Ethernet initiative lots of
    ancillary activity at IEEE.

27
Further Reading
  • FCoE www.t11.org
  • IEEE 802.1Q(azaubb) www.ieee.org
  • Thank you! Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com