R. L. Buckley, A. Dupont, R. J. Kurzeja, and M. J. Parker - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

R. L. Buckley, A. Dupont, R. J. Kurzeja, and M. J. Parker

Description:

R. L. Buckley, A. Dupont, R. J. Kurzeja, and M. J. Parker Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah River National Laboratory Palmetto American Meteorological Society – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: d099
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: R. L. Buckley, A. Dupont, R. J. Kurzeja, and M. J. Parker


1
R. L. Buckley, A. Dupont, R. J. Kurzeja, and M.
J. Parker Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah
River National Laboratory Palmetto American
Meteorological Society Mini-Technical Meeting, 03
April 2009
2
  • Background
  • Daily weather forecasts provided for worker
    safety
  • Prescribed fires conducted at the Savannah River
    Site (SRS) on routine basis to reduce potential
    fire hazards
  • Fire-weather forecasts are part of daily forecast
    package
  • Mixing depth is an important factor in
    determining altitude and dilution of smoke plumes

3
  • Description of Work
  • This work examines trends in average maximum
    mixing depths at SRS for 5 years using mesoscale
    model (RAMS)
  • Compare results between two versions of the model
    and examine seasonal trends
  • Compare simulations with specific days in which
    special balloon soundings were released

4
Standard Regional Simulations
  • Horizontal grid spacing 20 km. Lowest level above
    ground (25 m AGL).
  • Initialize model with ETA (NAM) and nudge to
    lateral BCs every 3 hours
  • Simulate 48 hours (keeping final 36 hours),
    updating twice per day
  • Basis for fire weather forecasts

5
Standard Meteorogram Forecast Product
6
  • Assumptions to Determine Trends
  • Use potential temperature gradient derivation
  • Limit to earliest 12-hr daylight period (i.e. 12Z
    to 00Z ? starting 07 or 08 LST)
  • Discard periods when RAMS did not run properly,
    or when windy and overcast or foggy conditions
    were predicted
  • Average maximums determined monthly
  • Time period considered (Jan. 2003Sep. 2007)

7
Results
(Over 1700 simulations considered in each line
depicted).
8
  • Comments on Mixing Depth Trends
  • Mixing depths for RAMS43 greater than RAMS3a
  • RAMS43 tends to predict higher surface
    temperature daily maximums
  • Surface parameterization differences
  • Maximum averages lower in 2003 than later years
  • SRS measurements support this trend

9
Observed Quantities Averaged over Summer (May-Sep)
P Total Precipitation S Incoming solar
radiation (average every 15-min from 12 to 00
UTC) T Temperature (average every 15-min from 12
to 00 UTC) HS3 Number of 15-min periods with
heat stress category 3
10
  • Comparison with Specific Observed Soundings
  • 50 SRS balloon-borne soundings released from
    20032007
  • Simulated mixing depth within 20 of observed
    mixing depth roughly 40 of all times
  • Better agreement with RAMS43 than RAMS3a
  • Difficulties seen in estimating mixing depth
    during mid- morning (transition)

11
Sample Comparison (20-Apr-2007,
RAMS43-vs-Observation)
Obs RED Sim 00Z Blue Sim 12Z Green 00Z better
than 12Z (shorter forecast lead time)
12
  • Conclusions
  • Simulated mixing depths calculated for 5 year
    period. Daily maximums recorded using two
    versions of RAMS.
  • Monthly averages indicate expected seasonal
    trends. Lower summer maxima predicted in 2003
    agree with SRS observations of temperature,
    precipitation, solar radiation, and heat stress.
  • RAMS43 mixing depths tend to be higher than
    RAMS3a mixing depths due to higher surface
    temperature predictions from differences in
    surface parameterizations.
  • Comparison with 50 balloon-borne soundings
    released over SRS indicate better overall
    agreement with RAMS43 simulations.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com