Title: U.S. Anti-dumping Policy and the World Trade Organization
1 U.S. Anti-dumping Policy and the World Trade
Organization Presentation27 January 2004
Gordon L. Brady
2Two recent issues involving U.S. anti-dumping
policy and the World Trade Organization (WTO)
- Raising tariffs on ten classes of steel imports
(safeguard procedures) - The January 2003 WTO ruling against the Byrd
Amendment passed in 2000 that had allowed U.S.
companies to bring qui tam actions and to receive
payments of anti-dumping duties collected by the
U.S. Customs Service
3WTO decision on steel safeguard procedures
- In November 2003, a WTO appeals panel ruled that
tariffs imposed by the U.S. on ten classes of
steel imports were illegal - WTO found tariffs illegal because
- Discriminatory - some importing nations were
exempted - Not based on unforeseen developments, and not
based on a surge of imports - U.S. Government responded by lifting tariffs to
prevent WTO-permissible retaliation against
roughly 2 billion in U.S. exports
4Byrd Amendment
- WTO panel ruled in January 2003 that the Byrd
Amendment violated the WTO dumping code - Payments were in qui tam tradition of U.S. law
non-governmental entities allowed to collect
bounties for enforcement of laws, e.g., false
claims, environment. Qui tam doctrine applies
here to enable successful litigants to receive
the entire penalty in anti-dumping cases. This
provides not only the benefits of protection
against imports but also a on-going subsidy for
the operations of the domestic industry - WTO thus found these payments to benefit U.S.
companies above and beyond benefits from
tariff-specific price hikes
More
5Byrd Amendment (continued)
- Eight WTO members will announce targeted
sanctions on U.S. exports unless the Byrd
Amendment is repealed. The WSJ (9 Jan 04) quoted
trade experts as suggesting the EU would seek
approximately 250 million a year in sanctions - Bush Administration has so far failed to persuade
Congress to repeal the Byrd Amendment, thus
illustrating the political clout of Byrd and his
Senate colleagues who trade favors with Byrd
(logrolling) - Arbitration before WTO will take place before WTO
authorises any retaliation
6Under what circumstances are WTO decisions likely
to prevail?
- WTO rules were a political compromise between
member states reflecting the compromise that each
state must make between protectionist and free
trade forces - Anti-dumping law will remain a protectionist tool
that WTO member states may still frequently
invoke to protect politically powerful
import-competing industries - Anti-dumping law was one of many side bargains
to secure industry support for the WTO - The extent to which anti-dumping law and other
measures against imports will continue to be
employed depends on how domestic economic forces
play out. Thus results will vary on a
case-by-case basis
7Interest Groups
- At least two categories of interest groups arise
in opposition to specific measures of trade
protection. In the case of steel safeguard
procedures above we may identify these
categories as follows - Steel users who benefit from lower cost imports
- Exporting industries which would be hit by
prospective EU retaliation
8 WTO ruling provided cover for the Bush
administration to its own global economic
agenda This case illustrates the working of the
U.S. domestic political economy as well as
whatever clout the WTO dispute resolution
mechanism may have Binding WTO decisions contrast
with decisions under the former GATT, which could
be blocked by the member states The Byrd
Amendment applies across the board and we may
identify the operation of interest groups
comparable to those we identified in the case of
the tariffs on steel
9I propose doing further research on this and
other international economic issues Why I am the
best candidate for the Director of the
International Economics Programme
- Experience in running these types of projects
- A substantial publication record, networking and
communication skills at the senior level, and
many contacts in business, economics, and
politics - Experience in fund-raising and financial
management as Director of the Law Economics
Center at George Mason University School of Law - Proven leadership to motivate research lead
writer on
10- President's Council on Environmental Quality --
lead writer of economics chapter, acid rain
studies - Department of Energy -- Western coal policy,
environmental quality - Department of the Interior -- conference on
western coal policy - President's Council on Environmental Quality
National Science Foundation study of air quality
management - Presidents Office of Management and Budget -
National Science Foundation evaluation of
emission trading policy proposal - National Commission on Air quality - Conference
on benefit estimation, Conference on cost
estimation - Primer on Public Choice