U.S. Anti-dumping Policy and the World Trade Organization PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 10
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: U.S. Anti-dumping Policy and the World Trade Organization


1
U.S. Anti-dumping Policy and the World Trade
Organization   Presentation27 January 2004
Gordon L. Brady
2
Two recent issues involving U.S. anti-dumping
policy and the World Trade Organization (WTO)
  1. Raising tariffs on ten classes of steel imports
    (safeguard procedures)
  2. The January 2003 WTO ruling against the Byrd
    Amendment passed in 2000 that had allowed U.S.
    companies to bring qui tam actions and to receive
    payments of anti-dumping duties collected by the
    U.S. Customs Service

3
WTO decision on steel safeguard procedures
  • In November 2003, a WTO appeals panel ruled that
    tariffs imposed by the U.S. on ten classes of
    steel imports were illegal
  • WTO found tariffs illegal because
  • Discriminatory - some importing nations were
    exempted
  • Not based on unforeseen developments, and not
    based on a surge of imports
  • U.S. Government responded by lifting tariffs to
    prevent WTO-permissible retaliation against
    roughly 2 billion in U.S. exports

4
Byrd Amendment
  • WTO panel ruled in January 2003 that the Byrd
    Amendment violated the WTO dumping code
  • Payments were in qui tam tradition of U.S. law
    non-governmental entities allowed to collect
    bounties for enforcement of laws, e.g., false
    claims, environment. Qui tam doctrine applies
    here to enable successful litigants to receive
    the entire penalty in anti-dumping cases. This
    provides not only the benefits of protection
    against imports but also a on-going subsidy for
    the operations of the domestic industry
  • WTO thus found these payments to benefit U.S.
    companies above and beyond benefits from
    tariff-specific price hikes

More
5
Byrd Amendment (continued)
  • Eight WTO members will announce targeted
    sanctions on U.S. exports unless the Byrd
    Amendment is repealed. The WSJ (9 Jan 04) quoted
    trade experts as suggesting the EU would seek
    approximately 250 million a year in sanctions
  • Bush Administration has so far failed to persuade
    Congress to repeal the Byrd Amendment, thus
    illustrating the political clout of Byrd and his
    Senate colleagues who trade favors with Byrd
    (logrolling)
  • Arbitration before WTO will take place before WTO
    authorises any retaliation

6
Under what circumstances are WTO decisions likely
to prevail?
  • WTO rules were a political compromise between
    member states reflecting the compromise that each
    state must make between protectionist and free
    trade forces
  • Anti-dumping law will remain a protectionist tool
    that WTO member states may still frequently
    invoke to protect politically powerful
    import-competing industries
  • Anti-dumping law was one of many side bargains
    to secure industry support for the WTO
  • The extent to which anti-dumping law and other
    measures against imports will continue to be
    employed depends on how domestic economic forces
    play out. Thus results will vary on a
    case-by-case basis

7
Interest Groups
  • At least two categories of interest groups arise
    in opposition to specific measures of trade
    protection. In the case of steel safeguard
    procedures above we may identify these
    categories as follows
  • Steel users who benefit from lower cost imports
  • Exporting industries which would be hit by
    prospective EU retaliation

8
WTO ruling provided cover for the Bush
administration to its own global economic
agenda This case illustrates the working of the
U.S. domestic political economy as well as
whatever clout the WTO dispute resolution
mechanism may have Binding WTO decisions contrast
with decisions under the former GATT, which could
be blocked by the member states The Byrd
Amendment applies across the board and we may
identify the operation of interest groups
comparable to those we identified in the case of
the tariffs on steel
9
I propose doing further research on this and
other international economic issues Why I am the
best candidate for the Director of the
International Economics Programme
  • Experience in running these types of projects
  • A substantial publication record, networking and
    communication skills at the senior level, and
    many contacts in business, economics, and
    politics
  • Experience in fund-raising and financial
    management as Director of the Law Economics
    Center at George Mason University School of Law
  • Proven leadership to motivate research lead
    writer on

10
  • President's Council on Environmental Quality --
    lead writer of economics chapter, acid rain
    studies
  • Department of Energy -- Western coal policy,
    environmental quality
  • Department of the Interior -- conference on
    western coal policy
  • President's Council on Environmental Quality
    National Science Foundation study of air quality
    management
  • Presidents Office of Management and Budget -
    National Science Foundation evaluation of
    emission trading policy proposal
  • National Commission on Air quality - Conference
    on benefit estimation, Conference on cost
    estimation
  • Primer on Public Choice
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com