Models for Software Reliability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Models for Software Reliability

Description:

Models for Software Reliability N. El Kadri SEG3202 Definitions 1991 IEEE standard: the probability of failure-free software operation for a specified period of time ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:120
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: siteUott
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Models for Software Reliability


1
Models for Software Reliability
  • N. El Kadri
  • SEG3202

2
Definitions
  • 1991 IEEE standard the probability of
    failure-free software operation for a specified
    period of time in a specified environment
  • The quality of the product improves over time,
    and we talk about reliability growth
  • Software-reliability growth problem estimating
    and predicting the reliability of a program as
    faults are identified and attempts made to fix
    them.
  • Fault density - The number of faults per thousand
    lines of executable source code.

3
Using Reliability Models
4
Taxonomy of Software Reliability Models
5
Time-dependent Reliability Growth Models
6
Time-dependent Reliability Growth Models
7
Discussion
  • One problem with models is an overwhelming
    number of models has been proposed to address the
    issue of software reliability assessment.
  • We must be aware that no single model can be
    recommended universally to users under any
    circumstances.
  • The best models may vary from time to time and
    differ form application to application.

8
Time-Independent Reliability Models Fault
Injection
  • Estimates the number of faults N in the system
    in the case where we know the outcomes of the
    already detected faults.
  • Insert into a software module a certain number A
    of faults
  • Proceed with its testing
  • Count the number of failures due to injected
    faults (f) Count the number of failures due to
    inherent faults (i )
  • Estimate the number of remaining faults

9
Time-Independent Reliability Models Fault
Injection
  • Example
  • Insert into a software module A25 faults
  • Proceed with its testing (results 32 failures)
  • Count the number of failures due to injected
    faults (f17)
  • Count the number of failures due to inherent
    faults (i15)
  • Estimate the number of remaining faults

10
Fault Injection Confidence Levels about the
Number of Faults
  • If not all artificial faults have been found
    (fltA), then
  • If all artificial faults have been found (fA),
    then

11
Fault Injection Example (cont.)
  • Confidence levels about the number of faults
  • Let us set E to 10.
  • f lt A gt

12
Fault Injection Example 2
  • Assume all artificial faults have been found
    (fA)
  • Given E10, certain confidence level ? and iltE,
  • how to determine the number of faults to be
    injected?

13
Time-Independent Reliability Models Input Domain
  • Software reliability depends on how software
    operates on a certain input domain.
  • This point of view relates to selecting software
    test cases over the input domain according to how
    software is used
  • Software usage information includes the
    environment information where software is used,
    as well as the information on the actual
    frequency of usage of different operations,
    functions, or features that the system offers.
  • The usage information is quantified through
    operational profiles

14
Input Domain Equivalence Classes
Software Module
15
Operational Profiles
  • Such a strategy is called Statistical Testing and
    it has at least two benefits
  • Testing concentrates on the parts of the system
    that are most likely to be used and hence should
    result in a system that the user finds more
    reliable.
  • Using the techniques which we have presented
    earlier, we have confidence that reliability
    predictions based on the test results will give
    us an accurate prediction of reliability as seen
    by the user.

16
Operational Profiles
  • Methodology to develop operational profile
  • 1. Determine customer profile or usage context
    profile.
  • 2. Determine user profile.
  • 3. Determine system modes and their profile.
  • 4. Determine the functional (requirements)
    profile.
  • 5. Determine the operational (implementation)
    profile.

17
Operational profile
  • A set of relative frequencies (or probabilities)
    of occurrence of disjoint software operations
    during its operational use
  • A software-based system may have one or more
    operational profiles.
  • Operational profiles are used to select test
    cases and direct development, testing and
    maintenance efforts towards the most frequently
    used or most risky components.

18
Operational profile
  • Construction of an operational profile is
    preceded by definition of a customer/user
    profile, a system mode profile, and a functional
    profile.
  • Profiles are constructed by creating detailed
    hierarchical lists of customers, users, modes,
    functions and operations that the software needs
    to provide under each set of conditions.
  • For each item estimate the probability of
    its occurrence and thus provide a quantitative
    description of the profile.
  • If usage is available as a rate (e.g.,
    transactions per hour) it needs to be converted
    into probability.  

19
User Profile - Example
20
System Mode
21
System Modes Example
  • We can identify five system modes
  • Normal Traffic load
  • High Traffic load
  • Start/Restart
  • Administration
  • Troubleshooting
  • The first three are only relevant to the
    subscriber user type, the fourth to the operator
    user type and the fifth to the customer care
    system user type.

22
Functional Profile
23
Operational Profile
24
Operational Profile
25
Input Domain Equivalence Classes
Software Module
26
Input Domain Equivalence Classes Operational
Profiles
  • Each Path through the Operational Profile
    hierarchy defines an equivalent class
  • Path E1 subscriber, normal traffic, MO SMS,
    originating MO SMS
  • Each path Ej has its associated probability Pj
    stating that the inputs will come from it under
    normal operation of the system
  • Assuming the inputs are independent from each
    other, the probability of a path is a product of
    the corresponding operational probabilities,
    i.e. for E1 the associate probability is
  • P1 0.90.60.050.95 0.35

27
Input Domain Model Reliability Estimation
  1. Assumption c equivalent classes Ei
  2. With each class comes its operational profile
  3. Let Pi be the probability stating that the
    inputs will come from Ei under normal operation
    of the system
  4. nj is the number of test cases sampled from the
    jth input domain Ei, where fj out of them
    resulted in software failures
  5. The estimated reliability is computed as

28
System reliability
  • Knowing the reliability of individual components
    Ri, one can easily compute the reliability of
    some architectures as follows
  • (a) Series configuration (b) Parallel
    configuration

29
Classes of Reliability Models and their main
Features
30
Reliability Measures
31
Availability
32
ANSI/IEEE 982.1-1988
  • Includes guidance for the following
  • Applying product and project measures throughout
    the software life cycle
  • Optimizing the development of reliable software
    with respect to constraints
  • Maximizing the reliability in its actual use
    environment
  • Developing the means to manage reliability in the
    same manner that cost and schedule are managed

33
More Information
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com