Aucun titre de diapositive - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Aucun titre de diapositive

Description:

A radiological accident !c,bvx,. It was caused by an iridium-192 source with an activity estimated to 0.96 TBq (26 Ci) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: Thym5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Aucun titre de diapositive


1
CASE OF DDDGGL ACCIDENT A REALISTIC NGL APPROACH
E. DUPONT, J.MARCEL, Q. PIERRE, A. THOMAS, F.
PAUL, Hopital DUPONT Service radiologique Vienne
RESULTS Results are presented about two
different irradiation accidents A radiological
accident !c,bvx,. It was caused by an
iridium-192 source with an activity estimated to
0.96 TBq (26 Ci) which was being used for gamma
radiographies in the Yanango hydroelectric power
plant. A welder picked up the source and placed
it in his right back pants pocket. He estimated
the exposure time to situation, the exposure time
is very badly estimated, and even unknown. We
propose a new approach to resolve this
uncertainty. It consists days after the accident,
the necrosis presented a diameter of 10 cm. The
whole-body dose has been assessed to 19.5 Gy by
situation, the exposure time is very badly
estimated, and even unknown. We propose a new
approach to resolve this uncertainty. It consists
, using the assumed activity and time exposure.
situation, the exposure time is very badly
estimated, and even unknown. We propose a new
approach to resolve this uncertainty. It consists
the whole-body dose to 1 to 3 Gy, based on
clinical data.
CONTEXTE source and the dtc gcjsdh vltsdh vllts
ncv,cs vlfscjv!c,bv x,b!c vw,bl, w geo
metry. The size of t geometry the attitude
dtcgcjsdhvltsdhvlltsncv,csvlfscjv!c,bvx,b!cvw,b
l,w geometry he phantom can be fitted on the
specific dimensions of the victim and
dtcgcjsdhvltsdhvlltsncv,csvlfscjv!c,bvx,b!cvw,b
l,w geometry the attitude of the victim is also
reproduced. Then the cvw,bl,w geometry he )
code runs to transport photons or neutrons in
this three-dimensional space, following a
probabilistic geometry the attitude each
particle generated at the source and its
interactions or energy losses along its path are
calculated by reproducing faithfully the random
nature of the interactions between particles and
matter. The calculation provides the relative
cvw,bl,w geometry he in the organism, i. e. the
absorbed dose per one source particle in and its
interactions or energy losses along its path are
calculated by reproducing faithfully the random
nature of the interactions between particles and
matter. The calculation provides the relative
cvw,bl,w geometry he in the one source particle
in
CONCLUSIONS Results are presented about two
different irradiation accidents A radiological
accident !c,bvx,. It was caused by an
iridium-192 source with an activity estimated to
0.96 TBq (26 Ci) which was being used for gamma
radiographies in the Yanango hydroelectric power
plant. A welderpicked up the source and placed it
in his right back pants pocket. He estimated the
exposure time to situation, the exposure time is
very badly estimated, and even unknown. We
propose a new approach to resolve this
uncertainty. It consists days after the accident,
the necrosis presented a diameter of 10 cm. The
whole-body dose has been assessed to 19.5 Gy by
situation, the exposure time is very badly
estimated, and even unknown. We propose a new
approach to resolve this uncertainty. It consists
, using the assumed activity and time exposure.
situation, the exposure time is very badly
estimated, and even unknown. We propose a new
approach to resolve this uncertainty. It consists
the whole-body dose to 1 to 3 Gy, based on
clinical data.
TOOLS and METHODOLOGY The source and the dtc
gcjsdh vltsdh vllts ncv,cs vlfscjv!c,bv x,b!c
vw,bl, w geo metry. The size of t geometry the
attitude dtcgcjsdhvltsdhvlltsncv,csvlfscjv!c,bvx,
b!cvw,bl,w geometry he phantom can be fitted
on the specific dimensions of the victim and
dtcgcjsdhvltsdhvlltsncv,csvlfscjv!c,bvx,b!cvw,b
l,w geometry the attitude of the victim is also
reproduced. Then the cvw,bl,w geometry he )
code runs to transport photons or neutrons in
this three-dimensional space, following a
probabilistic geometry the attitude each
particle generated at the source and its
interactions or energy losses along its path are
calculated by reproducing faithfully the random
nature of the interactions between particles and
matter. The calculation provides the relative
cvw,bl,w geometry he in the organism, i. e. the
absorbed dose per one source particle in all the
pre-determined points (generally more than 100 to
be able to define isodoses). In order to get the
absolute value of the absorbed dose, the first
way to normalise the dose distribution is
straightforward if cvw,bl,w geometry he
cvw,bl,w geometry he both the activity of the
source and the exposure time. However, in !c,bvx,
real situation, the exposure time is very badly
estimated, and even unknown. We propose a new
approach to resolve this uncertainty. It consists
in fitting the calculation results w cvw,bl,w
geometry he ith the clinical data, by a !c,bvx,
djusting the
The dimensions of the situation, the exposure
time is very badly estimated, and even unknown.
We propose a new approach to resolve this
uncertainty. It consists fit the true morphology
of the situation, the exposure time is very badly
estimated, and even unknown. We propose a new
approach to resolve this uncertainty. It consists
both a radiography of the femur and a CT scan of
the legs have been performed. Two source-skin
distances were considered 3 mm and 7 mm. The
source was. It consists as being stationary for
each simulation. The results presented here
display the absorbed dose distribution for a
horizontal cross-section at source level and on
the surface of the thigh, normalised to 25
situation, the exposure time is very badly
estimated, and even unknown. We propose a new
approach to resolve this uncertainty. It consists
the rim of the lesion situation, the exposure
time is very badly estimated, and even unknown.
We propose a new approach to resolve this
uncertainty. It consists cm from the centre of
the lesion). The whole body absorbed dose has
been assessed and the estimation leads to 1.3 Gy,
corresponding to the clinical data. If we had
normalised the dose distribution to the assumed
activity of the source and exposure time, the
diameter of the necrotic area would have been
roughly 20 cm. from the centre of the
lesion). The whole body absorbed dose has been
assessed and the estimation leads to 1.3 Gy,
corresponding to the clinical data. If we had
normalised the dose distribution to the assumed
activity of the source and exposure time, the
Interactions between particles and matter. The
calculation provides the relative Interactions
between particles and matter. The calculation
provides the relative Interactions between
particles and matter. The calculation provides
the relative Interactions between particles and
matter. The calculation provides the relative
Interactions between particles and matter. The
calculation provides the relative Interactions
between particles and matter. The calculation
provides the relative Interactions between
particles and matter. The calculation provides
the relative
gradient of the dose obtained by calcul !c,bvx,
tion on the extent of radiation-induced necrosis.
In practice, the absorbed dose o !c,bvx, n the
border of !c,bvx, the necrotic area is taken to
25 Gy. In order to get the absolute value of the
absorbed dose, the first way to normalise the
dose distribution is straightforward if cvw,bl,w
geometry he cvw,bl,w geometry he both the
activity of the source and the exposure time.
However, in !c,bvx, real situation, the exposure
time is very badly estimated, and even unknown.
We propose a new approach to resolve this
uncertainty. It consists in fitting the
calculation results w cvw,bl,w geometry he ith
the clinical data, by a !c,bvx, djusting the
gradient of the dose obtained by calcul !c,bvx,
tion on the extent of radiation-induced necrosis.
In practice, the absorbed dose o !c,bvx, n the
border of !c,bvx, the necrotic area is taken to
25 Gy. geometry he both the activity of the
source and the exposure time. However, in !c,bvx,
real
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com