The Continuing Role of SRF for AARD: Issues, Challenges and Benefits PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 22
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Continuing Role of SRF for AARD: Issues, Challenges and Benefits


1
The Continuing Role of SRF for AARD Issues,
Challenges and Benefits
Hasan Padamsee Cornell University
  • SRF performance has been rising every decade
  • SRF installations for HEP (and other
    applications) have been rising steadily
  • With strong support, SRF can continue to make
    major impact on future HEP accelerators
  • ILC, TeV upgrade, Superbeams for Neutrinos,
    Neutrino Factory, Muon Collider, Multi-TeV
    colliders

2
Steady Increase of Installed SRF Voltage in
Accelerators With Time
3
Total Installation gt 1000 m Total Voltage gt 6 GV
KEK-B
SNS
SNS/Jlab
CEBAF
CESR
HERA
LEP-II
CESR
TRISTAN
Stanford
Cornell
4
Steady Increase of SRF Gradients1980 20065
MV/m -gt 40 MV/m
Along the way
5
1995 Gradients 26 - 27 MV/m reached in Three
5-cell structures
Cornell DESY Fermilab Collaboration
6
Increase of SRF Gradients9-cells, 1995
2006-gt 40 MV/m
7
SRF for ILC (0.5 TeV)
SRF technology in US needs serious catching up
! Need to engage ALL available resources in US
35 - 40 MV/m DESY-KEK 6 best cavities, Vertical
Tests
8
Goals of Near Term RD for ILC
See talks by Holmes, Kephart, Kneisel
  • Demonstrate reproducibility of performance
  • Perfect EP, HPR, clean room techniques in US
  • Long term performance characterization of full
    scale structures in cryomodules
  • Assemble and operate one complete RF unit with
    all ILC building blocks
  • US labs engaged
  • Fermilab, Jlab, Cornell, Argonne
  • (SMTF collaboration)

9
Beyond 35 MV/m for TeV ILC
  • Important work started
  • BUT much more needed!
  • Better shapes
  • Better niobium
  • Better understanding of SRF physics of niobium

See Talk by Kneisel
See Talk by Gurevich
10
New Shapes Breakthrough50 MV/m in Single Cells
!Lower Surface Magnetic Field Lower Losses
Need Multi-cells Next
11
Better NiobiumStarted at Jlab
- Reduction of grain boundary density improves
performance - Lower cost through ingot stage
material
12
SRF for  Muon Colliders at Multi-TeV energies
  • Biggest challenge is muon cooling
  • being addressed elsewhere
  • Muon collider is a cascade of SRF Recirculating
    Linear Accelerators (many turns each)
  • Starting with linac at low frequency (e.g 200
    MHz) at 10 15 MV/m, followed by low frequency
    RLAs
  • TeV scale energies after with several 30 MV/m
    gradient RLAs
  • Total about 5 km of ILC-like linac

13
Need High Quality Nb Coatings For Low Frequency
Applications
  • For 200 MHz, cost of Nb is a major factor gt
    Develop Nb/Cu
  • CERN/Cornell collaboration reached 10 MV/m
  • Improved coatings needed for 15 MV/m
  • Ionize Nb atoms using various methods
  • Bias magnetron sputtering (Cornell/ACCEL)
  • Electron cyclotron resonance in a Nb plasma
    (Cornell/Jlab)
  • Vacuum Arc (Cornell/INFN-Rome)

14
SRF for the Neutrino Sector
  • Neutrino factory (Muons accelerated to 20 GeV via
    5-turn RLA, need about 4 GeV)
  • Could serve as demonstrator for the muon
    collider
  • Neutrino factory may or may not be needed
    depending on super-beams, as for example
  • 8 GeV Proton Driver
  • Main part of Proton Driver is SRF, ILC-like linac
  • Could also be test linac for ILC (if needed)

Neutrino Beams
See Talk by Foster
15
SRF for Colliders Beyond 1 TeVBoth gradients gt
50 MV/m Q 1011 can contribute
  • Higher gradients
  • Need New materials, e.g. Nb3Sn
  • Simple theory
  • RF critical magnetic field Superheating
    critical field
  • Nb 2200 Oe (57 MV/m) Best achieved 2000 Oe
  • Nb3Sn 4000 Oe (105 MV/m) Best achieved 1100
    OeWhy?
  • Fundamental research needed on the RF critical
    field of highly Type II superconductors
  • Theoretical studies
  • Experimental work to determine Hcrit
  • Coupled with fabrication of best materials
  • Present funding level for this effort is nearly
    zero !

16
Pulsed Measurements of RF Critical Field Nb
Nb3Sn
4000 Oe 105 MV/m in new shape cavities
T. Hays Cornell Campisi SLAC
Hc1- Nb3Sn
17
Simple Theory of RF Critical Magnetic Field
Plane Nucleation Model For flux lines
Other Models Are these right??
Best Nb
18
Increased Gradients Must Go Hand-in-hand With
Increased Q, to Keep Operating Costs in Line
For e.g. 80 MV/m will need Q 1011
19
Best Nb Q gt 1011 at 25 MV/m, 1.6 K
20
Best Nb3Sn Q at 2 K ! (But at low fields)
G. Mueller and P. Kneisel
21
Conclusions
  • Basic RD on SRF has steadily pushed gradients
  • With many benefits to HEP, and non-HEP along the
    way (See Talk by Swapan C.)
  • We must solidify our gains in the 35 40 MV/m
    range to realize ILC
  • With other potential benefits to HEP ( Neutrino
    Factory, Proton Driver, Muon Collider)
  • And non-HEP (Light sources, Neutron sources)
  • Support needed to stay on the road to 100 MV/m
    and Q 1011 to realize multi-TeV energy.
  • Continued evolution of the Livingston Curve?

22
A Look into the Past and FutureInstalled SRF
Voltage
ILC
XFEL
SNS
LEP
CEBAF
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com