AHW Ensemble Data Assimilation and Forecasting System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

AHW Ensemble Data Assimilation and Forecasting System

Description:

AHW Ensemble Data Assimilation and Forecasting System Ryan D. Torn, Univ. Albany, SUNY Chris Davis, Wei Wang, Steven Cavallo, Chris Snyder, James Done, NCAR/MMM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:148
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Ryan135
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AHW Ensemble Data Assimilation and Forecasting System


1
AHW Ensemble Data Assimilation and Forecasting
System
  • Ryan D. Torn, Univ. Albany, SUNY
  • Chris Davis, Wei Wang, Steven Cavallo, Chris
    Snyder, James Done, NCAR/MMM

2
Overview
  • Since participation in HFIP HRH test, we have
    been using cycling EnKF approach to create
    initial conditions for AHW model
  • Wanted initial conditions that
  • Have a good estimate of environment
  • Have a decent estimate of TC structure
  • Does not lead to significant initialization
    problem
  • Since then, we have upgraded the system based on
    observed flaws in both model and initial
    conditions

3
Assimilation System
  • WRF ARW (v3.3), 36 km horizontal resolution over
    basin, 96 ensemble members, DART assimilation
    system.
  • Observations assimilated each six hours from
    surface and marine stations (Psfc), rawinsondes,
    dropsondes gt 100 km from TC, ACARS, sat. winds,
    TC position, MSLP, GPS RO
  • Initialized system this year on 29 July,
    continuous cycling using GFS LBC
  • No vortex bogusing or repositioning, all updates
    to TC due to observations

4
AHW Model Setup
  • WSM6 Microphysics (includes graupel)
  • Tiedtke cumulus parameterization (includes
    shallow convection)
  • YSU PBL, NOAH land surface model
  • Updated Ck/Cd formulation in Davis et al. 2010
  • Pollard 1D Column ocean model
  • SSTs from NCEP 1/12 degree analysis
  • HYCOM Mixed-layer depths

5
Data Assimilation Nesting Strategy
  • Each time NHC declares an INVEST area, generate a
    12 km resolution two-way interactive nest that
    moves with the system until NHC stops tracking it
    (1600 km x 1600 km nest)
  • Observations are assimilated on the nested domain
    each 6 h
  • Nest movement determined by extrapolating NHC
    positions over the previous 6 h
  • Works better than vortex-following nests, which
    have largest covariances associated with
    differences in land position

6
Nest Example
Earl
Fiona
INVEST
Gaston
7
Cycling Nest Experiments
  • No Nest (HRH test setup)
  • Fixed 12 km two-way nest (1000 km x 1000 km)
    generated for each TC in domain at each analysis
    time. Discarded at end of model advance (2009
    real-time setup)
  • Moving 12 km two-way nest (1000 km x 1000 km)
    generated when TD is declared. Nest is cycled
    along with the coarse domain. Motion based on
    NHC advisory position over previous 6 hr (2010
    real-time setup)

8
TC Vitals Error
RMS Error
Bias
9
Deterministic Forecast
  • For each TC, choose one analysis ensemble member
    whose TC properties are closest to ensemble mean
    (see below)
  • Remove other 12 km nests, add additional 4 km
    nest to 12 km for that storm (800 km on a side),
    runs without cumulus parameterization.

10
2011 Retrospective Forecasts
Track
Maximum Wind Speed
11
Ensemble Forecasts
  • Currently running 15 member ensemble for NHC
    highest priority TC
  • Take first 15 members of the analysis ensemble
    since all are equally likely
  • All members use same lower BC, lateral BC, and
    model physics (will be relaxed in the future)

12
0000 UTC 2 Aug. Ensemble
13
(No Transcript)
14
Lessons to Date
  • Ensemble can produce fairly large variance in
    intensity without significant variance in
    large-scale environment parameters
  • Biases due to deficiencies in model physics (in
    particular aerosol and ozone treatment) lead to
    many situations where truth is outside ensemble
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com