Title: Smoking Cessation Medications and Pregnant Smokers
1 Smoking Cessation Medications and Pregnant
Smokers
- Cheryl Oncken, M.D., MPH
- University of Connecticut School of Medicine
Presentation prepared for UK Smoking Cessation
Conference, June 28th, 2013
2Cheryl Oncken, MD, MPH Disclosures
- Research/Grants
- National Institutes of Health (NICHD, NIDA)
- Pharmaceutical Nabi Biopharmaceuticals Pfizer
Inc.
3Risks of Smoking During Pregnancy(Surgeon
Generals Report 2004)
- Maternal smoking is responsible for a number of
poor pregnancy outcomes - spontaneous abortion (RR1.2-1.3 )
- preterm delivery (OR1.3)
- low birth weight (RR1.5-2.5)
- placenta previa (RR1.3-4.4)
- placental abruption (RR1.4-2.4)
- Perinatal mortality (RR1.2-1.3)
- SIDS (OR1.4-3.0)
4Effect of Prenatal Tobacco Exposure on Children
- Prenatal tobacco exposure
- Attention deficit disorder (Romano et al., 2008)
- Deficits in attention and auditory processing
(Fried et al., 1997 Fried et al 2003) - Increased risk of becoming a smoker (Kendell et
al., 1994 Buka et al., 2003) - Childhood obesity (Wideroe et. al., 2003)
5Benefits of Cessation
- Early cessation is best
- Women quit smoking by 16 weeks gestation have
normal birth weight infants (MaCarther et al,
1988) - Women who quit smoking by 30-36 weeks have near
normal birth weight infants (Ahlsten et al.,
1993) - Smoking Reduction may also be beneficial
- 50 reduction in cotinine has been shown to
improve birth weight (Li et al., 1993)
6Objectives
- Describe the natural history of smoking behavior
during pregnancy - Review overall impact of behavioral
interventions - Discuss smoking cessation research studies
- Pharmacotherapy
- Discuss areas of future research
7Natural History of Smoking During Pregnancy
- 25 spontaneously quit smoking after learning of
pregnancy (Floyd et al., 1993 LeClere Wilson,
1997 Severson et al., 1995) - Another 12 quit later on however, the majority
of pregnant smokers cut down, but do not quit
(Fingerhut et al., 1991) - Of women who quit during pregnancy, about 70
relapse within 1 year following delivery
(Fingerhut et al., 1991)
8Continued Smokers vs. Spontaneous Quitters
(DiClemente et al., 2000 Phares TM et al., 2004)
- Less educated, lower SES, white, unemployed women
are less likely to quit - Heavier smokers are less likely to quit smoking
- Partner smoking is an independent risk factor for
continued smoking during pregnancy
9Behavioral Interventions
- Two meta-analyses have shown that behavioral
interventions have a consistent, although modest,
impact on quit rates (Fiore, et al., 2008,
Cochrane reviews 2009) - On average behavioral interventions increase quit
rates by 6 compared to usual care (Fiore, et
al., 2008, Cochrane reviews 2009)
10Considerations in the Use of Pharmacotherapy
- Pregnancy quit rates in meta-analyses rarely
exceed 18 - Pharmacotherapies double quit rates in
non-pregnant smokers - However, the benefit/risk ratio is unknown among
pregnant smokers
11Pharmacotherapies in Non-pregnant Smokers
Type Number of Arms Estimated OR (95 CI) Estimated Abstinence Rate
Placebo 80 1.0 13.8
Nicotine gum 15 1.5 (1.2-1.7) 19.0 (16.5-21.9)
Nicotine inhaler 6 2.1 (1.5-2.9) 24.8 (19.1-31.6)
Nicotine nasal spray 4 2.3 (1.7-3.0) 26.7 (21.5-32.7)
Nicotine patch (6-14wks) 32 1.9 (1.7-2.2) 23.4 (21.3-25.8)
Buproprion SR 26 2.0 (1.8-2.2) 24.2 (22.2-26.4)
Varenicline (2mg/day) 5 3.1 (2.5-3.8) 33.2 (28.9-37.8)
Fiore et al., 2008 (Table 6.26)
12Clinical Practice GuidelinesFiore et al.
Clinical Practice Guidelines, 2008
- Safety is not categorical Although the use of
NRT exposes pregnant women to nicotine, smoking
exposes them to nicotine plus numerous other
chemical that are injurious to the woman and the
fetus. These concerns must be considered in the
context of inconclusive evidence that cessation
medications boost abstinence rates in pregnant
smokers.
13Expert opinions regarding pharmacotherapy
- Intermittent vs. continuous NRT delivery system
may deliver a lower total dose (Benowitz and
Dempsey, 2004) - Nicotine metabolism is accelerated during
pregnancy (Dempsey et al., 2002) - Pregnancy registries (prospective) would be
useful to better determine the risk/benefit
profile
14Pharmacotherapy in Practice
- A survey of US obstetricians, showed that 30 of
physicians prescribe pharmacotherapy (Oncken et
al., 2003) - 30 of pregnant smokers discussed medication with
their health care provider 10 utilized either
NRT or bupropion (Rigotti et al., 2008) - Older age, more education, living with a partner,
having an ob who discussed medication, private
insurance - English Stop Smoking Services, 15 were not
prescribed medication, 30 prescribed single form
of NRT, 55 prescibed combination NRT (Brose et
al., 2013)
15NRT Randomized-controlled trials
- Three studies have examined the effectiveness of
NRT for pregnant smokers (randomized, but not
placebo-controlled) - Three studies have examined the efficacy of NRT
for smoking cessation during pregnancy
(randomized, placebo controlled)
16Effectiveness Studies
NRT N Quit Rates Birth outcomes
Pollak et al., 2007 Gum, patch or lozenge 181 18 vs. 7 2x SAE rate in NRT group
Hotham et al., 2006 Patch 40 15 vs. 0 Not reported
Heggard et al., 2003 Gum, patch or both (heavier smokers only) 647 (75 received NRT) 7 vs. 2 BW similar in 2 groups.
17Nicotine Replacement and Behavioral Therapy
- Randomized open-label two-arm design
- 21 randomization with more in NRT group
- Arm 1, Cognitive Behavioral Treatment
- Arm 2, Cognitive Behavioral Treatment NRT
- Choice of patch, gum, or lozenge (72 patch, 32
gum, 12 chose the lozenge, 6 CBT)
Pollak KI, Oncken CA, Lipkus et al., AJPM
200733297-305
18Results Cessation Rates
Time-point CBT-only (n59) Unadj (Adj) CBTNRT (n122) Unadj (Adj)
7-weeks post-rand 3 (8) 18 (24)
38-weeks gestation 2 (7) 14 (18)
3-months postpartum 14 (14) 20 (17)
Adjusted for number of completed counseling
sessions indicates plt.05 Pollak KI, Oncken
CA, Lipkus et al., AJPM 200733297-305
19Serious Adverse Events
- 44/171 women had at least one SAE 34/113 (30)
NRT vs. 10/58 (17) CBT - RD0.13, 95 CI 0.00-0.26, p0.07
- After controlling for hx preterm birth, adjusted
SAE rate (27 NRT vs. 18 CBT) - RD0.09, 95 CI 0.05-0.21, p0.26
- Data and Safety Monitoring Board suspended
enrollment after interim AE report - Based on a priori stopping rule
- Concluded AEs likely not related to NRT use
20Efficacy Studies Placebo-controlled
NRT N Quit rates (Rx vs. control) Birth Outcomes
Wisborg et al., 2000 Patch (15 mg/16 hours) 250 28 vs. 25 NRT group 186 gm higher BW
Oncken et al., 2008 Gum (2 mg) 194 18 vs 15 ? BW and Gestational Age
Coleman et al., 2012 Patch (15 mg/16 hours) 1050 9.4 vs. 7.6 No difference in BW or gestational age
21Nicotine Gum for Pregnant Smokers Randomized
Placebo controlled Study
- To evaluate the efficacy of 2 mg nicotine gum
for smoking cessation during pregnancy - To evaluate the effects of nicotine versus
placebo gum on smoking reduction and on birth
outcomes - Trial was monitored by a DSMB, FDA and NIDA
22Methods
- Recruitment of 268 pregnant smokers
- Inclusion criteria
- At least 16 years of age
- English or Spanish
- Intent to carry to term
- Stable residence/phone
- Daily smoker
- 26 weeks gestation or less
- Exclusion criteria
- Current drug abuse or dependence
- Twins or multiple gestation
- Unstable psychiatric, medical, or pregnancy
conditions
23 Gum Instructions
- Begin chewing gum on their quit date
- Women who smoked at least 10 cigarettes/day
- (instructed to chew 9-12 pieces of 2 mg gum/day)
- Smokers lt 10 cigarettes per day
- (chew the same number of pieces as usually
smoked) - Smokers who chose reduction (substitute one
pieces of gum for one cigarette, with the goal of
abstinence in 3 weeks)
24Study Visits Relation to Quit Date
Screening
Baseline -1 week
Visit 1 3-7 days
Visit 2 2 weeks
Visit 3 3 weeks
Visit 4 6 weeks
Visit 5 32-34 weeks gestation
Birth Outcomes Birth Outcomes
Visit 6 postpartum
25DSMB recommendations
- 157 subjects completed visit 4 (6 weeks)
- Quit rates were
- 7 and 14 in groups A and B at visit 4
- 14 and 16 in groups A and B at visit 5
- Recommended termination of the study given the
very small chance of finding statistical
significance in quit rates between groups
26Table 1-Demographics
Age in Years Placebo (94) 24.7 (5.4) Nicotine (100) 25.5 (6.8) 0.31
Body Mass Index 26.6 (6.8) 26.6 (7.1) 0.99
Race/Ethnicity Hispanic Caucasian African-American Other 52 (55) 30 (32) 7 (7) 5 (5) 53 (53) 38 (38) 8 (8) 1 (1) 0.32
Education Less than high school High school More than high school 44 (47) 36 (39) 13 (14) 53 (53) 28 (28) 19 (19) 0.26
Marital Status Married/Live in partner 28 (30) 30 (30) 0.91
Insurance (Public) 80 (85) 81 (81) 0.45
27Table 1-Demographics
Methadone Maintenance 6 (7) 6 (6) 0.57
Antidepressant Use 8 (9) 6 (6) 0.51
Treatment History Mental health Substance use 38 (41) 19 (20) 42 (42) 17 (17) 0.87 0.57
Smoking Before pregnancy (cigs/day) cigs/day last 7 days Previous quit attempts Fagerstrom score 17.8 (9.3) 8.7 (5.7) 2.55 (5.66) 3.55 (1.95) 17.5 (9.6) 10.2 (6.6) 3.03 (5.69) 3.83 (1.91) 0.83 0.10 0.34 0.31
Smoke Menthol Cigarettes 75 (80) 81 (81) 0.83
Pregnancy Number of pregnancies Gestational entry (weeks) History preterm delivery First pregnancy 3.41 (2.56) 17.1 (5.5) 16 (17) 16 (17) 3.43 (2.11) 17.1 (5.6) 13 (13) 16 (16) 0.96 0.92 0.41 0.80
28Study Retention
Placebo Nicotine
Baseline 94 100
Visit 1 62 (66) 67 (67)
Visit 2 58 (62) 72 (72)
Visit 3 56 (60) 75 (75)
Visit 4 56 (60) 70 (70)
Visit 5 60 (64) 78 (78)
Postpartum 47 (50) 65 (65)
Nicotine group had significantly higher
retention, plt.05
29Gum Use
- Days of use
- Placebo (29.9 3.4 days) vs Nicotine Group
(37.8 3.4 days) (pNS) - Average gum use 3.22 2.3 pieces per day
- In both groups
- 50 believed they were on nicotine gum
- 25 believed they were on placebo
- 20 didnt know (?²(2) 3.71, p.16)
30Efficacy Rates
31Mean (SD) Smoking Outcomes by Visit
Placebo (n94) Nicotine (n100) P P
Cigs/ Day Screen/Baseline Visit 4 Visit 5 8.84 (5.7) 4.56 (5.4) 5.04 (6.1) 9.99 (6.1) 4.59 (4.7) 4.59 (4.9) 0.16 0.077 0.12 0.035
Cotinine Concentration Screen/Baseline Visit 4 Visit 5 633 (559) 577 (582) 512 (531) 672 (438) 542 (454) 492 (443) 0.10 0.17 0.047 0.043
Exhaled CO Screen/Baseline Visit 4 Visit 5 8.69 (10.1) 6.79 (10.4) 6.36 (8.8) 9.43 (6.3) 7.53 (6.0) 6.76 (6.2) 0.99 0.70 0.63 0.53
Anabasine Screen/Baseline Visit 4 Visit 5 4.73 (6.6) 4.94 (7.1) 4.17 (6.6) 4.74 (5.7) 4.18 (6.0) 3.23 (4.4) 0.30 0.31 0.086 0.61
P value using available data, P value with
substitution analyses
32Birth Outcomes
Placebo n84 Nicotine n94 P-Value
Birth Weight (Grams) 2950 (653) 3287 (569) lt0.001
Gestational Age (Wks) 38.0 (3.3) 38.9 (1.7) 0.014
Infant Length (Cms) 49.0 (4.4) 50.0 (2.7) 0.065
Head Circumference (Cms) 33.5 (2.0) 34.0 (1.7) 0.075
Apgar Score 1 Minute 5 Minutes 8 (8,9) 9 (9,9) 8 (8,9) 9 (9,9) 0.62 0.061
Length of Stay Baby Days 5.25 (11.4) 3.60 (5.6) 0.24
Birth outcomes on live born infants P value
obtained from square root transformation due to
skewness
33Conclusions
- Treatment of pregnant smokers with nicotine gum
for smoking cessation or reduction - Did not significantly improve quit rates
- Associated with a modest decrease in tobacco
exposure (cigs/day, cotinine concentrations,
alkaloid concentrations) - Associated with improved infant outcomes (birth
weight, gestational age)
34Nicotine Patch for Pregnant Smokers
- 1050 pregnant smokers between 12 and 24 weeks
gestation who smoked 10 cigarettes/day - Random assignment to 15 mg/ 16 hours or placebo
patches for 4 weeks, followed by an additional 4
weeks contingent on cigarette abstinence - Prolonged abstinence was 9.4 in NRT and 7.6 in
placebo groups - Low Compliance 7.2 in NRT 2.8 in placebo group
used greater than 4 weeks - No difference in birth outcomes between groups
- Tim Coleman, M.D., Sue Cooper, Ph.D., James G.
Thornton, M.D., et al. A Randomized Trial of
Nicotine-Replacement patches in Pregnancy. NEJM
2012 366808-18.
35Quit Rates
NRT Placebo Adjusted Odds Ratio (95 CI)
Prolonged Abstinence 9.4 7.6 1.27 (0.82-1.98)
1month after quit date 21.3 11.7 2.1 (1.49-2.97)
End of Pregnancy (gt24 hours) 12 10 1.24 (0.84-1.85)
Tim Coleman, M.D., Sue Cooper, Ph.D., James G.
Thornton, M.D., et al. A Randomized Trial of
Nicotine-Replacement patches in Pregnancy. NEJM
2012 366808-18.
.
36Placebo-controlled NRT trials in pregnancy
- All studies show low medication adherence, which
could impact efficacy (Oncken et al., NEJM 2012) - Reasons for low adherence could include
- Lack of efficacy
- Increased withdrawal
- Accelerated nicotine metabolism
- Concern about medication use during pregnancy
- Side effects
- Other reasons
37NRT in Clinical Practice
- 3880 pregnant smokers in one of 44 stop Smoking
Services in England - Outcome was 4-week quit rates, verified by
exhaled carbon monoxide (lt10 ppm) - Combination NRT was associated with a higher
quitting than no medication (OR1.93, 95 CI
1.1-3.3, p lt0.016) although single NRT showed no
benefit (OR 1.1 95 CI 0.6-1.86, p0.84) - Brose LS, McEwen A, West R. Association between
NRT in pregnancy and smoking cessation. Drug and
Alcohol Dependence, 2013.
38Bupropion SR
39Bupropion SR in pregnancy
- Non-nicotine medication, Category C in pregnancy
(US) - Teratogenicity Two prospective studies of
bupropion SR in the first trimester did not find
an increase in congenital malformations
(Chun-Fai-Cahn B et al., 2005 Cole et al., 2006) - Spontaneous Abortion In a prospective
observational study (N136) women taking
bupropion SR in the first trimester - The SA rate was higher in the bupropion vs. NTC
group (14.7 vs. 4.5 p.009) - SA rate in bupropion SR group similar to an
anti-depressant control group (14.7 vs.
12.3pns). -
40Bupropion SR for Smoking Cessation during
Pregnancy
- Efficacy for smoking cessation
- One pilot study does not support an effect of
bupropion SR on cessation rates (Miller et al.,
2003) - Effectiveness for smoking cessation
- In a controlled observational study, of 10/22
(45) pregnant smokers receiving bupropion quit
smoking, as compared to 3/22 (14) of controls (P
0.047) (Chan et al., 2005)
41Varenicline
- Category C in pregnancy
- Not teratogenic in rats and rabbits at 50x human
exposure - Theoretically, would not interact with alpha 7
nAchR, the receptor that controls apoptosis and
developmental regulatory effects - Animal studies are needed to evaluate potential
neurotoxicity
42Pharmacotherapy for Smoking Cessation During
Pregnancy
- Randomized placebo-controlled trials have not
shown efficacy of NRT, but risk/benefit ratio
seems favorable - Compliance has been poor either with dose
(Oncken, et al., 2008) or duration of use
(Wisborg et al. 2000, Coleman 2012) - Open-label, randomized trials have shown
effectiveness for NRT - One trial raised questions regarding safety
(Pollak et al., 2007) - Limited studies on buproprion SR
- No studies on varenicline
- More research is needed to better define the
benefit/risk ratio
43Summary
- Pregnant smokers should be treated with known
effective interventions (Fiore et al., 2008) - Person-to-person psychosocial interventions that
exceed minimal advice to quit - Treatment should be offered at each visit
- Given the absence of definitive data on
pharmacotherapy - individual decisions should be made between
health care provider and pregnant smoker - More research is needed to inform clinical
practice