Ka-fu Wong University of Hong Kong - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Ka-fu Wong University of Hong Kong

Description:

Title: Multi-fiber agreement Subject: Competition, Regulation and Business Strategy Author: Ka-fu WONG Last modified by: School of Economics and Finance – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:102
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: Kafu4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ka-fu Wong University of Hong Kong


1
Ka-fu WongUniversity of Hong Kong
Why hasnt Hong Kong ever passed a legislation of
minimum wage?
2
The need of minimum wage legislation?
  • We need to ponder whether wages can be driven
    too low. Can we see a situation emerge in Hong
    Kong where decent men and women trying to eke out
    a living simply give up working? Can we see a
    situation where wages are so low that a more
    attractive option is to rely on welfare
    payments?(Donald Tsang, Hong Kongs Chief
    Executive)
  • In Hong Kong, instead of raising living
    standards, a statutory minimum wage is likely to
    lead to a deterioration in working conditions,
    the export of more jobs to the mainland and,
    ultimately, higher unemployment(Minimum wage
    will simply do more harm than good, South China
    Morning Post, Apr 18, 2006 )

3
The absence of a regulation on minimum wage
  • Hong Kong unlike many developed economies had no
    minimum wage although an ordinance signed in 1932
    (the Minimum Wage Ordinance) made it
    theoretically possible. This ordinance gave the
    Chief Executive the right to set up a Trade Board
    composed of employer and employee representatives
    in order to implement minimum wages in some
    economic sectors. But this possibility has never
    been used.

4
The presence of a regulation on minimum wage
  • Domestic helpers have already benefited from a
    regulation on minimum wage. Domestic helpers were
    coming from developing countries around Hong
    Kong, mainly from Philippines, Indonesia or
    Thailand. Their salary could not be lower than
    HK3,320 per month. Even though this level was
    very low, these jobs continued to attract people
    as the salary was higher than what people
    received in their country of origin and they
    could send funds to their countries of origin.
    This level had even been cut in 2003 (HK3,670),
    officially due to the economic crisis that hit
    Hong Kong at that time.
  • The aim of the minimum wage for domestic workers
    was to allow them to live in decent conditions.
    If there was no minimum wage, there was a high
    risk of having foreign people going to HK and
    merely surviving. But the law was not observed
    everywhere. According to a survey, 40 of
    Indonesian maids employed in Hong Kong earned
    less than the official minimum while they worked
    during very long hours.

5
Who benefit and who lose?
Usually at this regulated wage, there will be
excess supply (i.e., quantity demanded lt
quantity supplied). Suppliers will compete for
buyers, offering additional attractions.
A
Wage
Labor Supply
Minimum Wage (floor)
Firms response Hire less workers. Keep those
workers who are more able. Fire workers who are
less able. Use more machines.
C
Labor Demand
D
Quantity
Excess supply
6
Impact on other markets that hire minimum-wage
workers
A
Price
Supply with minimum wage legislation
Supply
People who consume this kind of good lose. Who
are they?
C
Demand
D
Quantity
7
Agreement and disagreement among academics
  • The academic argumentand there has been plenty
    of it in recent yearshas focused on the
    employment effects. Elementary economics would
    suggest that if you raise the cost of employing
    the lowest-skilled workers by increasing the
    minimum wage, employers will demand fewer of
    them. This used to be the consensus view. But a
    series of studies in the 1990sincluding a famous
    analysis of fast-food restaurants in New Jersey
    and Pennsylvania by David Card at Berkeley and
    Alan Krueger of Princeton Universitychallenged
    that consensus, finding evidence that employment
    in fast-food restaurants actually rose after a
    minimum-wage hike. Other studies though,
    particularly those by David Neumark of the
    University of California at Irvine and William
    Wascher at the Federal Reserve, consistently
    found the opposite. Today's consensus, insofar as
    there is one, seems to be that raising minimum
    wages has minor negative effects at worst.
    Lawrence Katz, an economist at Harvard University
    and signatory of the EPI's letter, agrees that
    most reasonably well-done estimates show small
    negative effects on employment among teenagers.
    (The Economist Oct 26th 2006)

8
Agreement and disagreement among academics
  • A better tool exists for helping the working
    poor the earned-income tax credit (EITC). This
    tax subsidy, a negative income tax that tops up
    the earnings of the low-paid, was introduced in
    the 1970s and has been expanded four times since.
    Its benefits are currently focused on families
    with children. Single men get little from the
    EITC. Some left-leaning economists argue that it
    is important both to raise the minimum wage and
    expand the EITC. But a big EITC expansion is
    politically hard (unlike raising the minimum
    wage, it involves spending taxpayers' money). So
    others support a higher minimum wage as a
    second-best solution. If it were up to the
    economists though, fatter tax subsidies would be
    top of the list for helping the working poor.
    (The Economist Oct 26th 2006)

9
Moderate minimum wage
  • Minimum wage legislation, if passed, has to be
    moderate.
  • Slightly above the equilibrium wage. Why?

10
End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com