Online Peer Assessment

1
Online Peer Assessment

• Dr Nathan Clarke Dr Paul Dowland

Centre for Information Security and Network
Research School of Computing, Communications
Electronics
2
System Objectives

• Peer assessment website is designed to operate in
  one of two ways
• The peer assessment/review of individual
  contributions to group work
• OR
• The peer assessment of group work

3
Login Screen
4
Initial Staff User Screen
5
Module Management Screen
6
Assessment Modes
Module Preparation
1
Assignment Upload
2
Preparing Peer Assessment
3
Peer Assessment Submitting of Marks
4
Module Leader Reviewing Results
5
Display Results to Students
6
7
Module Preparation
8
Module Preparation
9
Module Preparation Student Prompts
10
Module Preparation - Assessment Criteria
11
Module Preparation Adding Students
12
Module Preparation Adding Students
13
Module Preparation Adding Students
14
Module Preparation Student Groups
15
Module Preparation Student Groups
16
Module Preparation Student Groups

• In addition to creating groups, you can also add
  individuals to existing groups
• Changes in group structure
• New students/group additions

17
Module Preparation Student Groups
18
Student View
19
Student View Mode 1
20
Student View Mode 1
21
Student View Mode 4
22
Student View Mode 4
23
Student View Mode 4
24
Student View Mode 4
25
Student View Mode 4
26
Student View Mode 4
27
Student Assessment Review
28
Module Leader Reviewing Results
29
Module Leader Reviewing Results
30
Module Leader Reviewing Results
31
Module Leader Calculating Results
32
Module Leader Calculating Results
33
Module Leader Calculating Results
34
Module Leader Reviewing Results

• Once all the results have been processed, you
  have the opportunity to modify results
• Scale/Modify the entire cohort of students
• Modify individual students

35
Module Leader Reviewing Results
Modifying the entire cohort of students
36
Module Leader Reviewing Results
Modifying an individual student
37
Student View Mode 6
38
Positive Student Comments

• It was a positive experience because one of the
  reports I read and marked was of very high
  quality. It helped to reiterate what was required
  in carrying out the assignment and helped to
  increase my knowledge of the subject.
• Gave me a chance to see how other people have
  interpreted the task in hand.
• It was very useful for revision purposes and
  also gave me an idea how my mates approached and
  tackled the task.
• I now understand the marking procedure behind
  the reports and the sort of scrutiny they are
  subject to.

39
Negative Student Comments

• Did not like deciding someones final mark
• Marks are awarded by subjective students and not
  a professional
• Marking sheet/criteria was not explained enough
• Increased the amount of work that had to be done
  for this assignment

40
Interested?

• Contact the developers
• Dr Paul Dowland / Dr Nathan Clarke
• info_at_cisnr.org

41
Any Questions?
Centre for Information Security and Network
ResearchUniversity of Plymouth www.cisnr.org