C h a p t e r 5 Spatial Buckling of Struts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 65
About This Presentation
Title:

C h a p t e r 5 Spatial Buckling of Struts

Description:

Title: Stability Author: Kotorm n Istv n. Last modified by: PTE POLLACK Created Date: 12/17/2000 1:13:52 PM Document presentation format: Diavet t s a k perny re – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:219
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 66
Provided by: Kot64
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: C h a p t e r 5 Spatial Buckling of Struts


1
C h a p t e r 5Spatial Buckling of Struts
2
5.1. Lateral-Torsional Buckling of Columns
Halasz, 1965 Wagner, 1936Kappus,
1937Goodier, 1941Bleich, 1952Timoshenko,
Gere, 1961Vlasov, 1961Murray, 1984
3
5.1.1 Equilibrium Method for General Open
Cross-section Column
4
(a) Displacements of the cross-section
Centroid C (yz0)
5
(b) Equilibrium equations
Bending moments
6
There are two factors which contribute further
torque components.
The first component is due to the fact that P
retains its original direction. In the y-x plane,
therefore, P has a component Pdu/dx which acts
through the centroid. Together with component of
P in the z-x plane the column has thus a twisting
moment about the shear centre.
7
The second component contribution to MT is
caused by the fact that two cross-sections dz
apart will warp with respect to each other, and
therefore the stress element sdA is inclined by
the angle a to the axis x.
The component of the stress element is
And it causes a twist about the shear centre.
Moment of polar inertia for the shear centre
Radius of gyration for the shear centre
8
Saint-Venant torsion
(c) Solution of equilibrium equations
Non-uniform torsion
Equilibrium
Boundary conditions
9
Substitution of the deflections and their
derivatives into the DE gives three homogeneous
simultaneous equations. The vanishing of the
determinant formed by the coefficients C1, C2 and
C3 gives the following buckling conditions
Non-trivial solution
10
Third-order algebraic equation
The critical value of P is always less than
either Pez, Pey and Pw, and must therefore be
computed!
11
(d) Plane or spatial buckling load is minimum?
Then
We can prove this as follows.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Let us call the left side of det. F(P) and
assume arbitrarily that.
(e)
12
Critical loads belonging to in-plane and spatial
buckling
13
5.1.2 Energy Method for General Open
Cross-section Column
(a) Strain energy of torsion
Galambos, 1968 Chajes, 1974
St. Venant torsion
Warping torsion
14
(b) Total strain energy
(c) The potential energy of external loads
From the Pythagorean theorem the length ds of the
deformed element is
15
The total displacements of the fibre at (y,z) are
therefore
To simplify this expression, we make use of the
following relations
The potential energy of external loads
16
(d) Simple supported column
Boundary conditions
Assumed buckling shape
Strain energy
17
Potential energy of the external load
Total potential energy
Stationary value ? all the derivatives vanish
18
5.1.3 Double-Symmetric Open Cross-section
5.1.4 Mono-Symmetric Open Cross-section
19
Two possibilities considered
(a) Euler-type flexural in-plane buckling in x-z
plane
(b) Flexural-torsional buckling
Gerard, Becker, 1957 Chajes, Winter, 1965
20
Parameters to be used
Limit curves to separate plane and spatial
buckling
21
Design process
Ideal slenderness
(Values of r coefficient are shown in the next
slide)
22
Values of r coefficient for spatial
(flexural-torsional) buckling
23
5.1.5 Column with Closed Cross-section
Hunyadi, 1962
24
(No Transcript)
25
5.1.6 Lateral-Torsional Buckling of Columns with
Imperfections
Hunyadi, 1962 Iványi, Hunyadi, 1988
External moments
Equilibrium equation
26
Solution
Open cross-section
Closed cross-section
27
5.2. Lateral-Torsional Buckling of Beams
Prandtl, 1899 Mitchell, 1899Timoshenko,
1910 Lee, 1960Nethercot, 1983Trahair,
Bradford, 1988
28
5.2.1 Equilibrium Method for Beams in Pure
Bending
(a) Rectangular Cross-section
Chen, Lui, 1987
Boundary conditions
Bending and torsion
29
For rectangular cross-section it is supposed
Substitution of the expressions in DE, leads to
the following equations
Moment components
30
Non-trivial solution
For rectangular cross-section
Boundary conditions
31
Timoshenko, 1910
(b) I Cross-section
Initial assumptions and boundary conditions are
the same as for rectangular section, but
32
Non-trivial solution
Boundary conditions
33
If
If
If
34
5.2.2 Energy Method for Beams in Bending
(a) I Cross-section Simple Supported Beams in
Pure Bending
Chajes, 1974 Allen, Bulson, 1980 Chen, Lui,
1987
Strain energy
35
Potential energy of external loads
36
Boundary conditions
37
(b) Fixed Ends Beam in Pure Bending
Boundary conditions
38
(c) Uniform Bending The Ends Free to Rotate
About Horizontal and Vertical Axis, but Fully
Restrained Against the Warping of End
Cross-section
Boundary conditions
This value is 3.3 more than the exact result
39
5.2.3 Lateral-Torsional Buckling of Beams with
Initial Imperfections
Hunyadi, 1962
40
for open cross-section
for closed cross-section
41
5.2.4 Design Method Fundamental Solutions
Two components of vector of bending moments M
Bending moments
Bimoment
Superpose
Stresses
42
(a) Mono-Symmetric I Cross-section
Open cross-section
Closed cross-section
Hunyadi, Ivanyi, 1991
Equilibrium DE
43
Critical moment
At the beginning of buckling
44
Safety factor
45
For double-symmetric cross-section it can be
supposed
In the previous figure
Thus
At lateral-torsional buckling
46
(b) Ayrton-Perry Formula
Costa Ferreira, Rondal, 1987
Initial imperfection
47
Suggestion for the formula
(i) Costa Ferreira and Rondal I.
(ii) Costa Ferreira and Rondal II.
Barta, 1972
48
(c) Rankine-Merchant Formula
In elastic state
In plastic state
49
Result
Expression
In general
Fukumoto and Kubo Suggestion
n2.5 for rolled cross-sectionsn2.0 for welded
cross-sections
50
(d) Experimental Tests and Hungarian Standard
(MSZ)
51
Experimental results for welded cross-sections
Experimental results for hot-rolled
cross-sections
Hungarian Standard (MSZ) regulation
52
(e) Effect of the Shape of Cross-section
Trahair, 1993
53
(No Transcript)
54
5.2.5 Design Method General Solution
Clark, Hill, 1961
Total potential energy
From the equilibrium
Transversal load
Transformation
Bending Moments
55
(Eurocode 3)
Equivalent bending moment parameter
56
5.3. Lateral-Torsional Buckling of Beam-Columns
5.3.1 Stability Requirements. Experimental
Results
5.3.1.1 General remarks
57
5.3.1.2 Bracing requirements for continuous
beams
58
5.3.1.3 Bracing requirements for beam-columns
(a) Requirements in the ECCS Recommendations
(b) Proposals of British authors
59
(No Transcript)
60
(No Transcript)
61
5.3.1.4 Test Results Halász, Iványi, 1979
(a) Effect of lateral buckling of beam-columns
(b) Effects of change in geometry
? Rankine-Merchant formula
62
5.3.2 Draft of Hungarian Specifications for
Plastic Design Halász, Iványi, 1979
63
(No Transcript)
64
(No Transcript)
65
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com